ML19344A984
| ML19344A984 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 07/07/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19344A976 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-80-18, NUDOCS 8008250287 | |
| Download: ML19344A984 (2) | |
Text
D APPENDIX A Sacramento Municipal Utility District P. O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95813 Docket No. 50-312 License No. DPR-54 NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS Based on the resulis of the NRC inspection conducted on June 9-13, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not in full compliance with the conditions of your license, as indicated below:
A.
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Sec. 50.54 (1-1) states in part that, "...the licensee shall have in effect an ooerator requalification program which shall, as a minimum, mcet the requirements of Appendix A of Part 55..."
By letter dated June 12, 1978, the licensee was advised by the Branch Chief of the Operator Licensing Branch, NRC, that the licensee's Administrative Procedure (AP) 25, " Licensed NRC Operator Retraining",
subject to specified conditions, met the requirements of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 55. One of the provisions of AP 25 is that the program shall include scheduled lectures.
Another provision is that " Operators may be excused from lectures in subjects for which they scored above 80%
but shall be required to attend lectures on all other topics." Provisions are also included for self-study of assigned reading material (within limits) when attendance at lectures is impracticable.
Contrary to the above a licensed operator received a grade of less than 80%
in one of the subject areas covered by the annual requalification examination given on July 5,1979, but there were no records showing his attendance at a lecture on this subject given on September 4,1979 or at any other time subsequent to the examination and prior to the licensee's certification on April 28, 1980 that this operator had satisfactorily completed the requalification program during the effective tenn of his current license.
Neither was there documentation showing that the operator had been assigned or had completed a self-study reading assignment on this subject.
This is an infraction.
B.
Facility technical specification 6.8.1.a states that written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering...the applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972.
Paragraph 8.a of Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33 states that procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances should be provided to ensure that tools, gauges, instruments, controls, and other measuring and testing devices are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy.
Rancho Seco Quality Assurance Procedure No. 14, Rev. 3 states in part that "...a list of items to be calibrateo shall 8008250 M7
. be prepared, noting the name of the item, its use in' the system, and the frequency of calibration required."
Contrary to the above requirements, at the time of this inspection, the prescribed list of items to be calibrated along with the name of the item, its use in the system, and frequency of calibration, had not been prepared.
This is an infraction.
F d
e
,,p,-
--,y-,
w,,,-----+-,+-~-,,,.-y r.-,,--,-.,+
-se.--g
...--.,,y,i
., - - - + -
-,e-.-
.,-,-,.,,.---.,