ML19340E096

Forwards 5-yr Projection of Licensed Operators at Plant, Per Fj Williams of Licensee Qualification Branch Request

ML19340E096
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	12/30/1980
From:	Nichols T SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8101060380
Download: ML19340E096 (14)

Text

.

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC a GAS COMPANY

.cn

,,,a,wu.

COLUMBI A, ScuTH CAROLINA 2968 r C. N'c Hots. JR.

v.a =.n m,o o c- ' E ' m" December 30, 1930

% u. c....,4 s Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 7

y UNS. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

{

Washington, D. C. 20555 t-I

Subject:

Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Docket No. 50/395 5

Five Year Projection of Licensed y

Operators at the Virgil C. Summer m

Nuclear Station Iicar Mr. Denton':

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, acting for l'.self and agent for South Carolina Public Service Authority provides forty-five (45) copies of the five year projection of licensed operators at the Virgil C. Surcer Nuclear Station.

This information was requested by Mr. F. J.

(Mike) Williams, Jr. of the Licensee Qualification Branch.

If you have any questions, please let us know.

Very truly yours,<&

/

/

/'

[..

{',

AGlL'/,jy,/

i g/

T. C. Nichols, Jr.

RBC:TCN:rh cc: V. C. Summer G. H. Fischer T. C. Nichols, Jr.

E. H. Crews, Jr.

O. W. Dixon, Jr.

W. A. Willians, Jr.

O. S. Bradham D. A. Nauman R. B. Clary A. R. Koon A. A. Smith J. B. Knotts, Jr.

J. L. Skolds B. A. Bursey NPCF/Whitaker File 8101060 39D W

O O

O FIVE YEAR PROJECTION OF LICENSED OPERATORS AT V. C.

SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION ya w-

---+,,-_--,n.,.-----,e-

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Attachnent I License Candidates Status for 1981 Attachment II Schedule of Training Programs Attachment III Licensed Reactor Operators December 1981 - December 1985 Attachment IV Licensed Senior Reactor Operators December 1981 - December 1985 Attachment V Total Licensed Operators versus Required Licensed Operators i

1

q ATTACEMENT I fl.

bp lit f

-e' -

- I_

- l- @: sq lu'91e !N. L,,!u\\.((!ai[i

'~D(- {!

ucesst casnnwrrs srait s von i9si t;

m;o ut n

as y

9 i

e s

Su "3

1 2r j,

.?,

6 b

Q

?

3 O,

?

m i,

?

E 8

E G

O<

p i

?

g R,

b E<

?o al I

Attachment I LICENSED CANDIDATES Jan. 1981 39 Eased on present number cf licensed candidates.

Includes two Westinghouse instructors.

Feb. 1981 39 No change from previous month.

Mar. 1981 39 No change from previous month.

April 37 Based on receipt of Westinghouse audit r' cults and decisions concerning withdrawc1 of candidates.

May 37 No change from previous month.

June 36 Based on previous twelve months' experience, vc anticipate 5-5%

turnover during 1981. This reflects loss of one candidate.

July 35 Based on explanation for June.

Aug.

35 No change from previous month Sept.

35 No change from previous month.

Oct.

35 No change from previous month.

Nov.

28 Based on receipt of NRC Cold License Examination results.

T.his assumes 80% of candidates will pass at either the SRO or R0 1cvel.

Dec.

28 No change from previous month.

n n

,~m m,

/

en:

k' Upgrade Prcgram 5

(

for candidates who M

f failed NRC Cold RO to SRO l'PCRADE p1 License Examination CROUP IV

^

,h RO to SRO UPCRADE NOT LICENSE H

CROUP III CROUP V w

N RO to SRO UPGRADE HOT LICENSE h

CROUP II CROUP IV Ei RO to SRO UPCRADE Il0T !.ICENSE CPOUP I GROUP 1(I HOT t,I d NSE l

n CROUP II I

Jl l

G5

~~

nur LICENSE T- &

Cm t'.PO!'P I C_m Dec Dec Dc Dec Dec (g a 1981 1982 1963 1934 1985 t C]s#

'; =-2

([~il)

W

<IMS T~~~')

N

J 1

Attachment II i

l

)

1 j

SCHEDULE OF TRAINING PROGRAMS 1

1.

l*pgrade Program for candidates who failed ImC Cold License Examination will consist of 7 candidates. This is based on anticipated failure rate of 20%,

t 2.

Each RO to SRO upgrade group will consist of 8 candidates.

It is j

assumed that approximately 75% of each class will be successful.

t 3.

Hot License Group I will concist of 12 candidates.

It is assumed that I

approxirnately 80% will be successful.

4.

Hot License Groups 11 through V will consist of 10 candidates each.

j It is assumed that approximately 80% will be successful.

i 4

4 I

1 1

i j

i i

i i

4 i

+-%,w-

-y.,,,,y,w--,%+mm.,...,-,

p ww w wm, mewy, - - c e re -*v-e e *=e w r = =-++ - t-e e w e e e - w m emw S*wm-w- -m e-e m e r*v*-**i=*"'"

v'

A MAC:

L1rE':cr3 ETACTor c'ProAiric

[b])> -' %'j [O G{ !( i l ' ' U j j,q q ln a

-DE ci' r1 y----19-!

r,. s " o q 7-C

,. b b

b_

5 J i

u 44, C W

-N

~

M N

Q w

g o

_u:

2 g

c:

u<,

-o C

m' w

D e

wU b

ec MO g

N O

I

" D'

==

w

$l b

w f

7 1

9 t

" k,,

w en V

l l

l l

I i

-e

$ $ j

, p/ l lv, l ' i ' '. ! I ;pl,'. !flLM

.. DL Cl?t EE R 19 81 - DI.C_OR E F.

f uo m Lue5

,L 3

4,.

(;j d,

!; t y

0 Y

Y

- ~ ~

~

?

e

~

c R

-o

-e I

C L,'

L C

D fb 4

4

-U M

@ 4 V

LD M N

. j e

9

~

@ n

%t "

Ep *>

%d l

- a.

5

~

CD O S'

l 1

?,

E-

^5

~

i oa n

%J9

• h w

-4..-4 4-e

.g-+-e h

m

--*meew n *% we mew, p,,,...,..

c I

i I

i Attachnent IV i

k l

LICENSED SRO's b'

December 1981 22 Based on anticipated number of

[

candidates passing NRC Cold License Examination at SRO Level.

Decrzber 1982 15 Bared on anticipated 30% turnover rate per year.

1 e

January 1983 21 Based on 6 new SFO's from RO to j

SRO Upgrade Program Group I r

l

[

I December 1983 15 Based on anticipated 30% turnover

[

rate per year.

4 January 1984 21 Based on 6 new SRO's from RO to SRO Upgrade Program Group II

(

4 December 1984 17 Based on anticipated 20% turnover j

j rate per year.

a i

l January 1985 23 Based on 6 new SRO's from RO to i

SRO Upgrade Program Group III.

t t

December 1985 18 Based on anticipated 20% turnover i

l rate per year.

j January 1986 24 Based on 6 new SRO's from RO to l

SRO Upgrade Program Group IV.

l t

i l

i I

8 I

i I

i i

I i

=ew -

- = rw=,etmyw w-w m w--g

-wwwn m ve,-w w w w-_.

, ww.e w ww _

eeww-

=====+-er-e-er-*

a m

ib.

1. O e,

39 38

,N s,<

u 37 N

ys 4 34, 1 >3 33

.7,

r.~

31 34i r

'30 au, 29

,. :y..

,m

'..7.-.p.~,_-

-e,.

j;.._

..m._,

^

.m-

.. ~ ~ -.

• _ _ - ~,

,,,, a

.. _ - - - ~

y CREEN

+

t.

t c-l

' * - ~

E. !

.*'Y i

L!

21 l t; 21 licenses required I

c. j for iive shift I E ;i 18,

rotation

_ I. E.v!

17 licenses c'

15 i i

i

..j required for (l

four shift

~ _ ' '

rotation 11 i c

y vi u

RED 9<

i 6

cr_'.[]

h,~1 F

c_

7 3

o

_3 c,=

r-(cf_ C 5 fe La D'C Dec t--

le. r 1:.. r June T+ c

,g m_.

19%)

1%2 1983 19g4 1965 Ld' 1.

@S w

j u L..

.m, o

V d

t -)

b)

i i

1 l

t l

l i

Attachment V e

l TOTAL 1ICENSED OPERATORS 1

l VS.

t REQUIRED LICENSES FOR FOUR S111FT j

' AND FIVE SHIFT ROTATIONS l

j l

I 1.

Total licensed operators are plotted by combining total RO and SRO IIcenses from Attachments III and IV.

s 2.

Total licenses required for four shif t rotation were determined as i

follows:

l SRO's Nunber Total i

Required of SRO's i

Per Shift Shifts Required l

2 4

8 RO's Number Total Required of RO's l

Per Shift Shifts Required l

2 4

8 I

l Operations Supervisor 3

requiring SRO license i

TOTAL l

Licenses 17 i

Required 3.

Total licences required for five shift rotation were deter...Ined as follows:

r i

SRO's Number Total Required of SRO's Per Shift Shifts Required i

j 2

5 10 j

I l

RO's Number Total Required of

'RO's Per Shift Shifts Required i

5 10 I

l Operations Supervisor j

requiring SRO license l

TOTAL.

I 1.frensen 21 1

j R( qui red

1.-

. =. -. =

i a

k l

Attachment V, continued e

i

}

4.

Total licenses required for four shift rotation and for five shift rotation are indicated by area shaded in red.

5.

Total licenses in excess of those required are indicated by area j

shaded in green.

i 1

1 l

i 6.

Graph indicates four shift rotation from December 1981 through June 1982.

Five shift rotation thereafter.

I i

a 4

s i

I i

I l

t l

.h

?

1 i

i

{

i

{

i 5

I i

a i

f 2

1 1-t V

2 l

)

-,...,.~,.,., -,....,_,,, ;

n,, -,..,, -.. - - -.,, _.,, - -.. -,,,.. - - -.,.

..,. - -, _,,.... ~. - _

-,.,,....