ML19339A822
| ML19339A822 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 08/29/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339A818 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-364-80-26, NUDOCS 8011050377 | |
| Download: ML19339A822 (1) | |
Text
v APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Alabama Power Company License No. CPPR-86 Farley Nuclear Plant Based on the NRC inspection July 30 - August 1, 1980, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indi-cated below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V and implemented by FSAR section 17.1.5, activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings and shall be accomp-lished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
1.
FNP QC Procedure 5.4.2.1A Paragraph 5.3 requires that damage to con-crete be reported as part of the concrete expansion anchor inspection.
Paragraph 6.14.2 requires that bolt spacing less than five times the bolt diameter of concrete expansion anchors be documented.
Contrary to the above, on July 30, 1980, damaged concrete adjacent to pipe support 2MS-R505 was noted and had not been reported on the completed pipe support inspection package; an unused concrete expan-sion anchor was also noted within 4\\ inches of a one inch diameter concrete expansion anchor bolt of pipe support 2MS-R505. This condition had not been documented.
2.
FNP QC Procedure 5.4.2.1 Addendum 1 Paragraph 5.1.2 requires QC to inspect pipe hangers to assure that all design requirements of the hanger sketch are satisfied.
Contrary to the above, on July 30 and July 31, 1980, dimensional discrepancies were noted between the actual installation and the "As-Built" sketches for QC inspected pipe support 2MS-R814, 2RH-P96, 2RH-R95, 2RH-R97.
3.
FNP QC Procedure 4.01 Appendix B Paragraph 4 requires that if a valve has an extended operator that the orientation of the operator be veri-fied to be correct.
Contrary to the above, the valve inspection checklist for valves QV-003F and QV-003C were marked "N/A" on the paragraph that required verification of operator orientation, valves QV-003F and QV-003C had extended operators.
This is an Infraction, 3090s0 9 7