ML19339A518

QA Program During Design & Const

ML19339A518
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	10/31/1980
From:	HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19339A516	List: ML19339A515 ML19339A518 ML19339A522 ML19339A524
References
NUDOCS 8011040178
Download: ML19339A518 (36)

Text

.,

-(

ATTACHMENT 1 PART A HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION i

I i

OCTOBER 31, 1980 i

+

4 l

f i,

f 8011040 %

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION j Table of Contents SECTION TITLE PAGE

1.0 Organization 2 2.0 Quality Assurance Program 8

3.0 Design Control 11 4.0 Procurement Document Control 12 1 5.0 Instruction, Procedures and Drawings 13 6.0 Document Control 13 7.0 Control of Purchased Material,

Equipment and Services 14 8.0 Identification and Control of Material, Parts and Components 15 9.0 Control of Special Processes 16 10.0 Inspection 17 4 11.0 Test Control 17 12.0 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 17 13.0 Handling, Storage and Shipping 18 14.0 Inspection,' Test and Operating Status 18 15.0 Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components 18 16.0 Corrective Action 19 17.0 Quality Assurance Records 19 l

18.0 Audits 20 l

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION  !

-List of Tables i

NUMBER TITLE 1 Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality for the Major Activities

~

2 ANSI Standard and Regulatory Guide Compliance List of Figures NUMBER TITLE I South Texas Project internal QA Relationship 2 Lines of Communication HL&P & B&R/ Westinghouse (Contractors) i i

l l

y -

r ATTACHMENT 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION South Texas Project E?ectric Generating Station-Quality Assurance During Design and Construction i  ;

Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P), as a licensee and as Project Manager for itself and the other owners, has quality assurance responsibility for design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction and operation associated with the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station'(STP). Although HL&P has delegated certain of its quality assurance authority to its contractors, it nevertheless retains the responsibility for the quality assurance program controlling all aspects of the STP. As an initial step in fulfilling its responsibility, HL&P establishes quality assurance requirements for the project in a Project Quality Assurance Plan. The Project Quality Assurance Plan specifies requirements applicable to prime contractors and HL&P. The HL&P quality assurance staff monitor the performance of i HL&P staff and contractors to assure compliance with the Project Quality Assurance Plan.

HL&P has co,ntracted with Westinghouse Electric Corperation (Westinghouse) for the design, fabrication and quality assurance services for the nuclear steam supply system and with Brown & Root, Incorporated (B&R) for plant design, construction, quality assurance services and other related services, including quality assurance services for Westinghouse items upon receipt at the project site. This quality assurance program description addresses the HL&P quality assurance program (Part A) and the quality assurance program of B&R (Part B). The Westinghouse quality assurance program is described in WCAP-8370, " Westinghouse Nuclear Energy System Divisions Quality Assurance Plan" and is not included in this program description.

i I

I i

a

~

J L 'l:

ATTACHMENT 1 j PART A-HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

~ South Texas Project' Electric Generating Station '

i Quality Assurance During Design and Construction l Y

' Houston' Lighting & Power' Company -(HL&P),L as a licensee and is Project  ;

i- . Manager for itself and.the other owners, has the Quality Assurance-(QA)

I! respocsibility for design, engineering, procurement, fabrication,-

construction, preoperational testing and operation of the South Texas

~

Project (STP) Electric Generating Station.-

HL&P's Quality Assurance Plan requires that HL&P, its prime contractors, subcontractors and vendors comply with the criterin established by 10CFR50 Appendix B. It is the intent of HL&P to comply with ANSI N 45.2 >

and the applicable daughter standards and implementing Regulatory A- Guides. Furthermore, HL&P will assure through programmatic direction that the Engineer / Constructor and all its subcontractors and suppliers performing nuclear-safety-related work comply with 10CFR50 Appendix B, ANSI ~N45.2, and the Regulatory Guides as referenced herein consistent

- with their scope of work.

Programmatic direction is defined as the role of the owner in establish-ing the program requirements and ensuring the adequacy of the contractor's Quality Assurance Program. The programmatic direction consists of review and approval of the system features initially and continued monitoring of those systems during implementation and further refinement or revision of the systems if the systems need strengthening.

The assurance of compliance by first level nuclear safety-related suppliers will be accomplished through the Engineer / Constructor's review and approval of the supplier's Quality Assurance Program.

s Implementation reviews are performed by HL&P Discipline Quality Assurance personnel using prepared checklists to evaluate the r effectiveness of compliance to the Quality Assurance program at the South Texas Project site during construction. The implementation reviews use techniques such as interviews with personnel performing the activities, observations of actual work in progress, and reviews of final form. Implementation reviews are performed by qualified personnel based on experience, educational level, training, and proficiency examinations. Certifications are issued for specific discipline oriented activities.

inspection verifications are performed by qualified (ANSI N.45.2.6/ASNT-TC-1A) HL&P Quality Control personnel to determine the effectiveness of Brown & Root inspection planning documents. The inspections will consist of witness points during regular Brown & Root processing sequences and special task oriented inspections (nonconformance closeout, followup ~ investigations into problem areas) as requested by HL&P Discipline Quality Assurance.

l l

1 1

- .- _, - - . . , - . - , . . . ~..._....~._.s,... - . . . , _ - . ~ . . , - _ . - . - . , . . ~ . _ -

L l

The HL&P Quality Assurance program is implemented in two phases. The l

. design and construction phase as defined by the Project Quality l Assurance Plan and the operational phase as defined by the Operational j l Quality Assurance Plan. The Project QA Plan is described herein. The Operational QA Plan is described in Chapter 17.2 of the FSAR.

The combination of these Quality Assurance programs augmented by definitive procedures provide HL&P with the assurance that its quality commitments are met.

1.0 Organization 1.1 The organization chart shown in figure 1 illustrates:

T (a) groups within HL&P having quality responsibilities (engineering, procurement, construction) 2nd (b) Quality Assurance interdepartmental relationships ter the South Texas Project.

1.2 The Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance is responsible for providing the programmatic direction, and administering policies, goals, objectives and methods which are described in the Project Quality Assurance Plan. The HL&P Executive VicePresident reviews and approves the Project Quality Assu ance Plan and has ultimate responsibility for Quality Assurance activities. The Project Quality Assurance Plan interfaces with the corporate Quality Assurance program objectives by describing specifie Quality Assurance controls to be established by HL&P and the prime contractors on the South Texas Project.

1.3 Two levels of control have been implemented by HL&P to monitor the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Programs at the South Texas Project: (1) Corporate level control relates to the overall activities and performance of EL&P, B&R, subcontractors and suppliers. This is admiaistered through the direct involvement of the RL&P Executivs Vice-President and through audits of project activities. (2fProjectlevel control relates to monitoring the specific activities and performance of HL&P, B&R and its subcontractors. This is accomplished through review of documents, implementation reviews, and, inspection verifications that establish QA system features (e.g. procedures, specifications).

1.3.1 Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance l~ The Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance

. reports on all technical and administrative matters directly to the Executive Vice-President of HL&P.

a- This organizational arrangement provides independence from cost and scheduling influences.

l l

2 he , < ,s., l>.x ..n- n ,- m maes* * -- --. - . . . - - - .--- -

I  !

The Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance must, as a. minimum, have:

~

(1) A college degree in~a field of engineering or

-science, or equivalene experience

+  ;

(2) Familiarity with nuclaar power generation-facilities and related operations (3) Knowledge of the Quality Assurance standards and regulatory requirements (4) Management experience and familiarity with HL&P Corporate Organizations.

The major responsibilities of the Manager, STP QA cre:

(1) Administer QA policies established by management and ensure the proper planning, .

-development, implementation, coordination and' l

administration of the Project Quality Assurance Plan.

(2) Provide programmatic direction on QA related matters to HL&P and contractor. management and interface with NRC. ,

(3) Coordinate activities relating to auditing i and vendor surveillance in conjunction with the HL&P Houston Quality Assurance Manager.

The .lanager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance has the authority to solve quality related problems and to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the solutions. He has the authority to "Stop Work" for

, cause on any quality-related activity of the South Texas Project.

1.3.2 Houston Quality Assurance Manager The Houston Quality Assurance Manager reports on all l technical and administrative matters directly to the Executive Vice-President of HL&P. This organizational l'

arrangement provides independence from cost and scheduling influences.

The Houston Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for directing all HL&P Houston office auditing, vendor

~

surveillance and technical support activities. He has j the authority to "Stop Work' for cause on any quality-l related activity of the South Texas Project.

I i

The Houston Quality Assurance Manager as a minimum, ,

has: l i

l l

3 l

. _ . ... . _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . . . . _ . - . - , . . - , _ _ . _ ~ 4. .. ._, , . . . _.

(1) A college degree in a field of engineering or science, or equivalent experience.

(2) Familiarity with nuclear power generation facilities and the related operations.

(3) Knowledge of the industry's Quality Assurance standards and regulatory requirements.

(4) Management experience and familiarity with HL&P Corporate Organizations.

The major responsibilities of the Houston Quality

' Assurance Manager are:

(1) Provide administrative guidance and direction for the HL&P Quality Assurance Audit Program.

(2) Direct the HL&P vendor surveillance programs.

1.3.3 Project Quality Assurance General Supervisor The Project Quality Assurance General Supervisor reports directly to the Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance. He is responsible for technical direction and administrative guidance to the discipline Quality Assurance personnel, providing programmatic direction to B&R and interfacing with the NRC. He has the authority to "Stop Work" for cause on any activity related to fabrication and construction.

1.3.4 Supervisor, Quality Systems The Supervisor, Quality Systems reports directly to the Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance.

He is responsible for providing technical direction and administrative guidance to the site Quality Systems personnel; developing and administering the HL&P Project QA Plan; evaluating the B&R QA/QC program; administering the HL&P STP QA personnel training and certification program; admir.lstrative control of HL&P quality assurance procedures and providing mechanisms to correct the QA programs as necessary. He has the authority to "Stop Work" for cause on any activity related to fabrication or construction.

1.3.5 Supervisor, Quality Control The Supervisor, Quality Control reports directly to the Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance.

He is responsible for technical direction and administrative guidance to the Quality Control personnel, coordinating inspection of selected fabrication and construction activities, ensuring 4

~

k proper nonconformance identification and assuring that

- the' personnel performing inspections are properly.

• certified. He has the authority to "Stop Work" for cause on any activity.related to fabrication or construction.-

^

1.3.6 Discipline Project Quait.y Assurance Supervisors The Discipline Project Quality Assurance Supervisors report to the Project Quality AseLrance General Supe rvisor. They are responsible for technical direction and administrative guidance to the Discipline Quality Ashutance personnel in their respective discipline group; oordinating implementation reviews;' interface with NRC during '

. audits;' identifying deficiencies; reviewing and approving procedures applicable to their respective discipline; and providing programmatic direction to B&R. They have authority to "Stop Work" for cause on any activity relatedoto fabrication or construction. '

. 1.3.7 Procurement Project Quality Assurance Supervisor The Procurement Project Quality Assurance Supervisor reports directly to the Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance. He is responsible for providing technical direction-and administrative guidance to procurement Quality Assurance personnel, coordinating the resolutions of vendor problems identified by HL&P, coordinating with site discipline Quality Assurance functions for input to vendor surveillance / audit activities and providing programmatic direction to B&R regarding vendor surveillance and auditing functions.

He has the' authority to "Stop Work" for cause on any activity related to engineering, design, or

procurement.

1.3.3 Manager, South Texas Project The Manager, South Texas Project reports to the HL&P 4

Vice-President, Nuclear Engineering and Construction.

He has overall responsibility for the engineering, construction, procurement, cost, schedule, and startup of the South Texas Project. He has authority to "Stop Work" for cause in all activities of the project.

1.3.9 Project Manager, Houston Operation

- The Project Manager, Houston Operation reports to the Manager, South Texas Project. ,He is responsible for engineering, procurement, project control services, accounting and project administration. He has the

authority to "Stop Work" for cause in activities related to engineering, design, or procurement.

5

- . - _. _. . _ ~ , . . . ..~ . . . - . . _ . . . . _ _ , , .. _ . . - _ . , . _

T l

r 1.3.10 Project Engineering Manager The Project Engineering Manager reports to the Project Manager, Houston Operation. He directs project engineering personnel in the performance of an owner's review of.the design and. engineering work performed by

{ the prime contractor. The Project' Engineering Manager l

ensures that adequate engineering planning and coordination of solutions to problems and work j priorities are established by the prime contractor.

Me can recommend "Stop Work" for cause in the engineering and design of all items.

[

l 1.3.11 Supervising Project Engineer ' Houston Engineering

~

The Supervising Project Engineer, Houston Engineering _

reports to the Project Engineering Manager. He is responsible for directing the Houston engineering

interface with the prime contractor. This work '

j includes engineering planning, coordination of  !

! solutions to problems,~ and work priorities. He can recommend "Stop Work" for cause in ene engineering and

. design of all items.-

1.3.12 Supervising Project Engineer, Site Engineering The Supervising Project Engineer, Site Engineering reports to the Project Engineering Manager. He is

- responsible for coordinating the cite engineering interface in the technical resolution of all site related engineering problems, reviewing field change requests, and site-initiated design change notices.

He assists in the release and interpretation of design documents. He can recommend "Stop Work" for cause in the engineering and design of all items.

1.3.13 Leader, Engineering Administration I The Leader, Engineering Administration reports to the Project Engineering Manager and he is responsible for the preparation, control and maintenance of

engineering manuals and documents.

1.3.14 Project Site Manager The Project Site Manager reports to the Manager' South Texas Project. He is responsible for providing technical direction and administrative guidelines to HL&P and its prime contractors in the area of construc-tion, site purchasing, security, startup, accounting, construction control and engineering, and reviewing 4 for approval documents, drawings and specifications related to construction. He has the authority'to "Stop Work" for cause in all activities related to i construction. l h

6

l 1.3.15 Construction Superintendent I

The Construction Superintendent reports to the Project Site Manager. This position is responsible for ensuring that the prime contractor complies with all contractual and construction requirements, evaluates and ensures that work is preplanned, that. work

' packages are being utilized in a timely and effective manner and provides recommendations to construction activities.

L 1.3.16 Construction Engineering Supervisor

• The Construction Engineering Supervisor reports to the Construction Superintendent. He is responsible for providing technical support to all HL&P Site Area

' Supervisors, overseeing construction operations, ensuring that work scopes are evaluated and problem  ;

'olutions are carried out. s :

1.3.17 General Construction Supervisor The General Construction Supervisor reports to the

. Construction Superintendent. He is responsible for monitoring and surveillance of the prime contractor's construction activities, expediting the resolution and corrective actions of problems identified by QA/QC and verifying that construction planning includes

! requirements fcr inspection and testing.

1.3.18 Project Purchasing Manage,r The Project Purchasing Aanager reports to the Project Manager, Houston Ope.atfans. He is responsible for the overall coordinatict and administration of purchas-ing and subcontracting activities for the South Texas Project including the development and implementation of procedures, vendor selection, contract negotiations

. and preparing purchase orders.

1.3.19 Supervisor of Project Purchasing The Supervisor of Project Purchasing reports to the Project Purchasing Manager. He is responsible for the development and implementation of procedures related to purchasing and subcontractor negotiations. He assists in the detection and resolution of procurement problems.

1.3.20 Contract Administrator The Contract Administrator reports to the Project Purchasing Manager. He is responsible for preparing the scope of esatracts, implementing procedures and i reviewing invoices to assure contract compliance. He 7

. _. _ _ .- . . _ . . _-. _ _ , ~ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ , _ - - _ . _ _ . - ~

participates in contract negotiations, contract changes and operation audits to ensure contract compliance.

1.4 The delegations of Quality Assurance authority for the South j Texas Project are as follows:

a. Houston Lighting & Power Company as a licensee and Project Manager for itself and tr other owners has the overall responsibility for design, engineering, procurement, construction, operation and quality assurance activities.

2 Brown & Root ha9 contractual responsibility to provide an acceptable QA progree to HL&P. The contract provides HL&P i the authority to audit and monitor Brown a Root's performance to assure that its Quality Assurance Program has sufficient authority and organizational freedom to be effectively implemented.

b. Brown and Root, Inc. as the architect / engineer and constructor provides HL&P with design, engineering, procurement, construction, and quality assurance services.

c. Westinghouse Electric Corporation as the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) supplier provides HL&P with the NSSS design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, and quality assurance.

d. Consultants - HL&P utilizes the services of qualified consultants to assist in the performance of quality tasks.

Figure 2 illustrates how these companies interrelate with HL&P foc the South Texas Project.

2.0 Quality Assurance Program 2.1 The HL&P Project Quality Assurance program for the South Texas Project has been developed in accordance with the criteria of 10CFR50 Appendix B, ANSI N45.2 and Regulatory Guides as referenced herein, to provide programmatic direction on quality requirements for the prime contractors and subcon-tractors during design and construction.

2.2 The nuclect safety-related structures, systems and components covered by this program are lieted in Section 3.2 of the FSAR.

Westinghouse Electric Corporation provides quality assurance services for the items lists.d in Table 3.2.B-1 of the FSAk until delivery to the site. Brown and Root provides quality assurance services'for the items listed in Table 3.2.A-1 of

-the FSAR and responsibility for the Westinghouse items (Table 3.2.B-1) upon receipt at the site.

2.3 The HL&P Quality Assurance program for the South Texas Project is described by the HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan. The plan requires that written procedures, training and certifica-tion, issuance of specifications and drawings, and work and 8

l I, l inspection planning be accomplished in advance of performing nuclear safety-related activities. HL&P Project Quality;  ;

Assurance ensures through procedure reviews that this advanca preparation is accomplished.

The Project Quality Assurance Plan for the South Texas Project (STP) is structured in accordance with the Regulatory Guides ,

(RGs) and Industrial Standards that are addressed in the NRC '  ;

- publications " Guidance on QA Requirements During Design and l Procurement Phase of NuclearsPower Plants," (The Gray Book) i Revision 1,, dated May 24~, 1974 (WASH 1283) and " Guidance on QA

- Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," (The Green Book) dated May 10, 1974 (WASH 1309) as

~

listed by Table 2.

2.4 The HL&P Plans and Procedures which are used to _ implement the quality related activities for each major organization and the reference to the applicable criteria of 10CFR50 Appendix B are licied in Table 1. Verification that plans and procedures are properly implemented is accomplished by HL&P Quality Assurance' through audits, implementation reyiews, inspection verifica-tions, and regular . management assessment of the Quality Assurance Program.

2.5 It is the policy of KL&P acting as_a licensee and Project Manager for the other owners for the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station (STPEGS) to assure that the design, fabrication, construction, testing, and operation of STP are in conformance with project specifications, i procedures, codes, and NRC regulations. It is the

] responsibility of each organization assigned to the STPEGS to ,

i ensure that project procedural review methods include j provisions to ensure that the requirements stated in this manual are incorporated into project procedures. The Project Quality Assurance Plan establishes activities and procedures i[ which identify, initiate and verify the resolution of nuclear i

! safety-related quality problems. The' implementing procedures

call for the resolution of quality problems at the lowest possible authorized level. However, if a dispute is

> encountered in the resolution of a quality-problem which I cannot be resolved at lower levels, the HL&P Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance presents the problem j

ultimately to the HL&P Executive Vice-President for resolution.

i 2.6 South Texas Project Quality Assurance is responsible for

conducting a quality oriented indoctrination program for new personnel that have quality-related functions. The HL&P

-Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that prior to performing activities affecting quality the personnel are trained in the applicable procedures. The training provides a thorough understanding of the purpose, scope, policies, principles, and techniques of the specific procedures or instructions. When personnel perform special process

, activities, a training and certification program is l

9

. . , _ . - . . _ - . . _ . . , . . mm m, , .,-. _, _. mc. __

established and maintained. Refresher training is conducted to ensure that proficiency is maintained. B&R is required to establish a training program including refresher training to ensure proficiency is achieved and maintained. This B&R training is addressed in Section 2.2.3 of the revised Brown &

Root Quality Assurance Program Description. HL&P Quality Assurance. audits are performed to ensure compliance with these criteria.

2.7 The Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance and the Houston Quality Assurance Manager are directly responsible for assuring effective implementation of the Quality Assurance program. The qualifications for these positions are defined in Section 1.3.

2.8 The EL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires the prime contractor (B&R) to submit all procedures which control nuclear safety-related construction activities to HL&P Project Quality Assurance for review and approval. It is the responsibility of HL&P Project Quality Assurance to determine that the prime contractor's procedures require proper equipment, environment and other prerequisites to perform the associated activity. These requirements are verified through implementation reviews by HL&P Discipline QA, inspection verification by HL&P QC and audits by HL&P Houston QA.

2.9 The results of the HL&P QA/QC and audit activities are presented in a monthly report to the HL&P Executive Vice-President. Regular executive management review of the monthly activities and the direct involvement of the HL&P Executive Vice-President assures that an objective program assessment of the South Texas Project Quality Assurance programs is being performed.

HL&P STP Quality Assurance reviews and documents concurrence with the B&R Quality Assurance manual and audits are performed by HL&P Houston Quality Asssurance to ensure compliance.

2.10 HL&P and Brown & Root Project Quality Assurance are in the process of establishing and documenting a program for transferring responsibilities and controls for quality-related activities from B&R to HL&P during phaseout of design /construc-tion and during preoperational testing and plant turnover.

This program will be implemented prior to preoperational testing.

2.11 HL&P is committed to maintaining the Project Quality Assurance J Plan as an effective and meaningful document to provide

- directions to HL&P and the prime contractors on the South Texas Project. When proposed substantive changes to this Project Quality Assurance Plan affect the docketed Quality Assurance Program description, HL&P will notify the NRC of the 10

_ . -. -. . _ . _ . , _ . . . . _ . ~ . _. . . _ . - . -.

L

-change (s) for their' review and acceptance prior to implementation. Organizational changes of a substantive nature will be reported to the NRC within 30 days of announcement.

3.0 Design Control HL&P has the overall responsibility for design and engineering of the South Texas Project and imposes the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion 111, Regulatory Guide 1.64 (Rev. 2) and ANSI-N45.2.11-74 or the prime contractors and applicable subcontractors.

HL&P contractors are required to provide the following design control measures in their quality assurance programs:

(1) A design control system is established to document the-methods of accomplishing and controlling essential design activities.

(2) Design documents such as calculations, diagramu, specifi-cations, and drawings are prepared and records de' eloped '

l' c

such that the final design is traceable to its sources.

(3) Design activities, documents,~ and interfaces are controlled to assure that applicable input such as design bases, regulatory requirements, codes, and. standards are incorporated into the final design.

(4) Design input requirements, including design criteria, are documented and their selection reviewed and approved.

(5) Design documents include an indication as to their importance to safety and shall specify the quality characteristics, including materials, parts, equipment and processes, that are essential to functions of ,

structures, systems, and components. Design documents also include, as apprcpriate, acceptance criteria for inspections and tests.

(6) Design control measures are applied to items such as seismic, stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation, and accident analyses, as they apply to the development of design input or as they are used to analyze the design.

(7) Safety related and/or Seismic Category I designs are verified for adequacy and accuracy through independent objective review of design documents by individuals competent in the subject activity. This verification may include the use of alternate or simplified solution methods or qualification testing, as appropriate.

(8) Design changes, including engineering, vendor, and construction originated changes, are controlled in a manner commensurate with the control imposed on the original design.

11

i i

I .

(9) Document distribution is controlled such that all individuals using a design document or its results and/or conclusions for further design work can be notified if the document is tr"ised or cancelled.

(10) Design documentatian includes evidence that design control requirements have been satisfied.

HL&P has contracted with B&R and Westinghouse to perform the

design, engineering and design verification. HL&P Engineering performs reviews of selected elements-of the completed design, design documents and specifications to ensure that contractual

requirements are met.

.i HL&P Houston Quality Assurance performs audits of ht&P, B&R and Westinghouse to ensure that design controls, requirements, specifications and documents are in accordance with the design control criteria.

In addition HL&P Project Quality Assurance reviews quality /construc-tion procedures to ensure that the quality requirements of the design specifications are incorporated, HL&P Project Qtality Assurance also performs implementation reviews to ensure ^ hat the work is accomplished in accordance with the design require ints and to ensure that field changes to the design are processed in accor-dance with.the design control criteria.

4.0 Procurement Document Control To assure that nuclear safety-related items are purchased in a planned and controlled manner, the HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan establishes basic requirements which are to be used by HL&P in a

preparing procurement procedures for the South Texas Project. B&R performs procurement activities for nuclear safety-related equipment, materials and services, exclusive of the NSSS contract, which is performed by Westinghouse. B&R and Westinghouse ensure through contract, vendor surveillance and audit that their suppliers comply with the established requirements.

The basic requirements are:

a. Procurement procedures which ensure that the applicable regu-latory, quality assurance, and engineering design requirements

as well as the purchasers right of access to the suppliers facilities are included.

b. Provisions for review, change control, and approval of procure-ment documents and supplier documents such as instructions, procedures, drawings, specifications and records by the procuring organizations.

c. Procedures for the evaluation and selection of suppliers. The evaluation shall involve a technical review by the cognizant engineering group, a commercial review by Purchasing /Subcon-tracts and a quality assurance review.

12-

. . _ _ - - . _ . ___. . ~ . . . . . - . - , . , , . - . . . ~,. - ._-

d. Measures for the control of purchased material, non-conforming items, equipment and services, including supplier surveil-lance, source inspection and audits.

-e. Control measures taken to assure that documentei evidence of conformance of material and equipment to procurement require-ments is available at the plant site prior to installation or use of such material or equipment.

HL&P Engineering is responsible for review and approval of B&R Procurement Specifications. Engineering also coordinates with HL&P Procurement QA for performance of a quality assurance review. HL&P Procurement QA coordinates with B&R and HL&P Engineering in the review of the procurement package.

In addition HL&P Discipline QA is responsible for reviewing field procurement packages to ensure that all quality assurance requirements have been included.

HL&P Houston Quality Assurance is responsible for performing audits and vendor surveillance to verify that the requirements have been implemented and that they are effective.

5.0 Ipstructions, Procedures and Drawings The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires HL&P, the prime contractors and their suppliers to establish and implement a Quality Assurance Program which is in compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix B. The program is effective in verifying that the defined activities are accomplished and documented in accordsnce wita written procedure 6, instructions, and drawings and that they provide cuantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria.

HL&P Project Quality Assurance reviews and approves the B&R South Texas Project Quality Assurance Program and nuclear safety-related construction procedures. To measure the effectiveness of the B&R Quality Assurance Program, HL&P has implemented a monitoring program consisting of audits which are performed by HL&P houston Quality Assurance and implementation reviews, trend analysis and inspection verifications performed by the HL&P Project Quality Assurance Department. HL&P Houston Quality Assurance also audits HL&P organizations and Westinghouse for compliance with their respective Quality Assurance Programs.

6.0 Document Control The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan and implementing procedures require that HL&P, the prime contractors and subcontractors implement a document control system for nuclear safety-related items for the South Texas Project. The established system ensures that design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, 13 l

and QA/QC proceduros, plans, and changes thereto are reviewed and approved by procedurally authorized groups aud that the documents are issued, maintained current and controlled by the use of controlled lists of document holders to ensure that superseded dccuments are replaced in a timely manner.

HL&P discipline Quality Assurance performs implementation teviews at the construction site to ensure that document control systems are in place and effectively implemented. HL&P Quality Assurance audits are performed to ensure compliance with these criteria.

[

7.0 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services i

The HL&P Quality Assurance Plan and implementing procedures require that HL&P, prime contractors and subcontractor., define and document the system and requirements for the control of nuclear safety-related purchased material, equipment and services. The system shali consist of:

a. Engineering, Purchasing and Quality Assurance in their respective areas perform evaluations of the vendors quality system, performance data, effectiveness, design control ability, specifications, documentation, personnel qualifications and training prior to contract award.

b. Source inspection and auditing for the purpose of determining compliance to the QA Program and procurement documents by witnessing process controls, inspections and reviewing docu-mentation.

c. Cert!.fications which contain relevant data and documentation required to verify compliance to the purchase documents for final acceptance and approval.

d. Receiving inspection at the South Texas Project to ensure that final source surveillance was performed or duly waived, that examination of specific criteria related to the item's ship-ping condition was made, and that there is identification and documentation of the parameters to be verified, including the status of any nonconformances.

B&R receiving inspection ensures that, for nuclear safety-related items received at the South Texas Project, there is accompanying documentation that indicates review and concurrence by the prime contractor or designee, that the item complies with established requirements or has an authorized waiver prior to shipment. HL&P Quality Assurance audits are performed to ensure compliance with these criteria.

l 14

i l

t HL&P Procurement QA ensures by an overview of the B&R vendor surveillance function that source surveillance and inspection are performed in accordance with the quality assurance program. In addition HL&P Discipline QA performs implementation reviews of activities commencing with receiving inspection at the site to ensure proper controls of purchased material and equipment are exercised-HL&P Houston QA perfor.1 audits of these activities to ensure overall compliance.

s 8.0 Identification ar? .atrol of Material, Parts and Components The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that prime contractors and suppliers establish written procedures which identify, control and ensure traceability of materials, parts and components including partially assembled components. Prime con-tractors and suppliers procedures shali include the documented verification of correct identification of gaterials, components and subassemblies, aad that the identification does not affect the function or quality of the item prior to release of the items for assembly or inreallation.

EL&P Project QA ensures that the above criteria are incorporated into the B&R Quality / Construction procedures during the review / approval cycle and then follows up with implementation reviews to ensure compliance.

HL&P Quality Control performs selected inspections to verify proper identification and control during construction activities.

In addition HL&P Houston QA performs audits for evaluation of the conformance to identification and contral criteria.

9.0 Control of Special Processes The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that written procedures be established by prime contractors and subcontractors for the activities associated with all special processes. For special processes the qualification of personnel, procedures and equipment relating to specific codes, standards, specifications and contractual requirements shall be documented and maintained current.

HL&P Discipline QA ensuree that the special process control criteria are met by review and approval of all B&R special process procedures and performance of implementation reviews to ensure compliance.

EL&P Quality Control will perform certain special process examinations (NDE) during the inspection verification process.

These examinations will be performed by personnel qualified in accordance with ASNT-TC-1A-75 using qualified procedures approved by HL&P NDE Level III personnel.

15 m- - -

HL&P Houston QA performs audits of special process activities to ensure compliance with all aspects of the Quality Assurance program.

10.0 Inspection The HL&P Project Quality Assurance F?an requires B&R to establish and implement an inspection operation whose activities are independ-ent from the group performing the activities being inspected. The training, qualifications and certifications of inspectors includes criteria from appropriate codes, standards and B&R procedures and

' shall be documented and kept current. Inspection activities relating to construction, fabrication, installation and testing are documented, kept current and identify all mandatory inspection hold and test points and the critscia to be witnessed by authorized inspectors. Operations and inspections (including rework, replaced items) are performed in predetermined, documented sequences and deviations or deletions must be accomplished in accordance with approved and documented systems. Inspection procedures include all required inspection operations defined by the specifications, drawings,' codes and standards.

Where direct inspections are impossible or disadvantageous, in-process monitoring is specified in the inspection procedures and both direct and in process monitoring are used when control is inadequate without both. All required procedures, specifications and drawings are made available ;o the inspectors prior to perform-ing inspection.

RL&P Discipline QA ensures that inspection control criteria are complied with by review and approval of the inspection procedures and by implementation reviews of inspections in each discipline activity.

in addition to the Discipline QA controls, HL&P has instituted an inspection verification program to evaluate the effectiveness of the B&R inspection activity. The HL&P inspections are performed by the HL&P Quality Control group. HL&P Discipline QA will determine specific activities and areas to be inspected by HL&P QC.

The HL&P Inspectors are trained and certified by a program conforming to ANSI N45.2.6 and as applicable, ASNT-TC-1A-75.

HL&P QC personnel will also be directed by Discipline QA to perform followup inspections on selected non-conformance report and correc-tive action requests to ensure proper close-out verifications by B&R.

HL&P Houston QA performs audits of HL&P and B&R inspection activities to ensure compliance with these criteria.

i 16 l

f-

{ f

-y.

11.0 Test Control

^

TheHL&FPridectQualityAssurancePlanrequiresthatatest-control pecgram be developed and documented by the prime contrac-tors and subcontractors which demonstrates that the facility

-. performs in accordance with the South Texas Project requirements and specifications. The training, certification of personr.el,

~

f

' calibration and certification of test equipment, system or i component status, environmental conditions, inspection hold points

• and configuration of_the items to be tested are included in the-procedures. Test results are documented, evaluated and the acceptance status determined by the authorized departments.

.f f HL&P Discipline QA ensures inclusion of so0guate test control

[

criteria by review / approval'of B&R Quality / Construction testing

-procedures. They also perform follow-up implementation reviews to verify that the controls are implemented and effective.

In addition, HL&P Discipline QA institutes hold points in the B&R test program to ensure witnessing by HL&P Quality Control -

I personnel.

HL&P Houston QA then audits both HL&P and B&R activities to verify QA program compliance.

The test control activities are an example of a case in which HL&P Discipline QA monitoring activities and the Operational.QA monitoring activities will interface and in some instances overlap.

HL&P Project QA procedures will specifically define the responsibilities for this transition period.

12.0 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires the establishment, doc mentation and implementation of a Measuring and Test Equipment Con rol System. The system is to include calibration techniques, spet .fications and accuracy, frequency and maintenance of all measuring instruments and test equipment used in the measuring, inssection and monitoring of nuclear safety-related items. Calibra-tio- and maintenance data shall be filed and kept current. Calibra-tiota standards are to be traceable to nationally recognized standards. If standards do not exist, the basis for calibration of the equipment is to be documented. If measuring or test equipment is found to be out of calibration, an investigation is required to be. performed to determine the validity of the use of the instrument and whether measurements or tests are required to be reperformed.

HL&P Discipline QA reviews and approves B&R calibration procedures to ensure these criteria are incorporated. In addition implementation reviews are performed to ensure compliance.

In the conduct of its inspection verifications HL&P Quality Control is required to use measuring and test equipment of the appropriate accuracy level which is centro 11ed by procedures meeting the requirements of this s'ction.

e 17 f ,_ _. ,,. _ __ ,

+- - - - - - . _ . _ - _ . . . _ , _ _ _ , . _ , . .

E HL&P Houston QA audits the measuring and test equipment controls to-ensure compliance to the QA program in this area.

13.0 Handling, Storage and Shipping The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that for nuclear safety-related items, written procedures be developed in accordance with design requirements, specifications and standards to control' the cleaning, handling, storage, packaging, shipping and preserva-tion to preclude damage and deterioation by environmental condi-tions. The activities are to be accomplished by appropriately

( trained and experienced- personnel.

i

$' HL&P Discipline QA reviews and approves construction procedures for receivingg h -dling, storage and cleaning to ensure that the appropriaie criteria of Regulatory Guide l.38 and ANSI N45.2.2 are included. Periodic implementation reviews are conducted to ensure compliance to the procedures.

HL&P QC performs periodic inspection verifications to assure adequate inspection controls and HL&P Houston QA performs audits to ensure overall program compliance.

14.0 Inspection, Test and Operating Status The 1L&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that the prime contractor and subcontractors indicate the current inspection, test and operating status of nuclear safety-related items through the '

use of stamps, markings, tags or other suitable means. Procedures shall define and document the use, application, removal and status of inspection tags, labels and markings which identify the status  :

of inspections or tests performed or attest to the acceptability of the structure, system, or component. HL&P Discipline Quality Assurance personnel review these procedures and conduct periodic verification to assure compliance. Houston Quality Assurance audits both HL&P Project QA and B&R to verify compliance.

15.0 Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan r,equires that the prime contractors Quality Assurance Program include a system which is documented by written procedures for the 3dentification, segregation and disposition of nonconforming , materials, parts and components. The procedures shall speciff thy' preparation and handling of nonconformance documents, segreghtion requirements and which groups are responsible for review and disposition of the items. Rework, repairs and subsequent reinspection shall be performed in accordance with~ controlled procedo.res and contain mechanisms for providing information to the identifying group as to l the disposition of the nonconformance. For NSSS items, HL&P coordinaten.nonconformance resolution through Westinghouse. HL&P Project Quality Assurance reviews for concurrence the proposed i disposition of selected Brown & Root nonconformance reports and 18 J - n .v , - , . .- ,

f t

performs an evaluation of Brown & Root nonconformance trend analyses. Compliance of these activities with Project Quality Assurance Plan Requirements is ensured through the performance of audits, implementation reviews, and inspection verifications.

. 16.0 Corrective Action The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan for the South Texas Project requires that a system be established and documented by prime contractors which defines the responsibilities, authorities and methods used by specific groups involved in the evaluation of nonconformances and trending to determine the need for corrective action. The system includes measures to identify the cause of

[ significant conditions adverse to quality, measures to ensure that

- the root causes are corrected, and measures to ensure that timely action is taken. Follow-up is performed to ensure the effective-ness of corrective action and that appropriate levels of management are informed of the results. HL&P Project Qualit.y Assurance performs a review for concurrence of selected Brown & Root nonconformance reports and corrective action reports. HL&P Project Quality Assurance also performs trend analyses to determine the need for corrective action. Compliance of these actions with Project Quality Assurance Plan Requirements is verified by HL&P Quality Assurance through the performance of audits and implementation reviews.

17.0 Quality Assurance Records The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Program requires that a Quality Assurance record system be developed by HL&P and the prime contrac-tors for the South Texas Project. The record system provides evidence chat activities relating to quality are defined, imple-mented and that inspection and test documents contain a description of the type of observation, reference to nonconformance reports, evidence relating to status of observation, date and inspector identification.

Quality records shall include reviews, audits, reports, specifica-tions, nonconformance reports, implementation review checklists, analysis, personnel and equipment qualification procedures and associated documentation.

The Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that HL&P and prime contractors establish requirements to ensure that records generated during the design, procurement, construction, preoperational and start-up testing are identifiable, retrievable and meet the  ;

requirements of 10CFR50 and ANSI N45.2.9 as amended by Regulatory l Guide 1.88, Revision 0. Compliance with Project Quality Assurance l Plan-Requirements is verified by HL&P Quality Assurance through the l performance of audits and implementation reviews, (

I r

l l

19 l

1

-- . _ , , _ . . . ~ , _

18.0 Audits'

.The HL&P Project Quality' Assurance Plan establishes the requirement

~

that HL&P, prime contractors Jud sub' atractors develop, document and implement audit activities lwhich are structured in accordance with the . requirements of ANSI N45.2.12 for .the South Te tas Project.

As required by the ANSI standard, results of audits are presented j for review to management of the audited organization anj the HL&P Executive Vice-President. Where4 indicated HL&P performs followup action, including re-audit of the deficient areas.-

r HL&P has the ultimate responsibility for.the auditing of the

quality related activities on'the project. This responsibility is fulfilled by Houston Quality Assurance, which audits the activities of HL&P, its prime contractors and their suppliers and subcontractors.

. The prime contractors and subcontractors perform quality related audits of internal activities and suppliers of material, components and systems. -

i HL&P and B&K perform supplemental audits when required, based on

~

such factors as significant changes in the Quality Assurance i Program, results of trending programs or investigations into the

" root causes of problems.

j. The HL&P Project Quality Assurance Plan requires that each year an i independent outside firm shall conduct an overall audit of the

! South Texas Project Quality Assurance activities.. The' audit j results are presented to the HL&P Executive Vice-President and the Manager, South Texas Project Quality Assurance. The audit results will be used by HL&P management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Quality Assorance program and to determine the need for changes in the Quality Assurance programs of HL&P and its contractors.

1 1

e

(

w 20

._ _, -.m._..., . . _ , . - - , , , , , , . - _ .r-. m . . .

]

Table 1

-Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B Criterion l' Is0 Project Quality Assurance Plan

'l. Introduction II

2. Organization I L

3. Proj(ct Administration 1,V,VI,KV I

4. Project Engineering III

[

5. Procurement IV,VII

6. Fabrication and Construction IV thru XVII

7. Records IV,VI, XVII

8. Auditing VI,XVIII i

I Table 1-1

- := .::- - - - -- : z , _

l Table 1

~

Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B 2.0 Project Site Quality Procedures (PSQP) Criterion PSQP-Al Organization & Responsibility of Project QA/QC l Personnel I,II A2 ~ Project Site Quality Procedures V.VI A3 Handling of NRC Inspection Reports XV,XVI A4 Control of Site Documentation VI A5 Non-Nuclear Site Quality Assurance N/A A6 Document Reviews V,VI A7 Stop Work XV,XVI A8 Trend Analysis Administration XVI A9 Implementation Review II,IV thru XVII A10 Quality Control Administration IX,X All Training & Certification of Quality Control Personnel II,1X,X A12 Audit Overview XVIII A13 Vendor Surveillance Overview IV,VII A14 Construction QA - Operations QA Interface II,XI, XVII Table 1-2

t Table 1 Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B 3.0 HL&P Houston Quality Assurance Procedures Criterion-QAP - 3 . Procedure for Vendor Quality Surveillance VII HL&P Vendor Surveillance VII 3A .

3B . Second Party Vendoi Surveillance VII j 5 . Audit Procedure XVIII Training and Qualification of Audit Personnel II,KVIII 5A .

Performing the Audit XVIII 5B .

SC . Audit Filing XVIII Review of NSSS QA Records Packages VII 11 .

l l Table 1-3

r es

~

Table 1 Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B 4.0 Project Engineering Procedures Criterion PEP - 1 Introduction II Manual Provisions

{

III Scope t

i J.V Definitions

. -01 Preparation and Control of Project Engineering VI Procedures

-02 Document Receipt & Handling N/A

-03 Engineering Signature Authority III

-04 Reference Document Library N/A

-05 Performance of Owner's Reviews ITC

-06 Design Change Request N/A

-07 (deleted) Design Document Distribution List N/A

-08 Engineering Action Item Tracking N/A

-09 Transmittal of Owner's Review Comments to Ext. N/A Organizations

-10 Project Engineering Organization & Responsibilities I

-11 Reporting Design and Construction Deficiencies XV,XVI to NRC

-12 Handling FSAR Change Notices II

-13 Review of NRC Inspection and Enforcement bulletins II Circulars

-14 Designation & Handling of Confidential Security N/A Documents

-15 PheparationofPurchaseAuthorizations(IP) N/A

-16 Engineering Activity for the Procurement of Spare IV,VII Parts Table 1-4

t Table 1 Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 4

10CFR50 App. B 4.0 Project Engineering Procedures Criterion

~-17 Preparation of NSSS Contract Modification Approval N/A (IP)

-18 Preparation and Control of Specificutions III,IV

-19 Processing Supplier Deviation Requests (IP) III,IV

-20 Document Change Notice control (IP) VI,III

-21 Design Verification (IP) III

-22 Personnel Training (IP) II Note: (IP) indicates procedure is in preparation and not yet issued for use.

l Table 1-5 l

\

Table 1~

Plan / Procedures use' to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B

' 5.0 Project Site Administrative Procedures Criterion

- PSAP-01 Preparation and Control of Project Procedures V

-02 Project Directives N/A

-03 Telephone Minutes N/A

-04 Project Correspondence N/A

-05 Mail Processing N/A

-06 Project Meetings N/A

-07 Project Trip Approval N/A

-08 Projact Files N/A

-09 Storage and Retirement of Project Records XVII

-10 Monthly Manhour Reporting N/A 6.0 Project Contract Administration Procedures PCAP-50 Work Authorization N/A

-51 PBA Review N/A

-52 Contract changes N/A l

l Table 1-6

l 1

Table 1 Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B  !

7.0 Project Site Procedures Criterion PSP -01 Preparation and Control of Project Site Procedures V

-02 Project Site Organization I

-03 Construction Functions and Responsibilities I

-04 Startup Functions and Responsibilities I

-05 Field Change Requests III

-06 Nonconformance Reports XV

-07 Construction Review of Documents VI

-08 Control of Construction VI

-09 Processing Site Correspondence N/A

-10 Site Procurement IV

-11 Construction Interfacing for Testing & Turnover II,X

-12 Transfer of Material Offsite IV,VII

-13 Indoctrination & Training II

-14 Equipment Inventory & Maintenance VIII,XIII

-20 Issuance of Photo Identification Badges N/A

-21 Camera Authorization , N/A

-22 Visitor Pre-Clearance N/A

-23 Vendor Control N/A I

i l

Table 1-7 e -. - __

__ .: - . . - - - ~ _ - _ . . ... -. ,.

Table 1 Plan / Procedures used to Implement Quality Assurance for the Major Activities 10CFR50 App. B 8.C . Records Management Systems Procedures Criterion 1-2 Records Management Responsibilities & Interfaces I 1-3 Preparation and Periodic Review of RMS Procedures V 1-4 Records Management. Personnel Training II 2-1 Records Center nau-ographic Section XVII T1-1 Flow of Nuclear Correspondence Within RMS Center XVII T2-1 Document Logging VI T2-2 Log Maintenance VI T2-3 Document Distribution VI T2-4 Storage & Maintenance of Nuclear Records XVII T2-5 Document Checkout XVII T2-6 Correspondence Serial Number Assignment VI T2-7 Correspondence Serial Number Corrections VI T2-8 Subject File Number Assignment XVTI T2-10 NSSS Data Package Handling XVII Table 1-8

l ,

~

TABLE 2 ANSI STANDARD AND' REGULATORY GUIDE-COMPLIANCE'

~

The STP Quality Assurance Program complies with the following ANSI-Standards and associated Regulatory Guides except as noted:

STANDARD TIT 1,E ANSI N.45.2-1971 Quality Assurance Program Require-R.G.1.28 (Rev. 0,6/72) .ments for Nuclear Facilities ANSI 1N.45.2.1-1973- Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Asso-R.G.I.37(Rev. 0,3/73) ciated Components During construc-tion Phase of Nuclear Power Plants

. ANSI N.45.2.2-1972 Package, Shipping, Receiving, Storage R.G.I.38 (Rev. 0,3/73) and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.3-1973- Housekeeping During the Construction i R.G.I.39(Rev. 0,3/73) Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.4-1972 Installation, Inspection and Testing R.G.1.30(Rev. 0,8/72) Requirements for Instrumentation and Electric Equipment During the Con-struction of Nuclear Power Generating Stations ANSI N.45.2.5-1974 Supplementary Quality Assurance Re-(See Notes 1 & 2) quirements for Installation, Inspec-tion and Testing of. Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ,

ANSI N.45.2.6-1973 Qualifications of Inspection, R.G. 1.58 (Rev.0,8/73) Examination and Testing Person-nel for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.8 .Supplementory Quality Assurance (Draft 3, Rev. 3,4/74) Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.9-1974' Requirements for Collection, Storage R.G. 1.88 (Rev.0.8.74) and Maintenance of Quality Assurance-Records for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.45.2.10-1973 Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions .

R.C. 1.74 (Rev. 0,2/74)

Table 2-1

I l

TABLE 2 ANSI STANDARD AND REGULATORY GUIDE COMPLIANCE (Continued)

STANDARD TITLE ANSI N.45.2.11-1974 Quality Assurance Requirements for the R.G. 1.64(Rev.2,6/76) Design of Nuclear Power Plants ANS: N.45.2.12 Requiremerts for Auditing of Quality (Draft 3, Rev.4, 2/74) Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power (see Note 3) Plants ANSI N.45.2.13 Quality Assurance Requirements for (Draft 2, Rev.4, 4/74) Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N.101.4-1972 Quality Assurance Requirements for R.G. 1.54(Rev.0,6/73) Coatings Applied to Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plant Exceptisa Motes

1. ANSI N.45.2.5-1974, Section 4.8, states " Pumped concrete must be sampled from the pump line discharge". In lieu of this statement, in process strength samples of pumped concrete are taken at the delivery point. Correlation tests of air content, slump, and temperature are performed to verify these plastic properties of the concrete at the placement point in accordance with the following frequency requirements:

A. A minimum of 2 correlation tests are performed for each pumped placement exceeding 200 cu. yds.

B. Otherwise, a minimum of 2 correlation tests per week are performed when any individual pumped placement during a week requires delivery of more than one truckload of concrete.

C. During a week when a pumped placement exceeding 200 cu. yds.

is made, the correlation tests performed on that placement will satisfy the weekly requirement for performing two correlation tests as specified in Item B above.

When any of the specified limits and tolerances on lons of air content, slump, or temperature are exceeded at the placement point, correlation tests between the delivery point and placement point will be accomplished for each 100 cu. yds. of concrete placed as Table 2-2

- - - . . -,,,_..v; -

.I i

l TABLE 2 ANSI STANDARD AND REGULATORY GUIDE COMPLIANCE (Continued) long as limits and tolerances are exceeded. If two consecutive tests are out of tolerence, corrective action will be inplemented to assure that subsequent loads awaiting discharge into the pump 4 are within tolerances for the placement. This will be accom-plished by adj'2 sting the plastic p'.-operty requirements of the concrete at the pump intake.

T " Correlation Tests", " Delivery Point", and " Placement Point" are as defined in ANSI N.45.2.5-1978, Section 1.4.

2. Samples and frequency for cadweld testing is in accordance with ACI-359/ASME Section III, Division 2, issued for trial use and comment in 1973, including addenda 1 through 6, (see Sections 3.6.1.6.3 and 3.8.3.6.3 of the STP Final Safety Analysis Report).

3. If a work activity and contract is for a two-month period or less, an audit is not necessary when a facility preaward audit has been conducted.

l Table 2-3 l

m

,y ll PRESIDENT s

EXECUTfvE VICE f PRESIDENT I

- i vcE PRESioENT i '

NUCLEAR ENGIL I a CasTRuCTa 1, '

Y I MANAGER MANAGER ,

MANAGER SOUTN TEMAS f HOUSTON 04 SOUTH TEMAS PRouECT QA PROJECT w

l I

{ l I I I I I

• I I I

'*JALITY QUALJTT OPERATIONS PROJaeAseAg4 T AUDITS /TEO9th PROKCT OA PROCUREMENT HOUSTON t'EN004 CONTROL SYSTEMS QA MANAGER CAL SERYlES GENERAL PROKCT NICIS SURVEILLANCE QAS W RYl3Gt St#ERVISGI alPERV W

.3UPERVISOR SUPERVISOR . SUPERVISOR

- I I I I ,

I EL ECT/ l& C PLANT feOE /ISI MECHrW C CIVIL / STRUCT OPUIATIONS PROKCT PROKCT OA SPERVISINt

,j PROKCT QA SUPUtvisoft ,

QA SUPERVISOR QA SUPERVISOR QA SUPERVISOK

.l

'l I I I I PROJ. SERV &

PROKCT PROKCT PROJECT PROJECT PURCHA9NG COdTROLLER ADMIMSTRATION r

g CONTROLS ENGNEERING MANAGUI WNAGE R SUPERVl5Nt

$ MANAGER 1 I I i 1 1

'I I I I ENERAL SUPERVIS1000 CONSTftUCTitpl CONSTRUCT O6 STARTLP SUPERVISOR CGITRACT SUPUWITDMNT CONTROL esassAER ADMINISTRATOs SUPERVISOR PROECT l PROKCT ENOPEER RFDtVt90ft STP ACCOUNTDIE

! PURCHASING

' I i i I i l GEfeERAL STAftTUP CGeST8tuCT10N LEADER SUPERVISING SUPERVISING ENGipfERIMO CONSTftuCT1000 staERAL EERING 1 PROKCT ENG'R ==Eaa 0R = - =0R EN.G.IN.iSrRATIO.,

Ao PROJECT.,EN6.aa%

STO o SITE E~aPaa= SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT = E = 0R

^

j INTERNALQA RELATIONSHIP ,

't Figure 1

)

I 5

B&R WESTINGHOUSE y (CONTRACTORS)

EXECUTIVE l

VICE PRESIDENT 4 HLS P .j BER WESTINGHOUSE (CONTRACTORS)

A l

MANAGEMENT

~

} h

!, .~ $ f.' .

VICE PRESIDENT MANAGER SOUTH TEXAS QA + ,

i NUCLEAR ENG.& h

! CONSTRUCTION i h h l

• i s QUALITY l . - ASSURANCE PROJECT I MANAGER + MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT SOUTH TEXAS GENERAL P SOR j A A A PROJECT 3[ )

' A M1 h

i PROJECT k QA SUPERVISOR

?L

LINES OF COMMUNICATION HL& P & BER/ WESTINGHOUSE (CONTRACTORS)

Figure 2 i

i .

9

. . 1