ML19338G615

Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test

ML19338G615
Person / Time
Site:	Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	09/26/1980
From:	Ainger K, Marianyi J COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19338G613	List: ML19338G612 ML19338G615
References
NUDOCS 8010310346
Download: ML19338G615 (50)

Text

' Q w

l l

s e

0-Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test I

Septerter 26, 1980 I

Written by:

$ g, Kenneth A. Alnger p fC@.,

Tech. Staff Engineer Approved by:

M Juan J. Marianyl

~

Tech. Staff Supervisor I

i

(

8010310 N

Table of Contents Page 1.

Abstract 1

2.

Analysis and. Interpretation of Type A 2-3 Test Results 3.

Analysis and Interpretation of Supplemental 4

Verification Test Results 4.

Test Log 5-8 5.

Summary Analysis of Type 3 and Type C 9-12 Test Results 6.

Calculations a.

"As Lef t" Leakage of the Personnel 13 Eatch and Escape Hatch b.

Induced Leak for the Supplemental 14 Verification Test Supplemental Verification Test Acceptance 15 c.

Criteria d.

Figure of Merit 16 7.

Containment Temperature Survey 17 8.

Calibrations of Test Instruments a.

Precisien Pressure Gauges 18-19 b.

RTD Buffer Amp 20-22 c.

RTD Temp. - Resistance Values 23-24 d.

Dewcell Temp. - Resistance Values 25 e.

Flowmeter (rotometerl 26-27 9.

Certificates of Calicration for Standards Used 28-35 i

List o.T Figures

• igure 1

Graph 1 ASL, CLU Type A Test 2

Graph la ASL, CLU Type A Test 3

Graph lb ASL, CLU Type A Test Containment Dry Air pressure 4

Graph 2 Type A Test, Supplemental Verification Test 5

Graph 2a Containment Dry Air Pressure Type A Test, Supplemental Verification Test 6

Graph 3 Containment Average Weighted Temperature Type A Test, Supplemental Verification Test

~

7 Graph 3a Containment Average Weighted Temperature Type A Test, Supplemental Verification Test 3

Graph 4 ASL, CLU Supplemental Verification Test 9

Graph 4a ASL, CLU Supplemental Verificatiod Test 10 Instrurant Locations 11 Instrument Locations 12 Instrument Locations

1 1

Abstract This report presents details of the Containment Integrated Leakrate Test successfully performed between June 15 and 20, 1980 at Zicn Station, Unit 2.

The test was performed in accordance with 10CFR50, Appendix J and the Zion Technical Specifications.

The containment integrated leakrate was found to be 0.00 7 weight %/ day at a test pressure of 28 psig, well within the 0.0465 weight %/ day acceptance criteria.

The result at the 95% upper confidence limit was 0.019 weight %/ day.

A leak of 0.036 weight %/ day was imposed on the containment for the supplemental verification test.

The instrumentation measured a combined leak of 0.053 weight %/ day and 0.064 weight

%/ day at the 95% upper confidence limit.

The difference between l

the measured combined leak and the imposed plus measured contain-

{

ment leak is 16% of the allcwable containment leakrate.

The acceptance criteria is that the difference be less than 25%.

Thus, the supplemencal verificacion test also meets the acceptance criteria.

I O

6

2 Analysis and Interpretation of Type A Test Results The statistical leakrate was scattered during the first 5 or 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> of the test due to the small number of data sets accumulated.

The data started falling into place between the 7th and 8th hour of the test.

The slope of the leakrate began to flatten out between the 9th and 10th hour of the test. LEvent 1 graph Il Therefore, it was concluded there was a leak out of the containment.

A few hours later the leak in the outer equalizing valve of the personnel air lock was discovered and plugged with a plumbers plug. (Event 2 graph ll The slope of the leakrate dropped short-ly thereaf ter.

Two hours later, the leak in the escape hatch inner equalizing valve was discovered and stopped. (Event 3 graph 1)

The leakrate continued to drop.

Other points of suspected leakage were checked, but nothing was found leaking.

It ' ras decided to begin a new "24-hour" ILRT when the escace hatch leak was stopped.

It was started at data set 122 and graph 1-a was initiated.

The leakrate dropped below the limit within lh hours and went negative two hours into the test. (Event 1 graph lal Then the plumbers plug was removed from the personnel hatch equalizing valve to see what effect it would have on the leakrate.

(Event 2 graph lal As seen on the graph, the leakrate increased and was above the limit within 45 minutes.

Six hours into the new test the plug was reinstalled. (Event 3 graph la) The leakrate turned around and was below the limit at 8.5 test hours.

The leakrate continued to drop and was negative again at 9.5 test hours.

It was evident that the co'ntainment was experiencing some sort of mass addition which resulted in a negative leakrate.

The sealing water supply between valve AOV-RV0005 and AOV-RV0006 was thought to be the source of the mass addition.

The water supply was isolated to these valves at 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> test time. (Event 4 graph la)

The leakrate turned towards a positive number again.

Another new "24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />" test was begun at this event.

Graph lb is a plot of the final and successful ILRT.

Eleven hours into the new test, constant leakrate results were appearing.

The test was continued for one more hour to confirm the results being obtained.

The test was terminated at hour 12 test time.

Since the test had already been running much longer than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />,

the requirement to keep the containment pressurized longer than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> had already been met.

1

1 1

3 l

Twelve hours of data were sufficient to determine the leakrate of the containment.

The water leakage past valve AOV-RV0005 was the source of' the negative leak during the test.

The volume between valves AOV-RV0005 and AOV-RV0006 was pressure tested during TS3 47 (IVSW Leak Testl with water and with air during a special IVSW test before the ILRT.

Both tests indicated only a small amount of leakage past these valves.

The containment leakrate was so small that the small amount of water leakage past AOV-RV0005 into the containment had a large effect on the test results.

The Zion Unit 2 containment has a very small integrated leak-rate.

The leakrate measured during this test is nearly seven times less than the allowable leakage of the containment.

When ecmpared with the results of the last ILRT performe.d in February of 1977, the leakrate measured during this test is only.002%

greater that the rest.lts of the previous test.

It can be concluded that the U-2 contair. ment has maintained its leaktight condition over the past 3 years.

h e

D*"]D D N

~

v_o Ju o fL 2._

f o

m

=

l T '-

^

m me I

e

=

3 --

oM

_~A

~ ~A f

3 -

=

~

a---

^

j L

==

=

A 1_--

-r.m l

e3 w.--_

N-

=_

.g

_w Me. -.

__-_.__m--

m,,

g p

6 Y

V

- - =

.3 p

e e M

aw e

m O

h Is^

1

.o N3.s h$a

9. =

4 SS sem - 4 g

N

--e 6- -

m

+-a

_.wm 4

_,,-M

-g

%,.,_-T

?'

~&

^'"

~

M

--+g.

.j_

9 h

w--m*a-w g

es.. -.ame.w=.s. e n a si g

=euene.ees =seame w

e massas

• e ein o=

wn@in GMriNN A

a 9

_-i w

'--esm--u f*

2

_-s=

• K

==

T

, ess. -.w

.N Nh

_m m

h

==

=-e

---%.w.-

b

-. ~,. - - _

_*s-----

-mem

~

m eg

'em ym am m

e 4

-"[

d-

=%-

m a

c-N

\\

qa

' ~"

w

_--f--

=-~

[

_=

• p

,-4'-~-

I

.9-m.

^

T

?

.-'u f' b_?"

i I

i W

W

=e 4 e.e es seem

=3ase a* wee es. es e e t d

.ee =sena.e W

.a...

e =sesa.e. sea..e s.

W W

G

~

,] D [' 3

._ R 3

OO f

D D

,-)

.c

==

=

~=2

,5

-~

_..e_

.- =-

=__

• _ E

--+-

w^

..-e

+ _ -_

,. =

- _ e-_

m

- =-

,s--- 3

_=

_ D--E

-a s-=-

._ g

= - + - --

- 3

____l__

-~

_---,_W

_a 1

r2

=

=

I n.

I ~_1.

r.-j

'I

.=

F 2

N

(-._-,

'-~--~*----s_.-_.____

_ _ _ _ _ _ n l

=

-~

t-

- _ _ _ _ __^

-:r f4_.

~i--

^- ^

^"f-+--".G Tw Z I V__ _ __ _

es... -.s.=.e ases.a.e ae a ea e s=

-..w. e s w

w wee 4ves.ees sea 6ase W

e *.an ei W

W 4

9

D '3

~

s j

~

o o

_ g J\\. n c, J

i

(

j l

=

=

1

-^

m

=

~~

L

~.

62-~

w

"- =,

9-

- - y==

? ^ --

-v-

?~

m _ -

~

+ 7 c-

-_m

-c

=~

~ --- ___-_.~._

p

____s~

1

~

.j

.s.=

-m 89*

g

_ 4 l

rF N

mwe

~*w+-----_so

"~

c.

l l

+-

L_

}

'T

^

~~.

^ ~ ^ZMM _2fW^ ^g-,*- -, ---,-- - *_ey w 3 m

c.

l 3

. e.e m

=s=. 4% ese es a as mesaveseeme =sease eseee =evee =seue o ei-sies tw

-y as

mm e

w+

h m.

-h St.

O

~

w---

_m

-e.-

e*

w F?

_.~

~

~

j '.

-w W.,

._._h7-N.'"rs;-

^

7_ 'l N

w ww

=

-%-e

- - - -. ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _.

'~ ?7

% +-

m_=-_____.,

._ m en t-

\\

-E Y--

m 4 W"-

- ~ '

O C Mme __ J w_ _.

e L Nw

= - W5 r-+_.

.- y. EK.

Ia

=_.-

~

4-&

-m..

<~

-- ~ _

_I-'en..,

_ M*"

• =

h

• _*=.-.-.--_.g-.

h

'I.

_q_. -_

-h-**--e--

a.

'""YW'J ~#@ Wh,7L-jW-lVfg _%_.

_iw -'

-~

-n w

-e-.

..... ~...

.s w.

3. s g. 3.

e

\\

l x

kT

_ - ~ -

~

^^

ge

.,~_-

^_

~

m

~' _

'.5

_w

. ^%i.-

.2 M

r -

-C

.D

, _ j._m-

= = - - -

_Z---~

T_-

-~

.,h_.S. -.

w_w mw

'm1 s

g ;= _

em

=

Cw %

g=

W N-_

e q

W-

- - ~. - -.. -~.-

4&, A

~

-=-epaw an e.e-

_e'I----.

g

-isgi.

4 4EM""'_-""'

E

~_

P _*

-M~~7 e-e g e. ees.

essee 49vse ese et a as g

mesayeeeeeS ese8&See e 8 eve soeves e3SE.a. Bee

• St S a pt gse

-a O

14 w

l 1

O w

j

-7 m

~

-N e

T=

Al "M

w E""*N

--"MW

"~

_y

- _N c::

~

e" o

-+mm

-~

3

_ ~ ~ ~

-- a- ~p-

--_~3

%.M

._. ___' _2

^_ _

r-7

~

96 h

n--w e

_-[-

eW"

~~

-e-.

ww

+

• • e--+-,

6.-

m y

5 a

~

. ~

~

M F ~

~~~-MA L e

m P

.3 9

.e..W..._

a WIW ese

......S.w..=m 6.s.S.t s WW_m 1 la gIgljQ

_d6 iL e

4 Analysis and Interpretation of Supplemental Verification Test Results A 2.0 scfm leak C 036%/dayl as measured by the rotometer was imposed on the containment.

The leakrate plot obtained during the first 10.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> of this test was scattered in and out of the acceptable tolerance band for no apparent reason.

Nothing else was changing during this t:.me.

When the raw data was looked at closer, it was evident that positive and negative pressure spikes on the order of 15 to 20 counts were occurring on the precision pressure gauges.

These spikes, noticed en the output tapes from the DAS, were occurring at randam intervals during this test.

This caused the containment dry air mass calculation to change significantly.

The oscillation in the leakrate results, as shown on graph 4, were caused by the pressure gauge problem.

The cause for the pressure gauge problems is not known, but water dreplets which might have formed in the sensing line may have entered the quart: bourdon tube capsule to cause the problem.

As soon as the problem was discovered the pressure stan-dard used to calibrate the precision pressure gauges was onnected to a centainment pressure sensing line.

A new supplemental verification test was begun at data set 340 (graph 44 using the pressure standard instead of the 2 gauges.

Eight hours later, successful results were obtained and the test was terminated at 8.33 test hours.

The successful results of this test demonstrate the validity of the leakage rate test measurements.

m

_ 4:sr____%

'E * ~~

e

~

7-'

TM

-w-

-q

^- %~_

g

\\

_M_I c -w -

w m=

.--+--I'~

_----& m_.

0 m,.-----

Y

,3 n._----

-.-- ^^

._C" k

- y m;-

--ce h_'

- _ _ - =

o A

=.-w_ ~

,g I

m-

_ _.-~

r T

" ~ _

_ h-

,, _ _. -~

_ _ _..__m__-_..

LM'W

-. - - - ~ ~

-..-n

~

~~

__-l.

_ - - - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _

~_~2

= -

__. ~

" r RM1 w~=~-t

- N

^- % si

_n r*

C S

=-Y--

_ _ =

-.- e _ a A

~

('

5&~

g_.-.__

___.2_

..-a u---

~

^pt_

^

}.->-q---.

C

_t i -

)

.-_.1x j

c et =--

,-w%

~_--

-g, q

---"t=

_____________,__y_

y g

_- s_

_A_nN-

~~

A p.}

~

=w'-.y-,

. o e e. eene as.e

.s..e ma 4.*sena g a w a.s wee es v

=suveeeees =sen.s.e e.a....,,,,

v v

D 1~

T j l D O.A A 9

1

'I d

m wm

,a w

'*m w

b-4

-w M

m-N r

s g

w m--

~=

-"--ee---

• ---.*a_

=--

^^

w

-~

x.

m K.-

" ^

.=

^

w

_-.ww m.

• m

~

_'m

---

__._..___a

~ ~ - - - ~

~,

-h-M

-."'M M__

6 e

t

. u

...aa

3.. --.a..a s e s.s w

..... a ai

.ns w

w q

0 O

l

i l

l 5

Test Log for U-2 Containment ILRT 6-15 6-20-80 Sunday, 6-15

'0, 1700 Valve line-ups completed.

Procedure signed off.

2030 Attempted to start both ccmpressors.

Had oil pump problems.

Monday, 6-16-80 0030 Started West compressor.

Attempted start on east compressor, 4KV breaker problem, compressor tripped.

Contacted OAD, will check problem in AM since 4KV feed is common to both ccmpressors.

0045 Discovered RV0008 leaking thru, spinning purge ex-haust fans backwards.

Cranked down on valve, but still leaks.

0200 Received fire detection alarms in the containment.

Containment pressure 2 2 psig.

0330 Filled pressurizer frem 38% -- 70%.

Partial clear done on seal injection and normal charging to fill it.

0830 Other ccmpressor started.

0930 Both compressors tripped on 2nd stage temperature high.

1130 Discovered AOV-RV0005,6 went closed, dead heading the ccmpressors.

The fuses to some containment isolation valves were mistakenly pullel and that affected RV0005 & 6 (fail close valves).

1300 Both ccmpressors started again.

1930 Eastcompressor tripped due to low N2 pressure.

2000 East compressor back on.

2130 Containment at 41 psia.

Filled pressurizer again.

2145 B RCFC tripped.

Decided to leave it off.

2215 Stepped compressors.

Containment at 43 psia.

2340 Containment sample ccmpleted per test procedure.

6 Tuesday, 6-17-80 0315 Found multiplexer cable penetration leaking.

0630 Outer airlock door closed.

Airlock equalized with centainment pressure.

1600 Determined frcm accumulated data that there is a leak out of the containment.

Began referencing systematic troubleshooting procedure to check for location of leak.

1630 Checked personnel hatch outer cable penetration and equalizing valve.

The penetration was okay, The equalizing valve didn't appear to be leaking any more than when the test was started.

Measured leak still greater than all0wed, 1715 Checked water pressure between RV0005,6.

Prassure okay.

1900 Decided to try to stop leak in personnel hatch outer equalizing valve.

1915 A plumbers plug was placed in the discharge part of the outer equalizing valve to stop the leak.

It worked.

1930 Increased water pressure between RV0005,6.

It had fallen to 15 psig.

2000 Isolated 2VC8435 Cletdownl.

Checked main steam line pressure gauges, no leakage.

Found very small leak in IW header (IW 211.

2015 Snooped outer personnel airlock, no leakage.

2055 Snooped escape lock.

Found a large leak in the escape lock inner equalizing valve.

Closed the outer escape lock door and equalized the airlock with the containment pressure.

2100-2300 Checking other points of suspected leakage.

Found nothing leaking.

2300 Containment leakrate below limit.

2330 Plumbers plug was removed from the outer personnel airlock equalizing valve.

7 Wednesday, 6-18-80 0130 Containment leakrate increasing above limit.

0330 Re-installed plumbers plug.

0530 Containment leakrate below limit.

0630 Containment leakrate negative.

1130 Shut off water supply between AOV-RV0005,6.

1145 Containment leakrate turning around towards positive. Started new "24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />" ILRT.

2140 ILRT terminated.

Acceptance criteria met.

Average statistical leakrate (ASL) = 0.007 %/ day.

Upper confidence limit leakrate (CLU) =.019 %/ day.

2220 Obtained containment air sample per procedure.

2230 Imposed a 2.00 scfm leak (0.036 %/ day) on the containment for the supplemental verification test.

Thursday, 6-19-30 0500 observed problems with precision pressure gauges.

0830 Installed pressure standard for precision pressure gauges on third containment pressure sensing line.

0930 Started new supplemental verification test using pressure standard.

1750 Terninated supplemental verification test. Acceptance criteria met.

1800 Performing valve line-up necessary for stroking Recirc. Sump valves MOV-SI8811 A, B.

1900 Stroked recire. sump valves successfully.

Performed releasecagcylationforblowdownofcontainment.

(1.06 x 10 t*/ min. maximum release ratel 2000 Performing valve line-up for containment blcwdown.

2145 Began containment blowdown.

1 Friday, 6-20-80 l

l 0600 Blowdown completed.

l 0630 Entered containment for post-test inspection.

Found the followi ng:

8 0630 can't Containment sump level::1 in, over the top, RCDT spilling water out of the vent.

s 3/4 in. water on the floor outside the missile barrier for m: 3 ft, from the missile barrier outward.

0715 Post test inspection complete.

0730 Released containment to operating. Test completed.

l

9 Summary Analysis of Type B and Type C Test Results The following table is a summary list of the periodic Type B and Type C tests that were performed since the last Type A test in February, 1977.

The results indicate that the isolation capability of all the ccmponents tested has not degraded with time.

1978 1979 1980 Total Type B Leakage (scfh t 48.5 22.48 6.26 Total Type C Leakage (scfhl 34.4 17.77 0.6 Total airlock seals leakage (10 psig test) (scfhl 1.2 0.15 0.07 The following is a ccmulative list of Type 3 and Type C leakages by individual components:

Type C Compcnents Valve (s)

Leakage (scfhl Date' Tested 2MOV-CS0003 15.2 3-30-78 1.32 4-10-79 0

5-28-80 2MOV-CS0005 0.5 3-30-78 3.11 4-10-79 0.15 5-28-80 2MOV-CS 0 00 7 9.3 3-30-78

. 23 4-10-79 0.08 5-30-80 2PR0029 1.1 3-30-78 2.84 4 79 0.12 6-05-80 2?R00 30 0.9 3-30-78 2.62 4-06-79 0

6-04-80 2IA01A,3 1.8 3-30-78 2.46 4-01-71 0.04 6-14-80

10 Type C Components con't 2DT9157 2.0 3-30-78 0.84 4-04-79 0.16 6-11-80 2AOV-RV0 0 01 -*- 4 0.1 3-30-78 0.23 4-04-79 0.04 5-15-80 2FCV-PR24A,3 3.5 3-30-78 2PR0007,8,9,ll,12,13, 2.12 4-06-79 15,16,17,19,20,21 0.01 5-31-80

11 Type B Components Electrical Penetrations Leakage (scfh)

Date Tested Zone 1 8.0 3-30-78 0.05 3-06-79 O.16 5-13-80 Zone 2 9.2 3-30-78 0.05 3-06-79 0.11 5-13-80 Zone 3 8.2 3-30-78 Q.07 3-06-79 0.09 5-13-80 Zone 4 2.4 3-30-78 Q.41 3-06-79 0.29 5-13-80 Mechanical Penetrations Zone lJ 2.7 3-30-78 1.07 3-22-79 0

$-13-80 Zone 1B 2.4 3-30-78 3.7 4-04-79 0

6-11-80 Zone 2J 0.7 3-30-78 3.09 3-14-79 0

5-13-80 Zone 3D 2.9 3-30-78 1.05 3-16-79 0

5-13-80 Zone 3K 2.2 3-30-78 5.57 3-14-79 0

5-13-80 Zone 4B 4.7 3-30-78 2.79 3-16-79 0.12 5-27-8J Zone 4H 1.6 3-30-78 3.68 3-19-79 0

5-14-80

12 Type B Components con't Leakage (scfh)

Date Tested Volume between doors on 0.1 3-30-78 Personnel Airlock 0.54 4-12-79 0.01 1-14-80 4.96 6-14-80 2.30 7-10-90 volume between doors on 3.4 3-30-78 Eecape Hatch 0.31 4-12-79 0.02 1-14-30 0.53 6-14-80 0.16 6-30-80 J

Personnel Lock Seals 0

3-30-78 (10 psig test) 0.12 4-12-79 0.39 l-14-80 0.01 6-13-80 Escape Hatch Seals 1.2 3-30-78 (10 psig test) 0.03 4-12-79 0.06 1-14-30 0.06 6-12-80 Equipment Hatch Seal 0.1 4-12-79 0.06 1-14-80 0

6-13-80 i

1

\\

13 1

1 Calculation of "As Left" Leakage of the Personnel Hatch and Escape Hatch Follcwing the ILRT, the inner equalizing valve of the escape hatch and the outer equalizing valve of the personnel hatch were repaired.

A Type C local leakrate test was performed at 25 psig on each hatch to determine their "As Left" leakage.

These leakages are to be added to the measured containment integrated leakrate to cbtain the total integrated leakrate of the Unit 2 containment.

As Lef t Leakage Personnel Hatch:

.0475 scfh Escape Hatch:

. 0 817 s cfh

(. 0 475 s cfh +. 0 817 s cfh) x 24 hrs. = 3.101 scfd 3.101 x 100% =.00004 %/ day 7332347 scf 9 25 psig The "As Left" leakage of.00004 %/ day is an insignificant amount to be added to the measured integrated leakrate of.007

%/ day.

Therefore, the total containment integrated leakrate re-mains at.007 %/ day.

14 Calculation of Induced Lesk for the Supplemental Verification Test Volume of containment = 2715000 ft.3 Volume of air in standard cubic feet at 25 psig:

( 25 + 14.7 2715000 14.7

= 7332347 scf Allowable containment leakage LT=.0621 %/ day In SCFM:

LT=.000621 (7332347) = 4553.4 SCFD 4553.4 L7 = 24L601

= 3.16 SCFM Allowable measured leakage L m i3:

t L m =.75 LT=.75(3.16) = 2.37 SCFM t

Induced leak should be between 2 and 3 scfm.

~

2 scfm was chosen,

15 Calculation of Supplemental Verification Test Acceptance Criteria Measured containment leakrate -

.007 %/ day Induced leakrate -

.036 %/ day Measured ccmbined leakrate -

.053 %/ day Allowable containment leakrate (L ).0621 %/ day P

.053

.036

.007 Percent Lp =

.0621 x 100% = 16%

16 % < 25%

The difference between the supplemental test data and the Type A test data is within.25 D.r

16 Figure of Merit Calculation 2

p egy 2 2'

M

,. 2 fe t 2

FOM = h x (10 )

+2

+2 L

P P

E = sensor repeatability error h = 24 hrs.

P = 43.2 psia T = 537.8 OR f.,= readout error (E33) 2 + (bpt),

e = measurement of change of parameter et=

p 44 of sensors pt =.001 E

= 0

1. of sensors = 2 epe = [(. 001) 2 + (o) 2)

=.00071 CE (E y) 2 + ({uy) 2 e.,y

=

n E y' =.00232 Ey

.000056

=

l4 of sensors p

p

1. of sensors = 10

_.00232) 2 + (.000056) 2

.00073

(

eay =

=

V10 (E ) 2 + (E t)

Et" 1

Et=.006 e

=

t

/4 of sensors et = ((.1)2+ (.006)2]

.01893

=

/28 2

, (. 0 0q3 2 ) + 2{.0

+ 2( 5 FOM =

x (10)2 2

(5x10-10+6x10-10+2.5x10-9

= 102 FOM = 6 x 10-3 Since the FOM is less than.25 LT (. 015 5), the instrumentation is acceptable.

D**D

• D

D

' T

)

.d.d".

cel e

.a 17 i

u IE'M P E R A TU RE.

SUJRV6 /

d+7t. -

f.; lI S lTO TiMi. -

lo.':D,4P/

U ri r r ?

'Ct le 7 ftt fo RM iC if f

'i~~d. Sc.(.uSTe.r-3 T !i C ' L e v s t 4p +1 ins;de M. B.

4ph ou+s:cle M.d.

0 75 'r & IECF :D D 78'F

( Q_ 2 2 1 (0

7?s'F @ sG 1c

@ 73'F 3 2:.: ~5 5

7?'F 3 ticP :5 60 WF @ t2.7

$)

7&'F 5 n= lns; le @

73 F.'c e :t-3 e

5'%. '

L1'/L L Yp +s In c 'de M. 6 Yp t.: co+sl ale l'l.a.

a

,l

- =. s EJ 7.' *F :

2C r) :C.

O 74 *:

G._ % 29 77.' T Ect:A 75 'F S 22 'o 77'." &

RcP 2B $ 72 '.= 3 534 r

I 2

&I7 L5ML

?(pc l< s 77 'i=

8

& ~ t l A ll S G. D u t '.itut

^3 Q, -)

/ /

l-z c

^

J.

','.~ h. '

E.

~

....,., } l

-e.

.T

~

. i.'.

Af

, y5 y

y "s

i.

w cal Gu, pe ', a +g y_ g.. ~

Oa +bi p>c k.

en.ns

~

Werc.cs 77'f ffA&u2l K-

/sy r/so

l d

i N

i I,

1 0

SuSVOLUME I ELEV. 735' - RT D'S ELEV.^13T*DGYCELLS e4 1

e i

4 5

1 ipgtSONNEL i

anrew (W7')

fN suBVoLuME 2.

}

RTD's 7(O', (,10, DGwc6LLS ~100' e'

\\

p

• 4 k

w RT D

• DEWCELL f

JN I

susvotuMe J g

KTOk - la50, (AO', HS' DEWCELLS - 645' A

1 i

u I

I f,

susVol.uME 4, 5'

/

R.706 -S92' DEWcEt.Ls - Sn' MISSILE BARRIEE l

• +

a:

RTD

• DEWCE4 f l

. _. = - _. -.

d i

i aN i

i SUSVOLuMS s4,5 4

i RTD's - SI,0' i

4 Ddr#c E u s - 56 0*

l 4

i 1

e i

i e

4 0

0 i

i 4

e a

W 1

l i

l 1

i i

e i

i l

I l

.i A

I h

I i

I 18

.rs,. VO LU M ETAICS j

1025 W AR80R VITAL elNGLEWOOO.CALIFORNI A 90301 PHONE 3213) Att 3747 PI-l Gauze s.n.

97a l Tube Ranze :0-100 osia s.n. 1140 Room Temo: 70.0F Tube Temo: 500C Reference Pressure: 110 m Torr Calibrated by:

KAA[ZG Date:

4-17-80 Calibration 5 d. No. 5 N?l 8{726 i

Pressurs I: rue)

Gauge Reading Pressure = Gauze Reading x M - C psia counts M

C 5

4869

/

~

\\

2 10 9747

/

1

\\

15 14651

/

\\

20 19549 7

~

5 25 24452 7

\\

6 30 29345

/

7 35 34251

\\

/

\\T

~

40 39153

/

\\l 45 44043

/(1.020490897

\\/

.0500250487 a

50 48960

/

11 55 53860 J

12 60 58757 j

j

\\

l 13 65 63670 7

\\

l' 7Q 68601

/

\\

15 75 73526

/

\\

0 80 78563 f

\\

1 7, y

\\

,a 7

,\\

,-n

'\\

o n.

~

\\

/

\\

2'o

/

\\

23 i

1 19

• q.

VOLUMETAICS 102$ 4 AR80R VITAE.INGLEWOOD Cat 1FORNI A 90301 PM04E '213i 441 3747 PI-2 Gaure s.n.

971 l1ube Ranze: 0-100 esta s.n.

1517 Ro0m Temp:

700F Tube Temo:

50 C Reference Pressure: 110 m Torr 0

Calibrated by KAA/ c Date: 4-17-80 Calibration Std. NoY d 107]g

$3 Pressureosia( t rue ) Gauge Reading Pressare = Gauge Reading x M - C counts

?4 C

5 4979

/

2

\\

10 9958

/

\\

15 14241

/

\\

20 19922 f

~

\\

3 25 24903 7

\\

6 30 29854 f

\\

7 35 34785

/

3 40 39740 Y

l l 45 44668

\\f

~

f 1.012206121

-0.2165713449 30 49595

\\

1, 55 54511

//

\\

60 59426

/

-~

\\

13 65 64350 f

it 70 69273 f

\\

12-75 74195 f

)

16 80 79227

\\

'~7 r

\\

,a

/

10

\\

f

\\

~O 7-

\\

/

\\

29

/

23 5

o V

0

i 20 RTD Buffer Amp Calibration 0

0 Channel RTD 60 90 120 0

0 58.47 90.18 119.88 1

1 59.29 89.98 120.03 2

2 59.23 90.70 120.06 3

7 58.66 90.10 119.98 4

4 58.97 90.13 120.14 5

5 59.45 90.14 120.11 6

6 59.32 89.93 120.09 1

7 11 59.25 89.97 120.05 8

8 58.98 89.92 120.00 9

9 59.46 90.18 120.09 10 10 59.53 90.00 119.98 11 15 58.66 89.92 120.06 12 17 59.37 90.14 120.06 13 23 59.01 89.97 120.00 14 15' 59.72 90.01 120.03 15 26 58.68 90.12 120.02 16 16 59.72 90.00 120.01 17 27 59.04 90.03 120.15 18 28 58.76 90.90 120.07 19 19 59.51 90.18 120.04 20 20 58.94 90.73 120.05 21 3

58.91 90.08 120.46 22 12 59.28 90.06 120.79

i 21 RTD Buffer Amp Calibration con't 0

Channel RTD 60 900 120 23 13 59.46 90.28 111.91 24 22 59.74 91.05 120.14 25 4'

59.05 90.09 111.95 26 14 59.05 90.15 120.06 27 21 59.50 90.23 119 97 28 25 59.74 90.05 120.14 Calibrated by:

f-3-8C U

All channels were within acceptable tolerance bands.

1

l 22 RTD Buf',

Amp Calibration Channel Dewce'1, 84.54 73.640 67.180 30 1

83.89 73.11 67.82 31 2

84.12 73.29 67.64 32 3

84.13 73.11 67.65 33 5

84.38 73.21 67.38 34 5

83.54 73.68 68.16 35 10 84.19 72.97 67.40 85.56 75.83 64.40 36 4

86.13 75.33 64.90 37 7

84.86 75.13 65.14 38 8

85.49 75.00 65.20 39 9

85.52 75.22' 64.96 i

Calibrated by:

$ -/2.-70 All channels were within acceptable tolerance bands, i

23 RTD Tempersture-Resistance Values 600 900 1200 RTD

/L OF JL OF J1-CF 0

106.303 58.59 113.225 90.05 119.778 120.01 1

106.573 59.35

.212 89.92 119.794 120.09 2

106.645 59.28 113.451 90.64 119.882 120.10 3

106.487 58.93 113.247 90.05 119.923 120.48 4

106.657 58.97 113.435 9b.12 120.027 120.15 5

106.620 59.51 113.269 90.07 119.836 120.17, 6

106.529 59.38 113.154 89.87 119.749 120.15 7

106.473 58.66 113.269 90.11 119.809 119.97 8

106.488 59.02 113.177 89.88 119.756 120.04 9

106.665 59.44 113.316 90.20 119.878 120.06 10 106.633 59.54 113.242 89.97 119.825 120.00 11 106.620 59.32 113.275 89.91 119.856 120.12 12 106.561 59.33 113.233 90.01 119.972 120.84 13 106.554 59.49 113.231 90.25 119.731 119.94 14 106.519 59.07 113.256 90.14 119.822 120.08 15 106.458 58.68 113.219 89.90 119.822 120.08 16 106.628 59.75 113.202 89.97 119.788 120.03 17 106.567 59.36 113.237 90.15 119.790 120.05 19 106.607 5 9. "> 4 113.275 90.13 119.828 120.07 20 106.594 58.91 113.485 90.75 119.902 120.03 21 106.633 59.57 113.315 90.14 119.852 120.05 22 107.045 59.77 113.863 91.02 120.272 120.18 23 106.649 59.06 113.357 89.92 119.931 120.06 25 106.699 59.73 113.260 90.05 119.853 120.13 l

24 RTD Temperature-Resistance Values con't 600 900 1200 RTD JL OF Jk 0

Ib 0F F

26 106.465 58.73 113.287 90.08 119. 857 120.06 27 106.466 59.01 113.193 90.07 119.805 120.12 28 106.383 58.74 113.348 90.93 119.748 120.05 15' 106.780 59.78 113.360 89.95 119.965 120.10 4'

106.686 59.15 113.425 89.98 119.975 120.05 Calibrated by:

4-/~80 l

{

o m-

.m__.-_

25 1

o 72 F A-I J b.c

• 54.5_v.5=

7 Li 4' 's L

)

1

~

i

/

.2 7 7 7 f '_~

272.4s ~

2 l-1 f l.,_

3ecn)

• Q_Ibskkir_o s,e ;< m>

u %.-

L. >. 2 e m /

in sir.l *I,b-,-saI ar da ble.

..t

_ 2 u..

n -> n.'

2 11.19 ___

2 w.AR_m ms 7.3. il m /

. O 7. / 4 m /

W s.bs l

i 3-A.21g_9.-

a 7/. 33 _s 2 L. sr. 74 _

i 9 4.'n ms v 2 93 -

&7..ao w

~

l i

3"

.2 75. i.> o _u 2 70. yz _a

21. b. 7 3' u '

i i

s s. r 2 m s 73,/4 m s

' & 7. 2 2. L -

1

JL t

i i

t 6

'-I -

(c.

.?_2_M(.,;~

• 2 73. ic 3 _ -

2 4'9. 94_ t.__ Q.co.cd # 10 IYs't211EO ire $1N i

9f4-@

7 8. %b a /

& 7 23 mf

• Q Bcaed* Le seeq rud.a ki n,

r i

j

[

i 1

I jo 2??.iv _a_

b 7t* J_9 _.s

'2 /,7.4,*f_.i'A m M M /0 irt5b))ed ia eleY #IOI h,

6 7. 2c m v e,M rdes BY. 47 m/'

15.97:

e2 a_v T4 % nc u to ms k

8 9

f 3

8 a

I

's.f s/s 'F 75._T3 5

& 4. 40 5

?

i j

i O.

2 77. #f f

'272.2V_.s 24 7. 2 / t I

WS. _TE sn/

7%E' Oms 44 rn /

7.

o, s. 7s_

i?2. e z. -

d sh.12.

~

i e

er.E7w 7s. 9.r.~

6_.n3Zw l

A a.

4 S

9 C-&c-a1.'

_.296ta/ tr2n 65-3.2 m 5' b ~ '

? *.?

9-

) 7 7 h.5~ u

.2 7,;7..h2. n t&E7An 72oata 2 I m Q],

RC-4.2, snv 7 1 3 5.-n L _

4 '/. 3cs.e_1.ask11e o

.

• c1 a h..- a ae

nua2, n -wa

- G A.L'd 3^.> w.'.

N 2.cC.d.t. S cs's {c A flc,._9c, __a:.2; l - 3 l $ 0 & W -_? *.

_Ela.he.-S6octt

. s-k ue.

pn

%i

@ n,$L._,

I

~

so

4 nn 26 g

~~ }~'[

O

~

i umanos i GRCNVTH WITH A Pt ;;;\\ POSE thmugh scr1dwice ex:ettence in instrumentation

.x=nenwealth Edisen Co.

Cate: 11 April 1979 Dresden Nuclear Pcwer Station

Subject:

CERTIFICATICN C/O Storercra RR# 1 Raf: 7903A9328R1 (2R7706A9209R2)

Morris, IL 60450 e

FLOWMETER CALIBRATICN ACCURACY CERTIFICATE A.

METER ICENTIFICATICN:

(1)

Custcmer Purchase Order Number 501163 REL CRI8 (2)

F&P Serial Number 7903A9328R1 (2R7706A9209R2)

(3)

Model Number lo A3555 B.

CALIBRATICN SPECIFICATIONS:

(1)

Date:

11 Aeril 1979 (2)

Flow Range 11.1 To

.9

. Unics sc?H (3)

Metering Fluic Air O

(a)

Viscosity 0.0181 cps (b)

Specific Gravity 1.0 60/60 F. Density o. coir cms /cc.

(c)

Temperature 14.7 psia (d)

Pressure 700 p C.

ACCURACY: 1 1g of war.

flow.

D.

CALIBRATION FACILITIES:

1)

The equipment and asscciated procedures used in the calibration of said meter are in accordance with Mil-C-45662A.

(a)

Through establishment of valucs of physical constants fer primary standards using tools of NBS accuracy pedigree.

(b)

Through direct, dynamic ccmparison of Fischer & Porter and NBS flow facilities using Fischer & Porter Tu.cbine Flowmeters as transfer standards.

NBS Test No. 213.31/193098.

(c)

Through inter-laboratory comparison of compatible Fischer

& Porter flow facilities.

Very truly yours,

& hyth.-G4L g

Albert N. Hernandez 4

w Manager, Fluids Quality Dbntrol AWH/=dt sis Hte & scorte CCM8&NY W AmusNsttR sa gSA 19974 (2151 $ 74+eCCC 6 CASLE seswpCR7 e ftttx 345-215 W'

4 27 Calibratien Repcrt Co==cenealth Edison Co.

E1cetronics Inr.,trument Laboratcry System Operational Analysis Department (A

104213 D 1LO @ lTER station DRESDEh!

Instrument:

/.fg. :

FISCWER fP PORTER S/N gg770C.A Group TECW STAFF 9209 RZ Iodc16 M 33c;5-S Propy DTS-4i Cal. Date 4.-.7c)

Kext Calibration 4.

8 l Last Calibration

4. -78 Chc.rse # _5/ 0/g Calibration Rcrerence 104 OOST '

By MM V

Repairs:

MOME I

Standards

,S/:I MA i

e

,S/N NA

/

,S/N NA i

,S/N MA

.As Roccived Calibre. tion As Lef t Calibration O.U E.

II:3_?.r: i::T T5J.:,

gC,. a.C_"i.u :. :T i

,.um.c.

Sr.:exas m.. 2 i exac.

s,.y.uc

/

/

/

4ME-ABOVE-lNSTf3UME41T

/

WAS_C AUBRATED AND FQLiN.

IO_BEdllIRIN n/

MANUF CIURERLIOLER --.

0 8

4

.A.NCE#. *....m_BLE m. m 4#

I 3

7 NAT#JigAL BUREAU-OF j 4 STANDAPWS I

I

~1EE ETATEFOR DETAHS~-

~/

l 3

I

/

_[

hl i.

'.U UO.

Of fOI.'Id

! ' ~ /..b Q/

9*

• 1*

>t t *. s

28 VOLUMETFICS 1

CEFTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION Attention: COMMONWCALTH EDISON CO.

Date:

1/3/80 Test

References:

Purchase Order No.

730266 Volumetrics Job No.

5958 Serial Number 1904 Government Contract No. ---

Gentlemen:

This is to certify that the enclosed Test Data Sheets contain correct and true data obtained in the performance of the test program as set forth in your Purchase Order.

Instrumentation used in obtaining this data has been calibrated using standards which are traceable to the National Bureau of Standards Calibration Procedure:

( MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION)

Reference Standards Used:

EQUIPMENT NO.

, CALIBRATION DATE 00E DATE REF. 5TD No.3902/54 12/13/79 6/13/80

Enclosures:

Data Sheets (

1 Pages)

Quali' t ol Approval:

/

i R.

JOHfSON t

VFORM-10024 w

L

_ ' i.

29

/^g VOLUMETAICS j

1025 W. AR80R VITAE. lNGLEWOOD. CALIFORNIA 90301 PH ON E.12131 M13747 Gaure s. n.10 61 l Tube Ranze: o_!oopsTA s. n.l c o a Roem Temp: 73 r Tube Teme: So,7 c Reference Pressure: 0.1 MTnop 0

0 Calibrated by: T.F.

Date: 1/3/go Call'aration Std. No. 390215a Pressure (true)

Gauge Reading Pressure = Gauge Reading x M + C M

C 0.000 0.000

/

2

\\ 0.99146 0.000 4.9920 5.035

/

X 0.99403

-0.013 9.9840 10.057 s

7 g 0.99284

--0.001 14.9760 15.085

/

0.99341

-0.010 5

\\

19.9679 20.110

/

0.99516

-0.045

\\

6 24.9596 25.126

/ 0.99520

-0.046 7

29.9515 30.142

/ 1.00078

-0.214 3

34.9434 35.130 0.99243 0.079 g

39.9353 40.160 1.00100

-0.265

,n 44.9273 45.147

\\

~~

/

1.00745

-0.556 49.9192 50.102

\\

^^

/ 1.00316

-0.341

,2 54.8999 55.067

\\

/ 1.00320

-0.343 59.8908 60.042

\\

3

~

/ 1.00459

-0.427 14 64.8816 65.010

\\

/

1.00322

-0.337 15 69.8726 69.985

\\

/

16 74.8635 74.948

\\ 1.00562

-0.506

/g 1.00301

-0.310 17 79.8545 79.924 7g 1.00342

-0.343 la 84.8455 84.898 f

l'.00181

-0.206

\\

19 89.8365 89.880 1.00423

-0.423 20 94.8275 94.850

\\

1.00261

-0.270 99.8185 99.828

\\

7 l

\\

/

\\

23

/

30 VOLUMETAICS CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION Attention:

COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.

Date:

1/25/80 Test

Title:

DEWPOINT

References:

Purchase Order No.

919393 Volumetrics Job No.

5959 Serial Number 101 Government Contract No.

Gentlemen:

This is to certify that the enclosed Test Data Sheets contain correct and true data obtained in the performance of the test program as set forth in your Purchase Order.

Instrumentation used in obtaining this data has been calibrated using standards which are traceable to the National Bureau of Standards Calibration Procedure:

Reference Standards Used:

EQUIPMENT NO.

CALIBRATION DATE DUE DATE VMC 203 10/25/79 4/25/80 VMC 301 3/27/79 3/27/81

Enclosures:

Data Sheets (

2 Pages)

Quality Control Approval:

(

~

L. B..0sd,

C.B. DREIKE i

VFORM-10024

L..--a_

.. _. -. ~ ~. _ _

GTV0LllMETRICS

>1 1025 wE ST AR 804 VIT A E lNCL EWCQD, C ALIFORNI A 90301 PHON E: (212) 641 3747 REPORT NUMBER:

5959 REQUESTER:

COMM0h WEALTH EDISON CD. DATE:

1/25/80 MODEL:

07731 SERI AL NUMBER:

101

REFERENCE:

919393 MEDIA:

e CERTIFIED ACCURACY:

.01 OHM TEMPERATURE:

72 F OHM METER CALIBRATION 6

STANDARD AS FOUND AS LEFT l

0.00 l

0.000 l

0.000 l

l f49.993 lf 49.993 l

50.00 l100.00 l

99.995 99.995 l

f f110.00 l110.001 l110.001 l

l

!120.00 l120.004 ll120.004 l

l130.00

,!130.005 l

130.005

- l140.00 l140.005 140.005 l

f I

l l

l 1

l l

I l

l l

l NOTE:

All standards used in this test report are traceable to the United States Bureau 'of Standards, Washington. D.C.

S ANDARD USED IS VMC-203 N CISION COMMENTS:

DECADE RESISTOR.

I l

l r

TECHNICIAN:

m-QUALITY CONTROL: C' 8 b M I. T E R CIJ SO N i.c.

U n c. A A r.

l C# VOLUME 1NCS 32 iors *Est aRao= v TAE INGL EwCOD. C ALIFORNI A 90331 PHONE: (213) 641 3747 REPORT NUMBER: 5959 REQUESTER:

COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. DATE:

1/25/80 MODEL:

07731 SERIAL NUMBER:

101

REFERENCE:

919393 MEDIA:

AIR CERTIFIED ACCURACY:

.60 F TEMPER ATUR E:

72 F DEWo0 INT CALIBRATION 5/N 101 1

5/N 101 VMC-301 DEWPOINT RESISTANCE DEWPOINT CALIBRATOR VALUES CALIBRATOR l

l l

51.90 F 100.00 f

32.00 52.2 F f

75.1 F l

74.82 F l

119.59 f

122.00 136.33 l

199.99 i

i l

l l

ll I

l lS/N101RTD Calibrator f

f 106.15 l

59.96 112.70 90.09 119.22 119.97 L

I I

NOTE:

All stancards used in this test report are traceable to the United States Bureau of Standards.

Washingten, D.C.

COMMENTS:

CALIBRATION WAS PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED IN IN THE RTD AND DEWCELL CALIBRATOR MANUAL.

IN ADDITION THE ABOVE POINTS WERE VERIFIED AGAINST VNC-301 DEWPOINT STANDARD.

RESISTANCE STANDARD USED IS VMC-203

ECHNICI AN:

Ah-~

QUALITY CONTROL: C8bJI T.

FERCUSON C.B.

OREIKE

~

l 1

ii pq. i..

sQ 33 i

f~w**' * !

i >

BURNS ENGINEER.ING INC.

~

.o, g

3,,

90209 Bren Rond faar Monnetonks, Manwsota $$342

$:.eot e s

iSerburbon Monneaooles)

'*W Tennohone933-4400 Arre Coor 612 r

trawing & instructional Literature Transmittal Tor

.umetrics Reference 2.is riest nroor Vitae Customer:

Volumetrics Inclewood. CA 40?01 Customer P.o. #

80975-3000 Customer P.O./I.D.

Job No: 9010 Attn Bill Metcalf

~

BURNS ENGINEERING, INC. Job Nu=6er 25818 Centlemen:

Enclosed please find documents requested per the above reference as identified belcw.

Drawings:

Copies and/or (ene) reproducible of each drawing nu=ber Instructional Literature:

Copies of Form =077:32 " Instruction.".anual it740" for Resistance O.ar: centers.

Copies of Form 4077230 " Installation & Cperating Instractions #772" for Thermoccuples.

Copies of Fc:s #077214 "Instraction Manual Model C-200" Resistance ~a M1111 volt Converter.

1 Copies of Fom 70878'190 - Calibration Recort Copies of 5.=,are Parts List:

Copies and/or (one) reproducible of the priced (not priced) Spare Parts List for model numbers or part numbers:

Abcve Material St'bmitted By:

Judy Mill ar-Date~

February 12, 1980

~ m Teles: 29 3984

7'. B U R N S ENGIN EAR,lMd INC.

s.

34 so.,,, a.or,s o. v,..e,w, s.<3os

• f,,'[

1. . &)T-.

I uoroua,an n a us retro one ns tooo. sae, coce et2

? Q r

'~ ~wr

(

CALIBRATION REPORT l

The Resistance Tenperature Device (RTD) described below has been calibrated by Burns Engineering, Inc. and the results are tabulated below.

In addition, a R vs T table has been generated using the procedure outlined in NBS Monograph IPTS.68. These data are also reproduced below.

CALIBRATICN DATA CALCULATED TABLE

~ ~ ~ ~

"TEftPF RESIS TE!!PF l

' 33,.300 100.000 0?2

'RESIS 100.220 033 100.iiG D34 100.000 100.ooO 035 100.880 0 36 TE:1rr igt, ;gg 977

i q

{ I,11, h;, t -:,

h.:

100,000 e ii1 SESIb

~

3 '.~4 a

'.' t 40 1

• O 4

101.759 101,979 041

..*i.....s :.

i ;S

..;..0; T.

1. 2.,:iOO

. 2. e ' :

.'2?

._.I -:.

102.857 045 33.99s 103.076 046 103.296 047 103.515 048 103.~35 04.9 CALIBRATI0t CATE February _ 6, 1980 CUSTOMER Volumetrics PURCHASE 'RCER 80975-3000 MODEL NUU3ER WPP0G1-5b.4A SERIAL rFSER 76448 8

mo o

9

..8.-

ist

,DD O

Jk y

v

. 954 "'-GS

'" '. ~ 1'17. 04 7 '.fj

-1 10 f

.230.006 1-

.j d/F -

A.173

' 051 -

117.064 111 112j 1 3 0. '. 2 0

.'f;

,N.

93 052 117.481 130.435

04.612 053 11?.698 113i 130. 50 134. A 31 054 117.915 114 130.965 j/

105.050 055 118.132 115 131.080 105.269

• 056 118.349 116 13-1,294 105./89 057 118,566 117 131.509 105.TOS 058 118.782 118 131,723 1.

105,927 059 118.999 119 131,938 106.146 0 60==-

119.216 1 2 0-= =-

132.153 106.::65 061 119.433 121 132.367 106.583 062' 119.649 122 132.581 106.802 063 119.866 123 132.796 107.021 064 120.082 124 '

133.010 107.240 065 120.299 125 133,225 107.459 066 120.515 126 133,439 1 U-r,. 6 p 7 L.o-.,

1.)0.

...mo e.

1

?.

13a o.. o,e...o 3

107.896 068 120.948 128 133.867 108.115 069 121.165 129!

134.082 108.333 0701 121.381 130' 134.296 108.552 071 121.598 131 !

134.510 108,770

-072 121.814 132 134.724 108.989 073 122.030 133 134,938 109.207 074 122,246 134 13".152 i v. 9. 4 2 6 10 075 122.462 135 115. 366

..e,..

e,..,e 1.., o.,.-..d o

cc.

13.. :.:::u 1,.,.,

p.,

.o.<

t...:..; g

.q..

,... e...:,

--.s, 110.081 078 123.111 138 136.00G 1. pJ. q.,g.g

., *.g

. c q.s. O..,

.t c...a i

1.

.s-.

. q,

..... L.,. q 1 *-

.. u. e.. -=

,.U

9. :...s..c.,...2

..g, 12

. i.-

- --=

., t.t.

JJ

-s v 6 e.a 1.

...;. 0. ;. t

-

."i s.. r. ;

. ;.:. o

1..,

4. g

. 4.

9. e ;.

7. ;.

1;.

a..

1A 5-se..

... s..

r o-1

• .1,a1 1,1..,.:.

so i * -s.-

..,.u..

1 111.390 084 124.406 144 137,290 ill.608 085 124.622 145 137.504 111.826 086 124.838 146 137 '17 112.044 087 125.054

47 137.931 i12.262 058 125.269 148 t3?..44 I 15',. n e," 4 ::: e 22 t 1 c.

b;,o.shb=

.$ 751 15b i N...' h:. e.:.

5

[

.e.

..:....J v.a 1 1. e..a. g -.e

.v.

10 :..

v

, 1.

1 o c.

,s.29

, o. t go

. e c.

.e is-113.351 093 126,347 153 139.211 11?.569 094 126.563 154 139..:25 1,...,

• .,e-U.; s

,.) e.. r '<

.i ~ q..

.\\ e,-

1 114.439 098 127.424 158 114..57 099-12'.640 159 114.o74 100 127.855 160 115.U91 101 128.070 161 115,309 102 128.285 162 115.526 103 128.501 163

,.=.4,4 1.,,,,. e.

. e..

. i.

..~

... i i 4 115.961 105 129.931 165 lii.179 106 129.146 166 116.395 107 129.361 167 116.613 108 129.576 168 116.330 109 129.-'91 169 i

3 %nas D'3~ l A j

D A.

s