ML19338G059

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Special Rept 80-2:on 800923,discovered That Fire Protection, Deluge & Sprinkler Sys Test Was Not Completed in Required Surveillance Interval.Caused by Misinterpretation.Employee Appointed to Track & Schedule Required Surveillances
ML19338G059
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1980
From: Hancock J
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
CS-80-250, RO-80-2, NUDOCS 8010280397
Download: ML19338G059 (2)


Text

I O

Florida Power C O R PO't A f sO N October 16, 1980 3-0-3-a-1 CS-80-250 Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Docket No. 50 302 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensee No. DPR-72 Office of Inspection & Enforcement Special Repo.rt 80-2 101 Marietta Street Suite 3100 Crystal Rivec Unit #3 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Discovery Date:

25 September 1980

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Enclosed please find Special Report 80-2 which is submitted in ac-cordance with Technical Specification 6.9.2.

Should there be any questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION f

N MJ J. A. Hancock Nuclear Plant Manager Assistant Vice President Nuclear Operations VAll:nca Attachment 8010280397 5

General Oflice 32o1 in.ny founn sieeet soutn. P O Box 14042, St Peter!curg Fiorda 33733 813--866 5151

t h

i SPECIAL REPORT f

Report No.:

80,

Facility:

Crystal River Unit #3 Report Date:

16 October 1980 Discovery Date:

23 September 1980 Identification of Failure to verify the Fire Suppression Water System Occurrence:

operable (Technical Specification 3.7.11.1) and failure to verify the Deluge and Sprinkler Systems operable (Technical Specification 3.7.11.2).

t Conditions Prior to Mode 1 power operation (99%)

Occurrence:

Description of Occurrence:

During routine procedure. review, it was discovered that SP-411, Fire Protection, Deluge, and Sprinkler Systems Test, was not completed in the required surveillance interval.

Further investigation revealed l

that the previous completed surveillance was performed on 20 March 1978 and the next surveillance was due by 20 September 1979.

A scheduling error resulted in surveillance being initiated on 18 March 1980 and com-1 pleted on 18 September 1980, twelve months beyond the required frequency.

Designati,n of The cause of this event is attributed to a scheduling Apparent Cause:

error based on a misinterpretation of partial comple-J tion of surveillance requirements completed on 29 January 1979.

Analysis of Occutrence:

There was no effect upon the general public health or safety.

1 Corrective Action:

The position of a Surveillance Programs Clerk has been instituted to better track and schedule required surveillances. The next surveillance is scheduled for completion by 18 September 1981.

Failure Data:

This is the first event of this type reported under i

these Specifications.

. -