ML19338F262
| ML19338F262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone, Monticello, Dresden, Peach Bottom, Nine Mile Point, Indian Point, Fermi, Oyster Creek, Haddam Neck, Ginna, San Onofre, Yankee Rowe, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Midland  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1973 |
| From: | Stello V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Skovholt D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| TASK-17, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8010140659 | |
| Download: ML19338F262 (2) | |
Text
F
=
,.; :+-
(
JUL 3 0 UU No D. J. Skovholt, Assistant Director for OR's, L QA FOR OPERATIONS In December 1972, letters were sent to selected licensees, listing deficiencies in their Quality Assurance Program as it applies to operation, maintenance, repair, refueling, and modification. The licensees were asked to reassess their program in light of the deficiencies noted, and Safety Guide No. 33, and resubmit a descrip-tion responsive to the guide.
Responses have been received from the licensees for the following facilities:
Dresden Oyster Creek Yankee Ginna Humboldt Bay Lacrosse Big Rock point San Onofre Connecticut Yankee Monticello Indian Point Tne facilities listed in my meiaorandum to you dated November 16, 1972, which are not included above are given below with the reason for their omission:
Quad Cities - Not on original list of March 1971, but included by the Project Manager in conmunications with the licensee regarding the Dresden Station.
Fermi - No further action necessary due to anticipated shutdown of facility, per Project Manager en 5/18/72.
Feach Bottom 1 - No furtner action necessary due to anticipated shutdown of facility, per the ORB Technical Coordinator on 12/5/72.
Nine Mile Point - The Quality Assurance Branch accepted the lead review responsibility for this facility in December 1972.
s l
P908GRIGINAl.
NN}&
f..
omct >
(
SURhAMr >
o ATE >
Form AEC-51e t Rev. 9 5 4. 0 0
- v. s. covrantnT ramTmo orritz : teto o. sos.sa O^
p
j.
t 2
Tj-T.==
~
l...G >
~~~
=
.. =:f
- .:....:. JUL 3 01973 D. J. Sko tholt i!=
Two facilities were added to the review by the ORB Technical Coordinator and their names and status are as follows:
........ f Millstone - The Quality Assurance branch accepted the lead review
~ ~ ~ - -
responsibility for this facility in December 1972.
Monticello - Operational Safety Branch will complete this review.
1 1 of the QA for Operations programs of the above facilities Our review:
Except for the two facilities named have been substantially completed.
below, the QA review responsibility for the facilities listed has nota been forwarded to the Quality Assurance Branch for final review to (Some duplication of effort has existed between assure consistency.
our branch and the Quality Assurance Branch, especially where a utility
~~
has submitted an application for a license to operate another reactor, and has addressed the QA Program for Operations in Section 17.2 of the
- =::.
FSAR.)
p
~
Lacrosse Two facilities will remain with the Operational Safety Branch:
M The response from Dairyland Power Cooperative concerning the Lacrosse facility is acceptable. A memo will be sent to you shortly.
E and Monticello.
E_
Additional informatian has been requested regarding Monticello as stated i
in our memorandum to you dated July 3,1973.
Originni Signed liy
~
yictor Steno
~..
Victor Stello, Jr., Assistant Director
't for Reactor Safety Directorate of Licensing F :
r-CC:
J. H. Hendrie, L:TR P
S. H. Hanauer, DRTA W. Mcdonald, L:0PS T. J. Carter, ORB R. H. Vollmer, QAB D. L. Ziemann ORB-2 R. J. Schemel, ORB-1 R. W. Houston, L:05B C. R. VanNiel, OSB
- ':~:.".
POOR OR!cpat L:0SB p-L:AyRS
.l.:0S omer.
o
_ _ VS lo
_C,R, el:lkd R,WH sun m E>
j /J473, 7/27/73,,__,,7/7/73 7
our>
- t. s. covrasvENT racrTrac orrier i teto o. 4os.3.s Form AEC-318 (Rev.9-53; AECM 0240 w