ML19332E599

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-206/89-29,50-361/89-29 & 50-362/89-29 on 891016-1105.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Addl Mgt Attention Required to Ensure That Plant Commitment Registry Sys Functions to Ensure Timely Resolution of NRC Concerns
ML19332E599
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/1989
From: Kirsch D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Ray H
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML19332E600 List:
References
NUDOCS 8912070428
Download: ML19332E599 (2)


See also: IR 05000206/1989029

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:W .. . , ' L V-' - ' ' 4 - h ' ' liDV 2 21999 ~- ' , ! I ' Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-311. i i ' Southern' California Edison Company ! Pt 0. Box 800 - l > 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue ~ a .Rosemead,. California 91770 t " + Attention: Mr'. H. B. Ray, Vice President ! , Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing Department . Gentlemen:- bg ' }- SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION OF SAN ONOFRE UNITS 1,^ 2, AND_3 l ! This refers to the routine unannounced inspection conducted by Mr. C. Clark

of this office on October 16-November 5,1989; of activities authorized by NRC

a ' License Nos. DPR-13,;NPF-10, and NPF-15, and to the discussion of our findings - held by Mr; Clark with members of, your staff. on October 20, 1989. -{ Areas examined ~during this insaection are described in the enclosed inspection l reportJ-Within these areas, tie inspection consisted of selective ! '- examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with ! , . . personnel,'and observations by the inspector. , , ., 'While no violations or deviations were identified during the inspection, we 'have concluded that additional management attention is required to ensure that 's , the-San Onofre Commitment Register system (SOCR) efficiently functions to

-

. ensure timely resolution of NRC concerns. In several instances, the inspector i 4 - , r C' noted that there has been a lack of attention to detail and timeliness on the . < part of: licensee personnel responsible for following up on NRC identified a concerns and there has been inadequate ~ priority and' resources assigned to s , L

resolve .NRC identified concerns.

The licensee has identified similar findings ' E t in audit report SCES-040-89,. issued October 4, 1989. Specific concerns in - this regard, are identified.in(the enclosed report. - e In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy'of this letter and the enclosure

e, will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.- l , Should you have any q'estions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to u < , discuss them with you. > , Sincerely, ! ()O (h1af hfhpL ~ D. F. Kirsch, Chief ! Reactor Safety Branch " fgo/ Enclosures: 1 - Inspection Report Nos. 50-206/89-29, 50-361/89-29, 50-362/89-29 r - g ( > }$[$$k $!'k' x w . . . - .

, _.. , . 'I. -- I , - . < , - GV 2 21999 l '- r , . , ~2- \\ . . , l ' . ! < < , ' .i cc"w/ enclosure- ^ ' 'D. J. 'Fogarty, Executive Vice President, Nuclear Engineering l& Operations ! R. H. Bridenbecker Vice President and Site Manager

H. E.' Morgen Station _ Manager i State ~ofCalIfornia ! bec w/enclosurei i ' Docket File' '

ProjectInspector

Resident Inspector G.. Cook. i B. Faulkenberry J. Martin ' , R.- Nease, NRR' f N.~ Western ~ . bec w/o' enclosure: ' M. Smith ! s '! J. Zo111 coffer- r . REGION Vac c C - " CClark/ oan- CRamsey FRHuey/89 8/"/89 j DF rsch

A/e/8 er //4/89 H /n c<v , t ' ST COPY , .R EST COPY 51 COPT , EST COPY ' ? YES / NO: g. / NO ES / - NO - ES '/ NO ~ v v 1

TO PDR J YE / NO ] ! , E & [ l L , t j, ,

l , }}