ML19332D185

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Environ Qualification Insp Repts 50-445/89-60 & 50-446/89-60 on 890807-11 & Notice of Violation.Open Item Identified Re Incorporation of Vendor Maint Requirements & Recommendations Into Plant Maint Requirements
ML19332D185
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/1989
From: Charemagne Grimes
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: William Cahill
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML19332D186 List:
References
NUDOCS 8911300122
Download: ML19332D185 (4)


See also: IR 05000445/1989060

Text

y

-

,,

~

. - - 41

-

O

J

.

, . , .

'n%W

tt

-

  • '

g h '"= f Q ..

ro .

UNITED STATES '

77g!

-

( g:

. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • o :. rr -

qg

WASWNGTON, D. C. 20555

  • g

g-

November 22, 1989

- ....

,

6

In Reply Refer To:

Docket Nos. - 50-445/446

q

Texas Utilities Electric Company

. ATTN: Mr. W. A Cahill, Jr.

Executive Vice President, Nuclear-

400 North Olive, Lock Box 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

,

Gentlemen::

g

SUBJECT:

ENVIRONMENT =QUALIFICATIONINSPECTION(50-445,446/89-60)

Enclosed is'the report of the team inspection conducted by Mr. G. T. Hubbard

-

-

and other NRC representatives on August 7-11', 1989, at_ the Comanche Peak Steam

Electric Station (CPSES), Units 1 and 2, of activities authorized by NRC

m

E

Construction Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127. The inspection findings were

1

discussed with you and members 'of your staff on August 11, 1989.

i

m

In addition to the~ August team inspection, Mr. Hubbard and another NRC

,

representative visited the CPSES site on October 19,.1989 to clarify some

,

'

concerns _ identified by the NRC during the inspection pertaining to the

L_

qualification of BIW electrical cable. Also on October 25, 1989, Mr/ C. Paulk

'(member of the inspection team) visited the site to review your corrective

'

1 actions for Okonite tape electrical wiring splices. Details of these visits are

[

_ included in the enclosed inspection report.

_

!

j

_The inspection reviewed your implementation of a program for establishing and

L

maintaining the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical

equipment -located in mild and harsh-(10 CFR 50.49) environments and safety-

L

related mechanica1' equipment located in harsh environments. The inspection

L

also included a review of the your implementation of the environmental portions

L

, of your. Equipment Qualification Corrective . Action' Program. Within these areas,

the inspection consisted of examinations of selected procedures and records,

-

interviews-with personnel, and observations by the inspectors.

E

>

-

The inspection determined that CPSES has implemented a program to meet the

l

environmental qualification-requirements of NRC requirements and the CPSES

-

Final Safety Analysis'Re) ort (FSAR), thru Amendment 76, except for certain

findings' identified in tle-enclosed inspection report. One inspection finding

indicates' that certain of your activities appear to violate NRC requirements.

'

-

The violation' involved failure to comply with established procedures during

j

the' installation of Okonite tape on electrical wiring splices. The violation

l-

-and' references to pertinent requirements, and elements to be included in your

+

i

fresponse are described in the enclosed Notice of Violation (NOV).

Another finding, identified as an Open Item, pertained to the incorporation of

4

l

' vendor maintenance requirements and recommendations into CPSES maintenance

requirements necessary to maintain the qualified status of installed qualified

u

l

equipment throughout the equipments plant life.

CPSES committed to the

L

performance of certain actions (see enclosed inspection report) to alleviate

I

8911300122 891122

/k

l

PDR

ADOCK 05000445

l

Q

PDC

,T g

,

g

,

W ^ .}

.

-

.. y

+

. s:

,

Mr. William J. Cahill',~Jr.

2-

-

the concerns of-th's inspection' team.

You are requested to review the

commitments described in the enclosed inspection report and notify the NRC of

your concurrence with the described actions.

~

The inspec' tion also identified two instances where'the CPSES FSAR needs to

be updated prior to fuel load.

In one case, Table 4-1, " Class IE Equipment

Located in a'.Potentially Harsh Environment," of Appendix 3A to Section 3 of

the FSAR must be revised to reflect the latest Equipment Qualification Master

,

List.

In the other case, the definition of " exact replacement" of Appendix 3A

to Section 3 needs to be revised to be consistent with current CPSES procure-

ment practices and procedures and industry standards.

. Additionally, the inspection report identifies a number of specific items

which must be certified to the.NRC as being complete prior to fuel load.

~

The certification for-those items may be included in your certification

that the CPSES Equipment Qualification Program is complete.

Program

o

certification is a' requirement of SSER 19.

l

.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

i

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placea

in the NRC.Public Document Room.

.

--The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice is not

subject to the' clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget

as required by.the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-5111.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

,

'

to discuss- them with you.

,

.

(

is pher I.

imes, Director

Com c e Peak Pro act Division

Offic of. Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

Appendix A: Notice of Violation

'!

Appendix B: Inspection Report

50-445/89-60;.50-446/89-60

j

cc w/ enclosures: See next page

,

i

-.-

-

e

-

y.

e

--a

.g

T',

c..j,

November 22, 1989

-

.

e-

Mr. William J. Cahill, Jr.

-2-

the concerns of the inspection team. Yott ere requested to review the

commitments described in the enclosed inspection report and notify the NRC of

your concurrence with the described actions.

The inspection also identified two instances where-the CPSES FSAR needs to

'

be updated prior to fuel load.

In one case, Table 4-1, " Class 1E Equipment

Located in a Potentially Harsh Environment," of Appendix 3A to Section 3 of

the-FSAR must be revised to reflect the latest Equipment Qualification Master

LList.

In the other case, the definition of " exact re)lacement" of Appendix 3A

to Section 3 needs to be revised to be consistent wit 1 currer.t CPSES procure-

ment practices and procedures and industry standards.

Additionally, the inspection report identifies a number of specific items

j

which must be certified to the NRC as being complete prior to fuel load.

I

The certification for those items may be included in your certification

!

that-the CPSES Equipment Qualification Program is complete.

Program

certification is a requirement of SSER 19.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

,

The response directetf by this letter and the accompanying Notice is not

j

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget

as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-5111.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

to discuss them with-you.

,

(original signed by JELyons for)

i

Christopher I. Grimes, Director

Comanche Peak Project Division

'

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

cc: See next page

gDISTRIBUTION,9

l

RIV Docket File

JPartlow

QDocket< File

NRC'PDR"

L. Shea, ARM /LFMB*

EJordan

~

LPDR

DCrutchfield

BGrimes

CPPDReading(HQ)

TQuay

BHayes

Site Reading *

CIGrimes

ADSP Reading

JHWilson

'

RWarnic k*

JLyons

JWiebe - OPS *

MMalloy

HLivermore - CONST*

MFields

MIS System, RIV*

CVanDenburgh

RSTS Operator, RIV*

JMoore, 0GC

RPB, RIV

JGilliland, RIV

  • w/766

[k

AD:

llRR AD:C
NRR D:C
NRR

R

lier

RMoiN

JLy

s

OHWirson

(CIG 'm s

ard

CPau k

PWag/'/89 11///'/8911/t989

11/2@89

11/ P/89

11//'/89

11// /89

11//

,

.

.

--

@

>

. . .

7, t.: ,,A

..

.

.. ...

.-

.;

.3j'

.

Mr. W. J.' Cahill', Jr.

-3-

cC:

Mr. Robert-F. Warnick-

Jack R. Newman,.Esq.

Assistant Director

Newman & Holtzinger

,

.for Inspection Programs

1615 L Street, NW

,

Comanche Peak Project. Division

Suite 1000

U. S.. Nuclear Regulatory Comission

Washington, D.C.

20036

-

P. 0. Box 1029

'

Granbury, -Texas 76048

Chief,-Texas Bureau of Radiation Control

Texas Department of Health

1

Regional Administrator, Region IV

1100 West 49th Street

U. S. Nuclear. Regulatory Comission

Austin, Texas 78756

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

Arlington, Texas 76011

Honorable George Crump

-

County Judge

Ms. Billie Pirner Garde, Esq.

Glen Rose, Texas 76043

' Robinson, Robinson, et al.

103 East College Avenue

Appleton, Wisconsin 54911

Mrs.-Juanita Ellis, President.

Citizens Association for Sound Energy

1426 South Polk

Dallas,. Texas 75224

,

,

E. F. Ottney

P. O. Box 1777

Glen Rose,. Texas 76043

l

Mr. Roger D. Walker.

-

D

Manager, Nuclear Licensing

l

Texas Utilities Electric Company

400 North Olive Street, L. B. 81

E

p

Dallas, Texas 75201

1,

Texas Utilities ~ Electric Company

c/o Bethesda Licensing

3 Metro Center, Suite 610

Bethesda, . Maryland 20814

l

William A. Burchette.'Esq.

Counsel for Tex-La Electric

l-

. Cooperative of Texas

l.

Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell

l

1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW

. Washington, D.C. 20007

GDS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Suite 720

1850 Parkway Place

Marietta, Georgia 30067-8237

.

L.

~ ::: .:

~ ~

--.

.-. . - .

.. .

.

. . . .

.