ML19332C443
| ML19332C443 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/01/1989 |
| From: | Shelton B NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| To: | Meyer D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332C415 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-54FR38863, RULE-PR-11, RULE-PR-25, RULE-PR-95 AD28-1-5, NUDOCS 8911280132 | |
| Download: ML19332C443 (2) | |
Text
y
- n...
Magr/
l, c
' /,,, ' o,,
UNITED STATES
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
-g' t
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 -
'%.. * #,[
o, AUG 1 liW e
MEMORANDUM FOR: David L. Meyer, Chief Regulatory Publications Branch-Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services Office of Administration FROM:
Brenda Jo. Shelton, Chief Records and Reports Management Branch Division of Infortnation Support Services Office of Information Resources Management i
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR COMMENT / CONCURRENCE ON THE PROPOSED RULE,'10 CfF.
11, 25, AND 95 CREDIT CHECKS - EXPANDED PERSONNEL SECURITY INVESTIGATIVE COVERAGE In response to your subject memorandum, the Records and Reports Management Branch (RRMB) provides the following:
X The Paperwork Reduction Act statement is correct for the subject rule.
However, approval. number 3150-0047 mustbeadded(seeEnclosure).
The Paperwork Reduction Act statement should be changed to statement number of the " Revised Paperwork Reduction Act Statements for Specific Situations."
Do not release the Federal Register Notice for publication until further notice.
r X
The Federal Register Notice can be released for publication.
t Enclosed is a copy of the RRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our concerns with the subject rule.
A copy of the RRMB memorandum to the program office addressing our concerns with the subject rule will be forwarded at a later date.
X An RRMB memorandum to the program office is not required.
AA enda e
, Chief Records and Reports Management Branch Division of Information Support Services Office of Information Resources Management
Enclosure:
As stated
/
cc:
B. Bradshaw, SEC/ADM D. Kidd, SEC/ADM 8911280132 891120
~
PDR-PR 11 54FR3BBb3_
Eo; GC' pg
- Environmental In; pact: Categorical Exclusion The NRC has. determined ~that this proposed regulation is the type of action described as a-categorical exclusion in 10 CFR 51.22 (c) (1).
Therefore, neither an' environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment has been prepared for this proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement-This proposed rule does not contain a new or amended information collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.) Existing requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval numbers 3150-0046 and 3150-0062.
4
> 3/f0 oo Y'7, Regulatory Analysis The Commission has prepared a regulatory analysis on this proposed regulation. The analysis examines the costs and benefits of the alter-natives considered by the Comission. The analysis is available for inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, LL6 2120 L Street, NW Washington, DC. Single copies of the analysis may be obtained from Beth Bradshaw, Division of Security, Office of Administration, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC 20555, telepnone:
(301) 492-4120.
Regulatory Flexibility Certification Based upcn the information available at this stage of the rulemaking 4