ML19329A698

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 750924 Request.Submits Addl Info Confirming Fuel Assembly Motion Is Not Occurring Due to High RCS Flow Rate During Cycle 1 Operation
ML19329A698
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/21/1976
From: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Rusche B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8001090680
Download: ML19329A698 (3)


Text

,. 7 g- -- -

7g-ctILT2cetAeony en ion o'ciariNuuutn

~~

50-270 s m.

NHC Dint tilBUTION on-PART 50 DOCIWT MATERIAL I

FROM:

DATE OF DOCUMENT To.

{

Duke Power Company 7/21/76 l

Mr. Benard C. Rusche Charlotte, North Carolina DATE RECEIVE D g

[

Mr. William O. Parker, Jr.

7/26/76 6 MLL T TE R ONoTORIZED PHOP INPUT F OHM NUMDLR OF COPICS HECEIVED l

NORIGIN AL h NCLASSiflED

{0corv one signed

' DE SCetPT SON ENCLOSURE TO

, r

' g.

r-

~

p. _. 2 Ltr. re our 9/24/75 ltr.. furnishing additional cvid;nce confirming that fuel assembly motion

^

is n*,t occuring due to the high reactor coolant cyct;m flow rate.

~,

+

.(2-P)

PLANT NAME:

D b

Oconee #2 l

[

SAFETY FOR ACTION /INFORMATION E atan 7/29/76 RJL i

ASSIGNED AD:

ASSIGNED _J,D:

[BRAFCH CJ1IEE:

Schwencer (f)

T.R AliCI L C E T m PROJECT IL*,NisG"a:

PROJE7" j'd;6 DEA:_

l is. ASST.:

Sheppard qq Agg,.

I~

j INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION gEgPljh

' 9' TEDESCO ENVIRO AN/JXSIS S'ISTEMS SAFETY piry n 73 m q SITE SAEErL(-

ia m seg HEIMOLAN

[I & E _g')

SChiROEDER EENAROYA DENTON & FTLLER pg,D LAIN!M GOSSICK & STAFF ENGINEERING IPPOLITO FNVIRO TEC1L.

MIfC'

}LSCCARRY K_IRKWOOD ERNST CASE KNIGilT BALLARD HANAJU_ER SIINEIL OPERATING REACTORS SPANCT ER

_EARLFSS PAULICKI STELLO t

MTTE TFrit PROJECT MANAGEMENT REACTOR SAFETY

. OPERATING TECH.

CA191TT T.

BOYD ROSS X EISENHUT STEPP P. COLLINS NOVAK SHAO 11UDiAM HOUS_ TON ROSZTOCZY

_BAER PETERSON CllECK EUTLER SITE AJiALYSIS GRIMES MELTZ VOLLIT11 HELTEMES AT & I

,_ HUNCH SK0ViihiT SALTZMAN N_ _J.

COLLINE.

~

,[

Rl' Tilt 1C imECER EM LidiAL UlSTillbUT lON CONTHOL huMBER

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

lFOitisatha1"la, S.C.

hiu lad:

BriOOK11AVEN NAT_LhB_

Tic ~i -

REG. VIE ULRIKSON(OR_NL) iiilC.

LA i'DR

[

h C0;gULTANTS 500109O__ g g

ASi.u:

XKCitS/f.CYS.;c f;2_EEgggpA%f,Q.

C

DUKE POWER COMI%NY Powr.u litimino 422 SouTu Cucacu STurr.T, CH.AuwTTr:. N. C. coa 42 WILLl AM O. PAR M E R,.J R.

TCit**eos g:Anta 7C4 WCg Patmotmi

_ [,,_,, l }

373-4083

$staes PaocuCtiom

'g.

~

.3 July 21, 1976

.V' jN N

[-

\\'

t.. g p;jg

/-

9 W ]. g' c'- {l3

'V'-

}jO ' \\~ s

{,

Mr. Benard C. Rusche

, v,(

, g.f Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

\\

V

,]/

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

,y O'

Washington, D. C.

20555 Atteation: Mr. A. D hwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 1 s,

Re: Oconee Unit 2 Docket No. 50-270

Dear Mr. Rusche:

In response to your letter of September 24, 1975 requesting additional evidence confirming that fuel assembly motion is_not occurring due to the high reactor coolant system flow rate existing at Oconee Unit 2, the following information is submitted.

.At the end of Oconee Unit 2, Cycle 1, an examination was conducted to determine if fuel lif t was evident due to fuel assembly position prior to removal. -No abnormalities or indications of fuel lift were observed.

Additionally, two selected Oconee Unit-2, Cycle 1 assemblies were examined for possible fuel rod fretting at spacer locations and for wear on the fuel assembly lower end-fittings. The examination consisted of a television and videotape scan of all four sides of both assemblies, plus periscope observations of two faces of one of the assemblies and all four sides of the lower end fitting area on both assemblies.

Special attention was given to grids, skirts and end fittings and several photographs were taken through the periscope.

The examination revealed no abnormal conditions.

All indications of wear on the grids, skirts and end fittings were normal and typical of other assemblies examined previously from Oconee Units 1 and 2.

Also, no unusual " crud" pattern was evident on the grids or fuel rods which could be indicative of disrupted coolant, flow.73,

,< 3%kl ! s c.

pa /

,;%v

/Q

~,

f'b y Q

,e, y 'a. cv./ d 1

-)

n f,fh!

h.h

{.

O

\\[-

ef, ?

b 74b6

,,4./

%y,

. ~

e," I,j\\

\\;

..,,,,p"#-

f,

..o

.Mr. Benard C. Rusche

,Page 2 J'uly 21, 1976 o

lift nor any It is concluded from these examinations that neither fuel d during other other types of abnormal fuel assembly motion occurre

- Oconee Unit 2, Cycle 1 operation.

Very truly yours,

. h.'

a William O. Parker, Jr.

EDB:vr

=

.