ML19329A298

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Fes Updating.Forwards Addl Info Request Discussed at 730308 Meeting W/Util at Site.Info Should Be Submitted as Suppl 2 to Environ Rept
ML19329A298
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/15/1973
From: Dicker G
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Thies A
DUKE POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8001020871
Download: ML19329A298 (2)


Text

'

~

bW!RON DIST?IBUTION:

AEC PDR 1

' LOCAL PDR J. R. McWherter, ORNL nachat Nos.#50-269 MAR 151973 Dock.

Files (ENVIRON)

E. G. Struxness, ORE 50-270, and 50-287 RP Reading EP-2 Reading A. Giambusso, L:DDRP H. Denton, L:ADSS D. R. Muller, ' L : ADEP Mr. Austin C. Thies Senior Vice President R. C. DeYoung, L:ADP Ws G. K. Dicker, L:EP-2 Production & Transmission R..J. Clark, L:EP-2 g p_,

I. A. Peltier, L:PWR-4 P. O. Box 2178 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201 M

D EP-2 R

DRO (3)

Dear Mr. Thies:

j 4

Reference is made to our letter of February 13, 1973, concerning the updating of the Final Environmental Statement for Oconee Units 1, 2, i

and 3 by preparation of an addendum to that document. At the meetin'g with your staff at the Oconee site on March 8,1973, it was agreed 1

that the information requested in the enclosure was necessary for this addendum.

l Please submit the requested information by March 30, 1973. Your reply should consist of three signed originale and 297 additimal copies as Gupplement No. 2 to the Environmental Report.

Sincerely, Original signed by Gordon K. Dicker Gordon K. Dicker, Chief Environmental Projects Branch 2 Directorate of Licensing Waelasures Request for Additional Information ec:

M. William L. Porter Duke Power Company

\\

.L:EP-2... y... L...:.EP. 2 omer > g.g.g XEMHHH:p b GKDicker j

sunnauc >

3/1),/,7,3,,,,,,,, 3/g/73 parr >

    1. ~

Poem ABC-Ste (Rev 9 53) AECM 0240 er.

ets-to-siess-3 us-47s 8001020 h

MAR 151973 o

REQUEST 70R ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OCONEg NUCLEAR UNITS 2 AND 3 Is the data submitted in the Catawba Nuclear Station application 1973, 1974, and a reasonably current estimate of peak loads for 1.

1975 and of the hydroelectric and thermal generating capacity that will be installed within the Duka Power Company system to maat these loads?

Have any agreements been made with APS, AEP, and other generat h as systems for temporary purchases of power in 1973 and 1974, suc 2.

the temporary arrangements made in 19727 How is the installed capacity in 1. above affected by a forced i

t outage of one or more of the major Duke Power generating stat ons

.3.

i Wat is the total installed capacity within the Duka Power system 4.

that is provided by combustion turbines?

Your " Statement by the Applicant W y the Construction Permits (for Oconea Units 1 and 3) Should Not be Suspended" (pages 12, 5

13, and 14) presented cost data on alternate sources of power.

Is this cost data current with today's fuel prices?

Was the Duke Power system, required to reduce load in 1972 in a sinf1ar manner to the load reductions in June,1971, and 6.

September, 1970, because of unavailable capacityt l

l l

a I

i OFFICE >

_g SURMAME>

ouEm

.st-ne-siess-44547s

_was AEC.Ste (Ilev.9-53) AECM 0240

__