ML19322E618
| ML19322E618 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1980 |
| From: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Dietch R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-03-12, TASK-3-12, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8004020013 | |
| Download: ML19322E618 (5) | |
Text
.
O Laruq%
UNITED STATES E
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
U E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 March 6,1980 Docket No. 50-206 Mr. R. Dietch Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Dietch:
RE:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SAN ON0FRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT N0.1 Reference 1:
Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors - to NRC letter to licensees, dated February 15, 1980.
Reference 2: Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors for which environmental qualification is to be addressed - Enclosure 2 to NRC letter to licensees dated February 15, 1980.
In our meeting of February 21, 1980 regarding the subject program, we indicated that an accelerated review schedule was being developed for this program.
The schedule is attached as Enclosure 1, which includes the required date for your submittal showing conformance to the qualification guidelines of reference 1.
The information to be provided in your submittal, as required by references 1 and 2, is summarized in Enclosure 2.
Where you have previously submitted some of the required information, it is sufficient to incorporate information already on the docket by specific reference.
It is not necessary to resubmit.
However, an orderly organization of the information should be maintained.
For example, if any previously submitted table is changed, revised pages should be submitted. does not show submittal dates for Palisades and Oyster Creek, since the scheduled site visits for these plants precede any practical submittal date.
Material provided for these two plants will be upgraded to the level of other plant submittals through a question-and-answer process.
8004020 Cl3
Mr. R. Dietch March 6, 1980 With respect to containment environmental conditions and systems required for accident mitigation we will request additional information, some of it prior to the dates list.ed in the enclosure, and provide some clarification of the guidelines.
Sincerely.
U W#
YfW.
g{ Operating Reactors Branch #2 Dennis L. Ziemann, Chief Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosures:
As stated i
4 i
ha 4
- ~ - -,,
e
,,w
--r, y
Mr. R. Dietch March 6,1980 cc w/ enclosures:
Charles R. Kocher, Assistant Director, Technical Assessment General Counsel Division Southern California Edison Company Office of Radiation Programs Post Office Box 800 (AW-459)
Rosemead, California 91770 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency David R. Pigott Cryctal Mall #2 Samuel B. Casey Arl'ngton, Virginia 20460 Chickering & Gregory Three Embarcadero Center U. S. Environmental Protection Twenty-Third Floor Agency San Francisco, California 94111 Region IX Office ATTN: EIS C0ORDINATOR Jack E. Thomas 215 Freemont Street Harry B. Stoehr San Francisco, California 94111 San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 1831 X M C, Inc.
San Diego, California 92112 ATTN:
Richard E. Schaffstall 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Resident Inspector Suite 1050 c/o U. S. NRC kashington, D. C.
20006 P. O. Box 3550 San Onofre, California 92672 Mission Viejo Branch Library 24851 Chrisanta Drive Mission Viejo, California 92676 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chai rman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 California Departrent of Health ATTN: Chief, Environmental Radiation Control Unit Radiological Health Section 714 P Street, Room 498 Sacramento, California 95814 4
t
ENCLOSURE 1 SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRAM SCHEDULE Licensee Site Visit Consultant Plant Submittal Date (week of)
Final Report Palisades Currently under review 1/21 6/30 Oyster Creek Currently under review 3/10 7/21 Ginna 4/25 5/5 8/4 Zion 2 5/1 5/19
- 8/11 Indian Pt. 3 5/1 6/2 8/18 Zion 1 5/1 6/9 8/11 Indian Pt. 2 5/1 6/16 9/2 Millstone 1 6/ 2 6/23 9/8 Haddam Neck 6/2,*
7/7 9/15 Dresden 2 6/ 2 7/14 9/22 San Onofre 6/ 2 7/21 9/29 Dresden 1 6/ 2 7/28 10/6 Yankee Rowe 6/2 8/4 10/14 Lacrosse 7/1 8/11 10/20 Big Rock Point 7/1 8/18 10/27
- Effort will be made to perform a significant portion of the Zion 1 site evaluation at this time.
ENCLOSURE 2 SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRhM SUBMITTAL CONTENT 1.
The emergency procedures and list of safety-related systems addressed in reference 2.
2.
The definition of and basis for the hostile service conditions both inside and outside containment addressed in reference i section 4.0, Service Conditions.
3.
The identification and justification of equipment considered qualified by experience in accordance with reference 1 section 4.3.3, Areas Nonnally Maintained at Room Conditions.
4.
The tabulation of safety-related equipment located in a hostile environment, with identification of the service conditions and qualification testing for each, in the format used for either SEP Topic III-12 or IE Bulletin 79-01B submittals.
5.
The list of equipment in the tabulation of item A that is not qualified in accordance with the specific requirements of reference 1, together with justification for the deviations from the guidelines.
Reference 1:
Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors.
Reference 2:
Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors for which environmental qualification is to be addressed.
i
_.