ML19322D911
| ML19322D911 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/15/1980 |
| From: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Goldberg S, Haller N, Purple R NRC OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM ANALYSIS (MPA), NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT, NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322D907 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8003100194 | |
| Download: ML19322D911 (2) | |
Text
.,
w AI ENCLOSURE 1 i,' /' *%,'
UNITED STATES
+'
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20556 n
%7 9 R, f February 15, 1980 y,,
mm omax MEMORANDUM FOR: Ed:rd "r :h:n Jere? S ir.to 5 "'# ~#"
~
Robert Purple Robert Browning Carl Seifert Robert Bernaro g.
qu Nunzio Palladino
%,,qa suos rueerH FROM:
WilliamJ.DircksU8 Acting Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
A TWO WEEK ASSESSMENT OF THE CLEAN UP ACTIVITIES AT THREE MILE ISLAND do ma n //aJ]u -
You are appointed to a task force to be chaired by E6::rd ".archen to evaluate i
l the clean up operations at Three Mile Island, how they are being accomplished, and the rate at which they are being accomplished to insure that the public health and safety is being protected.
The scope of the review effort is presented in the attachment.
By copy of this memorandum, I am also directi.ng that the Office Directors cooperate fully in these activities to assure that adequate resources are made available to. accomplish this task.
I am further directing that the task force have a comoleted report to the Commission on February 29, 1980.
I wish to emphasize that this date is firm 1
and no extensi,on will be granted.
Enclosure:
As stated i
l 1
1
p' '7.,t.
Encicsurn T.,,
SCOPE OF REVIEW The review should examine the clean up operations at TMI, how 'they are being accomplished, the rate at which they are being accomplished, and assess plans for future activities. Potential problems which could adversely impact on the public health and safety should be critically examined.
Recomendations should be made for avoiding or minimizing any such problem. The. examination must include both licensee and NRC activities; in addition,. legal requirements in the process should be identified and appropriate actions to respond to them should be recomended.
~
The review must recognize the need to assure opportunities for public partici-pation and balance them with the need for expeditious clean up operations.
Protection of public health and safety must be 'given first priority.
Also' to be considered are requirements for adequate maintenance and surveillance activities, access to and clean up of various portions of the plant, and the schedule by which these are accomplished.
This evaluation 'should include discussions with appropriate licensee and NRC staff members who have been directly associated with the clean up operations.
To the extent possible, discussions with consultants and others who are familiar with the clean up operation should be included.
1 e
0 e
4 e
f I
h o
. _.