ML19322A931
| ML19322A931 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1975 |
| From: | Moseley N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Thies A DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322A925 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911270817 | |
| Download: ML19322A931 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000269/1975001
Text
- .
..
....--..N_
- - .
. . . - _.
. . .
._
,
, _ _ _ .
~
..
I
UNITED STATES
.
.
-_
"b 7*
-NUCLEAR REGitLA10RY COMMISSION
REGION il
-
23 0 PE ACH?R EE STR EET, N. W.
SUITE 919
ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30303
In Reply . Refer To:
IE:II:TNE
50-269, 50-270
50-287/75-1
Duke Power Company
C:N :
Mr. A. C. Thies, Senior Vice
President, Production and
Transmission
Power Building
422 South Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
28242
Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. T. N. Epps, H. L. Whitener
,
~
and G. R. Jenkins of this office on January 27-31 and February 4-7, 1975,
of activities authorized by NRC Operating License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47 and
DPR-55 for the Oconce-1, 2 and 3 facilities , and to the discussion of our
findings held by Messrs. Epps, Whitener and Jenkins with Messrs. J. E. Smith
and J. W. Hampton and other menbers of the Oconee staf f at the conclusion
,
of the inspection.
,
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the
enclosed inspection report. Within these areas ,. the inspection consisted
of selective examination of procedures and representative records,
.
,
interviews with personnel, and observatiens by the inspector.
,
The results of our followup of previously identified matters are
contained in the enclosed report as follows:
a.
The results of our inspection of your corrective action on
previously identified iters of noncompliance are discussed
in Section II of the su= mary of the enclosed report.
b.
Ine status of unresolved items identified in previous inspection
reports is1 discussed in Section IV of the summary of the enclosed
report.
4ctuTlo9
db
fe
e
C
'
3
h
,
g
2
pg11svo< /7
d
.
% .#
E
- _ _ _ _ _
_
'
-.
.
. . .
,
.
..
.
,
I
Duka Power company
~2-
s
.
During the inspection, it was found that certain activities under your-
license appear to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements.
The non-
compliance and references to pertinent requirements are listed in
'
Section I of the sum =ary of the enclosed report.
This notice is sent to you pursuant te the provisions of Section 2.201
of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Pat: 2, Title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations.
Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office,
within 20 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement
or explanation in reply including:
(1) corrective steps which have
been taken by you, and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps
which will be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date
when full compliance will be achieved. No additional response is
requested to noncompliance items I.A.4 and I.B.2.
During the inspection it was determined that a previous commitment
made in writing to the Commission had not been met.
The item is
identified as a " deviation" and appears in Section V of the summary
,of the enclosed report.
You are requested to inform us of your
plans for implementation of this commitment.
,
Other infractions and deficiencies which were identified through
your internal audit program are shown in the details of the attached
report.
In each case appropriate reports were made and corrective
action was initiated or completed and no additional information is
needed for these items at this time,.
1
I
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter
and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public
Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you
believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written
application to this office requesting that such information be withheld
from public discicsure.
If no' proprietary information is identified,
a written statement to that effect should be submitted.
If an_ application
is _ submitted, it .must - fully identify ' the bases for which inf ormation
<
is claimed to be propriets;y.
The application should be prepared so
that informatica sought to be withheld- is incorporated in a separate
paper and referenced in the application since the application will
-
-be placed in- the Public Document' Roon. Your application, or written
statement, should be ' submitted to us within 20 days.
If we are not
~
contacted as specified, the enclosed report and this letter may then-
i
be placed in the Public Document Room.
j
i
i
r
u __.
,
-,
- - ,
-
._ _ _
.
.
,
.
Duke ?cuer Company
-3-
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad
to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours,
f<
j, 5
/
'f
/
,
. / orman C. Moseley
N
Director
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report Nos.
50-269, 50-270 and 50-287/75-1
cc w/ encl:
J. E. Smith, Manager
Post Office Box 1175
Seneca, South Carolina
29678
_
I
.
s-,~.-
,
-