ML19322A846
| ML19322A846 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1974 |
| From: | Moseley N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Thies A DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322A847 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911270605 | |
| Download: ML19322A846 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000270/1974001
Text
-- .., _ -
o,
p',,',
U'NITED STATES
f
,p'-
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
~f.
X e D *
'
DITIFTOHATE OF PSGULATGRY CPERATICN3
,
' a.
REGtON II - Sut T E C18
'~
2 D I8 E AC H f R E E ST R E E T , NORT HwE ST
to
'mi umu
ditt t'
AT6A te r A, G E oRG 6 A M 30 3
In Reply Refer To:
FEB 2 81974
a
R0:II:FJ
-
50-270/74-1
Duke Power Cocapny
ATTN:
Mr. A. C. Thies, Senior Vice President
Production and Transmission
Power Building
422 South Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
28201
Gentlemen:
'Ihis refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. F. Jape of this office
on January 22-26, 1974, of activities authorized by AEC Operating
License No. DPR-47 for the Oconee 2 facility, and to the discussion
of our findings held by Mr. Jape with Mr. J. E. Smith at the conclusion
of the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the
enclosed inspection report.' Within these areas, the inspection consisted
of selective exanination of procedures and representative records,
interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection, it was found that certain activities under your
license appear to be in violation of AEC requirements.
The violation
and references to pertinent requirements are listed in Section I of the
summary of the enclosed report.
In addition to the need for corrective action regarding these specific
deficiencies, we are concerned about the timeliness of incident reviews by
the Station Review Cornittee.
It is our understanding that you will
give further consideration to performance of timely reviews by the Station
.
Review Committee.
Consequently, in your reply, please include a description
of your actions taken or plans to improve the review of incidents.
The results of our followup of previously identified matters are contained
in the enclosed report as follows:
a.
The results of our inspection of your corrective action on
previously identified violations are discussed in Section II
.
of the sur=ary of the enclosed report.
.
_
.
-
.
79112y0fCT
j
mw
.
,
.a
,
.
' Duka Pow 2r Company
-2-
-
-s
,
FEB 2 8 574
,
-
s
.
'
-
b.
The status of unresolved itens identified in previous inspection
reports is discussed in Section IV of t,he summary of the encloseo
report .
s
,
New unresolved items are identified in Section III of the summary
of the enclosed report.
This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201
of the AEC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations.
Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office,
within 20 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement
or explanation in reply including:
(1) ccrrective steps which have
ueen taken by you, and the results adaieved; (2) corrective steps
which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date
when full compliance will be achieved.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations , a copy of this letter and the
enclosed inspection report will be placed in the AEC's Public Docu=ent
Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be
proprietary, it is necessary that you submic a written application to
this office requesting that such information be withheld from public
disclosure..
If no proprietary information is identified, a written
statement to that effect should be submitted.
If an application is
submitted, it must fully identify the bases for which information is
claimed to be proprietary.
Ihe application should be prepared so that
infor=ation sought to be withheld is incorporated in a separate paper
and referenced in the application since the application will be placed
in the Public Document Room. Your application, or written statement,
should be submitted to us within 20 days.
If we are not contacted as
specified, the enclosed report and this letter may then be placed in the
Public Docurent Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad
to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours,
'd?
s
-
Norman C. . s .-;
Director
Enclosure:
RO Inspection Report No.
50-270/74-1-
cc w/ encl:
J. E. Smith, Plant Superintendent
Box 1175, Seneca, S. C.
29678
'
_
- ,
.
._
..
y
_
a
.
'
,~
.
,
.
s
.
~
m.
s-
J
-
e
-
.
i
Duke Power Company
FEB 2 81974
i
Oconee 2
RO Inspection Report No. 50-270/74-1
cc w/ encl:
H.
D.
Thornburg, RO
RO:HQ (5)
j
2 p - =hDR Central Files
Regulatory Standards (3)
Directorate of Licensing (13)
cc encl. only:
- PDR
j
- Local PDR
"
- NSIC
- DTIE, OR
!
- State
- To be dispatched at a later date
i
t
i
I
l
.
,
-
a;
S, s n * " " OV L"
- -!
- - . . -