ML19322A741

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 720519 Meeting W/Util Re Deficiencies Noted in Insp Repts 50-269/72-06,50-270/72-05 & 50-287/72-03. Corrective Actions by Util Insufficient.Util Must Provide Better QA Supervision
ML19322A741
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/1972
From: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Thies A
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML19322A730 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911210772
Download: ML19322A741 (3)


See also: IR 05000269/1972006

Text

-

O

@1

  • ( '34 .

UNITED STATES

o

(M

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

$. V;,g, m)

l'

\\

p

..

... - -

g/y

m %4m

.-u s m ...:*

  • u-

.m, , m . y.m ,

17 g,

.

.w 2 y

,,,s

tus

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY CFERATIONS

.

In Reply Refer To:

June 2, 1972

RO:II:CEM

50-269/72-6

50-270/72-5

-

50-287/72-3

Duke Pover Company

Attn:

Mr. A. C. Thies, Senior Vice President

Production and Transmission

Power Building

h22 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28201

Gentlemen:

This refers to my meeting with you and Mr. W. S. Lee of your staff and

Messrs. Moseley and Murphy of my staff on May 19, 1972.

The meeting was requested so that we could express to you the broad impli-

cations of the results of our recent inspections of constrration activities

authorized under AEC Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-33, 3h, and 35

As was

discussed with you in the teeting, we are concerned about abserved defi-

ciencies in the implementction of your quality assurance program for the

construction of Ceonee Units 1, 2, and 3

The folleving general cenclu-

sions are based en cumulative results of our inspection pregram and on the

specific individual deficiencies identified in previous correspondence with

you:

1.

There has been a recurrence of problems which were previcusly identified

during our inspection program and were stated to have been resolved.

Your corrective measures have not been sufficient to avoid the recur-

rence of these identified problems.

-

2.

Several instances have been identified in which as-installed or as-built

components or systems differed from the description in the application

for a license. Our concern relates to the failure of your quality

assurance program to identify and to prevent these discrepancies.

3.

There is an apparent need for greater superviscry attentien to the i=ple-

mentation of the quality assurance program. This need can be inferred

from the number and variety of specific instances of nonec=pliance

identified by our inspection progrs=.

4

.

7 91131077R

_ .

.

_

__

_

- - -

- . - . -

_,

_

,

.

  • . .

,

,

.

O

!

'

~ Duke Power Company

-2-

June 2, 1972

..

As ve discussed with you, our inspection program is designed to test on a

limited sampling basis the effectiveness of your quality assurance program

'

and its implementation. We have noted some improvements in recent months.

4

However, our inspection findings to date indicate that further improvement

in the implementation' of the quality assurance program is necessary to

assure that completion of the construction and testing of your facilities

are in conformance with Appendix B to 10 CFR 50.

l

During our discussion, you and Mr. Lee referred to several quality program

upgrading actions which are planned or have recently been implemented.

Please provide us within 30 days, in writing, with your coments concerning

the matters discussed in this letter and specifically, steps which have been

or vill be taken to upgrade the implementation and supervision of your quality

Of particular interest to us are actions taken or planned

assurance program.

to assure that program veaknesses have not adversely affected the quality of

completed work on all units including previously-accomplished preoperational

l

tests on Unit 1.

1

  • ry truly yours,

(

\\d

.

John G. Davis

Director

I

i

4

2

e

w

4

"<

+m,

. .. .

._ .-

_

_

__

_

_

. _ . _ -

,

j

.

. , . - .

.

. . . . . . . . . .

. __.

i

~

~

P

_

.

,

,.

, .

,

L

Ltr. to Duhe Power Company

~

i

,

dtd 6/2/72-

n'

,

.

.

1

DISTRIBUTICII:

J. G. Keppler, RO

i

J. B. Henderson, R0

RO Office of Operations Evaluation

RO AD for Procedures

RO AD for Inspection & Enforcement

j

L, DD for pac + r Projects

RO Files 4 '

DR Central Files

PDR

Local PDR

i

NSIC

,

DTIE

,

i

,

'

l

1

i

l

f

(-r

.;

i

1

!

i

i

.f

i

%

.

i-

,

1

>

>

i

.

-*

I

l

-

.

.

.

W

e

1

'-

_,

_ _ _

_

_.

, , _ _

, . _ . - . . _

_ _ _

-. .

..

. .

.

-. _