ML19322A646

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-269/72-09 on 721003-06.No Violations Noted
ML19322A646
Person / Time
Site: Oconee 
Issue date: 12/04/1972
From: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Thies A
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML19322A648 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911210711
Download: ML19322A646 (3)


See also: IR 05000269/1972009

Text

.

,

'

-.

.

,

.

,

UNITED STATES

~~

f

[MJD j., \\ 'I . q

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

cA u a LGXXXXXXXXXXX

n: :,o - u a v-

-

3 /-

2 30 P E A T ,a

A F. f. ! * H E L ' , '+ 0 A ~ M * E S ?

7

. , ,%-

a.s.-s.

.m.

m1

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS

DEC 4

1972

In Reply Refer t>:

RO:II:RFW

50-269/72-9

Duke Power Company

Atta: Mr. A. C. Thies

Senior Vice President

Production and Transmission

Power Building

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina

23201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. Warnick and others of

this office on October 3-6, 1972, of activities authorized by AEC

Construction Permit No. CPPR-33 for the Oconee Unit 1 facility, and

to the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Warnick with Mr. Dick

and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are as described in the enclosed

inspection report No. 50-269/72-9. Within these areas, the inspection

consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative

records, interviews with plant personnel, and observations by tite

inspector.

.

Within the scope of the inspection, no violations or safety items

were observed.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter

and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the AEC's Public

'

Document Room. If this report contains any information that you (or

your contractors) believe te be proprietary, it is necessary that you

make a written application within 20 days to this office to withhold

such information from public disclosure. Any such application must

include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is

claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so

that proprietary information identified in the application is contained

-

.

u

vent slo 7//

p

._ _.

m-

-

_ _ . . . _ . _

.

.

. _ . _ _ _ . . . _ .

_ . _ _. __.

_._ ..

.__

_

,

.

.

.

.

s

.-

,

.

.

,

N

Duke Power Company

-2-

in a str. rate part of the document. If we do not hear from you in this

regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the

Pubif- Document Room.

In regards to the item of noncompliance brought to your attention in

our letter, dated August 30, 1972, please be advised that we have no

further questions at this time regarding this item.

.

A reply to this letter is not necessary. Should you have any questions

concerning the matters discussed in this letter,however, we will be

glad to discuss them with you.

Very truly yours,

'

.

, ohn G. Davis

Director

Enclosure:

Inspection Report No. 50-269/72-9

~

L

.

-

-

.-.

-

.

.

_ .

-

--.

.. ....

_-

_

.

.

a

.

..

.

.

,

,,

,

Duke Power Company

Oconee 1

Ro Inspection Rpt. No. 50-269/72-9

DEC4

1972

.

DISTRIBUTION:

J. G. Keppler, RO

j

J. B. Henderson, RO

RO:HQ (5)

,

.

,

DR Central Files

!

Regulatory Standarhs 3)

Directorate of Licensing (13)

l

'PDR

' Local FDR

'NSIC

(

'DTIE, OR

]

'To be dispatched at a later date.

1

i

,

e