ML19320D713
| ML19320D713 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1980 |
| From: | Seyfrit K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8007220109 | |
| Download: ML19320D713 (1) | |
Text
_. - - - -.. - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ _. _,
/pa archc NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NSIC CE'ITiuu, FILES 8W
/
REGloN IV 3 y (f, [
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 7
o 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000
%,l !. [.(';f June 10, 1980 In Reply Refer To:
RIV Docket No.
STN 50-482/IE Information Notice No. 80-26 Kansas Gas & Electric Co.
Attn:
Mr. Glenn L. Koester Vice President-Operations Post Office Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Gentlemen:
This IE Information Notice is being forwarded to you for information. No written response to this information notice is required.
If you have any questions related to the subject, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
//
/w r
0 Karl V. S6yfrit Director
Enclosures:
1.
IE Information Notice No. 80-26 2.
List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices cc: w/ enclosures Messrs. Nicholas A. Petrick, SNUPPS D. T. McPhee, Kansas City Power and Light Company Gerald Charnoff, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & TroA ridge E. W. Creel, Kansas Gas and Electric Company
- b 8007220 4
UNITED STATES SSINS No.:
6835 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Accession No.:
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 8005050064 WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 e,
_n cg as
. c9 m
av es IE Information Notice No. 80-26 To All Part 50 Licensees Date: June 10, 1980 Page 1 of 2 EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR QA PROGRAMS Description of Circumstances:
Appendix B to 10 CFR 30 requires that each applicant and licensee establish and execute a Quality Assurance Program, and that each licensee "shall require contractors or subcontractors to provide a quality assurance program."
Further, Appendix B requires each applicant and licensee to regularly review the status and adequacy of subcontractor programs.
The NRC is becoming increasingly concerned by continuing evidence that many holders of construction permits and operating licenses are not properly implementing these facets of their quality assurance programs.
Examples of this lack of effectiveness of contractor QA program implementation, and inadequacy of licensee overview of contractor QA program implementation are appearint
- every facet of project activity.
Instances have been observed where at.
.tect-engineers (AE) have released documents for procurement with inappropriate material specifications. Nuclear steam system suppliers (NSSS) have overlooked erroneous assumptions in analysis of instrument system response to design basis transients.
Other cases have been observed where both AEs and NSSS have not followed through on commitments to review vendor detailed designs. Vendors' quality assurance programs have been found to contain errors of both omission and commission.
A containment tendon installation contract was awarded to a specialty contractor.
During a licensee audit some three months after work started, i' appeared that a contractor inspector was falsifying records by initialing inspe tion points not actually observed. A subsequent investigation by the licensee revealed that the contractor had required that QC inspections be performed only on a random basir, even though all records had QC signatures. The signatures could mean that the activity was inspected or that record signoffs by others were reviewed; or that the data were recorded by the QC inspector.
It is apparent that the licensee had not appropriately reviewed the contractor's inspection program prior to the start of work.
In another-instance, after completion and acceptance of a major structural steel installation, the l'censee found that significant rework would be required to correct construction quality problems.
NRC inspection at the contractor's fabrication facility disclosed that in addition to work for that licensee, the contractor had contracts for "high density" fuel storage racks J
w m
=
IE Information Notice No. 80-26 To All Part 50 Licensees Date:
June 10, 1980 Page 2 of 2 from several operating licensees. None of the NRC licensees had inspected the contractor's shop or examined his quality assurance programs.
Response to Information Notice No. 80-26 is not required.
The NRC expects appropriate action from all licensees and organizations engaged in nuclear activities and actions will be examined in the ongoing NRC inspection program.
s i
e
--..,r---
-, - +.
--w-
,r-r P-
- = =
-'*---e'-
IE Information Notice No. 80-26 June 10, 1980 LISTING OF RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION NOTICES Information Subject Date Issued To Notice No.
Issued 80-20 Loss of Decay Heat Removal 5/8/80 All light water reactor Capability at Davis-Besse facilities holding Uni < 1 P 'le in a Refueling power reactor Operating Mode Licenses (OLs) or Construction Permits (cps) 80-21 Anchorage and Support of 5/16/80 All power reactor Safety-Related Electrical facilities with an Equipment Operating License (OL) or Construction Permit (CP) 80-22 Breakdown In Contamination 5/28/80 All power reactor Control Programs Operating Licenses (OLs) and near term C.nstruction Permits (cps) 80-23 Loss of Suction 5/29/80 All power reactor to Emergency Feedwater facilities with an Pumps Operating License (OL) 4 or Construction Permit (CP) 80-24 Low Level Radioactive 5/30/80 All NRC and Agreement Waste Burial Criteria State Licensees 80-25 Transportation of 5/30/80 Material Licensee Pyrophoric Uranium in Priority / Categories II-A, II-D, III-I and IV-DI; Agreement State Licensees in equivale_t categories Enclosure
~
g y
+
-+g g
y7-y e,
-r-a-i*+
te-e W e-4*~M+-
ev
=1gmet----W d
v 4
'--P
'ev*-
r