ML19320A134
| ML19320A134 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1977 |
| From: | Rueter D ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Madsen G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19320A129 | List: |
| References | |
| 1-037-19, 1-37-19, NUDOCS 8004140731 | |
| Download: ML19320A134 (2) | |
Text
_ - - _
r^^
~
1,
- '...j.
y
/$
\\
~
a n e t.p o n c e u n. o annansas W.J l
ARK ANS AS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY March 28, 1977 g
1-037-19 Reactor Construction and Operation Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region IV 1
611 Ryan Drive, Suite 1000 1
Arlington, Texas 76012 l
-j Attention: Mr. G. L. Madsen
Subject:
Arkansas Power 4 Light Company i
Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit One i
Docket No. 50-313, License No. DPR-51 IE Inspection Report No. 50-313/77-05 i
(, File:
0232)
Gentlemen:
The subject inspection report idetrified one violation of Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50. As applicable, our response to the violation
/n\\
includes:
(1) corrective steps which have been taken and results b
achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further i
non-compliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
The NRC position on the cited violation and corresponding AP4L response is provided below:
NRC Position Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted February 28-March'4,1977, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full comp 1' ance with your Reactor License or NRC require-i ments as indicated below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures and shall be accomplished in accordance with these procedures.
This requirement is further amplified by Section 5 of the licensee's NRC approved Quality Assurance Program.
Quality Control Procedure 1004.19, " Hold, Caution and QC Tagging Procedure", Revision 2, Temporary Change #2, April 26,1976, Section 4.1.1 requires in part that "an operator will remove the equipment from service, align components as required, and-install the card. The person obtaining the clearance and the operator installing the card should then document the verification of l
p) recoved the Hold Card and the person obtaining the clearance proper installation in the Hold Card Index". And "the person who
('v should then document the verification of proper removal of t:ie card in the Hold Card Index".
l 8004140 73[
TA X P AYING. INVE STQ/1 QWNEO_,g')
4
, MEMBER MICOLE SOUTM UTaLITIES RYRT88M.-
--)
/
Reactor Constniction and Operation Branch Onited State Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 28, 1977 Page 2
~
Contrary to the above, between January 29, 1977 and Febniary 28, 1977, 31 Hold Cards were i'ot verified as having been installed' and three were not veritied as having been removed in the Hold Card Index..
APSL' Response The hold cards identified in the Hold Card Index as not having documented' verification of proper hold card installation or hold' card'r'emoval have
]
been verified and documented as such in the Hold Card Index.
Immediate action has been taken to rectify hold card verification discrepancies. Training sessions have been initiated to make plant personnel knowledgeable of QCP 1004.19, " Hold, Caution and QC Tagging Procedure", and the requirements stated therein. Also, adherence to QCP 1004.19 has been stressed'.
4 1
It is our' belief that we, at this time, are in full compliance witft i
QCP 1004.19; however,our internal verification of full compliance will not be complete until }!ay 1,1977.
Very truly yours,
/
~
Donald A. Rueter Manager, Licensing DAR:LA:ph j
4