ML19319D871
| ML19319D871 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1977 |
| From: | Stello V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319D872 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003270527 | |
| Download: ML19319D871 (5) | |
Text
%'
fr
,g g ' k i,3,'
4 u
L
' L g
c
. e.
se
'n 4
U DISTRIBUTION:
TD 93 QocketD A
NRC PDR "u
- '5]
~ 1
_a L PDR Docket No. 50-312 ORB #4 Readina VStello
-OPA, Clare titles KRGoller Dross RIngram L01shan TAbernathy Sacramento Municipal Utility District GZwetzig
'JBuchanan 1
- f. _TCarter 1 _
ATTH: Mr. J. J. Mattimoe OELD r '. Grayifile' Assistant General Manager
.01&E(5)
. an<l Chief Engineer
'RJones (4).
Xtra File -~4 -
6201 S Street
!BScharf (10) g g a ng,gg y' P. O. Box 15830
'Jticr,ough Sacramento, California. 95813 BHArless
.. ; mg s'
DElsenhut Gentlemen:
ACRS(16)
,?
By letter dated July 9,1976, you requested an exemption' from the 9
provisions of Ap;*ndix H to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations; g 1
Part 50 (10 CFR 50, which would permit future operation of Rancho'
,m Nuclear Generating Station while irradiating the_ remaining portion ofn This: exemption;was[ requested because damage ~t NO 4;f; dm !
f
' holders prevented the. surveillance program fro By the same letter, you requested approval..of propose pJ g'
Rancho Seco Technical Specifications consistent with the' requestedchanges~
O. L;W w
exemption.
cations were included in your letter of DecemberSome revisions.
y.,
F M,
- 17, 1976.
1-C *f.M ~ W A
Irradiating the remaining Rancho Seco surveillance specimens at' Davis-' '
Besse Unit No.1 will cause the Rancho Seco program to be out of Mrradiatioconformance with the provision.of Appendix H which reouires the
' iN, W, l#
.However, an pmgram to be performed within the. Rancho Seco vessel.'
~~ N.?
s.noted in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, the nominal.
7%
^ ical to those.at Davis-Besse Unit No.-1,t t
{
w
- at these two reactors are very similar so that.with the exception of., i,. 4 w
., i actual operating history'and minor differences in power l distribution,:
7 B '~~
for. which adjustments can be provided, the technical, aspects of the material surveillance program will be achieved to our satisfaction.
r J h,,l cynn a
a S-
-~
z
- ~. -,
8003270 h e
,s
-m, y
.w pg
.g DAoADO &
a w
Sacramento Municipal Utility ~
m District
' D 9
- T f
d
)L a
4 Based on these' considerations, we have concluded that an exemption for Rancho Seco from this requirement for a continuing in-vessel material surveillance program as set forth in Appendix H to 10 CFR Part 50 for a period of five years t authorized by law and will not endanger life,.
or property or the comon defense or security and is othenvise in the
?ublic interest.
Therefore, the exemption requested in_your letter of
' July 9,1976, 'is approved for.a period of, five years from the date of,
+
'this letter.
T e
If an_ extension'of this exemption beyond this initial five year tem is desired, you should-submit an application for extension to the Comission.
y' ' ;.
no later than six months ' prior.to. expiration _ of the. exemption. This...
L
' application should provide a,1ustification for. extending the tem of. the exemption based on operating experience..
, n,.
In addition to granting this exemption, the Comission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. J5' to Facility Operating License No'. DPR-54.
.O for Rancho Seco.
This anendnent' provides for perfomance.of the Rancho
. g Seco reactor ves'sel material, surveillance program at Davis-Besse, Unit, z.
Ro.'l and for the submission of specified reports.._
g, g.y
.:,. s. 4.: % % &
3
..m
+.
5 ~~%,'*
m %
t
~
Copies. of-our related Safety Evaluation and the,. Notice of. Issuance,a.re 2
M '
L(
. F,,
{
L also enclosed. ],
v# 9.0% >4,,;4.g.
y
,y;4w r, X9 t y c'w Sincei el'y,.,
x:,..i,[.,,
,,:w,,
m i'
i,'
,i, M
^
4 i
~'
.m e.
~
(
Victor Stello, Jr., Director.
Division of Operating Reactors 0ffice of !!uclear Reactor. Regulation
Enclosures:
s
- 1.
AmendmentNo.h.to, si'%.
License No. DPR-54.,,
3.,. Notice h
,2.. Safety Evaluation.
,, m._
cc w/enclosuresi See next page..
g
- SEE PREVIOUS' YELLOW FOR CONCURREtlCES.
^
ORB #4: DOR f
RIngram*
10/./77
.(
,1 (Yshan:rm_
Rg#4:00R ORB #4:D0R C.0RB#4:00R DELD AD-0R:00R L
GZwetz i g.*.
RReid*
Karran*
KRGoll er" '- / J ' lo
,g,,, y 10/26/77
_10/ \\ /77
._10/__j77
- 1. 0/_.. / 77
_ l. 0/- ' / 77
.lh/kl7L i
. A,,,
-:g 2
'**f b=4,.
g g j
% N'-,8&,4
~ *'
y
'N~
'y t
_y y
96 4
Sacramento Municipal' Utility District
-2, 1
i Based on these considerations, we have conc)uded that an exemption for Rancho Seco from this requirement for a co surveillance program' as set forth in, Appen,ntinuing in-vessel material dix H to 10 CFR Part 50 for.
a period of five years is authorized by, law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense or security and is otherwise in the..
- qt public interest.
- m.,
sa a,g,;.
+j44
. K. _
2, If an extension of thisL exemption b yond this. initial five year term is 9
s
'no later than six ' months prior _ todesired,' you should, submit an app / ex lication for extension to the Comission
..Tnis....
i application should provide a jusKification for. extending the term of the exemption based on:opetating ex erience.
^
In addition.to granting is empt on, the Cbmission has issued the enclosed Amendment No.
cility Operating License No. DPR-.54 4..
t for Rancho Seco. This amen n(provides.for perfomance of. the Rancho Seco reactor vessel materi
. surveillance program at Davis-Besse Unit
~
No.1 and for the submissi n of spsc fied reports.
m'
.lll L."?
~
c Copies of our related Sa ety Evaluatio ' nd theJotice of Issuance are,.
also enclosed. 1, p p Q g g g ),% M W : % -~ _ x l S p j f flo
- 1. d i A p'
g% eQ. (M:; %
_. A N. Sincerely.
1i
.a
.. Q:&,}L
.ih
.? -
qyM7:e
- G.;DM'%
p a :" < x,f -?'
W: ?, T.t%
~
-L
.g 9 <
e J _ j.j ;p s '.
' ~
- j y f..
S.
m
~
y-o 2
7 Victor Stello, Jr.,
rector,
Division of Operating (Reactors s
^
0ffice of Nuclear React 6 Regulation
[OE'f ["".; [, 2b.
.7
Enclosures:
~l.
. Amendment No.
f to.
License No. DPR-S4
[
f~ 2. :Safet;y Evaluat!iori ~
M 4.[?'~ [.-.
D 3.
Hotice
,._ q s t '1/
- Cm, W L y.
7: g,,
sw e
'ce' w/e'nclosures:.See~next[page T
4
.a q
.D f
- +,
s.
~
)
C
.1
~
o,., e.
ORB #4: DOR RIngram*
10/ /77
[
'*SEE PREVIOUS YELL'0W'FOR CONC RRENCES j
.,,3,,u,
RB#4:D0R ORB #4:DDR.
00R OELD AD-0R: DOR D: DOR
,,,,,. b -
Olshan:rm GZwetzig_*_
. e Karman*
KGoller VStello I
- +. -
10nN77 10L.M
..106a7
_10/_
/77-10/. /.7. 7..
10/ /77_
4
- ).*-
A"**
s e*
Sacramento Municipal Utility District 2-l Based on these considerations, we have concluded that an exemption for Rancho Seco from this requirement for a continuing in-vessel material surveillance progran as set forth in Appendix H to 10 CFR Part 50 for a period of five years will not be detrimental to life or property or f
the comon defense and security;and is in the public intere.st.
There-fore, the exemption requested in~your letter of July 9,1976, is approved for~ a period of five years from the date of this letter.,
J t
If an extension of this exemption beyond this[ initial five year term is desired, you should submit'an application for extension to the Comission no later than six months prior to expiration of the exemotion.
This
' application should provide a justification for extending the term of
~
the exen.ption based on operating experience.
g.
In addition to granting this exemption, the-Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No.
to Facility Operating License No. DPR-54
.for Rancho Seco.. This amendment provides for'perfomance of the Rancho Seco reactor vessel material surveillance program at Davis-Besse Unit No.1 and for the submission of sp9cified reports.
/
\\
iCopies of our.relat' d Safhty Evaluation and the No'tice of' Issuance are e
falso enclosed.
^"
1 j',; %
+; '
A
- _~
N e
7,8 LSincerely,
~
~
-s
-J s
/
p q
7-
.c..
.[
.i Victor Stello, Jr., Director Division of Operating peactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Reculation
Enclosures:
1.
/mendment No.
to'
' License No. DPR-54 2.
Safety Evaluation-D 0
D 3.
Notice U
~
"d3
~.
- cc w/ enclosures:
~
,{
'O~D
. Q
~ T,j~
/
V See next page
/
_ dp
. { Jt. _.a
~ ' )-
c o
r ORB #4:00R gi
' Ringram:dd
'10/g/77 G
db.
_ -0RB#4:00R DELD
' D-0R: DOR D: DOR O
C y,,,,,
hgg Olshan:dn GZwetzig RWReid KRGoller VStello
... a.,
-... _ _/ 7 7..
10/.l3/77-10/ /77 10/.. /..
10/l?
77' 10/ /77 10/ /77 a.
w.*
i
' Sacramento Municipal Utility District cc w/ enclosure (s):
David S. Kaplan, Secretary and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency General Counsel Region IX.0ffice 6201 S Street ATTN:
EIS COORDINATOR P. O. Box 15830 100 California Street Sacramento, California 95813 San Francisco, California 94111 Mr. Patrick McLarkey, Chairnan Sacramento County Board of Supervisors Sacramento County Courthouse California Department of Health Sacramento, California 95814 ATTN:
Chief, Environmental Radiation Control Unit Energy Resources Conservation and Radiological Health Section Development Commission 714 P Street, Room 498 ATTN:
Librarian Sacramento, California 94814 1111 Howe Avenue Sacramento, California 96825 Business and Municipal Department Sacramento City-County Library 808 I Street-Sacramento, California 95814 Chief, Energy Systems Analyses Branch ( AW-459)
Office of F,adiation Programs U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Room 645, East Tower 401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C.
20460
. m,
,.-