ML19319D422
| ML19319D422 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 05/17/1973 |
| From: | Stello V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003170556 | |
| Download: ML19319D422 (3) | |
Text
.
.,,,.. '. *
- y~ t *7'"^7;,,, ;,, ; * -
.^-n
'.. ~
n y y N.
a.'
n,
'S
~.ap:.x.a v:n.,m
.w e-w ex
'.h S-
~'
.:?.
.-X~..,,-
'_s.
~4
.e
~
- )'?
g.
Me_
3' NAY 171973 R. C. DeVoung, Assistant Director fcr ?WR's, L RE5PON5E TO STANDARD REVIE'd ASSIGWENT - C3YSTAL RIVER N0. 3, FLORIDA F0HER COR?., REVIEW OF FSAR CHAPTERS 12 & 13 Plant ':am:
Crystal River No. 3 Licensing Stace: OL Docket No.:
33-302 Ernch 1 Frefect "anager Requestic:g Assistanc::
L :i"3R-4, 3. lcm ey Technical Review Brar.c5 Involved: L:0SS Requested Completion Date: 5/18/73 Review Status: Q2 cenplete The attached report contains iafematiar. requ.::ts and pcsitica v.ater.ents relative t: our review cf tue subject UI, for L anomittal u he applicant in w.;edenca with taa rcsin scaeduie.
b : w a.,
r,
-: : n
%y.
Victor Stello. dr., Assistant Director for P.cactor Safety Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enc 1:
J. M. Hendrie, L:TR,
. S.;H. Hanauer, DRTA.
A.'Schwencer,L:PWR-4
')B.DBuckley,L:PWR-4 1 Ri W. Houston, L:0SB-D D
- ]D 3 M, f6'
_g g gJL 1 1
- }ER.A11enspach,L:0SB 3
cc w/o.cnct:
U. Mcdonald, L:0PS n.
c
.. n.,..
~
_j
~.
~;
3*-
7i, l
w n.
[.7 -
h--scc.R y.:l L 0SB. J,, -l -
t 1;.Ti
.L OSIL...
T_ omer >
r.,
~
..:l j l',..
.L
- ~ ~.j '. '(
t k
.O b
- f,;f
.. /_
p
. / -
-/
ADATE >
4M4n.2-
....; t/.14!??
54L/413.-..-
~
p e. Asc-sis ster.s sh'Asds's40-c; ' iir, t ocnreiunarzt Wrdea2 orrier s tm o. es.sw.
f
n e
Crystal River No. 3 Flor"a "ower Corporation A.
Request for Additional Inforation 1.
We do not consider tha: the applicant has satisfied the recuire-ments of Appendix E of 1) CFR 50, (Emergency Plan).
In regard to this plan the applicaat should explicitly describe:
a.
the authority and responsibilities of local support agencies that may be called on in the event of an emergency, b.
Other empioyees (hoca offica) in his organization, such as haalth physicists and radice.emists with special qualifica-
- ions ho may be usa; fcr ucaing with e.r.ergency conditions that may arise, c.
the arrangements for :he services of a physician for emercency treatment cf the individuals at the plant site.
- he,cevisions fer. aining non-company support gecups or d.
0 agencias that, may cc callec upon in the event of an energency, e.
tha mans for deter 'ning ha magnitude of the release of radiocc:ive materia.
NOTE:
addition, the are nwnercus items that will recuire c u rification ar.
- ossicly scme changes.
We cons R r t.V t a ~.aeting w
- na applicant is the best maans for clearing up thas. items.
2.
The applicant has statac in section 12.3 of his FSAR : hat his Industrial Security Plc till not be decketed due to its sensitive nature.
The :,dustrial Security Plan has to be docketed, but may be sut aitted as proprietary according to Part 2.790 of the Commir sion Regulation.
We can not start our re, view of this item untii we receive a copy of the plan.
3.
We noted in cur memo to '. C. DeYoung, dated Aug. 15, 1972 our positica relative to ac :antation of the olant staff during initial startuo and operation c' the facility. Inis item was again described ;r a mema fr:
L C. ' eYcung to J. F. O' Leary, datec Aug. 18,1272, in a let - to the applicant dated Sect. 21, 1972 from J. F. O' Leary and Firma:. to J. F. O' Leary frca the ancli-cant date: Oct. 9, 1C-
.._ : ?licant has submittad Editicnal informatica relative tc Ois itam in his revisec sectica 13.
Mcwever, we do not cons: 2r the informaticn submitted scecific enough to allow us to cc ulete cur review of this item.
Therefore, we will need the folicwi a infcrmation; the identification of the J
~,
2_
individual and his qualifications (if not submitted to date) cf each person specifically designated to augment the plant staff for each of the foll^ 'ing positions; Plant Superintendent, Operation Engineer, Technic.1 Support Engineer, Chemistry and Radiation Protection Engine 2r ar.d each Shif t Supervisor.
B.
OSB Positions 1.
We do not consider the applicanfs startup test program satisfactory at this time.
3.n acceptable program is described in the AEC " Guide for the Pic1ning of Initial Startup Programs" which the applicant has sta ;c he is in accord with.
- Mcwever, he has not indicated he int ds to conduct the following tests cescribed in the subject -
a; H.l.j - Chemical and Racio-chemical Tests, H.l.k - r.
o Rod Ejection Test, J.l.3 - Chemical and Radiochemical Analysis. J.l.f - Effluent and Effluent Mor.itoring Systems, J.l.g - Zvaluation of Core Performance end Margins from DNS, J.i.
- Loss of Flow, J.l.k - Shutdown
, J.l.1 - Loss of Offsite Power, from. Outside the Control ~
J.l.n - Part-l ength Rod :
rtion/ Removal, and J.l.q - Psueda Rod Ejection Test.
In ac
-ion, his test program should specify the power level at which pcwer ascension tests will be performed.
' O
~m,