ML19319B567

Ack 750212 Meeting W/Util in Toledo,Oh Discussing Steps Taken to Correct Violations in IE Insp Rept 50-346/75-01

ML19319B567
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	03/03/1975
From:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Roe L TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML19319B568	List: IR 05000346/1975001 ML19319B567 ML19319B571 ML19319B574
References
750304, NUDOCS 8001270095
Download: ML19319B567 (2)

See also: IR 05000346/1975001

Text

-

-.-

s#

s

g

i

w

~

Nj

UNITCD STATE 3

-

NUCLEAR R E C U LATO R'i

C Oi.".itSS!O N

'

l

j

RCGION in

\\

/

799 nOOSEVEL' nO AD

CLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS ';0137

-

MAR

4 1975

Toledo Edison Company

Docket No. 50-346

ATTN:

Mr. Louell E. Roe

Vice President, Power

0

• %

Edison Plac:.

300 Madison Avenue

V O

Toledo, Ohio 43652

On

D

9, I

~

g

~

r

Centlemen:

V

-3

-

-

This refers to the special recting held by Messrs. Keppler, Hunnicutt,

and Hayes of this office with 'jou and Messrs. Novak and Lenardson of

your staff, and to our discussion with Mr. Williamson, at your corpcrate

of ices on February 12, 1975, relativa to construction activities at

the Davis-Besse site authoriced by Nuclear Regulatory Cm: mission Con-

struction Permit No. COR-GO.

This neeting van conducted in lieu of a

formal manage.r.cnt intervicu, follouing an inupeution perferra. by

Messrs. Sutton, ..aidu, and Jablonski of this of fice at the Davis-Pesse

em

site on January 22 - 24, 1975, and documented in IE Inspection Report

(

No. 050-346/75-01.

,

\\_,/

The purpose of the ceeting was to discuss the effecti"cacos of the

Davis-Desse Quality Assurance / Quality Control Progran relative to the

rec,virements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.

The =ceting consisted of a review of the infractions listed under

Enforcement Action in the Surnary of Findings Sectica of the referenecd

report, a revicu of similar infractions identified during previous

inspections at the Davis-Besse site over the past 12 - 1S months, and

possible generic problems lendtng to these infractions.

It uas pointed

out that, although none of the infractions taken individually is

considered of a serious nature, collectively they indicate weaknesses

in the Davis-Besse Quality Assurance Program. As discussed durin;; the

meeting, it is necessary that management action be taken promptly to

assure that those personnel involved in the construction, fabricatien,

and installation of the Davis-Ecsse 1 plant understand the need for

strict adherence to NRC requirements and the implementation of your

quality assurance progran as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

With regard to the issues raised during this meet.ing,, ue understand

that you intend to:

(1) review the ef fcetiveness

<>f the Cechtel

Corporation project field and quality control enr,ineers relative to

fotoTroS

C

,m3

9

(

O C;+J;n. w

t.

'

f

5

7. n r,

v

o

s 3,

e.

..n

Q (e. J j". l

.~ v g

,,, D .#'

6

80012700 7f

g

. ..

.-_ _ - - _

.

=_

_ ..

.

._ - --.

.

-

-

. _ - .

. _ .

.

4

,i

Toledo Edicos Cor.pany

-2-

MAR

4 m,alO

-

i

i

i

curveillance of contractor quality activities: (2) revici nnd initiate

j

indicated cetion to cccure indapandenca bett:cca quality accurance cnd

'

project ncncr.ecent groupc: (3) ctrengthen the Toledo Edicen Corpnny

lj

oito ccnstruction quality assurance group: (4) conpletc your revicu

and identificatica of cafety related ctructurec, synncun, equipment,

.

and conpenenta coasistent uith the renulations: (5) :!ncreacc Toledo

'

Edicen Co::pany quality nocurcnce audits of construction cctititicc;

j

cnd (6) promptly ccrplate revicier.c to your quality accurenca nanual

to cicarly catchlic;1 its applienbility to ongoing construction

,

I

activitica at Davie-Denac.

1

Ua plan to continun to conduct unanncunced innpcetieno to nacertain

l

j

vhether approprince corrective acticn has been tchen. The ::EC uill

i

take revencibic cnforcenent action, includiun the use of civil

penaltica or cucp.ucion of constructicn cctivitico, if ne.cossary,

should checc inspectionu fail to chmt cubstantial inprover.cnt in the

implementation of your quality nucuranca prograu.

i

Sincoroly yourn,

,

j

Jcnce C. Kepaler

~

Regional Dircetor

g

D

,

V

[~9~}[

.

bec:

IE Chief, FS&EB

,

-]"

l

IE:llQ (4)

'l

Licensing (4)

V

,

DR Central Files

i

IE Files

,

'

PDR

!

4

Local PDR

.I

NSIC

!

TIC

,

J. P. O'Reilly, Region I

4

N. C. Moseley, Region TI

!

j

E. M. Howard, Region IV

'

R.11. Engelken, Region V

i

g

i

I

I

1

,

i

J

!

~

!

t

t

u

- . _

. . .

_

.

.

.

.

. .

. . .

. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ , _ _ _ , . _