ML19319B395
| ML19319B395 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/05/1975 |
| From: | Sutton J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B385 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001150971 | |
| Download: ML19319B395 (2) | |
Text
UNITEo STATES 1.E A R REGULA.IORY COMMISSION REcloN til g
799 ROOSEVELT nomo CLEM ELLvas. ILLINoss 60s 37 v
November 5, 1975
/'
Region III Files THRU:
D. W. Hayes, Senior Reactor Inspector, Projects Section DAVIS-BESSE UNIT 1 SITE INSPECTION OCTOBER 29 AND 30,1975 J. W. Sutton and I. T. Yin conducted a scheduled, announced inspection of construction activities on October 29 and 30, 1975.
Mr. W. J. Dircks, Assistant Executive Director for Operations, Headquarters, accompanied the inspectors.
A rummary of Mr. Dircks' activities and expressed interests during the inspection are identified below:
1.
Mr. Dircks was given the following documents for his personal use:
a.
Current inspection plan, dated October 22, 1975.
b.
Report of the last Davis-Besse inspection (Report No.
v 050-346/75-18).
c.
Summary of I.icensing's October 15 and 16,1975, site electrical technical review findings.
d.
Brief description of the plar.c, license status, and major issues.
2.
Mr. Dircks also revieweil Inspection Reports No. 050-346/75-09, No. 050-346/75-10, No. 050-346/75-13, No. 050-346/75-15, and No.
050-346/75-16.
3.
Areas of interest, as expressed by Mr. Dircks during the inspection, were as follows:
a.
Freedom of IE inspectors to inspect without lic e n s ee / c o n e -' c a qr personnel present, and treedom to talk wi:h emplovees.
b.
Procedures and methods used by the inspectors in obtaining information f rom the licensee, and time and problems involved in obtaining this information.
O t
l G
3001150
R2gion III Fileo Nsveel.c r it. 1975
\\'
c.
Significant problem areas at the site (electrical, i.ilmary coolant pumps, and containment paint).
d.
Inspector's relationship with the licensee relative i..
communication channels, responsiveness, etc.
e.
Criteria of conducting exit interviews.
f.
The idea of Licensing personnel being stationed in ihn regions.
g.
The interrelacionshin between the Regional inspec t. e r: rin el Licensing personnel.
(I.e., the flow of informati..n an.i mutual notification of problem areas, etc.)
e 4.
The inspectors also discussed their backgrounds and exp. e lences, workloads, inspection module concepts, Yellow Book pres.ne as ions, etc.
The inspectors infor=ed Mr. Dircks that this inspect 6ni wa.: a typical inspection, using the techniques normally employ...a by IE:III personnel.
5.
Mr. Dircks accocpanied Mr. Sutton during his fie'id rev t.-v "I the licensee's cerractive action on previously reported vi..I...t..ns/
s
,,)
infractions and the review and observation of the ba.sel in.-
in-service inspection oc the pressuricer welds.
He ac...mp.nied
~
Mr. Yin during his review of the snubber / hanger installa: 1..n program and examination of actual Installations.
At the conclusion of the inspection, Mr. Dircks indicated 1... : lie was satisfied with the conduct of the inspection and had seen an.1 t.. en informed in all areas of his interest.
()' k/ Cu. nl h.W.Sutton Reactor Inspector, Projeran ;cction cc:
J. C. Keppler D. M. Hunnicutt l'~
\\
\\/
~-
l 1
l C
E