ML19319B261

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Structural Evaluation Rept
ML19319B261
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/14/1972
From:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
Shared Package
ML19319B260 List:
References
NUDOCS 8001140569
Download: ML19319B261 (4)


Text

.

v-7

-f Oconee Euclear Station Units 2 and 3 50-270/287 Docket Nos.

Structural Evaluation Report STROCTURAL DESCRIPTION: - facility include the

~1.

The Seismic Class I structures of the s; the auxiliary build containnent and its internal structure f.

and the dsm'and spillway complex.

d concrete structure -

The contalusent is a steel lined prestresseht circ in the form of a vertical rig The structures interior to the base and a flat spherical done.

d concrete castructica f

containment are typically of rein orce The wer plants.

'~

~

with details typical to PWR type nuclear pore, likcwise, structures external to tho' containment a nuclear power plant configurations.

DESIGN LOADS AND COMBINATIONS:

for the usual wind, tornado,;

II.

The Cissa I structures vers designed h pressure, accident and operi-reicnic, dead, live, buoyant, eart ating loads.

d a 59 psis desige.

The containnent was designed to withstan setente d t temperature.

pressure' and a concurrent peak acci en i e basis earthquakes, loads resulting from operating basis and des g w

have, likewus, been considered.

i h tand wind loading using-

~

The contahent was also designed to w t s

. A tornado loading ithe practica established in ASCE paper 3269.

Y

-s h4 h

-M I

3, g

A w+

n 2-

,)-

1

  • NVO& 7 g.,

- ~ -

. oppteg.

~

5~~

1

' mm.

~

~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _

~ - ~ ~ " ~ ~.

-DATt.(..,...

~ '

+:

,Liec.m m-.garcu om.

8001140g

1 1 t zis alse' included. he tornado model was the sinuitaneous p

application of a wind with a 300 mph velocity and a decrease n,

in atmospharie press'ure of 3 psi in 5 seconds. We find the

?

3 6

d

. methods of converting the. wind and tornado velocities inte loadings and the applications of loads to be acceptable since

~

they are similar to those previously approved.

.III.

CONTAIEMENT DESIGE:-

.ne containment structure was designed in accordance with tha

?

provisions of the ACI-318-63 and supplementary criteria as J.'.,.

established is. the SAR. no. containment prestressing consists 7,

mt L of a b'dop _... sad longitudinal prestressing tendocs in the cylinder g

1.,

and meritional ten, dons in the doms. Radial shear in the cylinder

. is carried 'directly by radial reinforcing bar.. In general,

,, w w

+

i reinforcing b'ar splices are by the Cadeeld process.

~

he containment structure was analyzed for Exi=ymmetrie loads

~

using finite element' theory. He finite element approach was y.

j also employed to evaluate the effect of non-axisynsmetrie loads. -

j na general design and analysis procedures as prepared by the a

applicant and out11=ad above are appropriata and acce'ptable for the containment, since they are in accordence with the general i

i practice of the profession.

-l

+

'^

Stresses resultant. frem smalysis have been s==anised in _ tabular' j

A 9

, 7

, +

form im Section Y of the safety. Analysis Report. S e stresses, in

.i j

O.

. W ii %. >.ni

~

3.

' general, lie well.withis established allowables and are acceptable.

~

1

- il,

a 1

9 Q

N 1

i-

,l.

N

~ O F F IC E '.

' 'C

.~._

L(

^

4 j

,m

- t;; e

' 4 %q a

'j u f,y,

gy, y,,,

g, -

}

p 4w

!=,

,) -wig ) 4.y,

. su mas. - g.

anat.

4

>m DA ti.'

b

^

.s.,

F.n. AEC 335 (Irev,9-53) AECW 0240 3 <gg

.g

(.

G

~....

'W 3-IV. CLASS I STEUCTURES OTi1ER TilAN CONTAIEMENT:

The static analysis techniques espiged are those conventionally applied in bees, frame, and this shall analysis.

~

~

He design of concrete structures internal and external to the contaf nment was accomplished in accordance with the provisicas f

~

of ACI-318-63. Design of interior structures included consider-ation of local pressure (208 pai for the reactor cavity) and jet impingement loads.

All Class I steel structures other than cont'ainment were designed by the working ~ stress method in accordance sith the provisions of the AISC Specification. Stress resultant 7were maintained below allowables..

~ ne applicant has designed all Class II'struct'.res that, through collapse, could damage Class I items as Class I or relocata such structures-so that the cafety function of Class I items is unaffected.

These procedures are similar to procedures approved for previously

. licensed facilities and are therefore acceptable to us.

V.

STRUCIURAL MATERTATS, CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, AND QUALITY COSTROL:- _

The structural materials, construction techniques, and quality control 'are, for the most part, similar to those applied on other recent maclear facility construction projects.- A 500 psi concrete'.

1

(.

OFFICE *

, M.

.4

(.

-g

- 9 '-

9=

M

. _. _ _ = _

.suw$.

f T lh,

O

-~

o

..c.u.f...

3>. c..... -

  1. 1 4

q

e

-4~

was used for the containment. Reinforcing steel conforms to i

ASTM A-615 with Crade 60 being used in' the foundatica slab and

. Crade 40 being eployed in the cylinder and dome for crack eco :

~ Full tanzion Cadweld splices were employed for bar~aplicing

-trol.

s

. of reinfoz ing bars of greater than size no.11.

Conventional construction sethods were used for this facility. The quality

. control procedures, which are similar in scope to those previously applied in other plants. such as Point Beach are acceptable to us for the Oconee Nuclear Power Plant.

t IV. STRUCTURAL ACCEPTANCE'TESTi.

The containment was pneumatically tested to l' 15 times the 4

dest pressure 'with gross deformation of the structure being recorded.

Tant wire'aystems,'. identical to the one employed a,--~~~~m~~~

T for Unit 1 were used for Units 2 and 3.

Crack pattern observa-4 tions were made in key areas.

Cafety Guide No.18, which was applied, includes a provision M

for lesser instrmientation for non-prototype containments.

In" view of the fact that Units 2 and 3 containments are identica11 f

a-,l

,. g in design to the Unit I contain=nt the lesser instrumentation.

21-providad is acceptable.

t

-.J '-

l

2-L

' :; + - _.. -

f Q-

s '..

q D

D m.-

g yc.

o.3 l

.n.:

...... M ) -

.::.>s.

c Oij

,J' 3

,O F F t c t,.

i k,

.,,jy

>r d,

-m

- - - ~.

g'f f,,

gjeu s,, ggt,

,+

+

e

~ ~ -. _ -.

1:b;[f lR?:,

"%L

. -:yfb

'F 3.g s p;'

3._

a x

.g.

,l

.DATE.

. s.

. m:

Yk 1 Fenn, AEC.388 (Rev. S 33) AECM 0240... _ _ _

.~-

,j y.

gp.,

,'.{

5

~

v,-~s

.k.-a 2

'e

-