ML19319A703

Forwards Evaluation of Amend 2 to Util Feb 1975 Topical Rept Entitled QA Program,DUKE-1. Approves QA Program for Design,Procurement,Const & Operation Activities of Nuclear Power Plants

ML19319A703
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	04/17/1975
From:	Vollmer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Wells J DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML19319A704	List: ML19319A703 ML19319A705
References
NUDOCS 7911270694
Download: ML19319A703 (1)

Text

..

mwe 4

:~~,=~ ~

m* 'w{ r: r -

s;r V,,.

a

.n r -

Q,j

S N.

W1

.. ev

^

3 y"

q@,

- b *1 f

y #%

.f,,

'7.,*;s %. f,

,,{

t*

2.- - -

mm, w, -

r

,iy &

J.M3 C c. idh ~ h~ > c.

DISTRIBUTION J

g

1. 4

• Central Files-QA. Reading i

NRR Reading

, p, :

.~

~

~

L..o n-n -

.FLiederbach,

C sh - a f ;

y AGarland~ J J,, '

,,y V'

~

4 2 gn

.s, p1.

3 %-m v p.

^t.. w w-w h e.aGilray

.q., s y #

g g g.,yy, e

APR 1 y 1973,.RVo.llber;

.m.

c., -

w=

~.~

2 A O.

• <2 Manager. Quality Assurance i ' :

r 9

DSkovbolt }

. ;> y~;= n A

, Duka Power Companyi Q iVJ A

• W;f.. ' a j. 7

' " r _*

~.+*1 M

' Power Building,; Box.2178, g

..J "E, N & ^

k' Charlotta, Morth Carolina 28201 i

..n e-4 y g 3r 3,.,

.. / 4,1 t -

N' g

, ~

m 4

'Dkar Mr. Walls's

'1"

' I

)

'i ' ["

x ;c :l *lQ "jki $,

.$ h ka,Q j.Q

~

z, < n..

'u w

e

-.e. have r. ev.i,e6ed and.'_ evaluated bmA:nent N. ol 2 of. th'a.D.u..

~

a V

. Company's Topical Report antitled " Quality Assuran~ce Pro.k.a Power K r~

?

- N

~

.o

^

.' s grams., '

. DUKE-1."1~We fihd'that it describes an acceptable Quality Assurance '

yk

, Program for tha'da' sign,"procurom?.nt? construction Cand' operations;

- aM cE.

phase activities'which are'within the Duka Power Company's~ecope'-

of work for nuclear. power plants.' - -

.n i.

-u

..e y n u

?

$-4~ i g-a m.

- s m.

v.

~

,c For the Duke Power Company Quality Assuranca Program,,y.ou needc

.J,.~,

3 m;. ;% b; c

u. -

only'referen d'Seetions 17.0 and 17.1'of this Topical Report; >..#

4 o< tM

>4 by repo'rt'nu:.ber'in[SectionT7.1"of^Pra11minary Safety Analysis x-r ' #S' Q~

.RepoYts: and, need'enly reference. Sections 17.0 End 17 2 'of this.

?-

te Topical Report by Esport number in Section 17.2 of Final SafetyJ

' J, 841 W

• ' Analysin Reports.' j We'do' 'not'inEend to' repeat our review of this #

~

i

'. 1 %.-

J Topical Re' port when~it is Taferenced in"an application.E i *^ ',

~

Should regulatory criteria or^ regulations change ^ such.that our L i f

"?,G i. L

,p

.,% f f y & _: ;' f f Q Q ;i t { f % @ %: fjf

.V c-

'conclusionsaboutthisTopical,Reportareinvalidated[we'wil1+

?

' notify'you [ You will be ~given the opportunity.to revise and; :~

~

f.,

resubmit it should you so desi,ra.:

pcJR2:

n c

.ie

.LI,

,y

.?

,~

~ n..

....~.3 Q,

r_ U 4'

Please include a copy of this letter and our, evaluation in each, of the reports and resubmit 70 copies to the NRC.- AR Y

v i m

a-Sincerel.

s 4

t

~

' j

'Origind sMy" %

~

J.

~

~

u N, v_ i

'?"

.gs,-

c f

n 3.

' Richard H. vonmer_,

, ; q;

'q

. g.

~

3

9 3

n z

' Richard L Vol b r; Chief 3

Quality Assurance Branch'-

b.

>lI

(

.3 Division of Reactor' Li,censin. g i N MG

' W 1

yr%

3v

,m y

m

@y::S.l A *

• p"' :vc r g" sg - *

~ e3

. a

n.,q.g;.

2:a Enclosurst.t f f g

e

.n -

s-t m : 3 <.

~

NRC Topiem1 Report? "'

' "i

/

4 a,

Evaluation'of DUKE-1 E

~ '

M/

~L (Amhndment No. 2)

^*

// ecd [s/vI.sas.s j' '