ML19317G930

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/73-04 on 730612-15 & Notice of Violation
ML19317G930
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 08/01/1973
From: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML19317G926 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004020585
Download: ML19317G930 (1)


See also: IR 05000312/1973004

Text

.

,*

5

.

p

,

,6 ,

UNITEo STATES

~

,

t

\\

'

' ' . , . 1

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

(

.

s .)

oinscronars or necui.avony orunavions

-

! ;

.j

.

%CtXMMM*RROKX:tRRX

.

i

amaxxxxxxxauenunxRxsnemi

,,,,,,,..,,,.. ..,,,

r. o.i m isis

.. ...

i

$

'

mentY, CNIl@flA 94701

,

4

.

,-

.

'

-~

c

AllG

1 1973

i

,

g

i

.

-

_

__

- '

$

s

-

'

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Docket No.

050-0312

,

P. O. Box 15830

-

- Sacramento, California 95813

Attention: Mr. John J. Mattimoe

Assistant General Manager

e

,

i

and Chief Engineer

'

,.. Gentlemen:

.

Thia, refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. R. T. Dodds and

,

L. J. Garvin of this office on June 12-13, 1973, of construction

'

activities authorized by AEC Construction Permit No. CPPR-56 and to the

discussion of our findings held by Mr. Dodds with Messrs. J. J. Mattimoe,

O

J

J. Jewett and other members of your utaff at the conclusion of the

(

inspection.

.

Areas examined during this inspection included (1) reactor coolant pressure

(

boundary pipe welding, (2) other Claan I pipe welding, (3) Class I

components, (4) reactor vessel internals, and (5) several industry related

potential generic problems. Within thene areas, the inspection consisted

of selective examination of procedurca vnd representative records,

interviews with project persEnel, and observations by tiie inspectors.

In addition, the status of actions you have taken with respect to the

items identified in our letter of April 18. 1973, and your answer of May 15,

,

1973, were examined. We have no further questions concerning these items.

During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities

appeared to be in noncompliance with your quality assurance program

requirements. The items and referencen to the pertinent requirements

are listed in the enclosure to this letter.

This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of

the AEC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2. Title 10, Code of Federal

Regulations.

Section 2.201 requiren you to submit to this office wLthin

thirty (30) days of your receipt of thin notice, a written statement or

-

explanation in reply including:

(1) cerrective steps which have been

taken by you, and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will

be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance

will be achieved.

' D

bf .v

800

0b