ML19317G535

Requests Comments & Concurrence Re post-CP Review Items Concerning R&D,Initial ASLB Decision,Ser,Hearing,Transcript & Containment Design.Meeting W/Util to Be Arranged for Latter Half of Feb 1969

ML19317G535
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	01/16/1969
From:	Boyd R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 8003180834
Download: ML19317G535 (4)

Text

s.

..w.

w 3

^

.z m

s,,

. _ =..

4 Januar/ 16, 1969 D

Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing POST-CONSI'RUCTION PERMIT REU.EW OF FLORIDA FOhr CORPORATIO3'S CRY @AL RIVER U31T 3 (DoCKh? 50-302, CPPR-51.)

A construction permit van issued to Florida Power Corporation on September 25, 1968 for the Cr/stal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Station. The items listed belev require additional DEL consideration for the interim period of post-CP, pre-provisional operating license application. A meeting with Florida Pcvar Corporation vill be arranged for the Intter half of Februar/

._969 Tc/c cct:c,cnts and concurrence on the fcilow'.ng ;cints are requcated.

1.

Research ard Develot:mont Items The Cr/stal River unit rene bles the Three M'ic Island (~D!I) plant,' for

.tuh a post-cocctracticu pemit me+: tins was cold en i>eceicer 19, lido.

Moct of the ?MO infor: anion precented in that rectics d.cala also be applicable tc Crystal River. Since we have had the benn:.t of that recent meetiag, we do not anticipnte any additiccal detailed questicac cf."IC en rhi escept to veriff their c &cdf.u.

• ie vill ask WC if it is chan61nG its ccctral red drive desic a nu "e. "1 did, cicce thi is = $.o1 iten.

1 2

Initial fecisica cr AdL3 The initial decision vaa revised for itens which ni@t require DEL action. The decisica van senewhat unique in that the 2cari recc.w* cled a ccedition for incrporation in the CP cc=craias the use of cedia:

thiosulfate. Since the I.D..is ncy under review by the Commission, we should aweit their rf.ing ancl not bring the subject up at the aceting.

3. - Safety Evaluation (S.E. )

Harricane Design (p. 6)-

i a.

'We said:

"We intend' to evaluate the proposed plant deuign relatite

'o hurricane effect.s es, eocu au.the revied I231, repcct w n

Lavailable. The applicant has stated, and we vill require, that the plant pnatection vill confo~n to the applicable

~perticus of.v.* iced 23SA criterin."

m s,

4 *-

t

.[

- - CUTCE >

~

8003J 8083V

~

s l'

.,1

m. _

w f7 re

0 l

q.* : 4 ' _ c.

.,p n,. _

=

- '- J

' S4TE >

.i.....

q,g,, _ ',,, a,,S** o-2Wa lD ' ~

usMui:c'%W--4:.._ r ; & h;.'$D2%i5 -

Ferma ABC.814(Rev.HD '

g:.s

• • J O L1 W W -y. ws ;-As':mW

Q ~ k t'c m.

_ = gmg.,

' ~ - c 7m e yygeggg;.e;gcsy;~ y psy**; m,gggp

,. L r.

L'_

., p,-

w-

'v

. ~

L "f

~

N.

'," J u

b

~

Peter A.. Morris

. 2 _-

Jeausry lo,1939.

p-p.

m The E3SA criteria are still not published.. However, we are avaro that the applicant's consultant has infor-M1y discussed the proposed revision with ESSA.

We should ask FPC vhat their cratus of desia,n is, for hurricane tidec Our concern should be that the prcposed new criteria and wave reups.

be made available on-a timely basis rela?,1ve to FPC's design and

~ construction needs.

b.

Cembined Seismic and Blowiown Forces (p.13)

We said:

"The applicant has performed the analysis of ecmbined seismic and hievdcyn forces based on preliminarf eatinates of pressure differential ti:te histori's. The final 1 cal-ings vill be sub.itted to us for reviev vhen available later this year."

As of this writin; the submittal has not leen nodo.

Preau:tably it vill be the same as Appendix 4A for Oyster Creeh 2.

Wo intend to discuss this with Y C.

Ccntrcl Ecd Drive Design (p.17) c.

Ee intend to veri.^..c.; type of re'l drite to be ud, and the additional info:.nution required if the decign chance sh~t.id tda pla.M.

d.

Segrattm of Contral end.hfa 7 (p. EG) re said:

"The ACES has stated (Ge tion 11.0) than the control and protectica instrunentatica should be ;cparated to the fallest extent practicablc. U2 -#11 review the detailed final design, and implement this recoemendation, at the operating license stege."

-Our ecucern at the meeting vill be restricted to inquiring as to the present. status of design.. Wo shall have had the tenefit of a separate meeting with B&W on this sub, Ject.

e.

Part-Length Rod.-

~We said:

"If xen a oscillations prove c be a prcelen in ze :.inal core design, part-length reds may be required."

Some information en part-length rode, la'teled Axial Foger Shaping 3cds

~

^

(APSR) vsa included in the ansver to question 71-A on Oyster Creeh 2.

We intend to discuss this answer with the appliennn's reactor syste:

. wg

_~ ~

l g

suppne::, inw. -

w -

2 "n i sumaanat > l :^ '

~

j

.;1 C J=4 '.

• ~--

4.e ~

.....t 04TE >

b4.wvtahueT mrw-04 cm2.t ais-<>2wes,

~ EN

.hj, ' ','

,,,,,,2-~>&~.

.t if ~ u. ~ T.

+ J

<-w.

~

L ~ -7 em A,

h

~w-

x. ~..w

.w.-

x.

n.a...,. c ~

n.-

,e...,.,w.

. n,

~

g

. f.. - Q:3t;..

e.7,.#.. a..e 3-

. g4 f~ yq)pq pp,.x ;& '

1 n

f g

3 i g

_~.

,i m..,

,i D,

i y

u -,

., ~

w-,m.

.. a.:-

.n

.w -

se.

e

_.. C s L,

m.

,y J

Peter A. Mc Wis

_.w 3--

-- M January.16, 1969, dii+

f.

~neactor Building Fnn Coolers (p. 22)

We said:

"The applicant vill review the bearing design after integration into the cooler system and detemine the neceacity for envircncectal tests. We vill also assure ourselves -that the fan cotor housings have been con-servatively designed and, depending on-the final design, may requira a prototype envirocrantal test of the cocrplete motor unit.#'

Since ve have discucced this subject recently at the Met-D1 meeting involving the same A-E, Gilbert Associates, little c&litional infoma-tien vill be caught. Our discussicn should be limited to confimntion of si=ilcrity in design.

g.

Failed ? col Eic=ent retecter (p. 25)

We said:

" Scoping studies on such a systen have been initiated by I?R.

We vill review che resulta of that study tinen available."

Since the reper; is n:t yet avcil ble, re chculd inquir? a0 to it: Otatu:.

h.

Pre : ure Ve: sci Thm- "- "%er (p. Le )

We said:

"Tha applicant ch uld also egiore possible chan;;;0c to the feuility Ic clir.iante the necc,a Ocnaider po~C "

re 20*or vessel failure due to the:- nl -neck."

We ahould explore the general status of analyaic cn thia cubject; it tcc va:: discussed at the Het-Ed meting.

1.

Quality Accurance (p. 31,49-50)

This plant ~.;as processed through the C.P. stcge before the increased regulatory interest. Consequently, w vill requect a conprehensive presentation on QA'by the applicant. As requested in an earlier memorandum frca Dr. Morris, Dr.. Beck will be invited to the meeting.

4.

H. M. Newmark Raport (Appendix F to 3.E.)

a.'

D7nneic Analysis (p. O cf Nein: ark report; 67 of S.E. )

Newmark said: "It 'a cur meat:nendation, and the applicant ::c. curs in Anendner.t 2, that a for~ni dynamic analysis be perfemed for Class I structurcs, eqaipcent and piping, especially fer those systems which ern ritsi

• .o

lm safety."

l l

l 4

CFFICE >

Y' y i

' V Q' ' #1:q-7^

• DATE >

M

w., ~ ~ m,.gw

.w e

., -n

_,n

~

=-

r

e,r: -. -

., n.: p.eg ~ m~~

-m

-1) ~-

.r

~.

, w,n. n...: w.wm

.n a

..a,~.g# w - #

.w

... e..

m..

t.; ;le

, c : y p-[ - T ng, fd -

Se-c.#.-

1, j ja

- - -.4_..

.,j.f y-.

• -s-qgi

..l

- ~.

.s-7 3

i

.,~

~. w

~x.:n D

'#.f.h a w-*-

H.. -

i 3 wl y ^-

a

~

u n..

c.4

~.

...u, r

s 4-

-January 16,1969 Peter A. Morri; We chould discuss the status of;this analysis (Newmsrk aln recocmended a 20% uniform ::t sin 1*mit' on piping decign, cee 3.E., p. 90).

b.

.Cadvald Celices Heve.arh notes that.Cadveld oplices are to be employed.

We should discuss the criteria, the applicant's and ours,- for nondestructive testa.

5 Transcript'of Hearing a.

Reactor Eu11 dine Fan Coolers-(See 3-f above)

Transcript pp. 414-420.

The tastimony.31atcrates on the S.E. discussion cu faa ecclers.

Again we say (Tr. p. 415, lines 6-8) thac we *. rill myiew the final design.

On p. 416, linco 12-14, we said that we expect to perfo: s cur reviev na theco data become Trailnhie, in cdvance of nc applianti n for ice POL.

C.galityAssurance'(bee 3-1noove) b.

.. 3 s

.me appAican,c :.c uameu tee m=;r on @.

('_..T. pp. 4.ya-q., )

.a, mora de a n.,

y

-hen that previded in the PEE.

'.'c i.T end tc nee 'he draft ;nde dst.i Ja mary 1,1960 in evaluating FF;'s c'trrent GA place.

6.

Oct.=,taruu~ Daair;n. -

We understand thet t,he cc itainment prestress design vill te che: ged fron 90-vire to 163-vire u.nN syctet. Clic virca vill be slig1tly larger i

than tha '170-vira ay:sta on Me -Ed.

Je V M r*iscus:i the c ch qc3 n th Florida Pover Corporation.

'/S/

\\

~

Roger S. Boyd, Assis^ ant Director for Reactor Pro,jects Division of Roactor Licensing Dis t ribution:

Suppl.

S. Levine-DPl-Eesding-D. Skcvhci:

FF3-1 Reading R. TeYcung

~0 rig:- 5Hoss O)

DE~. Err.neh i'hiefs F. Schrceder

,t g?@C M :'m.~&

• '= %p"'.,.

^

enscs >

Qf hn( -

'k j

sumiaast>

DTRcss:ct:

C&:.ci.~0 R5so'& -

u

. #g oan >...:1

5 6.<0!' 7........I..

4 4_.

- 4 1 1*-69

~

Perm ABC-318 (ks.N31

%m map,sirru.tae-o-ais-e:s.

l R::

%,!L::. Sci t L.i~~. @ :

~ *

.f e Dak.

~ ^

.ut

.c.~.

w