ML19317F222
| ML19317F222 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 05/16/1974 |
| From: | Robert Lewis US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Thornburg H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317F223 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001080934 | |
| Download: ML19317F222 (2) | |
Text
(
w//lZll,,
L.~
~
n k
- 4 UNITID STATES 1
kh J
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION b
g ff
.If
.p).!
E J P,/.TF OF FZJuAT Wi " G TICC d ~_' ~ # '
~
I g,
ue c io., n - suo r em i,,,.,, p
,s
.c n u u - t e r, w -
- c s
,,,m
........a e...,.. m-c t. wn e
MAY 161974 H. D. Thornburg, Chief, Field Support and Enforcement Branch Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Headquarters DUKE POWER COMPANY (OCONEE, UNIT 3), LICENSE NO. CPPR-35, DOCKET NO. 50-287 This refers to an inspection of the subject facility by our inspectors on April 29 - May 2, 1974: RO Inspection Report No. 50-287/74-5.
This memorandum is submitted for your information.
Implementation of Oconee's QA program for operations as described in the FSAR, DPC's letters to Directorate of Licensing dated April 27, 1973, and July 31, 1973, and Directorate of Licensing's " Summary of March 28, 1974, Heeting With DPC Representatives to Discuss DPC's Topical Report on QA," was inspected.
Significant deficiencies were identified. DPC stated they would be responsive to the inspection findings, however, t. hey stated the following two items would be pursued with Directorate of Licensing:
The DPC letter of April 27, 1973, states that a program of inspections a.
to observe for signs of wear, deterioration or loss of efficiency for safety-related structures, systems and components will be included in
)
their operational QA program.
DPC stated they would seek relief from this comitment through Directorate of Licensing.
b.
Technical Specification 6.1.2.2.i(2) states that the Nuclear Safety Review Committee (NSRC) shall review proposed changes in equipment or systems which may constitute an unreviewed safety question defined in 10 CFR 50.59, or which are referred by the operating organization.
DPC's position is that if the Station Review Committee (SRC) determines that a modification does not constitute an unreviewed safety question then NSRC review is not required. The inspectors stated that position was not consistent with the technical specification requirement.
DPC stated that they would resolve this matter with Directorate of Licensing.
B. C. O R. C. Lewis, Acting Chief Facilities Test and Startup Branch i
O 8001080 h V
k
s~<
p.
RO Inspection Report No. 50-287/74-5 MAY 161974 DUKE POWER COMPAhT Oconee 3-DISTRIBUTION:
H. D. Thornburg, R0 RO:HQ (5)
DR Central Files Regulatory Standards (3)
Directorate of Licensing (13) cc encl. only:
l
- PDR
- Local PDR
- NSIC
- DTIE, OR
- State
- To be dispatched at a later date.
A
- - - - -,