ML19317E245

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Adequacy of Structural Criteria for Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1,2 & 3
ML19317E245
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/1967
From: Hall W
NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
To: Morris P
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19317E246 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912170495
Download: ML19317E245 (2)


Text

l j

9 ummswv wA'wwsenen.ubru.cmw.i 4,p.f;p u.- Qu % 5Ar>se r.d dA, othusvews s<.ys<.w'twzm

' NO.s

oATE OF ooCUhENT:

' DA E RECEI D

~

r.

. att, n. a m.= ^

saw 52m a

oingR

,,cpo,,

" ,9EI JJts M ir015 ug,o g3,,

V, (W. J. Ibil) x f

OTHER; ORIG.

CC:

10:

A IOra tat (tssARY Q

CCNCURRENCE O

o^rt ^NSwt'fo=

ce n tui o

ev.

no Acweiassm o

~CLA%It.s exKsts 50-269, ~270 and -207 FlLE (ODE:

POST Of FICE

r _;_. __

tJ REG.NO:

DATE RECElVED SY DATE _,

REFERRED TO DESCRIPTION. (Ws18e hlawf.ed) 1 Ltr. trono. ono (1) cigned copy of tho i

fo11ou3ng report by liemark and llalls

. Eqvd1:

6-ZT v/1 cy. - Fort ACTI71

~.

?

EhCtO50RES.

Ir.fo Conios to Eoport (final) to IIC Ecculatory Steff H. Pcico A St #

on tha "idequacy of the Structural Dr Morrin Critoria for tho Oconco !!cclear Station Skovholt linita 1 2 cnd 3 for Dako Fover Co.,"

inn; 3

dated Jano,1967

vfyeye, 110 71

,,Jf3 (ppl B llo

'j-au c/o.

platritution:

orig. In 50 -269) t# vins acu m s:

J0 N0 JR EM0E v3%

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Mall CONTROL FORM FOsM AsC-326s.

48-6 01 1966 - 235 519 W U. S. GobEp%4thT PRINTING OFFICE; i

1 i

4 1

J s

i r

9 7,

B'

-n B 6\\ h N A T'11 A N M.

NEWMARK CONSULTING Ef 4GINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING GUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 61801 23 June 1967 gem

_v u L<

Dr. Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545 Re: Adequacy of the Structural Criteria for the Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3 Duke Power Company

Dear Dr. Morris:

i am returning herewith one signed copy of the final report by Dr. N. M. Newmark and me on the above noted facility.

Corrections noted on the signed copy are as follows:

p. 4, line 5 of 2nd par.:

"O.Olg" should be "0.10g"

p. 6, lines 5, 6 and 7 from bottom should read:

"given in_the Rankine lecture to the Institution of Civil Engineers, in which the analyses given in Supplement 1 used static slip circles for the dynamic analysis.

In ceneral the slip circles for the dynamic analysis will be different from those for a static analysis, but in this case it appears..."

We have reviewed Supplement 5 to the PSAR, which was received yesterday, and the statements made in our report prepared prior to receiving Supplement 5 stand unchanged.

Sincerely yours, W.)' N4AA-W. J. Hall i

bd cc:

Dr. N. M. Newmark I

t