ML19317D330
| ML19317D330 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 09/12/1973 |
| From: | Murphy C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Thornburg H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317D327 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911270555 | |
| Download: ML19317D330 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000270/1973010
Text
-
.
4
- ,%d
UNITED STATES
-
r
'i
' ~~
C
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
} ' , e'Q '
1
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATCRY OPERATICUS
+
.
aEGioN o - suit E sie
$
54
y
230 PE ACHf R E E ST R EET. NCRT HwEST
IP
4
,
,, , ,,,,, ,,, y ,,
4rgg C
ATLANTA. GEORGIA N 303
September 12, 1973
H. D. Thornburg, Chief, Field Support and Enforcement Branch
Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Headquarters
PAGE INSERTICH - DUKE POrrR COMPANY (CCONEE 2) , LI N SE NO. CPPR-34
REPORT NO. 50-270/73-10
The enclosed pages were inadvertently cmitted from the subject report
distributed to you on August 29, 1973.
Please insert these pages into your copy of the report.
l
Z4/.yy
C. E. Murph', Chief
Facilities Test and Startup
RO:II:CEM
Branch
Enclosures
Page Nos. 4 and I-2
cc w/encls:
RO:HQ (5)
3-
1 Central Files
Regulatory Standards (3)
Directorate of Licensing (13)
cc encls. only:
- PDR
- Local PDR
'
'NSIC
- DTIE, OR
- State
- To be dispatched at a later date.
.
.
C
7911270
t
_
i
n
.
,
l
.
,
..
!
.
-4-
~.i
-
~
!
10 Rpt. No. 50-270/73-10
'
j
.-
C.
Personnel Changes
The following personnel changes were announced August 2,1973:
,
1.
M. D. McIntosh was promoted to Assistant Plant Superintendent
j
at DPC's McGuire Station.
l
2.
L. E. Schmid was promoted to Operating Engineer at the
Oconee Station.
i
3.
T. L. McConnell was promoted to Assistant Operating Engineer
'
at the Oconee Station.
4.
C. Tongue was promoted to Assistant Health Physics Supervisor -
(new position).
VII. Management Interview
A management interview was held on August 17, 1973, with the
following in attendance:
Duke Power Company (DPC)
J. E. Smith - Plant Superintendent
,
,
J. W. Cox - Assistant Plant Engineer
T. L. Cotton - Junior Engineer
The following items were discussed:
A.
Review of Administrative Procedures
The inspector stated that he had reviewed the administra-
tive procedures currently in effect with those described
in Regulatory Guide 1.33; there are three procedures lacking.
The licensee's representative stated that these would be pre-
'
pared by September 20, 1973.
(Details I, paragraph 3)
B.
Previously Reported Unresolved Items
..
The status of previously reported unresolved items, as described
in Section IV of the Summary of Findings, was discussed.
(Details
I, parsgraphs 4 and 5)
)
,
i
C.
High Energy System Interim Measures
The inspector stated that he had reviewed the status of.the
,'
interim measures for Oconee 2, presented in MDS Report OS-73.2,
'
i
" Analysis of Effects Resulting Frem Postulated Piping Breaks
[
Outside Containment," dated April 25, 1973, and Supplement 1,
'd
-
l
- . -
-
. _ .
--
-
._ _
.. _ .. - .
!
l
--
l
. _
-
..
-
.
-
.}
s
.
.
.' '.
-
_1.
RO kpt . No . 50-270/73-10
I-2
-
-
.
ff'S
il(/
2.
Witnessing Hot Functional Tests
I
l
The inspector witnessed performance of the following hot functional
tests (HFT):
,
1'
a.
IP 330/3A, " Control Rod Drive - Rod Droptime Test"
,
b.
TP 200/12A, "RC Pump Flow Test (HFT)"
c.
TP 200/36, " Loose Parts Monitoring Functional Test"
There were no questions or deficiencies noted on IP 330/3A and
TP 200/12A. The acceptance criteria on these tests were satisfied.
A deficiency was no" d by the inspector during the performance of
TP 200/36.
The test was run with four of the eleven sensors in a
location different from that specified in the test procedure.
The
table below shows the sensor location as found and as specified in
the test procedure:
Sensor Location
Sensor No.
Actual
As Specified by TP
~'
1
Incore Guide Tube 41
Incore Guide Tube 41
,
2
Incore Guide Tube 48
Incore Guide Tube 48
3
Incore Guide Tube 1
Incore Guide Tube 1
4
CRD 67
Incore Guide Tube 34
5
CRD 63
Incore Guide 'ube 52
6
SG 2A Hand Hole
SG 2A Hand Hole
7
SG 2A Tube Sheet Vent
SG 2A Tube Sheet Vent
8
CRD 69
SG 2A Pulse Line
9
SG 2B Band Hole
SG 2B Band Hole
10
SG 2B Tube Sheet Vent
SG 2B Tube Sheet Vent
11
CRD 65
SG 2B Pulse Line
The location of four sensors had been changed about a week prior to
performing the test, and after the initial verification of the sensor
'
location by the test coordinator, to monitor a condition on selected
control rod drives (CRD).
The inspector stated that relocation of sensors without the test
coordinator being aware of the change appeared to be in violation
,
of Criterion XI, " Test Control," of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50.
.
e
i
i q
,
7
l
>
- _ _ m --
--
-
--
._
_
_-
.
--
~
,-
.
_