ML19316A218

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 28,28 & 25 to Licenses DPR-38,DPR-47 & DPR-55,respectively
ML19316A218
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/27/1976
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML19316A211 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912030336
Download: ML19316A218 (2)


Text

(

,[%

g UNITE 3 STATES g

j NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20586 g, ***e* j SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEA ION S_UPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.

28 TO FACILITY LICENSE NO. DPR-38 SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.

28 TO FACILITY LICENSE NO. DPR-47

_ SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.

25 TO FACILITY-LICENSE NO. M R-55

_ DUKE POWER COMPANY

_OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3

_ DOCKET NOS. 50-269, 50-270 AND 50-287 Introduction By letter dated April 16, 1976, Duke Power Company (th Licenses Nos. DPR 38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 for th y Operating Units 1, 2 and 3.

limiting Oconee Unit 3 cycle 1 operation to 10 944 EffThe pro Hours (EFPH).

ective Full Power Discussion 1

The Oconee Technical Specifications presently prohibit of Oconee Unit 3 cycle 1 beyond 10,944 EFPH until supporti the operation and data pertinent condition have been approved by the NRC.to fuel clad collapse under nucle ng analyses determined that creep collapse will not occur duriindi cation at it has been three cycles of operation.

ng the projected the restriction limiting Unit 3 cycle 1 operation tThe licensee has there deleted.

o 10,944 EFPH be l

1 Evaluation The limitation which restricts Oconee Unit 3 cycle 1

=mrimum of 10,944 EFPH was applied by us as an interim m operation to a supporting analyses were approved pertinent tofuel claddi easure until resulting from fuel densification.

ng collapse Program to Determine In-Reactor Performance of B eport BAW-10084, Collapse, May 1974.

applications with provisions specified in our letter of AThe to B&W subsequently resubmitted the topical report d cense ugust 9, 1974.

as r< fined by our provisions.

escribing the analysis,

~

m F

7912030

2-l h licensee has applied the approved analysis to predict the most limiting -

. time to cladding collapse for Uconee Unit 3.

h application has several conservatisms including those we have previously identified. The most "

?

limiting time to cladding collapse exceeds tha mar' mum projected three-cycle core life of 24,746 EFP51. We therefore conclude that the current limitation of 10,944'EFPH on Oconee Unit 3 cycle 1 operation can be deleted.

We have determined that the amendments do not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendments involve an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of envf.ronmental impact and pursuant to 10 CFR 951.5(d)(4) that an g

environmental statement, negative declaration, or environmental impact l

appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of these

==*nd=*nts.

Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:

(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the conson defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

Date: July 27,1976

, non M W**

y l

l w

- 6 1

(

9 UNITED' STATES ~ NUCLEAR REGULATORT COMMISSION DOCKET'NOS. 50-269; 50-270, AND 50-287 DUKE ' POWER COMPANT -

NOTICE OF' ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT'TO FACILITY OPERATING' LICENSE

..l Notice is hereby given that the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission u

(the Commission) has issued Amendment Nos. 28, 28, and 25 to Facility Operating Licenses No. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55, respectively, issued to l

Duke Power Company which revised Technical Specifications for operation of the Oconee Nuclear Station Units Nos.1, 2, and 3, located in Oconee County, i

South Carolina.

The amendments are ef fective as of the date of issuance, f

These amendments delete the restriction which limits Oconee Unit No. 3 Cycle 1 operation to 10,944 fffective Full Power Hours.

1 The application for these amendments complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has itade appropriate l

findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in f

10'CFR Cha'pter I, whicE are set forth'in'the'licanas amendments.- Notice of

~ Proposed Issuance of Amendment to Facility License No. DPR-55 in connection 1

with this action was published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on Jime 21, 1976 (41 FR 24955). No request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene was filed following notice of the proposed action.

el1

~

1

'79/1970 0 '

i 2-

~,

The Commission has determined r. hat the issuance of these amendments' will not result in,any significant environmantal impact and that pursuant to 1.0 CFR 551.5(d)(4) an environmental statement, negative declaration, or environmental impset appraisal need not be prepared in connection with issuance of these amendments.

For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the j

application for amendments dated April 16, 1976, (2) Amendment Nos. 28, 28, r-and 25 to License Nea. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55, respectively, and y

(3) the' Commission's related Safety Evaluation. All of these items are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public

' Document Room, 1717 H Street, N..W., Washington, D. C.

20555 and at the 29691.

Oconee County Library, 201 South Spring, Walhalla, South Carolina A copy of items (2) and (3) may be obtained upon request addressed to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.

20555, Attention: Director, Division of Operating Reactors.

Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 27th day of July 1976.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y

  • C4ub,/7). /i
  • Charles M. Trammell, Acting Otief Operating Reacters Branch #1 Division of Operating Reactors l

4%

-e r

,r-m w-

,,..,,.-ww..,--a,ew.-

---,,-4,

.,-g


~,-----e-