ML19312D126

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-388/79-50 & 50-339/79-59.Corrective Actions:Repts Received for Processing at Sys Level Elevated in Priority for Preparation & Review
ML19312D126
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/1980
From: Stallings C
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19312D124 List:
References
067.011779, 67.011779, NUDOCS 8003210137
Download: ML19312D126 (2)


Text

._

's

-V

,,Vaprog A,ELucrusc Axis Pownx COMPANY

'!T '..

strenmonn,vimorn:A 9 02061

[r.'p'A6..F ruary 11, 1980 6

Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 067/011779 Office of Inspection and Enforcement P0/RMT:baw U. S.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. 50-338 Region II 50-339 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 License No. NPF-4 Atlanta, Ceorgia-30303 Permit No.

CPPR-78

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

We have reviewed your letter of January 17, 1979, in. reference to the inspection conducted at North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. I and 2 on December 10-12, 1979, and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-338/79-50 and 50-339/79-59.

Our response to the specific infraction is attached.

We' have determined that no prop: *etary information is contained in the reports.

Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to these inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosuye.

Very truly yours,

. f', ' 0.Ni cle. s.,.:-

C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment ec: Mr. Albert Schwencer 9

4 4

,s 1

800821013 7

g--.

Attcchments P;gs 1 of 2 Response To Notice Of Violation i

Items Reported in IE Inspection Report 50-338/79-50 and 339/79-59 NRC Comment As required:by Technical Specification 6.9.1.9, written reports of the types of events listed in that specification shall be submitted to the

~

Director of the NRC Regional Office within 30 drys of the occurrence of the event.

Similarly, Specification 6.9.1.8 rec,uires that written reports lof events of the types in that specification be submitted within 14 days of the' event occurrence.

Contrary to the above,' Licensee Event Reports (LERs) numbers79-123, a.79-124, 79-129, and 79-134, all reporting events as listed in Specifi-cation 6.9.1.9, were submitted to the Director NRC Regional Of fice between 31 to 33 days af ter the. occurrence.

b.

Contrary to the above, LER number 79-141, reporting an event as listed in -Specification 6.9.1.8, was submitted to the Director NRC Regional Of fice 22 days 'af ter the event occurrence.

This is an-infraction.

A similar item was brought to your attention in our letter dated September 19, 1978.

Response

N A Licensee Event Report (LER) Ris written as a result of a reportable deviation occurring at the station.

A rough draft of the final report is prepared and reviewed by the Station Nuclear Safety and' Operating Committee and any. comments are incorporated into the report.

The report is then forwarded to the Cor-

.porate of fice for further review and submittal to the NRC.

Pursuant to Section' 2i201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice" Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federa1 ' Regulations, the_. following information is submitted.

1.

Corrective steos taken and results achieved:

A visual tracking system under the control'of a report preparation group was established.

This system has shown that at certain times the number of LERs to be prepared exceeds the responsible individual's capability.

1 Reports received for processing at the system level have been elevated.in priority status for both preparation and review.

Additional clerical personnel have been added to the existing staff to better facilitate the incorporation of final-report revisions.

S w

-t -

--,\\2a u

u---.-

--a