ML19312C881
| ML19312C881 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 04/02/1973 |
| From: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Hendrie J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001130054 | |
| Download: ML19312C881 (5) | |
Text
o APR 2 1373 Docket I;os. 5 @ /287 J. Hendrie, Deputy Director for Technical Eeview, L OCO::EE 2/3 REVII'J, SER SUPPLO:E:1T AND TFCC'ICAL SPECIFICATI0';S In order to complete the Oconce 2/3 review by June 1,1973 and finalize the Oconce SER Supplerent and Technical Specifications in tine for a July ACRS necting, the enclosed ntenary of inputs are needed from Technical Review. The enclosed curiary is so:cuhat cryptic and chould be discussed between the L-PH nnd the responsible review branches but the items are listed according to teajor review area.
Crt;!nal R of by R. C. (;Y nng R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for Pressurized L'ater Reactors Directorate of Licensing Encio rour e:
As stated cc: D!accary RVollmer DISTRIBUTION JKnight VBenaraya
[ Docket Files (2)
Spat licki 1Denton RP Rdg LShao EGrima.
PWR-4 Rdg VStello WCac: mill IAPeltier (2)
Dross JKastner ASchwencer RCDeYoung TIppolito THovak PJ1ouston RTedesco CLong GLainas Q (g mgr, gr p[ g SYa
[
cvr imvv1n11e vrt T nist roR CnNCliRRENCE L:AD K's
-7 PWR-4
,. ja omct >
y.
^Pel,t,,,[ghf fu 4,,
R sV%AME >
~
~ "
~
~~~~
rm. 4tc-n o in sTsI lbk no
.I S E 5[ > :=
8001130059 O
w
. s\\
/
\\.
/
Docket Nos. 50 S70/287 x
\\
s
\\
J. Hendrie, Deputy Director for Technical Review, L -
N OCONEE 2/3 REVIEV SER SUPPLDIEUT AND TECEIICAL SPECIFICATI0;;S
'\\
In order to co=pleth the Oconce 2/3 review by June 1,1973 and finalize the Oconce SER Supplement and Technical Specifications in time for a July ACRS cceting, the enclosed nu=ary of inputs i
are needed from Technical, Review. The enclosed suranry is I
soncuhat cryptic and should. be discussed between the L-FM cud the responsible review branches but are listed according to A
l r.sjor review area.
Ilv d b N
'N f
' R. C.XDcToung, Assistant Director for Pressurized Water Reactors Directorate of Licensing
/
\\
Enclosure:
DISTRIBUTION S
As Stated Docket Files
\\
RP Rdg
\\
PWR-4 Rdg
\\
cc: EMaccary RVo11=ct JKnight VLenaroys IAPeltier
N SPavlicki HDenton ASchwencer LShao BCrimes RCDeYoung
'N VStello <
E' ~'
N Dross JEastner
\\
TIppolito N
TNovak
\\
EHouston Eredesco
,CLong
/ cLainas
/
\\
i
. R-4
.t:# m..
W Pw.
._. t
.,,m Welti..,..bf..ASc..enegy
.g.. qn g,_
~ sum = >
.3 /.d.2....'1.73;..1.. 32.. 3.13..HL.2... n3..
om,
,_,._,,....e.,
r ac->i. in.. 33utcx ou.
/
L o
OCONEE 2/3 REVIEW Engineering 1.
Testing Program for Active Valves Status: Duke's response to our January 2, 1973 request is anticipated prior to May 1, 1973.
2.
Mechanical Design and Installation of the Floodline Flow Limiters Status: Duke described the limiters in FSAR Supplement No.14, Revision 26, Amendment 39, January 29, 1973 3.
Oconce 1 as Prototype for Oconee 2/3 Vessel Internals Status:
Duke is scheduled to submit s qualification report by May 1, 1973 4.
High Energy Line Rupture External to Containment Status:
Duke is scheduled to make its completed response to our December 15, 1972 letter by April 25, 1973.
This is a LPM review task but TR assistance may be required in some technical areas.
Containment Safety 1.
Reactor Containment Overpressure Status: Duke responded to our October 25, 1972 letter in FSAR Supplement No. 13, Revision 26, Amendment 39,
_ January 29, 1973.
(Also by letter dated Dece=ber 19, 1972) a 2.
Subcompartment Overpressure Status:
Duke responded to our January 8, 1973 letter by letter dated March 2, 1973 3.
Net Positive Suction Ucad Status: Duke responded to our request for information on NPSH in FSAR Supplement 11, Revision 20,-Amendment 32, May 25,1972.
(This item was in the original Oconee 2/3 review but to our knowledge we do not have TR's evaluation).
m e.
m a
o mov
~...
L..
~
i J
e 1 4 4
i 4.
Non-Category I Equipment Failure l
Status: Duke responded to our September 26, 1972 Ictter by j
letter dated October 24, 1972 and in FSAR Suppicment No. 13, j
Revision 26, Amendment 39, January 29, 1973.
1 5.
Auxiliary Service Water System 2
Status: Duke responded to our letter of October 21, 1972 by letter dated November 20, 1972 and in FSAR l
Supplement No. 13, Revision 26, Amendment 39, January 29, 1973.
i 6.
High Energy Line Rupture External to Containment l
Status:
(Same as item 4 under Engineering) j Site Safety i
)
1.
Revised Meteorology 4
Status: TR has reviewed the revised meteorology data for the Oconee site and arrived at new x/c,'made available to 4
factors.
The impact on accident analysis has not been the LPM.
2.
Also See Item 5 under Reactor Safety Reactor Safety 1.
ECCS Analysis j
Status: TR is preparing SER input on reflood, small break, j
Oconee 1.
It is assumed that these evaluations will floodline break and less than 4 pump operation for
)
be equally applicable to Oconee 2/3.
1 2.
Fuel Densification Status: TR is performing lead plant evaluation for Oconee 1.
Acceptable models are required for the LPM to evaluate il Oconee 2/3.
i 1
3.
Review of Control Circuits I
Status: Duke has been requested to respond to our March 7, 1973 4
letter by May 7, 1973 (60 days).
i 4
r-s 1
, ~' ~
.'.,f*"*
._J
~ ~,
~
' 7 E,_. _..
.__L_,___
e
o-4.
Q/A for Operations Status:
Duke has been requested to respond to our M.rch 27, 1973 letter by April 27, 1973 (30 days).
This is a Unit 1 item but should apply equally to Unit 2/3.
5.
Review Duke's response to our December 15, 1972 letter on Technical Specifications Status:
Duke is scheduled to respond to the December letter prior to May 1, 1973.
15, 1972 6.
Technical Specification 3.3 Status:
Duek revised this specification in FSAR Revision 24, Amendment 37, I;ovember 15, 1972.
on this revision.
TR should cot ent 7.
Technical Specification 3.7 Status:
We gave Duke our position on this specification in a-letter dated January 4, 1973.
Duke responded by FSAR Revision 26, Amendment 39, January 29, 1973.
TR should evaluate this response.
.9
!