ML19312B749
| ML19312B749 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 10/10/1969 |
| From: | Seidle W US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | James O'Reilly US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19312B750 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911180073 | |
| Download: ML19312B749 (2) | |
Text
,
3 UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION I,
DIV!Slof J OF COfAPLI AtJCn I
\\
IIE G IO N ll - SulT E 918 2% Pf; AC HT H f:E ST H ff E T, f 4 G.4 T H W L S T AT L ANT A GLCHGI A 31 M 3 October 10, 1969 J. P. O'Reilly, Chief, Reactor Inspection and Enforcement Branch Division of Compliance, Headquarters (OC01;EE 1, 2, 3), LICENSE HOS. CPPR-33, 3h, 35, DUKE POWER F" "Y DOCKET HO'. S0-269, 270, 287
(%
The attached report of an inspection of the subject facilities by our inspectors on f'eptember 9-12, 1969, is forwarded for information. Our l
inspectors' in-depth spot-check review of welding practices revealed The items pertained to PT practices and three itens of nonconformance.
(discussed in Sections
}
the qualification of weldors and welding procedures G and H of report). We are favorably imprecsed with Duke's overall welding program and are confident that appropriate action will be teken to correct the three deficiencies detected during the in-depth review.
Two lots of defective Cadweld powder were received from the manufacturer, (Ref: Inquiry Menorandum - Duke Power Ccepany, dated September 16,1969.)
Although the defective lots could have caused a serious problan, the li-t censee's prompt action apparently precluded the embe0 ment of any defective splices.
Extensive laminations have been detected in one heat of containment liner It is si6nificant plate recently erected for the Unit 1 containment done.
to note that a Duke worker, while grinding the edge of the plate in prep-aration for welding, noted a lamination and reported it to his foreman.
-]
The effect of the lamina-Subsequent UT revealed other plate laninations.
s_
tions on containnent integrity has not been ascertained nor have repair procedures been developed.
An in-depth review of the site environmental monitoring program by our [
radiation specialist revealed that the program appears to be satisfactorr. ~- '
We continue to be favorably impress 2d with the prompt action taken by Duke QA mana6ement to correct deficiencies detected by their own people and by All indicaticns to date continue to point toward Duke our inspectors.
producing quality plants.
/
f_.
< / o...,
W. C. Seid e Cenior Reactor Inspector CO:II:WCS
Enclosure:
i C0 Report Nos. S0-26)/69-8 and 270, 287/69-7 (Murphy,Kelley Feery) 79111eoC 73 p
J. P. O'Reilly October 10, 1969 cc w/encls:
E. G. Cace, DRS R. S. Boyd, DRL (2)
- 3. Levi ne, DEL (6)
D. J. Skovholt, DHL (3)
L. Kornblith, Jr., CO R. W. Ki rk:<.an, CO : I B. H. Grier, CO:III D. I. Walker, CO:IV R. W. Smith, C0:V REG Files i
1
',