ML19309D612

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Bulletin 80-07, BWR Jet Pump Assembly Failure. No Written Response Required
ML19309D612
Person / Time
Site: Hartsville, Phipps Bend  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 04/04/1980
From: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Parris H
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
References
NUDOCS 8004110017
Download: ML19309D612 (2)


Text

' I

/

'o' UNITED STATES l'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e

REGION 11 8

4 o

101 MARIETTA ST., N.W SUITE 3100

%,*****[

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 APR 4 1980 In Reply Refer To:

RI P4 0-518, 50-519 50-520, 50-521 50-551750 354 Tennessee Valley Authority Attn:

11. G. Parris Manager of Power 500A Chestnut Street Tower II Chattanooga, TN 37401 Gentlemen:

The enclosed Bulletin 80-07 is forwarded to you for information.

No written response is required.

If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.

Sincerely,

/

p James P. O'Reilly Director

Enclosures:

1.

IE Bulletin 80-07

2. A list of IE Bulletins Recently Issued

.Y O,RW ^

e t

a n

800ijld(O)7

-.L;L.-.:.. =.:.--..

APR 4 1980 Tennessee Valley Authority.

cc w/ enc 1:

R. T. Mathcote, Project Manager Post Office Box 2000 s

Martsv111e, Tennessee 37074

3. F. Cox 400 Commerce Street W10C131 C-K Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 J. E. Wills, Project Engineer 400 Chestnut Street Tower Il Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 H. N. Culver 249-A HEB 400 Comunerce Avenue Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 b

r 9

og O

l SSINS No.:

6820 Accession No.:

UNITED STATES 8002280648 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555 IE Bulletin No. 80-07 Date:

April 4, 1980 Page 1 of 4 BWR JET PUMP ASSEMBLY FAILURE Description of Circumstances:

On February 2, 1980, Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) reported that a jet pump failed in Dresden Unit 3 while operating at about 67 percent of full power in a coastdown mode to a refueling shutdown.

Observed changes in plant parameters during the event indicated an individual jet pump failure had occurred.

In accordance with T.S., an orderly plant shutdown was begun to bring the unit to cold shutdown within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

The plant parameter changes reported by the licensee were (1) generator electrical output decreased from 539 to 511 MW electrical, (2) core thermal power decreased as indicated by decreased APRM readings and steam flow tg the turbine, (3) indicated total core flow increased from 97.6 to 104.7 x 10 lb./hr.,(4)coreplatedifferentialpressuredecreasedfrom16.1to33.8 psid.,2nd(5)Brecirculationloopflowincreasedfrom49to54x10 gpm while A recirculation loop flow remained at 49 x 10 gpm.

These changes were readily observed by the operator in the control room and it was postulated that a jet pump had failed.

Individual jet pump readings were taken, the jet pump operability surveillance was performed, and an apparent failure of jet pump No. 13 was determined.

Following vessel head removal and defueling, TV camera and visual inspections of the jet pumps and vessel annulus revealed the hold-down beam assembly of the suspect jet pump had broken across its ligament sections at the mean diameter of the bolt thread area.

Failure of the beam assembly resulted in pump decoupling at the diffuser connection.

Subsequent insitu ultrasonic i

examination of all other jet pump hold-down beams, using a special UT technique j

developed by General Electric (GE), revealed ultrasonic indications of cracking I

at the same location in 6 of the remaining 19 beams examined.

Initial estimates l

of crack depth ranged from 6 to 20 mils.

A sketch of the typical jet pump assembly is shown in Figures 1 and 2.

On March 15-16, 1980, insitu ultrasonic jet pump hold-down beam assemblies at Qua refueling). One beam was found to contai in excess of 100 mils depth in the same 1 DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Dresden.

Entire document Previous 1y On March 28, 1980, Boston Edison reported entered into system under:

re a d crack indications in three (3) h y

h l

.w y

No. of es-l l