ML19309A142
| ML19309A142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 11/06/1974 |
| From: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309A134 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003260857 | |
| Download: ML19309A142 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000312/1974011
Text
._
-
-
O
.-.
.
4
UNITED STATES
e
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
i
d N h +d
oinECronATE.or nEcutArony orEnArioNS
mEoioN v
i .i
'
J.'I
9
1990 N. CALIFonNEA BOULEVAnD
WALNUT CnEEK PLAZA
SUITE 202
0
WALNUT CnEEK. CALIFonNI A. 94598
- . ..-
v ;
.c-
9. <.: . :
.. 2. : ,: . .~ : . m . . ; %. .. ::. .. j k s. . c :... -.n.y . : ..:: ., . ;>
.y. : .< .:. , ,. ; .. ;; g
..
.
.
,
.
.
-
-
-
..
i
-
..
.
.
.
.
.
1
Sacramento Municipal Utility Distr'.ct
Docket No. 50-312
P. O. Box 15830
Sacramento, California- 95813
.
Attention: John J. Mattimoe, Assistant General
Manager and Chief Engineer
Gentlemen:
This refers to the laboratory capability inspection conducted by the
Region V office of the Directorate of Regulatory Operations during the
period June 12 through October 28, 1974 of activities authorized by AEC
Construction Permit No. CPPR-54 and License No. DPR-54 and to the report
of our findir.gs relating to that inspection. This also relates to the
telephone discussion of the inspection results held by Mr. Fish of tuc
j
,
'
i
office with Mr. R. Rodriguez.
The inspection was a comparison of the analytical results for several
test samples submitted by the AEC to the Rancho Seco plant. Analytiul
.
,
i
results reported by the plant staff were compared with the results
obtained by an AEC laboratory. The criteria for comparison of the
results is contained as an attachment to the inspection report.- Of the
,
14 analyses compared, 13 were in agreement and one was in disagreement.
A second test of the isotope in disagreement showed the analysis was
,
'
within the "possible agreement" range. Additional comparisons of this
'
type in .uding the isotope in "possible agreement" will be made in the
near future.
No violations of AEC requirements were identified within the scope of
this inspection.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and
the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the AEC's Public
Document Room. If this report contains any information that you believe
to be proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application
to this office, within 20 days of the date of this letter, requesting
that such information be withheld from public disclosure. The applica-
tion must include a full statement of the reasons why it is claimed that
,
l
8003260[f7
_
,
e-w--
g-
v-
w
--,---- -.
- - - -
-
.,-,i-
,-
w
w
e---e
--we,
,ev
w
.,
,
.
.
-
)
~
D
-
-
.
,
,
Sacramento M - 4fpal
Utility District
-2-
NOV 6 Z4
the information is proprietary. The application should be preps. red so
char any proprietary infor:2ation identified is contained in an enclosure
,
to the application, since the application withoet the enclosure will
l
also be placed in the Public Document Room. If we do not hear from you
in this regard within the specified' period, the report will be placed in
the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be
glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely.
-
Original signed by
R. H. Engelken
R. H. Engelken
Director
Enclosure:
RD 'asspection Report
No. 50-312/74-11
cc w/o enclosure:
R. Rodriguez, SMUD
L. Schwieger SMUD
. . .
bec w/o enclosure:
RO Chief, FS&EB
RO:HQ (4)
M ctorate of Licensing (4)
RO Files
DR Central Files
- .
=
1
~
--
- ..
..