ML19308D882
| ML19308D882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/15/1972 |
| From: | Grill R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Schwencer A US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003191102 | |
| Download: ML19308D882 (2) | |
Text
e
~~,
s
.a.
7mm
- .p y
.. ~.
7
-~~
f 4 3 d.2
..~ ' ~
~
9 E9 15572 A.sSchw Chief, PWR#4, DRL x,~A. ncerg
- w q_A_.s_u a n
_t m.m
,..a en,
-,. my-
-- y y.~
vV.
W m
CRYSTAL RIVER QUESTIG?G In response to your request for further explanation of the questions submitted to Florida Power cad Licht Company on January 17. 1072, the in11oving is presented.
In genersi, all of the requests for information which originated with this group voce an attempt to nolicit _lulfert.ation which w Ld bring tae public recorg_gf_this gpliention in ectfuananer with current indus rf and staff pract_ icy. There should have been no ca.cprises tor the 0 g:;ay if t% had re1%cd, even in a curnery way, the revie.v of other r cant appitcation: for operating licenses.
It they had done so sud had sub-citted an. ppliention which reflected current staf f conecens and prece-dures, rest of thne cucati~:: need ecver hmm been asicd.
sirce ene infa t-ti zca nr: eddreseed, the ataff reque:t-d the inir
.i'a be subr.itend for the public record.
hetion 2 Question 2.2 -- Mot certain this is our question but we 'would have ar;ked it if others had not.
Infernation is required to asseaa the potential for ground water contaminutDa free: plaat effluents, both radiological and non-tadiological. This could be a significant envirom: ental irspact.
Questions 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 -- Basically,Ithese q' estions attempt to solicit information concerning interaction of ac.vitics outside the plant boundaries with the plant itself.
If an intera..; ion is possible, we next atteept to determine both the probability of occurrence and the consequences.
j These general sort of questions do not imply that corrective action is necessary but merely allow the staff to deter =ine ene extent ot risk inh 3Jant in issuance of this carticular operat_ing licea.se.
These are current staff c6ncerns and are ask of all O.L. applicants where appropriate to place on the public record the fact that these aress have been reviewed.
If we do not review these on Crystal River, we must justify why we reviewed these areas on earlier plants sud not on this one.
Questions 2.5 and 2.7 - These questions attempt to establish a confidence-
' level in en area of basic input into both the accident dose avaluation and
~
. routine release limits. Fras this confidence level. the staff, i:n parc..
establishes the a:nount of conservatisc. applied is aetting itaita.
80031911 M
'