ML19308D288
| ML19308D288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1976 |
| From: | Long F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Rodgers J FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19308D285 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002270734 | |
| Download: ML19308D288 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000302/1976017
Text
_ _ .
---
l*
..
p2 %g
".
UNITED STATES
-
.
,
. g' 2;
fg
NUCLEAR REGULATORY CC
.lSSION
a
o
REGION il
(
g gE CON
W
r
230 PEACHTREE STREET. N.W. SUITE 818
o, gi '
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
\\.'....!
'
9 1976
-
In Reply Refer To:
IE:II:FJ
50-302/76-17
Florida Power Corporation
Attn:
Mr. J. T. Rodgers
l
Assistant Vice President
Quality and Environmental Departments
-
i
3201 34th Street, South
3
P. O. Box 14042
St. Petersburg, Florida
33733
Centlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. G. L. Troup of this
office on September 28 - October 1, 1976, of activities authorized by
NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-51 for the' Crystal River 3 facility,
and to the discussion of our findings held with Mr. J. Alberdi at the
conclusion of the inspection.
Q
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the
Q
e..iesed inspection report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of
m Icctive examination of procedures and representative records, interviews
.
'h personnel, and observations by the inspector.
t
Within the scope of this inspection, no items of noncompliance were disclosed.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter
and the enclosed inspection rep (>*t will be placed in the NRC's Public
Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe
to be proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application
to this office requesting that such information be withheld from public
disclosure.
If no proprietary information is identified, a written
statement to that effect should be cubmitted.
If an application is
submitted, it must fully identify the bases for which information is
claimed to be proprietary. The application should be prepared so that
information sought to be withheld is incorporated in a separate paper
and referenced in the application since the application will be placed
in the Public Document Room.
Your application, or written statement,
should be submitted to us within 20 days.
If we are not contacted as
specified, the enclosed report and this letter may then be placed in
the Public Document Room.
(mV) -
l
.
8002 220Dy
_
........_._....T'-
.
"
--- - -
- - - - - - -
- - - -
__
_
_
-
. . . .
nuy
V $6'
,
..
_
.
Florida Power Corporation
-2-
_
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
Very truly yours,
_
( N
F. J. Long, Chief
' Reactor Operations and
Nuclear Support Branch
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report No.
.
'
'
50-302/76-17
.
f
ec: Florida Power Corp.
G. P. Beatty, Jr.
',
,
P. O. Box 1228
.
.
&_
Crystal River, Fla.
32629
.
.
. .
.
.
.
)
,
I
.. .
,
,
,
l
-
l
!
.
.
I
.
.
_
.
l
.
.
..
.
. .
.
_.
e
,
e
.
>
.
.
-
I
f
t
.
.
l
.
.
..
-
-
- -
'- ' ' ' '
. . . - .
.T --'
-
. -.
.
-
.
._
.
. .
. -
,
i
~
.
,
,
's
.
- .
,
i
.
IE Rpt. No. 50-3O //6-17
-2-
.
SUIDIARY OF FINDINGS
1
I.
Enforcement Items
. .
None
j
i
II.
Licensee Action on Previousiv Identified Enforcement Matters
.
,
Not inspected.
4
III. New Unresolved Items
l
'
None
IV.
Status of Previousiv Reported Unresolved Items
75-19/4
Testing of Radioactive Waste Sample Lines
A program for the testing of the sample lines has not
-
been developed. This item remains open.
75-19/6
Evaluation of Samoling Media Collection Efficiencies
/^s
(
)
'"'/
The licensee's evaluation of the collection efficiencies
s
is incomplete.
This item remains open.
-
V.
Unusual Occurrences
i
None
,
VI.
Other Significant Findings
None
VII. Management Interview
_ . . .
_.
. . _ _ _ _
At the conclusion of the inspection a managcment interview was
..
held on October 1, 1976, with J. Alberdi, Project Manager, and
members of the corporate and plant staffs.
Items discussed
included the status of previously identified unresolved.it_ ems,
the status of preoperational testing, the status of plant pro-
_ .___
cedures and the inspector's observations during the inspection.
!
,
,
('N,
l
\\
?
\\-s _ . . -
'
-
s
-
. . - . . . . - -
. . _ . _ , . - _
.
._,.w....,.._._..,_