ML19305E263
| ML19305E263 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1980 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19305E252 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004230236 | |
| Download: ML19305E263 (2) | |
Text
.... _. - - ~.. -.
',e DUKE POWER COMPANY Powzu Buttnzwo 422 Socin Cnuncu Sinzzr, Cruntorrz, N. C. 28242 WILLIAM O. PAR K E R, J R.
Vice Passiorm?
February 4, 1980 TELtposoNE; AatA 704 Sytaan Paoouction 373-4083 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303 Re: RII:FJ 50-269/79-41 50-270/79-39 50-287/79-41
Dear Sir:
With regard to Mr. R. C. Lewis' letter of January 14, 1980, which transmitted the referenced Inspection Report, Duke Power Company does not consider the information contained therein to be proprietary.
Please find attached our response to the cited item of noncompliance.
Very truly yours, a
William O. Parker, Jr.
[
SRL/sch Attachment f PRoGgg%
/
,\\
t-s
.s 3
h Anniversl$
800423Ul3b
%,*owen #f UniUJAL gypy
-. ~...
'o
,.y, e
}
ITEM Technical Specification 6.4.le requires preventative or corrective maintenance to be accomplished by adhering to approved written procedures.
Contrary to the above, on December 9, 1979, an I&E Technician performed mainten-ance on two Unit 2 engineered safeguards valves while the unit was at 99% full power whereas his assigned task was to perform maintenance on these same valves for Unit 1, which was in a refueling outage.
This is an Infraction and applies to Ut L 2.
RESPONSE
The technician involved in the cited incident has been given a written warning concerning his deficient performance. All I&E Technicians have been counseled to exercise particular caution in order to assure that the correct equipment is removed from service.
In addition, an Independent Verification Program is being developed to assure the proper status of safety-related equipment.
It is anticipated that this program will be implemented by February 15, 1980.
These steps are considered to provide adequate assurance against the recurrence of a similar incident.
l 1