ML19305C213
| ML19305C213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1980 |
| From: | Seyfrit K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003260348 | |
| Download: ML19305C213 (1) | |
Text
n_.
/ LPDR UNITED STATES TIC
/'s>0 08Gogy'o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NSIC 7W REGloN IV
^
e
) *(
611 RY AN PLAZA DRIVE, SulTE 1000 CENTRAL FILES o
7
', f ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76o12 tf..O /of March 13, 1980 In Reply Refer To:
RIV Docket No.
STN 50-482/IE Bulletin No. 80-06 Kansas Gas & Electric Co.
Attn: Mr. Glenn L. Koester Vice President-Operations Post Office Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Bulletin 80-06 is foru
,d to you for information. No written response is required.
If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.
Sincerely, Karl V. Seyfrit Director
Enclosures:
1.
List of IE Bulletins Recently Issued cc: w/ enclosures Messrs. Nicholas A. Petrick, SNUPPS D. T. McPhee, Kansas City Power and Light Company Gerald Charnoff, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge E. W. Creel, Kansas Gas and Electric Company t
I 8003260 M E
/
f SSINS: 6820 Accession No.:
UNITED STATES 8002280639 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 IE Bulletin No. 80-06 Date: March 13, 1980 Page 1 of 3 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE (EST) RESET CONTROLS Description of Circumstances:
On November 7, 1979, Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) reported that following initiation of Safety Injection (SI) at North Anna Power Station Unit 1, the use of the SI Reset pushbuttons alone resulted in certain ventila-tion dampers changing position from their safety or emergency mode to their normal mode. Further investigation by VEPC0 and the architect-engineer resulted in discovery of circuitry which similarly affected components actuated by a Containment Depressurization Actuation (CDA, activated on Hi-Hi Containment Pressure). The circuits in question are listed below:
Component / System Problem Outside/Inside Recirculation Spray Pump motors will not start after Pump Motors actuation if CDA Reset is depressed prior to starting timer running out (approx. 3 minutes)
Pressurized Control Room Dampers will open on SI Reset Ventilation Isolation Dampers Safeguards Area Filter Dampers Dampers reposition to bypass filters when CDA Reset is depressed Containment Recirculation Cooler Fans will restart when CDA Reset Fans is depressed Service Water _ Supply and Discharge If service water is being used as Valves to Containment the cooling medium prior to CDA actuation, valves will reopen upon depressing CDA reset Service Water Radiation Monitoring Pumps will not start after Sample Pumps actuation if CDA reset is depressed prior to motor starting timers running out Main Condenser Air Ejector Exhaust After receiving a high radiation Isolation Valvec to the Containment monitor' alarm on the air ejector exhaust, SI actuation would shut these valves and depressing S1 Reset would reopen them
IE Bulletin No. 80-06 Date: March 13, 1980 Page 2 of 3 Review of circuitry for ventila ion dampers, motors, and valves reported by VEPCO resulted in discovery of similar designs in ESF-actuated components at Surry Unit 1 and Beaver Valley; where it has been found that certain equipment would return to its normal mode following the reset of an ESF signal;
- thus, protective actions of the affected systems could be compromised once the associated actuation signal is reset.
These two plants had Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation for the architect-engineer as did the North Anna Units.
The Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation and VEPCO are preparing design changes to preclude safety-related equipment from moving out of its emergency mode upon reset of an Engineered Safety Features Actuation Signal (ESFAS).
This corrective action has been found acceptable by the NRC, in that, upon reset of ESFAS, all affected equipment remains in its emergency mode.
The NRC has performed reviews of selected areas of ESFAS reset action on PWR facilities and, in tone cases, this review was limited to examination of logic diagrams and procedures.
It has been determined that logic diagrams may not adequately reflect as-built conditions; therefore, the requested review of drawings must be done at the schematic / elementary diagram level.
There have been several communications to licensees from the NRC on ESF reset actions. For example, some of these communications have been in the form of Generic Letters issued in November, 1978 and October, 1979 on containment venting and purging during normal operation.
Inspection and Enforcement Bulletin Nos. 79-05, 05A, 05B, 06A, 06B and 98 that addressed the events at TMI-2 and NUREG-0578, TMI-2 Lessons Learned Task Force Status Report and Short-Term Recommendations. However, each of these communications has addressed only a limited area of the ESF's.
We are requesting that the reviews undertaken for this Bulletin address all of the ESF's.
Actions To Be Taken By Licensees:
For all PWR and BWR facilities with operating licenses:
1.
Review the drawings for all systems serving safety-related functions at the schematic level to determine whether or not upon the reset of an ESF actuation signal, all associated safety-related equipment remains in its emergency mode.
2.
Verify the actual installed instrumentation and controls at the facility are consistent with the schematics reviewed in Item 1 above by conducting a test to demonstrate that all equipment remains in its emergency mode upon. removal of the actuating signal and/or manual resetting of the various isolation or actuation signals.
Provide a schedule for the performance of the testing in your response to this Bulletin.
3.
If any. safety-related equipment does not' remain in its emergency mode upon reset of an ESF signal at your facility, describe proposed system modification, design change, or other corrective action planned to
~
resolve the problem.
R v+t%>
p<#h e$
'+
s
,M eEEv.<e 1,em TEST TARGET (MT-3) h.
1.0 pf m en
$f,$ E24 u
?.._ = BE
\\,
\\
1.25 1.4 1.6 A
6" y
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART
.,ll
+
i 1.
, =.,
=.. -.
IE Bulletin No. 80-06 Date: March 13, 1980 Page 3 of 3 4.
Report in writing within 90 days, the results of your review and include a list of all devices which respond as discussed in Item 3 above, actions taken or planned to assure adequate equipment control, and a schedule for implementation of corrective action. This information is requested.under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f).
Accordingly, you are requested to pro' vide within the time period specified above, written statements of the above information, signed under oath or affirmation.
Reports shall be submitted to the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office and a copy shall be forwarded to the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Division of Reactor Operations Inspection, Washington, D.C.
20555.
For all power reactor facilities tith a construction permit, this Bulletin is for information only and no writ'+n response is required.
Approved by GAO, B180225 (R0072); clearance expires 7-31-80.
Approval was given under a blanket clearance specifically far identified generic problems.
4 1
IE Bulletin No. 80-06 March 13, 1980 RECENTLY ISSUED IE BULLETINS Bulletin Subject Date Issued Issued To No.79-01B Environmental Qualification 1/14/80 All power reactor of Class 1E Equipment facilities with an Operating License (OL) 80-01 Operability of ADS Valve 1/11/80 All BWR power reactor Pneumatic Supply facilities with an Operating License (OL) 80-02 Inadequate Quality 1/21/80 All BWR licenses with Assurance for Nuclear a Construction Permit (CP) or Operating License (OL) 80-03 Loss of Charcoal From 2/6/80 All holders of Power Standard Type II, 2 Inch, Reactor Operating t
Tray Adsorber Cells Licenses (OLs) and Construction Permits (cps) 80-04 Analysis of a PWR Main 2/8/80 All PWR reactor facilities Steam Line Break With holding Operating Licenses Continued Feedwater (OLs) and to those nearing Addition Licensing 79-01B Environmental Qualification 2/29/80 All power reactor of Class IE Equipment facilities with an Operating License (OL) 80-05 Vacuum Condition Resulting 3/10/80 All PWR power reactor In Damage To Chemical facilities holding Volume Control System Operating Licenses (OLs)
(CVCS) Holdup Tanks and to those with a Construction Permit (CP)
Enclosure
-