ML19305B088
| ML19305B088 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1980 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19305B081 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003190128 | |
| Download: ML19305B088 (3) | |
Text
.
_(
f DUKE POWER COMPANY Powra Duit.oixo [.['- ((,PI}'
422 Sourn Cauwcu SrnezT, Cauniorre, N. C ana4a February 6, 1980,((,r ll gll*.
4 WIWAM Q PARMER,JR.
MCF Potsiotut TtttPwoNE: Anta 704 Strau PeoovCTiose 373-4003 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:WPA 50-269/79-39 50-270/79-36
Dear Sir:
With regard to Mr. C. E. Murphy's letter of January 1, 1980 which transmitted the subject inspection report, Duke Power Company does not consider the infor-mation contained therein to be proprietary.
Please find attached responses to the cited items of noncompliance.
Very truly yours, h
Wi' J 0. Parker, Jr.
a KRW:ses Attachment L
8003190 ID
DUKE POWER COMPANY
_0CONEE NUCLEAR STATION Inspection Report 50-269/79-39, 50-270/79-36 ITEM As required by 10 CFR 73.55(d) Access Requirements (1) states in part the li-censee shall control.all points of personnel access into a protected area...
. search of all individuals shall be made at such points, the search func-tion for detection of firearms, explosives, and incendiary devices shall be conducted either by a physical search or by use of equipment capable of detect-ing such devices. Paragraph 3.2.1.5 Search and Administrative Control Hard-ware, of the Oconee Nuclear Station Security Plan, states in part, "All per-sonnel and packages shall be searched for firearms, explosives and incendiary devices prior to entry into the protected area... the personnel search pro-gram shall consist of the following:
(5) Conducting a " Hands-On" search of 5% (selected randomly) of all Duke Power Company employees who are not regularly employed at the site.
-l (6) Subjecting all outer garments such as coats and heavy sweaters of each individual who is not a regular employee at the site to search.
Contrary to the above, on December 4, 1979, the inspector observed two indivi-duals who were wearing visitors badges enter the protected area without bene-fit of a " Hand-On" search nor search of their outer garments.
This is an infraction.
RESPONSE
Although the two individuals mentioned in the infraction were not subjected to a physical " hands-on" search, they were processed through operable metal and explosive detectors. The security force members involved in the incident were counselled on the necessity to properly implement established security proce-
.dures.
Station management will continue to monitor implementation of the Sta-tion Security Plan.
ITEM As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix "B" Criterion V as implemented by Duke. Power Company Topical Report 1A Section 17.2.5 and Oconee Technical Specification Section 6.4.1 activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings... and shall be accomplished in accor-dance with these instructions procedures or drawings.
(1). Duke Power Company Procedure MP/0/A/3019/01 Paragraph 11.3 Note 3 requires that "Any attachments (extra pipes, cable trays, extra steel, etc.) must be shown on the support restraint design drawing.
Contrary'to the~above, Hanger Numbers SLA-0-479A-H21C, SlA-0-479A-H18C'and 2-53B-2-0-436E-R3 had attachments that were not shown on the surveillance "as-built" design drawings.
1
- -- =..
1^
e.
- - Q.
(2) ' Duke Power Company. Procedure Specification No. OS-0020.00-00-003 Paragraph 4.4.2 requires that wedge anchors shall have the proper test torque ap-plied to ensure expansion of the anchor.
Contrary to the above, Hanger 1-07A-400B-DE014 Plate A was found to have three wedge anchors that-had been torqued to less than the required test torque
.value.
This is an infraction.
RESPONSE
- Part l-Station investigation revealed that, with the exception of Hanger 2-53B-2 436E-R3, attachments to hangers not shown on "as-built" drawings were the re-sult of a deficient inspection.by one team leader.
This team leader was,sub-
- sequently removed from all further Bulletins 79-14 and 79-02 activities and the hangers in question were inspected again. All surveillance team leaders were assembled and station management re-emphasized the importance of obtain-ing accurate and complete information on piping and hangers inspected.
Team leader responsibilities were reiterated.
All hanger discrepancies identified I
. in'the infraction were corrected and drawing revisions instructions were for-
)
warded to Design Engineering.
Part 2 The inspector was' initially interested in the hole configuration beneath the wedge anchor nuts on the hanger inspected. He requested that the torque be i
tested while removing the nuts from the wedge anchors.
The torque values read were less than the required value.
Subsequently, on-site calibration testing and the manufacturer confirmed that the Proto Model 6014-3 torque wrench used will not function properly in a counter-clockwise direction with-
]-
out special adjustment.- Therefore, the torque values read for the inspector while loosening the anchor nuts were inaccurate.
Consequently, Part (2) of.
i-the infraction is considered to be invalid.
a 5
4 4
-e
---..v
,.,,wr---,,
.----e m
.ery v~-,,
...,,,e,
.,,,,.w y
. - - -,,g.
,,-,,,--.4.c
-,c.--