ML19290G614
| ML19290G614 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1980 |
| From: | Danielson D, Yin I NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290G612 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-358-80-22, NUDOCS 8012180135 | |
| Download: ML19290G614 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000358/1980022
Text
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IIJ
Report No. 50-358/80-22
Docket No. 50-358
License No. CPPR-88
Licensee:
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company
139 East 4th Street
Cincinnati, OH 45201
Facility Name:
Wm. II. Zimmer Power Station
Inspection At:
Zimmer Site, Moscow, Oli
Inspection Conducted: October 1-2, 1980
A p' .
-
<
Inspector:
I. T. Yin
_
7'C
Approved By /1
I
ielson, Chief
't/4/pg
'
Engineering Support Section 2
Inspection S m ary
Inspection on October 1-2, 1980 (Report No. 50-358/80-22)
Areas Inspected:
Inspection of safety related hangers, restraints, snubbers,
and related QA/QC program provisions. The inspection involved a total of 14
inspector-hours onsite by one h"'C inspector.
Results: Of the areas inspected, two apparent items of deviation were
identified relative to failure of the licensee to implement its response to
noncompli ance items documented in R11I Inspection Zeport No. 50-358/80-05.
8012180/35
.
DETAILS
Persons Contacted
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (C6c
- W. W. Schwiers, Manager QA
- S. C. Swain, Construction Manager
- J. F. Weissenberg, QA Engineer
D. C. Kramer, QA Engineer
Henry J. Kaiser Company (HJK)
- R. !!arshall, Project Manager
kP. S. Gittings, Site QA Manager
K. T. Shinkle, QA Engineer
Sargent and Lundry Engineers (S&L)
I. Kleban, Senior Structural Engineer
USNRC-RIII
- T. P. Gwynn, Resident Inspector
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items
(0 pen) Noncompliance Item (358/80-05-01):
Inadequate document control on
S&L specification and desiga engineering procedures. The inspector reviewed
Supplement 20 to S&L Specification H-2256, " Erection of Phase II Piping
Systems and Mechanica4 Equipment", dated July 14, 1980, and determine)
that (1) DDC's have been incorporated into Supplements 1 through 20, (2)
effective DDC's have been attached in the specification, and (3) specifica-
tion has DDC's listings that are being reviewed. The inspector considers
the corractive actions to be adequate, however, the control of design
engineering procedures will be reviewed at S&L corporate office during a
future inspection.
(Closed) Unresolved Items (358/80-05-02; 358/80-05-03: The lack of es-
tablished personnel qualifications for NPS design staff, verification of
personnel background by the employer, and indoctrination and training
prograa. The inspector reviewed CG&E Audit Report No. 321 of NPS, con-
ducted July 30-31, 1980, subject " Implementation of Design Control Pro-
ced' ires ;
Indoctrination and Training; and Interface with S&L", and CG&E
QASS Surveillance Report No. 277, conducted September 23-26, 1980, that
closed out deficiencies identified in Audit Report No. 321, and had no
-2-
.
adverse comment. The inspector also reviewed S&L External Audit No. E-1
of NPS, conducted April 8-9, 1980, subject " Imp'ementation of QA Program,
Procedures and S&L Specification 101 and 102, Personnel Qualification and
Verification of Worker Education and Work Experience", and S&L External
Audit No. E-1.1, conducted June 24. 1980, that c79 sed out deficiencies
identified in Audit No. E-1, and had no adverse comments.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (358/80 05-04):
Lack of hanger design guidance.
The inspector reviewed the S&L " Mechanical Compoaent Support Steel Design
Procedures" dated March 24, 1980, and the S&L Calculation No. 876, " Mechan-
ical Hanger Design Reference Manual", Revision 0, dated February 28, 1980,
and considers the matter resolved.
(Closed; Noncompliance Item (358/80-13-01):
Lack of design control for the
pipe whip restraints FWFR-1029 and FWFR-1030 connecting boics.
The inspector
discussed the issue with the S&L Senior Structural Engineer, CG&E's QA Engineer,
and HJK's QA Engineer.
DDC's to document the misalignment problems, ASTM
material specifications, and AISC design manuals were presented.
Because of
the explanations, the inspector concurred with the licensee that no apparent
noncompliance exists as stated in the response letter.
NRC internal records
will be changed as appropriate.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected
Fellowup inspcetic7 of site small bore pipe support and restraint design and
installation problems ident ified in RIII Inspection Report 'Jo. 50-358/80-05.
1.
Site L~ sign and Installation of INX (Instrumentation) Pipe Supports
Since September 8, 1980, responsibility for the above subject activities,
was contracted to Nuclear Power Services, Inc. (NPS), and Nuclear Services
Corporation (NSC) personnel at the site. The work is defined in S&L
Consultant Specifications No. 105A (for NPS) and No. 105B (for NSC), "INX
Piping Supports Design and Related Activities", dated July 15, 1980. The
present assignment is that NPS will handle INX supports inside the diesel
generator buildings and the service water pump structure, and NSC will
har.dle supports in the reactor building cutside primary containment and
the auxiliary building. At present, there is a hold on NX support details
in primary containment (CG&E memorandum 80-176, dated Septem er )?, 1980)
b
to curtail installation of NX support details from h&L drawings M-471,
Sheets 38, 40, 46, and 47 inside primary containment. The NX support
design groups (Specification 105 A and B) will issue designs f;r in-
stallation. HJK was requested not to install NX supports unless they
are issued by the Specification 105 contractor or authorized by CG&E
General Construction Department.
-3-
.
2.
Review of Procedures
-
In conjunction with paragraph 1 of RIII inspection Report 50-358/80-05,
the inspector performed further review of the following HJK field
construction procedures, HJK inspection procedures, and S&L criteria.
a.
FCP 2-6, " Design Document Change", Revision 8, dated August 14,
1980.~ - No adverse comment.
b.
FCP 6-1, " Nonconforming Material Control", Revision 1, dated
February 12, 1980. - No adverse comment.
c.
FCP 2-135, " Process Pipe Support Installation After S&L Final
Design Aanalysis and NX Instrumentation Pipe Support Installation
Criteria", Revision 9, dated July 17, 1980. - No adverse comment.
d.
FCP 2-27, "S&L Review of KEI Drawings", Revision 0, dated
October 16, 1980. - No adverse comments.
e.
S&L EMD-017629 included in Specification H-2256, Supplement 20,
" Criteria for Weight and Seismic Control of 1/2", 3/4", and 1"
Pipe and Tube for Reactor and Containment Buildings", Revision 1,
dated January 2, 1980. - No adverse comments.
f.
FCP 2-115, " Pipe Support Installation - Small Bore Piping",
Kevision 1, dated December 7, 1977, which states in Paragraph
3.3.1, " Construction Inspection Plans (CIP) shall be used to
acceptability of essential piping only"
The inspector questioned
what was a CIP and what was the control procedure in applying
the CIP.
Subsequently, Revision 2 of the procedure, dated
October 1, 1980, paragraph 3.1.0 reads, " Construction inspection
shall be in accordance with QACMI M-12 for essential piping
support only".
g.
FCP 2-134, " Installation of NX Type Pipe 9upports", Revision 1,
datod March 16, 1979, which states in paragraph 3.2.1, "Const ruc-
tion inspection shall be in accordant e with QACMI M-16 for
seismically supported pipe only".
QACMI M-lo was replaced by
QACMI M-12 on June 23, 1980, and this was not reflected in FCP
2-134.
Subsequently, Revision 2 of the procedure, dated
October 2,1980, revised paragraph 3.2.1 to read " Construction
inspection shall be in accordance with QACMI M-12 for seismically
supported pipe only".
h.
QACMI M-12, " Inspection Instructions for Pipe Hangers, Support
and Restraint Installation", Revision 10, dated September 16,
1980. The inspector commented that timely incpection of tastalled
hangers was not required specifically in the procedure in two
categories:
4-
.
(1)
Installation of hangers for S&L final approved drawings
'
(2)
Installation of hangers per site DDC's permitted by FCP
2-6, paragraph 3.2.2, which states,, in part, that "When the
DDC receives preliminary approval the work can proceed and
the formal S&L approval to follow through regular channels"
' Subsequently, Revision 11, dated October 2, 1980, was issued
and included the following requirements:
Paragraph 3.2:
"The hanger engineer shall submit the support package to
the inspection supervisor for review, who in turn shall
transmit the package to the lead inspector. The lead
inspector shall provide for inspection of +.he support
within thirty (30) days of receipt of the support pa"kage"
Pa ragrap . 4.1"
" Inspection personnel shall verify that the latest appropri-
ately approved drawings and applicable DDC's have been
utilized for the installation of essential and nonessential
seismic pipe hangers, supports, or restraints"
Exit Interview
The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted under Persons
Cuntacted) at the conclusion of the inspectiva on October 2, 1980. The
inspector summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection.
The
licensee acknowledged the findings reported herein.
-5-