ML19289D074
| ML19289D074 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/28/1978 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19289D065 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-78-27, NUDOCS 7901290199 | |
| Download: ML19289D074 (3) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A g
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Alabama Power Company License No.: NPF-2 Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on October 2-6, 1978, it appears that certain of your activities were,not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in our correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI states in part: " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as...
nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected..."
The accepted Quality Assurance Program (FSAR Chapter 17) Section 17.2.16 states in part:
"An Administrative Procedure will be written to assure that conditions adverse to quality such as deficien-cies, deviations, defective material and equipment and other noncon-formances are promptly identified and corrected. OQA-AP-09, COR-RECTIVE ACTION, Revision 8 dated April 1978, states in part in paragraph 4:" Appropriate action shall be taken to correct the condition and preclude recurrence. The corrective action is to be completed within 30 days of notification of the condition.
In the event corrective action cannot be completed within that period, an exple.ation as to why it cannot be completed and a schedule date for its completion are to be included in the Monthly Report of OQA Corrective Action."
Contrary to the above:
3 nonconformances involving 11 specific deficiencies were identified in an internal audit report dated 7/25/78, corrective actions were not completed and/or reported until 10/02/78 (68 days elapsed); 5 nonconformances were identified in a vendor audit report dated 5/01/78, corrective actions were not completed and/or reported until 8/29/78 (119 days elapsed); and, 1 nonconformance was identified in a vendor audit report dated 2/24/78 and corrective actions were not completed and/or reported until 6/06/78 (89 days elapsed).
This is an infraction.
B.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 states in part: " Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained..." Administrative Procedure 4, Section 8.7.2, states in part:
"...FCR's and CN's which are outstanding in the particular revision being issued shall be logged in on the status block of the affected drawings 7901290m
Alicama Power Company Appendix A License No. NPF-2 Notice of Violation Contrary to the above, on October 4,1978, the below listed drawings in the Control Room were affected by outstanding CN's but were not annotated as required:
D-175073 Main Feedwater System Revision 6 D-170806 Air Start System for Diesel Generators IC/2C Revision 3/2 D-170807 Air Start "vstem for Diesel Generators IA/2A Revision 1 This is a deficiency.
C.
10 CFR 50, Appendix L, Criterion III states in part: "... Measures shall be established for the identification and control of design interfaces and for coordination among participating design organi-zations. These measures shall include the establishment of proce-dures among participating design organizations for the review, approval, release, distribution and revision of documents involving design interfaces.
..." The accepted Quality Assurance Program (FSAR Chapter 17) Section 17.2.17 states in part:
"...An Administra-tive Procedure will develop a method for identifying, filing, and maintaining records in accordance with the guidance provided in ANSI N45.2.9-1974.
..." ANSI N45.2.9-1974, Section 4.2 states "To assure their availability, a specific submittal plan shall be established for quality assurance records by agreement between the purchaser and supplier."
Contrary to the above, as of October 4, 1978, the facility had had an operating license for fifteen (15) months; however, design documents from Bechtel Corporation had not been turned over to Alabama Power Company t..d neither an agreement nor a specific submittal plan were established to affect this transfer.
This is a deficiency.
D.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI states in part:
" Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as instructions, procedures, and drawings, including changes thereto, which prescribe all activities affecting quality...." The accepted Quality Assurance Program (FSAR Chapter 17) Section 17.2.6 states in part: "... An OQA Administrative Procedure will describe the method used by the OQA Department to control documents.
Administrative Procedure FNP-0-AP-04, Revision 2, Section 8.1 states in part: ". 0fficial copies are issued by the Central File to authorized holders and are maintained current by automatic distribution of new revisions as they are approved.
..." Additionally, Section 8.3 states in part: ".. 8.3.1 Each official copy of a Class
Alabama Power Company Appendix A License No. NPF-2 Notice of Violation A document shall be identified as follows: a. Stamp the outside of each binder or volume with "0FFICIAL COPY; COPY NO.
X," where X represents the actual copy number.
... and ".. 8.3.2 Each official copy of a Class B document shall be identified by stamping the outside of each binder or volume with the stamp used for Class A documents.
Contrary to the above, as of October 3, 1978, one copy of Component Cooling Water Pump manual (U168870), a Class B controlled document, was uncontrolled in that it was in the possession of the Mechanical Maintenance Department without the required check-out from the Central File.
Additionally, one copy of the same manual was not identified and serialized as required.
This item is a deficiency.