ML19289C413

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 781128 Meeting Re Turbine Trip Transient Analysis.Applicant Proposed Revision to Design & Analysis of Equipment to Reduce Severity of Main Steam Generator Load Transient.Nrc Accepted Revision for Review
ML19289C413
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1978
From: Kintner L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7901120152
Download: ML19289C413 (19)


Text

A/ }(' / W) d' D

UNITED STATES

[

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMI5sION

^

g W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 t

/

. 2,.. #

DEC 2 71978 Docket No: 50-341 APPLICANT: Detroit Edison Company FACILITY:

Enrico Femi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF NOVEMBER 28, 1978 MEETING REGARDING TURBINE TRIP TRANSIENT ANALYSIS Detroit Edison Company has procosed a revision to the design and analysis of equipment designed to reduce the severity of a main steam turbine trip or a generator load rejection transient. Currently, the safety analysesl assume that stop valve closure or fast closure of the turbine control valves trips the reactor control rods and the r1 circulation coolant pumps, and that there is no steam bypass around the tur> ~ne.

The proposed revision to the analysis would assume no recirculation pump trip and account for steam bypass (a) to the steam reheater between the high pressure turbine and the low pressure turbine, and; (b) through one of the two unitized steam bypass systems. The effect of steam bypass on minimum critical power ratio (or MCPR) is expected to more than offset the effect of eliminating the recirculation pump trip. Enclosure 1 is a copy of each slide shown in the meeting.

The purpose of this meeting was to obtain comments from the staff regarding the acceptability and impact of this revision on the Femi 2 operating license review. Enclosure 2 is a list of attendees. Previous discussions on the proposed revision are discussed in Memoranda from L. Kintner dated August 2, 1978, October 20, 1978 and December 5,1978.

During the meeting the applicant provided the following infomation regarding the proposed revision to the design and analysis.

(1) The turbine trip and generator load rejection transients would be analyzed assuming one of the two steam bypass valves fails to open. This results in 13% of rated steam flow through the open bypass valve and 16% through the reheater (See page 3 of Enclosure 1).

(2) The transients will be deemed acceptable if the minimum critical power ratio is equal to or greater than 1,07,2which is the acceptance criteria for incidents of moderate frequency. (3) Deletion of the recirculation pump trip for

' Final Safety Analysis Report, Sections 15B.2.2 and 15B.2.3 2 Applicant agrees that the acceptance criterion for infrequent incidents that allows fuel failure will not be used for these transients.

790112DiD-

DEc 2 71973 these transients will reduce the number of plant trips and associated themal cycles on plant equipment.

(4) The equipment used to trip the recirculation pump during an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) is independent of the equipment used to trip the pump during the turbine trip or generator load rejection transients; therefore, deletion of the pump trip for these transients will in no way affect the capability for a pump trip to reduce the consequences of an ATWS. (5) The calcula-tions would be made with the REDY Code using a constant bypass steam flow as input to the Code. Based on sensitivity calculations of heat transfer in the reheater, an assumed bypass flow of 10% for the first two seconds of the transient is conservative (page 6 of Enclosure 1).

(6) Because of the separate bypass valves, valve actuators, valve controls, and servo oil systems, a single failure could result in one-half the rated steam flow through the bypass system (pages 7 through 13, Enclosure 1).

(7) The decision to retain the recirculation pump trip in the design basis for these transients must be made soon because delivery of breakers to perfom this function required 12 months from the date of purchase.

The staff provided the following coments on the proposed revision.

(1) Recirculation pump trip has been used by other BWR licensees to reduce the severity of turbine trip and load rejection without bypass transients. Use of the pump trip is neither required by NRC regulations nor recomended in its regulatory guides or standard review plan.

However, the analysis of turbine trip and load rejection without steam bypass has been required in BWR plants. The proposed Fenni 2 assumptions of steam bypass will require a significant amount of additional information for review, including a description of the steam bypass system and the reheater, a failure modes and effects analysis of equipment relied on for the bypass, and the methods and results of the analysis. (2) The auxiliary, electrical, instrumentation and c mtrol systems used in the safety analysis to reduce the consequences of this transient are not required to be Seismic Category I because the probability of a safe shutdown earthquake coincident with this incident is sufficiently small.

However, the reliability of the systems should be discussed. Considera-tion should be given to technical specifications and associated surveillance tests of the systems to demonstrate availability and operability throughout plant life. Consideration should be given to comon mode failures as well

. DEC 2 71978 as single active component failures. (3) The analysis should be 3

performed using the ODYN Code instead of the REDY Code. (4) The sensitivity of the minimum crit 1 cal power ratio to steam bypass should be calculated, including the effect of partially closed turbine control valves at various power levels and loss of bypass valve but with credit for flow to the reheater.

As a result of the meeting, the staff concluded that the proposed revised analysis of the turbine trip trtnsient, as modified by our comments, appeared to be acceptable for review. The description of the equipment, modification of the ODYN Code to incorporate bypass steam, and safety analyses should be tendered prior to docketing to minimize later questions for information.

The following schedule was established subsequent to the meeting for review of this transient. The scheduled review is about 2 months later than the approved Fermi 2 reactor system review schedule. However, it is early enough to be included in the Fermi 2 Safety Evaluation Report scheduled to be issued August 31, 1979.

45uosequent to tne meeting, the use of the ODYN Code rather than REDY Code was discussed with L. Schuerman (Deco) by telephone. During 1977, turbine trip tests run at Peach Bottom Unit 2 showed that the REDY Code underpredicts the minimum critical power ratio. In a March 31, 1978 letter, General Electric proposed that certain transients, including turbine trips,be calculated with the ODYN Code, which includes a better simulation of the steam line and connected bypass line for rapid pressuriza-tion events. The staff expects to complete its review of ODYN Code in February 1979.

In the interim, the staff recommended in its November 21, 1978 Safety Evaluation Report on NEDE 23786-1 " Fuel Rod Prepressurization" that future code calculations follow the evaluation procedures for use of the ODYN Code as described in General Electric's March 31, 1978 letter.

Mr. Schuerman said that the limiting transient for Fermi 2 would be reanalyzed using the ODYN Code. However, the transients that have been submitted for Fermi 2 were calculated with tt.' REDY Code and the reanalyses of transie.its for prepressurized fuel parameters are currently being made with the REDY Code. The selection of the limiting transient will be based on the REDY Code calculations for Fermi 2.

The staff advised Mr. Schuerman that it is likely several transients will be required to be run with ODYN to demonstrate that the most severe transient has been selected. One of these transients should be the turbine trip with steam bypass because the REDY Code has known deficiencias in the modeling of the steam line and correct modeling of the main steam line, reheater line, and bypass steam lines may be significant for the analysis proposed for Fermi 2.

. ggg 3 7 g7g Applicant tenders information January 15, 1979 Staff sends letter to applicant February 16, 1979 accepting information for review Applicant files infonnation as April 27, 1979 an appendix to the FSAR with applicable changes in the FSAR Safety Evaluation Input to LPH June 22, 1979 kWw

. Yv% w Lester L. Kintner, Project Manager Light Water Reactors Branch No.1 Division of Project Management

Enclosures:

1.

Slides from Meeting 2.

Attendees List cc:

See next page

DEC 27 G78 Or. Wayne H. Jens Dr. Wayne H, Jens, Mr. Jeffrey A. Alson Assistant Vice President 772 Green Street, Building 4 Engineering & Construction Ypsilanti, Michigan 48197 Detroit Edison Canpany 2000 Second Avenue Mr. David Hiller Detroit, Michigan 48226 University of Michigan Law School cc: Eugune B. Thomas, Jr., Esq.

Hutchins Hall LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 1757 N. Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 Peter A. Marquardt, Esq.

Co-Counsel The Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Mich' in 48226 Mr. William J. Fahrner Project Manager - Fermi 2 The Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 Larry E. Schuerman Licensing Engineer - Fermi 2 Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit Michigan 48226 l

Charles Bechhoefer, Esq., Chairman Atomic Stfety & Licensing Board Panel V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. David R. Schnik Department of Oceanography Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77840 Mr. Frederick J. Shan Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

ENCLOSURE 1

~

j TURBIN E TRIP w1THouT SyPAss NOT VAL)O TRA N SI EN T FO R FE RM'l 2

FA ILORE OF CON TROLLED ByPAS$

RESULTS IN A BYPASS FLOW O F 23% NBR BYPASS FLOWS RE50LT PROM

$ PEci FIC.

DESIG H QMARAGTERISTICS QF THE G EC TL)liBIAJE

2-,

FERMI 2

By' PAS 3 3 TEAM SYSTEM T\\NO INDEPENDENT BYPASS M5TEMS l hlHERENT LIVE STEMI FLOW TO TORB)NE RENEATERS 10%N8K EHe ccnrieoLL ED BYPASS -

TW0

) AJDEPEAlDEAIT VALVE SVSTEMS LU ITH A

C.oM81UED C APAc t T y 0F 24 7 O/, N88

^

FERMI 2 BYP/MS SYSTEM g

TO contenste G 04 NBR FElovo^ur Byt%ss tkvE 0 2.5EC CPEandr Tski e

TV. CAL or f

i Foat B"

NP pe,:E A TER LP sup N

I MA st/

~'

TVRL m ll Q

}

Tor <8ME SEFBVATM i

t 1

1 w

I r

r r

J STW1 STor heonte k

VAai VAL s'E a

e W

o.a sse crossa Tire (w) r i

l I

o Flll LURE OF ONE t

SyPASS VALVE CN T URalN E TRsP TRhnSIENT RESULTS REH EhTER Lev i STEh!1 SCHty IA A #D%b/nR AprF6n s0 /o MBR 1 (

0 FLotu = Llue stset) yg caosu ee 25 sr.c.

t & BYPA$5 QALVE hFIE R TCle TO

.O JLR coHbwSEE I

E

$Q TO conceasce REovuoh or BVPM: vat t'(

O.L SEC oftasA Tuse

y<.-.

~

REkEATER BYPh5S PA SSI UE SYSTEM, Nor SU8TEcT To FAILul!rE WILL WoT Tvg s ex.>E 1ammer BE o

bannanne e

opsantsO A 7' H I G H-Pewex L s vsc.S

'>ITHOu Y RE hen T*

y 9

1 e

i !

h*

i

\\

a l

}a!.::

li I

o.

3y

):

j }

N II m

1 c,

~/ - !l

' <..h%. !

.g,,..% '

k _ /',i j i.

--l 3

1 s.

I

.; >f,

si

- y, b

8


N g 8 %

L.

\\

]

't j' s $../

Y.M, % y' oS QN. !! ?.:,

l jd Ej p

. \\g

,d[

./ll' 8

d 2

3.

0----

\\\\

4/

f i

/

T. S \\ \\ ///i l

/lg I.tr s s.

\\ \\'

s

,N', '

s.,,/-

-\\

l

,.\\}\\\\,/;/.1

/

-lirv't \\,-

2'

.\\

.(5. g,\\ j /

e e 3

'k g'\\K j

". P 1

i/

/ /

j

?!

!r 5's\\

/ / '1 g

l' s N' s'\\ N\\/./

' /jj 1;

\\n s

"\\ -

.~

n,

c.,,. t ~ s..

. g, w, is mi m

1r a

\\'Lfft 4?' g. -'

~

af r

w x

la mdAc -

1:

- -s 1

c.

i

. n" \\\\ N

{

  • I

\\ 'Y js(Tbf Pfe bk 1

- \\p F-% 9.M

_i ir ij i

=

j/T; $NQ s%4,4 5ja

,I-

\\y s/z,s., # b e.c,, h !,;!

\\ au

& 4.c.

--.--3 h

sw 3

, \\' .

y

.3 O

,g

.,. v h

f

, sT' i

Me...-

l- ]{2

}/

\\

(7 s, 1

\\< 2f y

3

' @Td' Y /Y 3

j k\\

I

\\

M/**

1:

i:

1-i s!

fi 1

?

l is i

t =e +. e 3 l

l m

e e

9

...........,..,.... g.

.~.,....#.

.i...

.......1.

....4

{

.i.

...............g..

.j.-

.4.....,

L...

...g.......

..-.a.

4

...ep.

_.(...

i.

.n.

I

.k

-C a

.**F.e

&.....I.-

4 r..

e.

  • 6 t

... I

. f 6

..f

...=.

S r...

... +...4.......

. _,...>-t...

,l

...,.............s.

.l--

.4...

...g

-q s

e*

~.

. ". j_...... '.. -... e.

6_......

9 a

. N

, i.

.g g.

.. 4......,f,....p

.-e..

t w oe,.. -

..q

., (..

-l..... O

e.,...

.+6..

. t

.e I

.l...

N g

[

.l Q

4

...,, ;=. g....

Q s

....N,_

_g.&.

4. ~

N 4.

eg p %=e 4

9,J I

.i.... _

., _....p..g...?

N

.e.

...y

.n e,.,- -..

.s..,.....e.

..y,....

5

.(

,===-9 W....

Q q%

a.

,N p...,4..a..,....._.

..6

.3

..e...

  • et

.(....

1

.. g og

,.. gp d

{

t

~...g

,y

.+

.4

,J

.--7

^

.e i.

i.,.,, :k

,K' g

1"

,,.5......J._.~l.,....e.

....... 4.,...

..s

.e-.

3g 4

  • 3 D..

I, g

_- l.. /.

w

,e u..-.-_,

7..

s.....--

9

.,... a -,

.4

...,. ~.

j...,.....i p.

j t

,........+...,...S.

g.

.6..

,ed e

.._e..

6

.,......~,.....e-...

L.

.........../

)

6 _.+

w....-..

p

.,........ 6. &.-

6

--w u

i

._.L...

m s,

~

.~.

..4..

5..__.

.!..,...s.

~

,......I...

I 4

k i

.A o

3:

3 a

d-3 9

9 s

v NEN % M BG2:1 WV3.LC 2N7 h3w5nsy

_7-EHC CONTROLLED BYPASS caeac,,,

zs.ei. nsa R ED U N O A N T" I N DEP END E MT SIMC.L.E FAlLU R E e

CA PA Q ITV f/z, NOMINA L

  • ,e I*
  • nt

[.' :+

l,-

o e

l' i

VALVE OPER ATING Gg An

{

\\

l

\\

[.-

GAw vu,n a m ma g

m

/

4wuemov N7 3

8;.

Il

[ ' *-

O r-E AST e va Ly t tit

!j A

l l _, % iy I

s

~

k PF E;

W AIN 'sgAM INLtT5 TO HP STOP VALVES

=

,\\

\\

VALVE CPER ATING CL AM

\\,

m.r e,

,C :*

\\

\\

S

\\

?"I Livt 57EAM HEActs i

N, 4A. ;

'M r

i W

i J

pr

=

v y

\\

- e h

~ -- J '\\

c.%

y s_.

b l

x t

w g st

,' vaLvt b

f W+T c..

I a=-

i L;.

t

?

EHC CoMeos.Lcb

~.

V#

BYPASS STEAM SYST E M

~

m

. 4 E

'm

.I 2

8 h

a

[.

    • CaswG P'ECE 4

bg h

57uos FC4 g,

' LEvlA MCU$eNG

- N' f, N f' '

fl I*IL3 MC*a sa e l e

4 m aDe afiCN W CLDS LOCKING PLFE

-[

5

/ u88047 RANG LaCO*4 in.(L3 p sa.93 t L..

i X

ai~c ~uf N'

A-

-,at.c e,. us I 5 vaLvt cec 57 00Vtm

/\\

d WP*tA 47.CLE ev5M

, c.

. \\

GASit?

SP'NCtt Liam 088 passact h

[ x 4-et'-f.

o

{

pN N

/

/

j l,

do;m f,

a t

p go gg go,gegg ;g;g,,

\\

s

)

Cr, s

r,tr / t ts, \\

y.? x ' % W,,

, % ! l,s.p'O7 % "~ %

~ t,~~

R

~

p(._.

. / ;.

b ana Simaanta 4

, l(

waLyg wa e

PLVC f

vaLvC COvtA vaLvt mea 3 goLT 7[

yatyg sta r Vb U '

ih r u,<.f, g-l<

j 4

g s,-

i w~

O df _ M h' 3; Sftsw racu i

wa44 $T{aw M(aO(2 g

ggy sr y

owG vaLvt MCa3 x

x

'vatyt Staf SOLT

\\ valve SEaf SigcKE }.6% smus foe 1,15Ecco T

,,... to

,c u.

_7 p N

a k

j s

"A E

!!!!l j!

O 2

m*

i:iii j=

3 e

I' i I i>

1:

I' N

s t 8i l' l' Ei} f i

!!i} l.

sg y

e-5: -

!: I: !.

"nT 11 I.I I; l

r

=

i:i:i a-o a

u i

_i

{

N i-d d-J-_-,,___J-l l !.,i i i. f I I

r-l I

17 1

t s.

g I,"

- l.i.

t.

' -li

%. Mii. '.

l

[

i i i

I i

l i!

i

~

i I

I i (.

!.. !!!!;l l.l!I l i Ll!!

l I

j l

i i

1 i

l

~

I l

iii, 'j l illt! I i yyj

,i; l

i

[

sjt I

Iil I

.'., ' 'i i

i j

i 8

I llli I

IIjj l ll 1

i!

ij it;i i i

I i

t w.

i I

I i

.g 1

p.

c, ha.l l-3 3

$-II f 'i I!--'@ I I

1 I

r i

I I

g II~

.!! t II~

. i L.__T_J

, !!in ft I

i f

i 1

3 I

liil

!!l 11 t__

_______J u

1 mi s

Y I

N k

P I

+{

2 4

u.l._____.._

c u!

i w

je is

.a

~

I:

it

!?

i t

l

{

i l'-

f.

L t,,

I

= o di 3 3

)

C a

f

', I tIl j

A i

A 1

f4J l

ti s

4 i

1 N

l

}3

  1. 1 3 _.

w an.

5L 37 n

s I

g o;

t fe I

i 1.

l],31"k V Ir' a

ij'a s1 l -! s "'

CQ r

!j:1-

$ @D

!q y

5t a

j' i 3 i

i ijs

}

[-

ji 2

a o

e O

t..

k i's I

4 O

Ik i

EE i

a

=&

LU

!w

))i.s 3, $ " &

h 4

if 4

R 0

Ss. 9

)

t =,

. d <4 s

A 4

h L

h (b lE, I

1 8

tu e

A

.E u

i l

s

]

1 3 31 T

7 12

= 73

23 i

ji s;4 1.g

-s a

c

,r.

t

'r G

i A &

A I

l.L l

t ]

l 1

I 8 I i

L 3dl ilE I

$ig

$3h

=

s A

a B

73 It li li it it P

P I

I a4 &

AA A l I l

- l b

i

~.

e

  • e-}l,3g

5.:o.

I ess"*

8

-3 s

=

i i}t i 11

.;4 r

I}i i

i g p 1

]

3 l

!,5 p I;! -il t

i i!

!I

I
l 1

si a

n e

1 2:1 II

,3 31! F

'l l

31I l

I

!=

"u n

f I

j l

,I g

j e

l i

=

\\

1 l

l 1

\\

5 i

i t

s

\\

l h,

\\

d '

~~ ~r l;

, >. i

\\

.i I t i.j

.-, ex; 'y')

s sj

~

\\

q

'- - qa

/\\1 Np i

/,

rj e, m ;s-,.,y i.,

. ~ ~ ~.

.\\ pn m 5 *-

'\\

~? NiI

, w' &c:

. {m :\\. A t \\,'s S

'o f-a 4cem

,cr\\%.Je

/

of i M

b LF

~/

ch $ { h_,

..n d' 7 i

/

r)

ciG :P),.

k.Rf:\\\\.

\\"

,/

\\\\

/..y r

r s

,u.q,.tq,

,.\\

w

>A.

y

h\\C W:

N".

h..,'.:~-,.; 6 k W^

l'frs

. ;1:,\\ c:9r!

' ij

(:5.f(

Y$$)-,.A.cp.-

\\

y +g a

>w, ~

. su.(lw +.

/g

-{

rs

~ 'd '

\\

, A p(M %f',/tW-l /,'/ '~. ;l j, '

9

/

/

' Q ':

c.7 s

t f

l1 c n, /

' h./

l8 8

5,.6 p

. v /,

jj g % __

_ _: j.

j e

1

\\

\\

ohfl

\\

s ji l

\\

~

i i i

. 'j

\\

\\

t t

\\

\\

l

\\ i i

(

{ {

j i i:

r 3-I !:

3 l !

T

/

\\

I{

Ik.

I _!

o o

o 5

unun s,

u

',fg j

,/.7

%.4 b'.6

?

+

\\.

3 I

_]

mp

~

2

?

2 i%Q

.A,

\\ft; ".?'~R Q l x=

p. -

5 x.,,

~. -*;

g

\\f 3

Q 5

5 t

1 I

)

=

~....

I t

l P l BT e

I 32 f.

V2 v

c yw T

>s, I

QT i

i,^

e-i p

r

.r.

3 i.

l gg d

I

)

4 O a

!;O t h i'~~ & 5 l

I l

.i g.

=a

'b l '

.h t f

ss h

p-1: y, l

n

%e-! h it-

. -c,.C ll o5 i'

d!

.L

[ ll' H

0 -

1 ** '

(& "5I l

s~,

o a

n..

il s..-

r -

V

.-)***I 4

g.

.'I db 5 5 5

I 1

1 t..:

I.'.7 f

1 T.

i 3

1.

.5 g

... 1 2:== 1 3s

!(I===:

i D,r1 I

i J-*:u v

-r D * :.=

==r=,

.z=- ::ex-m

} l,$Ye.

i 2-

?

I

-}-

ll l

,.~.jIcN 8 ',,:u b z=mm7 m.f j

g '... t c s g-g g?.

,7Q,s M "* 7 L.

t i

=-

2

+

$di d'

j

~_

'I

. t t

i

i

=.

==,lli.,

yg 5

g

.T

!}.

g

< u

-__a u

.b r c 3 :&;-

G, y. __._, _ _ _

g

=>

=

ji e

e = =c.y

-y b.lb

" (-

I l

.-Q

, _i'

. ;l-l l ll 3

I 3 1 **.

m, n

4 i

1

=-

t

'., E"!5

\\

(

j'l f - ' d 74i

['

W

%, 7 et 3

h

- pa y..--uzmus a - ammm :

g

-3

    • I

.t

=

3 l

14

['

ji P

.e.

,gh a;

s

.t ti!-

I3 l

\\$!

t

  • ).h i lI -- [3!

i lI i

l6

- =- % _.:q k _

. =,u c v i

f.

2

..,f -,

.m t-s v

I g

__,i 3

35 r

Z U

e

' M=

N w.cs 5

!I!

^8"N h:

.,i,

'ii:ii 2

-[ i r :o a-

.r e

o fl,l ll l[

6 &

a

  • J

'J e ef t /G.f o er e el M

ENCLOSURE 2 ATTENDEES LIST DETROIT EDISON COMPANY MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 1978 NRC L. L. Kintner R. R. Bellamy D. H. Beckham J. F. Stolz C. Graves F. Odar J. Wemiel F. Fitzpatrick T. M. Novak P. Norian P. Matthews Detroit Edison Comeany L. E. Schueman L. F. Wooden E. Lusis