ML19277B039

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Not Responding to Ltrs Is Lack of Courtesy & May Be Reason Why NRC Is Not Receiving Greater Support. Suggests Attitude & Expensive Public Relations People Be Investigated
ML19277B039
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/1982
From: Crump G
GLEN ROSE, TX
To: Burwell S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19277B040 List:
References
NUDOCS 8204090275
Download: ML19277B039 (1)


Text

'

Q ,'.E Q . . . _.

.A. 3, GEORGE CRUMP CdUNTYJUDGE

  • I LN ' '

Post Office Box 851 .['j,' '*- g. g*fi -

County Courthouse Phone: 817-897-2322 -.

Glen Rose, Texas 76043 February 26, 1982 m

~

@ s O/ .d$ 1 Mr. Spottswood Br.rwell N $

Director, Division of Licensing b Deq h

d 'i Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation '

,, 6;," ' ' ' b U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ro #G..T ' Q Washington, D.C. 20555 Nf

Dear Sir:

One of the first rules in conducting any successful business is . . . basic courtesy. Responding to personal mail is certainly one of those " Basic Courtesies."

Being a federal agency does not exempt this recongized practice.

During the past year, I have written several letters to your office and have yet to receive a response. Should you ever wonder why you are not receiving greater support and a team-effort from the public and politicial subdivisions, take a close look at your attitude and that of your expensive public relations people -

you just may find some answers!

./

w.p" b e George R. Crump County Judge GRC:lw K @f IO B204090275 820226 CF SUBJ CF