ML19270F686
| ML19270F686 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch, Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 02/16/1979 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | John Miller GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7903080533 | |
| Download: ML19270F686 (2) | |
Text
t km af 00 UNITED STATES 9'o, j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
RECloN il 3
g 101 M ARIETT A sTR E ET, N.W.
8 ATLANTA. CEORGI A 30303 o,
FEB J 61979 In Reply Refer To:
RII:JP0 50-321, 50-366 50-424, 50-425 Georgia Power Company Attn:
Mr. J.11. Miller, Jr.
Executive Vice President 270 Peachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Gentlemen:
This Information Notice is provided as an early notification of a possibly significant matter.
It is expected that recipients will review the infor-mation for possible applicability to their facilities.
No specific action or response is requested at this time.
If further NRC evaluations so indicate, an IE Circular, Bulletin or NRR Generic Letter will be issued to recommend or request specific licensee actions.
If you have questions regarding the matter, please contact the Director of the appropriate h7C Regional Office.
- Q~ - Y. u y /
James P. O'Reilly 6'R. Director
Enclosures:
1.
IE Information Notice No. 79-04 2.
List of IE Information Notices Issued in 1979
~.
790so80'533
FEB 161979 Georgia Power Company cc w/ encl:
Mr. M. Manry, Plant Manager Plant E. I. Hatch P. O. Box 442 Baxley, Georgia 31513 Mr. C. E. Belflower Site QA Supervisor Plant E.
I. Hatch P. O. Box 442 Baxley, Georgia 31513 Mr. K. M. Gillespie Construction Project Manager Vogtle Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 282 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Mr. E. D. Groover QA Site Supervisor Vogtle Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 282 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASifINGTON, D.C.
20555 February 16, 1979 IE Information Notice No. 79-04 DEGRADATION OF ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES Summary On September 16, 1978, an unusual sequence of events occurred at Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2.
The events involved the electrical power sources and culminated in the spurious activation and degraded operation of Unit 2 Engineered Safety Features (ESF). Analysis of the course of the incident has identified three safety concerns in the electrical distribution system operation and design.
(1) The offsite power supply for ANO Unit 1 Engineered Safety Feature loads was deficient in that degraded voltage could have resulted in the unavailability of ESF equipment, if it were to be needed.
(2) The design of the ANO site electrical system that provides offsite power to Units 1 and 2 did not fully meet the Commission's Regula-tions, 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 17, because in certain circumstances a loss of one of the two offsite power circuits would also result in a loss of the other such circuit.
(3) Deficiencies existed in the operation of the Unit 2 inverters that convert DC to AC power for the uninterruptable 120 volt vital AC buses.
l>escription of Circumstances Initially Unit I was operating at 100 percent power; Unit 2 was in hot standby performing hot functiona criticalityandpoweroperation.}testinginpreparationforinitial Unit I auxiliary electrical loads were being supplied from the Unit 1 main generator via the unit auxiliary transformer.
Unit 2 auxiliary electrical loads were being fed from the offsite grid through Startup Transformer No. 3.
The normal operating status was interrupted by the failure of the Unit 1 Loop "A" Main Steam Line Isolation Valve (MSIV) air operator solenoid causing the MSIV to close as designed. The Unit 1 Reactor Protection System sensed conditions requiring reactor shutdown and tripped the reactor. The The Unit 2 Operating License did not permit criticality of power C
operation at the time of the incident.
f 7903020383 I of 5