ML19270F622

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
to Environ Rept Containing Updated Matl as Detailed in Application Page
ML19270F622
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 02/27/1979
From:
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML19270F621 List:
References
ENVR-790227, NUDOCS 7903020355
Download: ML19270F622 (38)
v • d • e


Text

,

Consumers V,?,,w%jPOWBf

(

']'-

\, [#'I // C0mpany j

S**""""'"

Senior Vice Presulent 80E01.13 HOWE 67-79 RFG 0279-21 General o ffices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, Michigan 49201 * (517) 788-0453 February 27, 1979 Director of Nucle ar Reactor Regulation Att Mr Roger Boyd, Director Division of Pro. ject Management US Nuclear Regulatory Ccemission MIDLAND PROJECT -

DOCKETS 50-329, 50-330 -

AMENDMENT 60 -

FILE: 0485.11 SERIAL 6575 Enclosed herewith is Amendment 60 to Consumers Power Company's application for construction permits and operating licenses containing forty-one (41) copies including three (3) signed originals of Revision 6 to the Company's Environmental Report, Operating License Stage.

Revision 6 to the Environmental Report (OLS) contains updated material as detailed in the application page.

We are retaining an additional one hundred nine (109) copies of Revision 6 to the Environmental Report for direct distribution. Within ten (10) days after docketing, we will provide an affidavit that distribution in accordance with Euclosure 1 to your April 10, 1978 letter (as revised by April 28, 1978 letter) has been completed.

Stephen H Howell (Signed) 790302036f

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY APPLICATION FOR REACTOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND OPERATING LICENSE DOCKET 50-329 DOCKET 50-330 AMENDMENT 60 Enclosed herewith, revising and supplementing the above-entitled application, are revised pages for incorporation in the Environmental Report (OLS). The Environmental Report was submitted with Amendment 43 to the above dockets on April 12, 1978. The enclosed material consists of the following:

1. Revised responses to Mr W H Regan, Jr letter of October 11, 1978 requesting additional information.
2. Responses to Mr W H Regan, Jr letter of January 31, 1979 requesting additional information.
3. Revised material on makeup water withdrawal and on decommissioning and dismantling.
4. Correction of minor errors and omissions.
5. Changes relating to the above (Tables of Contents, Text, Figures, Tables, etc).

These new and revised pages bear the notation " Revision 6 - February 1979" and are marked in the margin to indicate where changes have been made. Additional pages and figures have been added as reflected on the revised Midland Plant ER

" List of Effective Pages."

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY By Stechen i' Hewell (Sicned)

Stephen H Howell, Senior Vice President Dated: February 27, 1979 Sworn and subscribed to before we this 27th day of February 1979.

Betty L Bishoo (Sicned)

(SEAL)

Betty L Bishop, Notary Public Jackson County, Michigan My commission expires September 21, 1982.

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADDING REVISION 6 TO THE MIDLAND PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT This Revision 6 to the Environmental Report (ER) of the Midland Plant consists of pages that are to be inserted into your copy of the ER.

Vertical bars in the margin indicate the location of the revisions in text and tables. Pages without bars are either unchanged pages furnished for continuity or contain minor spelling or editorial corrections which do not change the text content. The pages to be removed and inserted are as follc ws :

REMOVE INSERT Volume 1 Af ter Tab, LOEP-1 thru LOEP-ll After Tab, LOEP-1 thru L0EP-11 Volume 2 2.6-3 thru 2.6-5 2.6-3 thru 2.6-5 3-iii/3-iv 3-iii/3-iv 3.3-Ib/3.3-2 3.3-1b/3.3-2 3.4-7b thru 3.4-12 3.4-7b thru 3.4-12 Tb1 3.4-5 thru Tb1 3.4-8 Tb1 3.4-5 thru Tb1 3.4-8 4.1-3/4.1-4 4.1-3/4.1-4 4.3-3/4.3-4 4.3-3/4.3-4 5.J-:/5.8-2 5.8-1/5.8-2 Tb1 5.8-1 Tb1 5.8-1 5.8R-1 5.8R-1 Volume 3 6-i thru 6-v 6-i thru 6-v 8.2-1 thru 8.2-3 8.2-1 thru B.2-3 Q&R-i thru Q&R-iv Q&R-i thru Q&R-iv ARC 3-1 ARC 3-1 ARC 9-1 ARC 9-1 ARC 10-1 ARC 10-1 FPM l-1 thru FPM 3-1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 1 of 1

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(0LS)

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES CP Co Transmi.tal Letter NRC Receipt Tendered ER 02/28/78 03/01/78 Docket 04/12/78 04/14/78 Revision 1 - April 1978 05/08/78 05/12/78 Revision 2 - June 1978 06/29/78 07/05/78 Revision 3 - November 1978 11/10/78 11/16/78 Revision 4 - December 1978 12/07/78 12/12/78 Revision 5 - January 1979 01/29/79 02/01/79 Revision 6 - February 1979 02/27/79 Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet IL Rev VOI.UME I i 3 1.1-17 4 (3 of 4) 4 ii 3 1.1-17a 4 (4 of 4) 4 iii 0 1.1-17b 4 Tb1 1.1-12 2 iv 0 1.1-18 4 Tb1 1.1-13 4 v 0 1.1-19 4 Tb1 1.1-14 2 L0EP-1 6 1.1-20 2 Fig 1.1-1 2 LOEP-2 6 1.1-21 4 Fig 1.1-2 2 LOEP-3 6 1.1-22 2 Fig 1.1-3 2 L0EP-4 6 1.1-23 2 1.2-1 3 L0EP-5 6 1.1-24 4 1.3-1 4 LOEP-6 6 1.1-25 4 1.3-2 4 LOEP-7 6 1.1-26 4 Tb1 1.3-1 4 LOEP-8 6 1.1-27 4 Tb1 1.3-2 4 LOEP-9 6 1.1-28 4 2-i 0 L0EP-10 6 1.1-29 4 2-ii 0 L0EP-11 6 1.1-29a 4 2-iii 2 1-i 3 1.1-29b 4 2-iv 3 1-ii 4 1.1-30 4 2-v 4 1-iii 2 1.1-31 4 2-vi 0 1.1-1 2 1.1-32 4 2-vii 0 1.1-2 2 1.1-33 2 2-viii 0 1.1-3 2 1.1-34 2 2-ix 3 1.1-4 2 1.1-35 2 2.1-1 0 1.1-5 2 1.1-36 2 2.1-2 0 1.1-6 2 Tb1 1.1-1 4 2.1-3 0 1.1-7 2 Tb1 1.1-2 4 2.1-4 0 1.1-8 2 Tb1 1.1-3 4 2.1-5 1 1.1-9 2 Tb1 1.1-4 4 2.1-6 1 1.1-10 2 Tb1 1.1-5 4 2.1-7 0 1.1-11 2 Tb1 1.1-6 4 2.1-8 0 1.1-12 2 Tb1 1.1-7 4 2.1-9 1 1.1-13 2 Tb1 1.1-8 4 2.1-10 1 1.1-14 2 Tb1 1.1-9 4 2.1-11 0 1.1-15 2 Tb1 1.1-10 2.1-12 0 1.1-16 2 (1 of 2) 2 2.1-13 1 (2 of 2) 2 2.1-14 1 Tb1 1.1-11 (1 of 4) 2 (2 of 4) 2 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 L0EP-1

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev 2.1-14a 1 Tb1 2.1-19 2.2-10 1 2.1-14b 1 (1 of 2) 1 2.2-11 0 2.1-15 1 (2 of 2) 1 2.2-12 1 2.1-16 0 Tb1 2.1-20 1 2.2-13 0 2.1-17 0 Tb1 2.1-21 1 2.2-14 0 2.1-18 2 Tb1 2.1-22 1 2.2-15 1 2.1-19 1 Tb1 2.1-23 1 2.2-16 0 2.1-20 0 Tb1 2.1-24 1 2.2-17 1 2.1-21 1 Tb1 2.1-25 1 2.2-18 0 2.1-22

. 1 Fig 2.1-1 0 2.2-19 0 2.1-23 1 Fig 2.1-2 0 2.2-20 0 2.1-23a 1 Fig 2.1-3 0 2.2-21 0 2.1-23b 1 Fig 2.1-4 0 Tb1 2.2-1 0 2.1-24 0 Fig 2.1-5 0 Tb1 2.2-la 5 2.1-25 0 Fig 2.1-6 0 Tb1 2.2-2 2.1-26 1 Fig 2.1-7 0 (1 of 3) 0 2.1-27 1 Fig 2.1-8 0 (2 of 3) 0 2.1-28 2 Fig 2.1-9 0 (3 of 3) 0 2.1-29 1 Fig 2.1-10 0 Tb1 2.2-3 0 2.1-30 1 Fig 2.1-11 0 Tb1 2.2-4 0 2.1-31 1 Fig 2.1-12 0 Tb1 2.2-5 1 2.1-32 1 Fig 2.1-13 0 Tb1 2.2-6 1 2.1-33 1 Fig 2.1-14 0 Tb1 2.2-7 2.1-34 0 Fig 2.1-15 0 (. of 2) 0 Tb1 2.1-1 0 Fig 2.1-16 0 (2 of 2) 0 Tb1 2.1-2 0 Fig 2.1-17 0 Tb1 2.2-8 Tb1 2.1-3 0 Fig 2.1-18 0 (1 of 2) 9 Tb1 2.1-4 0 Fig 2.1-19 0 (2 of 2) 0 Tb1 2.1-5 0 Fig 2.1-20 0 Fig 2.2-1 0 Tb1 2.1-6 0 Fig 2.1-21 0 Fig 2.2-2 0 Tb1 2.1-7 0 Fig 2.1-22 0 Fig 2.2-3 0 Tb1 2.1-8 1 2.1R-1 1 Fig 2.2-4 0 Tb1 2.1-9 0 2.1R-2 0 2.2R-1 1 Tb1 2.1-10 1 2.1R-3 0 z.2R-2 0 Tb1 2.1-11 0 2.1R-4 1 App 2.2A NA Tb1 2.1-12 0 2.1R-5 1 App 2.2B NA Tb1 2.1-13 0 2.2-1 1 App 2.2C NA Tb1 2.1-14 0 2.2-2 5 2.3-1 0 Tb1 2.1-15 0 2.2-2a 4 2.3-2 0 Tb1 2.1-16 2.2-2b 4 2.3-3 1 (1 of 3) 1 2.2-3 1 2.3-4 0 (2 of 3) 0 2.2-4 1 2.3-5 1 (3 of 3) 1 2.2-5 1 2.3-6 1 Tb1 2.1-17 1 2.2-6 0 2.3-7 0 Tb1 2.1-18 1 2.2-7 1 2.3-8 0 2.2-8 1 2.3-9 0 2.2-9 1 NA = Not applicable. This appendix was not written by Consumers Power Company or its contractors.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-2

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest latest Latest Sheet ID __

Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev 2.3-10 0 2.3R-3 1 Tb1 2.4-3 0 2.3-11 0 App 2.3A Tb1 2.4-4 0 2.3-12 0 2.3A Title Pg 0 Tb1 2.4-5 0 2.3-13 0 2.3A-i 0 Tb1 2.4-6 0 2.3-14 0 Tb1 2.3A-1 0 Tb1 2.4-7 2 2.3-15 0 Tb1 2.3A-2 0 Tb1 2.4-8 2.3-16 0 Tb1 2.3A-3 0 (1 of 4) 0 2.3-17 1 Tb1 2.3A-4 0 (2 of 4) 0 2.3-18 4 Tb1 2.3A-5 0 (3 of 4) 0 2.3-19 0 Tb1 2.3A-6 0 (4 of 4) 0 2.3-20 0 Tb1 2.3A-7 0 Tb1 2.4-9 2.3-21 0 Tb1 2.3A-8 0 (1 of 5) 0 Tb1 2.3-1 0 Tb1 2.3A-9 0 (2 of 5) 0 Tb1 2.3-2 0 Tb1 2.3A-10 0 (3 of 5) 0 Tb1 2.3-3 0 2.4-1 0 (4 of 5) 0 Tb1 2.3-4 0 2.4-2 1 (5 of 5) 0 Tb1 2.3-5 0 2.4-3 1 Tb1 2.4-10 0 Tb1 2.3-6 0 2.4-4 0 Tb1 2.4-11 2 Tb1 2.3-7 0 2.4-5 1 Fig 2.4-1 0 Tb1 2.3-8 0 2.4-6 0 Fig 2.4-2 0 Tb1 2.3-9 0 2.4-7 0 Fig  ?.4-3 0 Tb1 2.3-10 0 2.4-8 J Fig 2.4-4 0 Tb1 2.3-11 0 2.4-9 0 Fig 2.4-5 0 Tb1 2.3-12 0 2.4-10 1 Fig 2.4-6 0 Tb1 2.3-13 0 2.4-11 1 Fig 2.4-7 0 Tb1 2.3-14 0 2.4-12 1 Fig 2.4-8 0 Tb1 2.3-15 0 2.4-13 1 Fig 2.4-9 0 Tb1 2.3-16 0 2.4-14 0 Fig 2.4-10 0 Tb1 2.3-17 0 2.4-15 2 Fig 2.4-11 0 Tb1 2.3-18 0 2.4-15a 2 Fig 2.4-12 2 Fig 2.3-1 0 2.4-15b 2 2.4R-1 1 Fig 2.3-2 0 2.4-16 0 2.4R-2 1 Fig 2.3-3 0 2.4-17 0 2.4R-3 0 Fig 2.3-4 0 2.4-18 2 2.5-1 0 Fig 2.3-5 0 2.4-19 2 2.5-2 2 Fig 2.3-6 0 2.4-20 1 2.5-3 0 Fig 2.3-7 0 2.4-21 0 2.5-4 2 Fig 2.3-8 0 2.4-22 0 2.5-5 1 Fig 2.3-9 0 2.4-23 2 2.5-6 0 Fig 2.3-10 0  ?.4-23a 2 Tb1 2.5-1 0 Fig 2.3-11 0 2.4-23b 2 Fig 2.5-1 0 Fig 2.3-12 0 2.4-24 2 Fig 2.5-2 0 Fig 2.3-13 0 2.4-25 0 Fig 2.5-3 0 2.3R-1 1 Tb1 2.4-1 0 Fig 2.5-4 0 2.3R-2 0 Tb1 2.4-2 0 Fig 2.5-5 0 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-3

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(0LS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Fig 2.5-6 0 Fig 3.1-5 0 Fig 3.4-8 0 Fig 2.5-7 0 Fig 3.1-6 0 Fig 3.4-9 3 2.5R-1 1 3.1R-1 1 Fig 3.4-10 2 2.5R-2 1 3.2-1 1 3.4R-1 1 3.2-2 3 3.5-1 1 VOLUME II 3.2-3 3 3.5-2 0 i 4 Fig 3.2-1 1 3.5-3 1 ii 4 Fig 3.2-2 3 3.5-4 1 iii 0 3.3-1 2 3.5-5 1 iv 0 3.'-la 2 3.5-6 1 v 0 3.3-lb 2 3.5-7 0 2.6-1 3 3.3-2 6 3.5-8 0 2.6-2 3 3.3-3 0 3.5-9 0 2.6-3 3 Tb1 3.3-1 3.5-10 0 2.6-4 6 (1 of 2) 3 3.5-11 0 2.6-5 6 (2 of 2) 1 3.5-12 0 Fig 2.6-1 3 Tb1 3.3-2 0 3.5-13 1 2.6R-1 3 Fig 3.3-1 0 3.5-14 0 App 2.6A NA 3.4-1 0 3.5-15 0 App 2.6B NA 3.4-2 2 3.5-16 1 App 2.6C NA 3.4-3 1 3.5-17 0 2.7-1 0 3.4-4 0 3.5-18 0 2.7-2 0 3.4-5 2 3.5-19 0 Fig 2.7-1 0 3.4-6 2 3.5-20 0 Fig 2.7-2 0 3.4-7 2 3.5-21 1 Fig 2.7-3 0 3.4-7a 2 3.5-22 0 Fig 2.7-4 0 3.4-7b 2 3.5-23 0 Fig 2.7-5 0 3.4-8 6 3.5-24 1 Fig 2.7-6 0 3.4-9 6 3.5-25 0 3-i 2 3.4-10 6 3.5-26 0 3-ii 2 3.4-11 6 3.5-27 0 3-iii 0 3.4-12 6 3.5-28 0 3-iv 6 Tb1 3.4-1 0 3.5-29 0 3-v 2 Tb1 3.4-2 1 3.5-30 1 3.1-1 0 Tb1 3.4-3 2 3.5-31 1 3.1-2 1 Tb1 3.4-4 0 Tb1 3.5-1 0 3.1-3 1 Tb1 3.4-5 0 Tb1 3.5-2' 3.1-4 0 Tb1 3.4-6 6 (1 of 2) 0 3.1-5 0 Tb1 3.4-7 6 (2 of 2) 0 3.1-6 0 Tb1 3.4-8 2 Tb1 3.5-3 3.1-7 0 Fig 3.4-1 0 (1 of 2) 0 Tb1 3.1-1 Fig 3.4-2 0 (2 of 2) 0 (1 of 2) 0 Fig 3.4-3 3 Tb1 3.5-4 0 (2 of 2) 0 Fig 3.4-4 0 Tb1 3.5-5 0 Fig 3.1-1 0 Fig 3.4-5 0 Tb1 3.5-6 0 Fig 3.1-2 0 Fig 3.4-6 0 Fig 3.1-3/ Fig 3.4-7 0 Fig 3.1-4 0 NA = Not applicable. This appendix was not written by Consumers Power Campany or its contractors.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 L0EP-4

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Tb1 3.5-7 1 Tb1 3.5A-10 0 (2 of 2) 1 Tb1 3.5-8 Tb1 3.5A-11 0 3.7-1 0 (1 of 2) 0 Tb1 3.5A-12 0 3.7-2 4 (2 of 2) 0 Fig 3.5A-1 0 3.7-2a 4 Tb1 3.5-9 0 Fig 3.5A-2 0 3.7-2b 4 Tb1 3.5-10 1 Fig 3.5A-3 0 3.7-3 0 Tb1 3.5-11 0 Fig 3.5A-4 0 3.7-4 1 Tb1 3.5-12 0 Fig 3.5A-5 0 3.7-5 0 Tb1 3.5-13 Fig 3.5A-6 0 3.8-1 0 (1 of 4) 1 Fig 3.5A-7 1 3.8R-1 0 (2 of 4) 0 Fig 3.5A-8 1 3.9-1 0 (3 of 4) 1 Fig 3.5A-9 1 3.9-2 1 (4 of 4) 0 Fig 3.5A-10 0 3.9-3 1 F 3.5-1 0 Fig 3.5A-11 0 3.9-4 1 Fig 3.5-2 0 Fig 3.5A-12 0 3.9-5 1 3.5R-1 1 Fig 3.5A-13 0 3.9-6 0 App 3.5A Fig 3.5A-14 0 3.9-7 1 3.5A Title Pg 0 Fig 3.5A-15 0 3.9-8 1 3.5A-i 0 Fig 3.5A-16 0 3.9-9 1 3.5A-ii 0 Fig 3.5A-17 0 3.9-10 1 3.5A-iii 0 Fig 3.5A-18 0 3.9-11 4 3.5A-1 0 Fig 3.5A-19 0 3.9-12 4 3.5A-2 0 3.6-1 0 3.9-13 1 3.5A-3 0 3.6-2 1 3.9-14 0 3.5A-4 0 3.6-3 1 3.9-15 0 3.5A-5 0 3.6-3a 1 Tb1 3.9-1 5 3.5A-6 0 3.6-3b 1 Tb1 3.9-2 0 3.5A-7 0 3.6-4 1 Fig 3.9-1 0 3.5A-8 0 3.6-5 1 Fig 3.9-2 0 3.5A-9 0 3.6-6 2 Fig 3.9-3A 0 3.5A-10 0 3.6-6a 2 Fig 3.9-3B 0 3.5A-11 0 3.6-6b 2 Fig 3.9-3C 0 3.5A-12 0 3.6-7 1 Fig 3.9-3D 0 3.5A-13 0 3.6-8 1 Fig 3.9-3E 0 3.5A-14 0 3.6-9 0 Fig 3.9-3F 0 3.5A-15 0 Tb1 3.6-1 0 Fig 3.9-3G 0 Tb1 3.5A-1 0 Tb1 3.6-2 Fig 3.9-3H 0 Tb1 3.5A-2 0 (1 of 2) 1 Fig 3.9-4 0 Tb1 3.5A-3 0 (2 of 2) 1 Fig 3.9-5 0 Tb1 3.5A-4 0 Tb1 3.6-3 2 Fig 3.9-6 0 Tb1 3.5A-5 0 Tb1 3.6-4 1 Fig 3.9-7 0 Tb1 3.5A-6 0 Tb1 3.6-5 0 Fig 3.9-8 0 Tb1 3.5A-7 0 Tb1 3.6-6 Fig 3.9-9 5 Tb1 3.5A-8 0 (1 of 2) 1 3.9R-1 1 Tb1 3.5A-9 0 3.9R-2 1 3.9R-3 1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 L0EP-5

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev 4-i 0 5.1-10 3 Fig 5.1B-4 0 4-ii 4 5.1-11 0 Fig 5.1B-5 0 4.1-1 1 5.1-12 0 5.1BR-1 0 4.1-2 1 5.1-13 1 App 5.1C NA 4.1-3 1 5.1-14 0 5.2-1 0 4.1-4 6 5.1-15 0 5.2-2 0 4.1R-1 1 5.1-16 0 5.2-3 0 4.2-1 0 5.1-17 0 5.2-4 0 4.2-2 0 5.1-18 1 5.2-5 0 4.2-3 4 5.1-19 0 5.2-6 0 4.2-4 4 5.1-20 0 5.2-7 0 4.2-5 4 5.1-21 1 5.2-8 0 4.2-6 4 Tb1 5.1-1 3 5.2-9 0 4.2-7 4 Tb; 5.1-3 1 5.2-10 0 4.2-8 4 Fig 5.1-1 3 5.2-11 0 4.2-9 4 Fig 5.1-2 3 5.2-12 0 Tb1 4.2-1 5 Fig 5.1-3 3 5.2-13 0 4.2R-1 1 Fig 5.1-4 3 5.2-14 0 4.2R-2 0 Fig 5.1-5 3 5.2-15 0 4.3-1 1 Fig 5.1-6 0 5.2-16 0 4.3-2 1 5.1R-1 1 5.2-17 0 4.3-3 0 5.1R-2 1 5.2-18 0 4.3-4 6 5.1R-3 1 5.2-19 0 4.3-5 0 App 5.1A NA 5.2-20 0 4.3-6 1 App 5.1B 5.2-21 0 4.3R-1 0 5.1B Title Pg 0 5.2-22 0 4.4-1 0 5.1B-i 0 5.2-23 0 4.4-2 1 5.1B-ii 0 5.2-24 0 Tb1 4.4-1 0 5.1B-iii 0 5.2-25 0 4.4R-1 0 5.1B-1 1 5.2-26 0 4.5-1 0 5.1B-2 1 5.2-27 0 4.5R-1 1 5.1B-3 1 5.2-28 0 5-i 3 5.1B-4 1 5.2-29 0 5-ii 4 5.1B-5 0 5.2-30 0 5-iii 0 5.1B-6 0 5.2-31 1 5-iv 3 5.1B-7 0 5.2-32 1 5-v 4 5.1B-8 0 5.2-33 0 5-vi 3 5.1B-9 0 5.2-34 1 5.1-1 0 Tb1 5.1B-1 0 5.2-35 0 5.1-2 1 Tb1 5.1B-2 0 5.2-36 0 5.1-3 1 Fig 5.1B-1 0 Tb1 5.2-1 0 5.1-4 0 Fig 5.1B-2 0 Tbl 5.2-2 0 5.1-5 0 Fig 5.1B-3 0 Tb1 5.2-3 0 5.1-6 0 Tb1 5.2-4 0 5.1-7 3 Tb1 5.2-5 0 5.1-8 3 5.1-9 3 NA = Not applicable. This appendix was not written by Consumers Power Company or its contractors.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-6

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheat ID Rev Tb1 5.2-6 0 5.5-5 0 VOLUME III Tb1 5.2-7 0 5.5-6 4 i 4 Tb1 5.2-8 1 5.5-7 4 ii 4 Tb1 5.2-9 0 5.5-8 4 iii 0 Tb1 5.2-10 0 5.5-9 4 iv 0 Tb1 5.2-11 0 5.5R-1 1 v 0 Tb1 5.2-12 0 5.5R-2 1 6-i 5 Tb1 5.2-13 1 5.5R-3 4 6-ii 5 Tb1 5.2-14 0 5.6-1 4 6-iii 5 Tb1 5.2-15 0 5.6-la 4 6-iv 5 Tb1 5.2-16 0 5.6-1b 4 6-v 5 Tb1 5.2-17 0 5.6-2 3 6.1-1 1 Tb1 5.2-18 0 5.6-3 3 6.1-2 1 Tb1 5.2-19 5 5.6-4 3 6.1-3 2 Tb1 5.2-20 0 5.6-5 1 6.1-3a 2 Tb1 5.2-21 0 Tb1 5.6-1 0 6.1-3b 2 Tb1 5.2-22 0 Tb1 5.6-2 1 6.1-4 1 Tb1 5.2-23 5 5.6R-1 4 6.1-5 1 Tb1 5.2-24 0 App 5.6A 6.1-6 2 Tb1 5.2-25 5 5.6A Title Pg 1 0 6.1-7 2 Fig 5.2-1 0 5.6A Title Pg 2 0 6.1-8 2 Fig 5.2-2 0 5.6A-i 0 6.1-9 2 Fig 5.2-3 0 S.6A-1 0 6.1-10 0 Fig 5.2-4 0 5.6A-2 0 6.1-11 1 Fig 5.2-5 0 5.6A-3 0 6.1-12 0 Fig 5.2-6 0 5.6A-4 0 6.1-13 0 Fig 5.2-7 0 5.6A-5 0 6.1-14 0 Fig 5.2-8 0 5.6A-6 0 6.1-15 0 Fig 5.2-9 0 App A (1 of 2) 0 6.1-16 0 Fig 5.2-10 0 App A (2 of 2) 0 6.1-17 I Fig 5.2-11 0 App B Title Pg 0 6.1-18 2 Fig 5.2-12 0 App B (1 of 2) 0 6.1-18a 2 5.2R-1 0 App B (2 of 2) 0 6.1-18b 2 5.2R-2 3 App C Title Pg 0 6.1-19 0 5.2R-3 1 App C (1 of 7) 0 6.1-20 0 5.2R-4 1 App C (2 of 7) 0 6.1-21 0 5.3-1 3 App C (3 of 7) 0 6.1-22 1 5.3-2 3 App C (4 of 7) 0 6.1-23 1 5.3R-1 0 App C (5 of 7) 0 6.1-24 2 5.4-1 1- App C (6 of 7) 0 6.1-25 2 5.5-1 0 App C (7 of 7) 0 6.1-26 3 5.5-2 0 5.7-1 0 6.1-27 5 5.5-3 0 5.7-2 0 6.1-27a 3 5.5-4 0 5.8-1 6 6.1-27b 3 5.8-2 0 6.1-28 0 Tb1 5.8~1 6 6.1-29 1 5.8R-1 6 Tb1 6.1-1 1 5.9-1 0 Tb1 6.1.2 1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-7

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Tb1 6.1-3 0 6.2A-2-5 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-6 4 Tb1 6.1-4 0 6.2A-2-6 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-7 4 Tb1 6.1-5 0 6.2A-2-7 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-8 4 Tbl 6.1-6 0 6.2A-2-8 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-9 1 Tb1 6.1-7 1 6.2A-2-9 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-10 4 Tb1 6.1-8 0 6.2A-2-10 0 6.2A-3R-1 1 Tb1 6.1-9 4 6.2A-2-11 0 6.2A-3R-2 1 Fig 6.1-1 3 6.2A-2-12 0 6.2A-4-1 0 Fig 6.1-2 2 6.2A-2-13 0 6.2A-5-1 0 Fig 6.1-3 2 6.2A-2-14 0 6.2A-5-2 0 Fig 6.1-4 1 6.2A-2-15 0 6.2A-5-3 0 Fig 6.1-5 0 6.2A-2-16 0 6.2A-5-4 0 Fig 6.1-6 0 6.2A-2-17 0 6.2A-5-5 0 Fig 6.1-7 0 6.2A-2-18 0 6.2A-5-6 0 Fig 6.1-8 2 6.2A-2-19 0 6.2A-5-7 0 Fig 6.1-9 0 6.2A-2-20 0 6.2A-5-8 0 6.1R-1 1 Tb1 6.2A-2-1 0 6.2A-5-9 0 6.1R-2 1 Tb1 6.2A-2-2 0 6.2A-5-10 0 6.1R-3 3 Tb1 6.2A-2-3 1 6.2A-5-11 0 6.2-1 1 Tb1 6.2A-2-4 1 Tb1 6.2A-5-1 0 6.2-2 0 Ibl 6.2A-2-5 0 Fig 6.2A-5-1 0 6.2-3 2 6.2A-2R-1 1 6.2A-5R-1 0 6.2-3a 2 6.2A-3-1 0 App 6.2A-5A 6.2-3b 2 6.2A-3-2 0 6.2A-5A-1 0 6.2-4 2 6.2A-3-3 0 6.2A-5A-2 0 6.2-5 0 6.2A-3-4 0 6.2A-5A-3 0 6.2-6 0 6.2A-3-5 2 6.2A-5A-4 0 6.2R-1 0 6.2A-3-5a 2 6.2A-5A-5 0 App 6.2A 6.2A-3-5b 2 6.2A-5A-6 0 6.2A Title Pg 0 6.2A-3-6 0 6.2A-5A-7 0 6.2A-i 4 6.2A-3-7 0 6.2A-5A-8 0 6.2A-ii 0 6.2A-3-8 0 6.2A-5A-9 0 6.2A-iii 0 6.2A-3-9 0 6.2A-5A-10 0 6.2A-iv 0 6.2A-3-10 4 6.2A-5A-11 0 6.2A-1-1 0 6.2A-3-11 4 Tb1 6.2A-5A-1A 0 6.2A-1-2 0 6.2A-3-12 4 Tb1 6.2A-5A-1B 0 6.2A-1-3 0 6.2A-3-13 4 Tb1 6.2A-5A-1C 0 6.2A-1-4 0 6.2A-3-!4 4 Tb1 6.2A-5A-2A 0 6.2A-1-5 0 6.2A-3-14a 4 Tb1 6.2A-5A-2B 0 6.2A-1-6 0 6.2A-3-14b 4 Tb1 6.2A-5A-3 0 6.2A-1-7 0 6.2A-3-15 0 Tb1 6.2A-5A-4A 0 6.2A-2-1 1 6.1A-3-16 1 Tb1 6.2A-5A-4B 0 6.2A-2-2 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-1 0 Tb1 6.2A-5A-5 6.2A-2-3 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-2 2 (1 of 2) 0 6.2A-2-4 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-3 2 (2 of 2) 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-4 1 6.2A-5AR-1 0 Tb1 6.2A-3-5 4 O

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-8

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest latest latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev 6.3-1 0 Tb1 7.1-4 0 10-iii 0 6.3-2 0 Tb1 7.1-5 0 10-1 0 6.3-3 0 Tb1 7.1-6 0 10R-1 0 6.3-4 0 Tb1 7.1-7 0 10.3-1 0 6.3-5 0 Tb1 7.1-8 0 10.3-2 0 6.3-6 0 Tb1 7.1-9 0 10.3-3 1 6.3-7 0 Tb1 7.1-10 1 10.3-4 1 6.3-8 5 7.1R-1 1 10.3-5 0 6.3-9 5 7.2-1 0 Tb1 10.3-1 0 6.3R-1 1 7.3-1 0 Fig 10.3-1 0 6.3R-2 0 7.3-2 1 Fig 10.3-2 0 6.4-1 0 7.3-3 1 10.3R-1 1 Tb1 6.4-1 0 7.3-4 1 10.9-1 0 Tb1 6.4-2 0 7.3-5 0 10.9-2 1 7-i 0 7.3-6 1 10.9-3 1 7-ii 0 7.3-7 1 10.9R-1 0 7-iii 0 Tbl 7.3-1 0 11-i 0 7.1-1 0 Tb1 7.3-2 1 11-ii 0 7.1-2 0 7.3R-1 1 11-1 4 7.1-3 1 8-i 2 Tb1 11-1 4 7.1-4 0 8.1-1 4 11R-1 0 7.1-5 1 8.1-2 4 12-i 0 7.1-6 1 8.1-2a 4 12-ii 0 7.1-7 1 8.1-2b 4 12.1-1 3 7.1-8 0 8.1-3 0 Tb1 12.1-1 7.1-9 0 8.1-4 0 (1 of 10) 0 7.1-10 0 8.1R-1 0 (2 of 10) 0 7.1-11 0 8.2-1 6 (3 of 10) 0 7.1-12 0 8.2-2 6 (4 of 10) 0 7.1-13 0 8.2-3 6 (5 of 10) 0 7.1-14 0 8.2R-1 4 (6 of 10) 0 7.1-15 0 9-i 0 (7 of 10) 3 7.1-16 0 9-ii 2 (8 of 10) 3 7.1-17 0 9.1-1 0 (9 of 10) 3 7.1-18 0 9.1R-1 7.1-19 0 (10 of 10) 3 0 9.2-1 0 12.2-1 0 7.1-20 0 9.2R-1 0 12.3-1 0 7.1-21 0 9.3-1 0 12.4-1 0 7.1-22 0 9.4-1 2 12.5-1 0 7.1-23 0 Tb1 9.4-1 2 12.6-1 0 7.1-24 0 9.4R-1 2 12.6-2 0 7.1-25 0 9.5-1 3 13.2-1 0 Tb1 7.1-1 0 9.5R-1 0 13.2-2 0 Tb1 7.1-2 0 10-i 0 13.2-3 0 Tb1 7.1-3 0 10-ii 0 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-9

MIDIAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev 13.2-4 0 AEC 5-1 2 Tb1 4-1 2 13.2-5 0 AEC 5-2 2 B-C 5-1 2 13.2-6 0 AEC 5-3 2 B-C 6-1 2 13.2-7 0 AEC 5-4 2 B-C 7a-1 2 13.2-8 0 AEC 6-1 2 B-C 7b-1 2 13.2-9 3 AEC 7-1 2 B-C 8-1 2 13.2-10 0 AEC 8-1 2 B-C 8-2 2 13.2-11 0 AEC 9-1 2 B-C 9a-1 2 13.2-12 0 AEC 9-2 2 B-C 9b-1 2 13.3-1 0 AEC 10-1 2 E-C 9b-2 2 13.~ 3-2 0 AEC 11-1 3 B-C 9c-1 2 13.3-3 0 AEC 11-2 3 B-C 10-1 2 13.3-4 0 AEC 12-1 3 B-C 10a-1 3 13.4-1 0 AEC 13-1 3 B-C 11-1 2 13.4-2 0 AEC 13-2 3 B-C 12-1 2 13.4-3 0 AEC 13-3 3 B-C 13-1 3 13.5-1 0 AEC 13-4 3 B-C 14a-1 2 13.5-2 0 Tb1 AEC 13-1 3 B-C 14b-1 2 13.5-3 0 Tb1 AEC 13-2 3 B-C 15-1 4 13.5-4 0 Tbl AEC 13-3 3 END 1-1 4 13.5-5 0 Tb1 AEC 13-4 3 END 1-2 4 13.5-6 0 Tb1 AEC 13-5 3 END 1-3 4 13.5-7 0 ARC 1-1 3 END 1-4 4 13.5-8 0 ARC 2-1 3 END 1-5 4 13.5-9 0 ARC 3-1 6 END 1-6 4 13.6-1 0 ARC 4-1 3 END 1-7 4 13.6-2 0 ARC 5-1 3 END 1-8 4 13.6-3 3 ARC 6-1 3 END 1-9 4 13.6-4 3 ARC 7-1 3 Tb1 END 1-1 13.6-5 3 ARC 8-1 3 (1 of 2) 4 13.6-6 3 ARC 9-1 6 (2 of 2) 4 13.7-1 0 ARC 10-1 6 END 2-1 4 13.7-2 0 ARC 11-1 4 END 2-2 4 13.8-1 0 B-C la-1 2 END 3-1 4 13.9-1 2 B-C la-2 2 END 4-1 4 13.10-1 0 B-C lb-1 3 END 5-1 5 13.10-2 0 B-C Ic-1 2 END 6-1 5 13.11-1 0 B-C Ic-2 3 FPM 1-1 6 Q&R i 6 B-C Ic-3 2 FPM 2-1 6 Q&R ii 6 B-C Ic-4 2 FPM 3-1 6 Q&R iii 6 B-C Ic-5 2 HDS 1-1 2 Q&R iv 6 B-C Ic-6 2 HDS 2-1 2 Q&R v 5 B-C 2-1 2 HDS 3-1 2 AEC 1-1 2 B-C 2-2 2 HDS 4-1 2 AEC 2-1 2 B-C 3-1 3 HDS 4-2 2 AEC 3-1 2 B-C 4-1 2 HYD 1-1 2 AEC 4-1 2 HYD 2-1 2 HYD 3-1 2 HYD 4-1 3 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 LOEP-10

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Latest Latest Latest Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev Sheet ID Rev HYD 5-1 3 RAD 1-4 5 HYD 6-1 3 RAD 1-5 5 HYD 7-1 3 RAD 2-1 4 HYD 7-2 3 RAD 3-1 4 HYD 8-1 4 RAD 4-1 4 HYD 8-2 4 RAD 4-2 4 HYD 9-1 5 RAD 5-1 4 HYD 10-1 4 RAD 6-1 5 HYD 11-1 3 Tb1 RAD 6-1 5 HYD 12-1 3 RAD 7-1 4 Tb1 HYD 12-1 RAD 8-1 4 (1 of 3) 3 S0C 1-1 2 (2 of 3) 3 S0C 2-1 2 (3 of 3) 3 SOC 3-1 4 HYD 13-1 4 SOC 4-1 2 Tb1 HYD 13-1 4 SOC 5-1 2 HYD 14-1 3 SOC 6-1 3 MET 1-1 2 SOC 7-1 2 MET 2-1 2 SOC 8-1 4 MET 3-1 2 S0C 9-1 3 MET 4-1 3 SOC 10-1 4 MET 5-1 2 S0C 10-2 4 MET 6b-1 2 SOC 11-1 3 MET 7-1 2 SOC 11-2 3 MET 8-1 2 S0C 11-3 3 NET 9-1 2 SOC 11-4 3 MET 10-1 2 SOC 12-1 4 MET 11-1 2 SOC 13-1 4 MET 12-1 2 SOC 14-1 4 MET 13-1 3 S0C 14-2 4 MET 14-1 3 SOC 13-1 3 MET 15-1 3 SOC 16-1 3 MET 16-1 3 S0C 17-1 3 MET 17-1 3 S0C 17-2 3 PEC 1-1 2 SOC 18-1 3 PEC 2-1 4 SOC 18-2 3 PEC 2-2 4 TEC 1-1 2 PEC 2-3 4 TEC 2-1 2 PEC 2-4 4 TEC 3-1 2 Tbl PEC 2-1 TEC 4-1 4 (1 of 2) 4 TEC 5-1 3 (2 of 2) 4 PEC 3-1 2 PEC 4-1 2 PEC 5-1 2 PEC 6-1 2 PEC 7-1 2 PEC 8-1 2 PEC 9-1 2 RAD 1-1 4 RAD 1-2 5 RAD 1-3 5 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 L0EP-11

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) arrangements and the topsoil was removed without notification to the amateur archaeologist.

Consumers Power forwarded a copy of Mr Pomranky's letter to the State Archaeologist on June 14, 1978 asking for a letter giving his evaluation for inclusion in the Midland Plant Environmental Report. Initially, the State Historic Preservation Officer, in a letter of June 23, 1978, declined approval of this request.

A subsequent meeting (on July 24, 1978) between Consumers Power representatives, the State Historic Preservation Officer and the State Archaeologist provided necessary background to these State personnel (refer to confirming letter of August 2, 1978 in Appendix 2.6A). The functions of State 3 Historic Preservation Office were transferred from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Office to the Michigan History Division c ' the Department of State neat he end of 1974. Apparently as a result of this transfer some key documents were never received by the Michigan History Division, particularly those of 1971 which established Consumers Power Company's initial contact with the State Historic Preservation Coordinator. Realizing what had occurred, at that earlier time, the State Historic Preservation Officer, on August 21, 1978, although noting the inadequacy of the archaeological appraisal, acknowledged that the facts stated and correspondence cited are accurate as far as they are able to determine and that Consumers Power adequately discharged its historic preservation responsibilities at the Midland Plant at the time in question (1971).

REVISION 3 - NOVEMBER 1978 2.6-3

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O Subsequent to the meeting with the State, Consume-s Power received Ms Wang's letter providing more details on the investigation conducted by the amateur archeologists at the Midland Plant site in 1971. The Michigan History Division was informed of this additional information by letter of August 2, 1978.

At a meeting on September 7,1978 with members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff, Ms Wang of the Michigan Archeological Society and Mr Brunett 3 of the Saginaw Archeological Coraission (formerly with the Chippewa Nature Center) it was indicated that other archeological materials had been collected from the Midland Plant site at various times prior to Plant construction.

The results of the evaluation of these other cultural materials collected on site and available from members of the Michigan Archeological Society and at O the Chippewa Nature Center and of prehistoric cultural materials found on the 6 l site in 1971 by amateur archeologists are presented in a report on the floodplain archeological survey of the Midland Plant site (refer to Section 2.6.2).

2.6.2 Operating License Stage 3 Consumers Power presented specific information to the Michigan History Division regarding the proposed pond blowdown discharge line in an August 9, 1978 letter. Subsequently the Michigan History Division requested that an archeological su-vey of the pond blowdown discharge line be performed by a professional archeologist prior to the construction of that discharge line.

O REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 2.6-4

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

On August 29, 1978 Consumers Power Company representatives and the State 3 Archeologist toured the Midland Plant site. A survey of the Tittabawassee River floodplain (including the route of the proposed blowdown discharge line) was initiated in October 1978. Two previously identified archeological significant sites which contain historic and prehistoric artifacts were 6 i.dentified during the survey and are discussed in the report, Archeological and Historical Investigations of the Floodplain Area, Midland Plant Site, Midland, Michigan. This report describing the results was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on February 8, 1979.

2.6.3 Transmission Line Right-of-Way Archeological Features Appendix 2 6C is a copy of the archeological survey of the transmission line 3 right-of-way associated with the Midland Plant. A detailed plan for the mitigation or avoidance of the identified archeological sites that could be disturbed by the construction and operation of the Plant's associated 4 transmission facilities is presented in Section 4.2.2.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 2.6-5

Section Title Page No 3.7.1.2 Fire Water Diesel Pumps. . . 3.7-2 3.7.1.3 Auxiliary Boilers. .

3.7-2 3.7.2 Liquid Effluents .. . . . 3.7-3 3.7.2.1 Laundry Waste. . . . . ... . 3.7-3 3.7.2.2 Storm Drainage .. . . . . . . .. 3.7-3 3.7.2.3 Sanitary Waste .. .. . . . ... . . . 3.7-4 3.7.2.4 Laboratory Wastes.... . . . .. . . . 3.7-4 3.7.3 Solid Waste. .... .. . . . . .. .. 3.7-5 3.8 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL MOVEMENT. ..... . 3.8-1 3.8R REFERENCES . . .. . . . .

3.8R-1 3.9 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES. . . 3.9-1 3.9.1 Implementation of Environmental Guidelines . . 3.9-1 3.9.2 Regulations and Controls . . .. . 3.9-1 3.9.3 Land Usage . .. .. .. . . . . 3.9-3 3.9.4 Environmental Assessment . . . . 3.9-4 3.9.4.1 Terminal Points. . . . .. 3.9-4 3.9.4.2 Midland 138 kV Start-Up Lines. . . .. 3.9-5 3.9.4.3 Midland 1 ani 2 to Tittabawassee 345 kV Lines. 3.9-7 3.9.4.4 Tittabawassee to Kenowa/Thetford 345 kV Lines. . 3.9-7 3.9.5 Railroad and Highway Crossings . 3.9-12 3.9.6 Environmental Effects of Electrical Fields 3.9-12 3.9.6.1 General. . . .. . 3. 12 3.9.6.2 Electrostatic and Electromagnetic Induction Effects. .. . . . .. 3.9-13 3.9.6.3 Radio and Tt'evision Interference. . .. ... 3.9-14 3.9.6.4 Audible Noise. . . . ... . . 3.9-14 3.9.6.5 Ozone Productio.i ... . . . . . . . . . 3.9-14 3.9R REFERENCES . . . .. . . . . 3.9R-1 3-iii

CHAPTER 3 LIST OF TABLES Table Description 3.1-1 LIQUID AND GASEOUS WASTES RELEASE POINTS 3.3-1 WATER USAGE 3.3-2 EXPECTED SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN WATER USAGE AT MAXIMUM POWER 3.4-1 CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS 3.4-2 SERVICE WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS 3.4-3 AVERAGE MONTHLY METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS USED IN POND THER'!AL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 3.4-4 MONTHLY COOLING POND PERFORMANCE FOR ONE UNIT OPERATING 3.4-5 MONTHLY COOLING POND PERFORMANCE FOR BOTH UNITS OPERATING 6l 3.4-6 MAKEUP WATER WITHDRAWAL REGIME 3.4-7 MAKEUP WATER APPROACH VELOCITIES FOR VARICUS WITHDRAWAL RATES 2l3.4-8 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURES DURING HOURLY SIMULATIONS FOR 40-DAY PERIOD 3.5-1 PARMIETERS USED TO CALCULATE EXPECTED REACTOR AND MAIN STEAM SOURCE TERMS PER NUREG-0017 3.5-2 EXPECTED REACTOR COOLANT ACTIVITY CALCULATED 3.5-3 EXPECTED SECONDARY COOLANT CONCENTRATIONS 3.5-4 NITROGEN-16 ACTIVITY IN REACTOR COOLANT 3.5-5 AVERAGE PROCESSING RATE THROUGH PURIFICATION DEMINERALIZERS AND BLEED PROCESSING SYSTEM 3.5-6 TRITIUM PRODUCTION 3.5-7 REFUELING CANAL AND FUEL POOL CONCENTRATIONS 3.5-8 PARAMETERS USED IN THE CALCULATION OF GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVITY RELEASES 3.5-9 POTENTIAL ANNUAL RELEASES IN GASEOUS EFFLLINTS 3.5-10 EXPECTED LWS COMPONENT RADIONUCLIDE INVENTORIES 3.5-11 RADWASTE GAS SYSTEM -- ESTIMATES OF GASEOUS WASTES GENERATED PER YEAR DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3.5-12 PROCESS SYSTEM DESIGN CAPACITY 3.5-13 CONTINUOUS PROCESS Ah3 EFFLUENT RADIATION MONITORING 3.6-1 MIDLAND MUNICIPAL CITY WATER CHARACTERISTICS 3.6-2 EXPECTED CHARACTERISTICS CF WAS1F cTREAMS 3.6-3 EXPECTED TITTABAWASSEF RIVER WATER QUALATY AT THE MIDLANT PLANT RIVER INTAKE STRUCTLPE 3.6-4 EXPECTED CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COOLING POND BLOWDOWN AND COMBINED PLAhT DISCHARGE 3.6-5 PROCESS STEAM SYSTEM BLOWDOWN VOLUME AST QUALITY 3.6-6 EXPECTED ANNUAL CHEMICAL USAGE 3.9-1 ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION FACILITIES 3.9-2 LAh] TYPES CROSSED BY TITTABAWASSEE TO KENOWA/THETFORD 345 kV LINE REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 3-iv

MIDIANI) 1&2-ER(OLS)

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REVISION 2 - JUNE 1978 3.3-lb

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) 6l Tittabawassee River at a maximum rate of 270 cfs subject to the restrictions O

listed in Table 3.4-6 and a 1 ft/s approach velocity. Table 3.4-6 provides restrictions on makeup water withdrawn during periods of low river flow.

The 880-acre (356 ha) recirculating cooling pond is designed to provide dissipation of heat removed by Plant cooling and condensing systems and provides water for the Plant fire protettion system. Cooling pond makeup and blowdown discharge is discussed in Sections 3.4.3, 3.4.4, 3.4.5, and 3.6.4.

The effects of pond level fluctuations on pond biota are discussed in Section 5.6.2.

3.3.3 Domestic Water Water for use as domestic water is taken from the Midland Municipal Water District, which draws its supply from Lake Huron. Domestic water is supplied to sanitary fixtures, laboratory fixtures, and laundry facilities.

Treatment and discharge of domestic wastewater is discussed in Section 3.7.

3.3.4 Precipitation Precipitation falling on the Plant site is transported via roof drains and site storm drains to Bullock Creek, the Tittabawassee River, and the 880-acre (356 ha) rec'.rculating cooling pond. Precipitation falling on areas where oil contamination may occur such as transformer areas, oil storage areas, and oil transfer areas is routed to the oily waste collection system for treatment (refer to Section 3.6). Precipitation talling on the 880-acre (356 ha) recirculating cooling pond contributes slightly to the pond makeup water requirements.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 3.3-2

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REVISION 2 - JUNE 1978 3.4-7b

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O 3.4.4 Cooling Pond Makeun System Structures Cooling pond makeup water is taken from the Tittabawassee River through the river intake structure illustrated in Figure 3.4-7. River water is supplied from the river intake structure to the makeup pump structure shown in Figure 3.4-8 through a single 96-inch (244-cm) diameter pipe. Three cooling pond makeup pumps, each having a nameplate rating of 31,500 gpm (70 cfs) capacity 6 and 40,400 gpm (90 cfs) maximum capacity at river levels exceeding 595 feet msl, take suction from the common suction chamber of the makeup pump structure and discharge the river water into the cooling pond through a 72-inch (183-cm) diameter concrete pipe. A dilution line (shown as Laundry Waste Dilution line on Figure 3.3-1) is provided from the ecoling pond makeup pumps to the cooling pond discharge structure to provide minimum dilution flows for discharge of 6llowlevelradioactiveeffluentsasdescribedinSection5.2.2.1.1.

Floating logs in front of the river intake structure prevent admission of 6llarge floating debris. Vertical trash racks with 3-inch (7.6-cm) openings and three traveling screens with 3/8-inch (9.5-mm) mesh size are provided for further removal of smaller debris which would otherwise enter the river intake 6l structure. Disposal of debris is addressed in Section 3.7.

The design of the river intake structure features a natural bypass channel which creates a sweep flow in front of the traveling screens. The bypass channel provides an escape route for fish and helps to reduce accumulation of debris and silt in front of the traveling screens.

6 The makeup water withdrawal regime as a function of river flow is listed in Table 3.4-6. Furthermore, the average .alocity of the withdrawn river water REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 3.4-8

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) approaching the screens, normal to the screens, should not exceed 1 ft/s (30cm/s). This is accomplished by operating the appropriate number of makeup pumps as illustrated in Table 3.4-7. Due to operational limitations of the makeup pumps, excess water withdrawn above tl.at permitted for makeup according 6 to Table 3.4-6 is recirculated back to the makeup pump structure.

During initial filling of the pond, river water in excess of 350 cfs is 6 withdrawn until the pond is full. Two makeup pumps normally provide a minimum withdrawal rate of 140 cfs.

3.4.5 Cooling Pond Blowdown Discharge Structure The cooling pond blowdown discharge structure shown in Figure 3.4-9 consists of three parallel 30-inch (76-cm) diameter concrete pipes which have an invert elevation of 587 feet msl (179 m) at their outfall. The pipes are positioned at the river bank normal to the river flow, and connect to the 66-inch (168-cm) diameter blowdown line at the edge of the Plant fill as shown in Figure 3. -

The blowdown discharge is regulated-by three valves located on each of the 30-inch (76-cm) diameter pipes. This scheme provides control of blowdown discharge velocities up to 15 ft/s (4.6 m/s) by allowing shutoff of one or two of the three pipes depending on the Plant discharge. Thus, by maintaining high discharge momentum when possible, more effective mixing of the blowdown with the river flow is achieved. A riprap blanket in front of the pipe outfalls protects the riverbed from potential erosion due to the jet action.

Physical model testing of the blowdown system at a scale of 1:15 was carried out to assess its thermal performance as discussed in Section 5.1.2. Thermal plumes, as defined by the T = 5 F (2.8 C) isotherm, contain not more than 25%

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 3.4-9

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O of the cross-sectional area or volume of rivar flow at any transect of the Tittabawassee River. Chemical characteristics of cond blowdown are discussed in Section 3.6.

The cooling pond blowdown operation is designed to control the pond total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations which originate from the use of Tittabawassee River water. TDS contribution from the Plant operation, sulfuric acid and hypochlorite addition to the circulating water and the possib:e discharge of condensate demineralizer regeneration waste are not significant. As evaporation losses of pond water resulting from the heat dissipation process will result in TDS accumulation, the cooling pond blowdown and makeup process will allow for TDS control within the pond operating requirements.

The principal parameters influencing the occurrence of cooling pond blowdown and its flowrate are: TDS levels in the pond, pond temperature, TDS levels in 3 the river, river flowrate and ambient temperature, and the ability to make up to the pond. Because the blowdown criteria are dynamic, the Company plans to utilize an automatic control system on the pond blowdown which is responsive to appropriate parameters to assure applicable discharge limitations are met.

An automatic control system is provided to minimize the TDS concentration in the cenling pond by maximizing blowdown and makeup flowrates. The frequent changes in the variables, particularly river flow, dictate the need for an automatic rather than a manual system.

The combined effects of the cooling pond blowdown and The Dow Chemical Company discharge shall comply with Michigan Water Quality Standards regarding REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 3.4-10

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) temperatures, TDS, mixing zone length, and width. The cooling pond is generally kept full when possible and therefore blowdown is usually voluntarily restricted when makeup canot keep up with pond losses.

Blowdown flowrate is determined by calculating the flowrate that satisfies the river TDS limitations and separately calculating the flowrate that satisfies the river thermal limitations. The lower of the two flowrates is selected and then checked to verify that it is within the physical range of the blowdown system. Pond level and makeup rate are also checked to make certain that blowdown discharge will not unacceptably decrease the pond level. The calculated blowdown rate is then set by an automati adj us tment of the three blowdown control valves. Flow measurement is provided in each blowdown line.

3 Periodically the flowrate is recalculcLed and reset as required.

The blowdown flowrate to satisfy river thermal limitations is calculated from the Alden Research Laboratory model testing program results. Calculations can be done for all river flowrates up to the maximum rate tested by interpolation. For higher river flowrates, extrapolation of the test data and proportioning are used to calculate blowdown flowrates. The measured parameters required for this calculation of blowdown are river flowrate, the cooling pcnd blowdown temperature and the natural river temperature. If the natural river temperature exceeds the monthly maximums stated in the Water Quality Standards, no blowdown is planned.

The blowdown flowrate to satisfy river TDS limitations is based on a calculation of a fully mixed mass bal.nce using measured values of river flow and TDS concentration, The Dow Chemical Company discharge flow and TDS REVISION 6 - FEERUARY 1979 3.4-11

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O concentration, and the blowdown TDS concentration. River TDS is measured downstream at Freeland to verify compliance.

During the months of March, April and May, the pond blowdown discharge will most likely be continuous. For the remaining months, the discharge may be intermittent. At any given instant, the blowdown flow may be between 5 and 200 cfs or there may be no pond blowdown discharge flow dependent upon the parameters previously outlined.

Pond blowdown is used for radwaste dilution when the blowdown flow is 3 adequate. When the pond blowdown flow is not adequate, the makeup pumps provide the necessary dilution flow and pond blowdown flow is temporarily suspended.

Results of the recent cooling pond operational study indicate that the 5 F O

isotherm criterion of the State Water Quality Standards could be met within 1,700 feet (515 m) downstream of the pond blowdown discharge structure. The 25% river cross-sectional or flow criteria of the Water Quality Standards can also be met on an average temperature basis.

O REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 3.4-12

tilDLAND lh2-ER(OLS)

TABLE 3.4-5 (a)

?!ONTilLY COOLING POND PERFORf1ANCE FOR B')Til UNITS OPERATING UNIT 1 BACK END LittlTED flAXIt!Ut! GUARANTEED LOAD AND UNIT 2 VAlNES WIDE OPEN ItiPOSED llEAT LOAD: 7.69 x 109 Btu /br IflPOSED llEAT LOAD: 9.05 x 109 Blu/hr CIRCULATING WATER FLOW RATE: 653,<200 GPr! CIRCULATING WATER FLOW RATE. 653,900 GPfl Percent Percent Imposed imposed Condenser Ave ra ge Total llea t Load Condenser Average Total llea t Load Inlet Pond Sur- Evapo- I.ost by Inlet Pond Sur- Evapo- Lost by

?!onth Temperature face Temp ration Evap Teinpe ra t u re face Temp ration Evap

("F) ( F) (acre- (O ( F) ( F) (acre- (D ft/ day) ft/ day)

January 59.0 64.I 29.0 44 63.5 69.4 35.9 46 February 60.5 65.8 31.6 46 64.5 70.0 37.2 46 ff a rch 65.0 69.9 36.5 50 69.0 74.6 44.0 52 April 73.5 78.3 44.4 57 76.5 82.3 52.5 59 flay 83.0 87.9 55.4 64 86.0 91.6 63.8 66 June 89.5 94.2 61.1 68 97.5 92.0 70.2 69 Ju1y 92.0 96.8 60.8 69 94.5 100.1 69.8 70 August 92.0 96.5 57.4 68 94.5 100.0 66.5 70 September 85.5 90.4 53.0 67 88.0 93.9 61.6 69 October 78.0 82.9 45.2 61 81.0 87.0 53.6 63 November 68.0 73.0 36.5 53 71.5 77.6 44.2 55 December 60.5 65.8 30.5 46 65.0 71.0 37.7 44 C = 5 ( F-32)/9-(2)

(a) Bechtel, 1973 .

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O TABLE 3.4-6 6l MAKEUP WATER WITHDRAWAL REGIME River Flow Withdrawal Less than 350 cfs No withdrawal for pond (for dilution only) 350-390 cfs Withdraw flow in excess of 350 cfs 390-650 cfs Withdraw 40 cfs for Plant evaporation and seepage losses 650 cfs or more Withdraw 40 cfs plus that flow 6 above 650 cfs up to the total pump capacity equal to 270 cfs O

O REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979

MIDLANI) 1&2-ER(OLS)

TABLE 3.4-7 MAKEUP WATER APPROACH VELOCITIES FOR VARIOUS WITHDRAWAL RATES No of Water Surface Average River Withdrawal Total Pumps Elevation at Approach Flow for Makeup Recirculation Pumping Operating Intake Velocity (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (ft (ms1)) (ft/s) 350 0 67 (b) 67 1 588.8 0.42 390 40 40 (c) 80 1 589.0 0.24 700 90 69 (c) 159 589.4 2 0.50 744 134 15 (c) 159 2 589.5 0.73 1000 200 33 (c) 233 590.0 3 1.00 2150 238 0 238 591.5 3 <1.00 6 5000 270 0 270 (a) 595.2 3 <1.00 a) Maximum pump output is 270 cfs at river flow exceeding 5,000 cfs.

b) Recirculation to the river for laundry waste dilution only. Dilution flows may also occur at higher river flow, but will usually be provided by cooling pond blowdown.

c) Recirculation to makeup pump inlet.

1 ft = 0.3048 m 1 ft/s = 30.5 cm/s ,

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O TABLE 3.4-8 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURES DURING HOURLY SIMULATIONS FOR 40-DAY PERIOD ( F)

Equilibrium Temperature!2)-

CondenserInlgt Temperature (b.

Max Min Max Min Hourly 113.2 35.9 97.7 87.6 l Daily Average 80.2 59.9 97.0 88.3 2 6-Day Average 75.1 65.7 95.1 90.4 Period Average (40 days) 71.0 89.9 Average - last 30 days 72.5 92.0 (a) Equilibrium temperature is the temperature of a water body at which there is no net heat transfer across the water surface. Equilibrium tempera-ture is determined solely by meteorological conditions.

(b) Figures represent last 30 days of simulation period to allow for adjust-ment to assumed initial conditions. The heat load in Btu /hr was 7.61 x 109 O

REVISION 2 - JUNE 1978

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) above mean sea level (msl). To minimize the effects of dredging, the following measures were taken:

a. Constructie of a cofferdam to prevent runoff and erosion during the construction of the intake structure and retaining walls.
b. Dumping of dredge spoils onshore.
c. The placement of riprap along the banks for minimizing erosion and siltation.

All riprap was sound, durable rocks, free of cracks, and coverage size of 8 to 12 incnes (20 to 30 cm) with specified maximum and minimum sizes of 18 and 6 inches (43 and 15 cm), respectively.

d. Finished surfaces around the intake structure were smoothed to conform to the general contsur of the floodplain. Finished surfaces and embanknents were seeded, fertilized and mulched to prevent soil erosion.

Benthic macroinvertebrates inhabiting this area were t.;nd in concentrations ranging from 54 to 1,595 per m2, both prior to and following dredging, indicating complete recovery. Much of the variation was due to the constant shifting of bottom substrates in the river (4) . Benthic organisms inhabitating the area were removed with the spoils, but the modification has not affected the assimilative capacity or the water quality and biological productivity potential of the river. The downstream effects of increased suspended solids, fine particulates, and siltation are expected to be minimal since most macroinvertebrates inhabiting this type of stream are adapted to the silty REVISION 1 - APRIL 1978 4.1-3

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) conditions that normally occur in lotic waters such as the Tittabawassee O

River.

Although not specifically monitored, the efftets of dredging on fish populations of that area are also expected to be minimal, resulting in only temporary displacement of some local individuals.

Tile net result of this dredging, from a fisheries standpoint, is an improvement of the stream due to deepening, bank stabilization and cover, and an increase in the area available for spawning, feeding and cover provided by the riprap.

4.1.4 Other Impacts of Site Preparation and Station Construction Socioeconomic impacts are discussed in Chapter 8.

Impacts associated with transmission facilities have been addressed in Section 3.9.

Two previously identified archeologically significant sites which contain 6 historic and prehistoric artifacts were identified in a 1978 survey on the Tittabawassee River floodplain (refer to Section 2.6.2). Archeological sites along transmission corridors have been addressed in Section 3.9 and described in Appendix 2.6C.

O REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 4.1-4 I

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) 345 kV towers and installation of four wood poles. It is assumed that the above land can be reclaimed for previous uses following decommissioning.

As stated in Section 3.9.4, towers will be located within an existing corridor between Tittabawassee Substation and the point of connection with the Kenowa-Thetford 345 kV Line. Towers will be located to avoid disturbance of archaeological sites identified by University of Michigan archaeologists (refer to Appendix 2.6C). A total of 8.3 acres (3.4 ha) will be disturbed for construction of towers within the corridor. These 8.3 acres will be lost to existing uses for the duration of line operation. However, this commitment of land is not irretrievable.

Less than 0.4 acre (0.2 ha) will be disturbed by the towers required for the Midland start-up circuits. One tower each will be located on public land (City of Midland, Saginaw Road-Waldo Road interchange) and Dow Chemical Company river frontage. The remaining towers and poles will be located on site or on Consumers Power Company land associated with the Tittabawassee Substation site.

Part of the Midland Plant 345 kV Line right-of-way will cross Dow Chemical Company lands. A major part of this right-of-way was formerly reserved for railroad sidings. Less than 1.0 acre (0.4 ha) of newly disturbed land will be added for tower construction since many towers will be located on fill established for Dow pond containment dikes.

The accumulative impact of construction activities for transmission facilities will be minor and temporary. For all transmission facilities associated with 4.3-3

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

O the Midland Plant, less than 12 acres (4.9 ha) of land will be lost to present uses by construction of 190 towers and 16 wood poles.

4.3.2 Water Resources Some commitment of water has been, and is, required during construction of the Plant but losses are negligible and result only in a redistribution of water resources. In addition to using the City of Midland water supply, water needed for construction purposes has been obtained from wells that were drilled on site. Water for initial filling of the cooling pond is obtained from the Tittabawassee River in accordance with limits set forth in Table 6l3.4-6. The Tittabawassee River was dredged and widened by 100 feet (30.5 m) for approximately 2 miles (3.2 km) adjacent to the Plant to compensate for the floodplain that was lost due to the construction of the Plant and cooling pond (see Section 4.1.3).

4.3.3 Biotic Resources Irretrievable loss of aquatic biota during construction has been addressed in Section 4.1.3. The irretrievable losses are limited to benthic organisms removed during dredging. Some temporary displacement of fishes probably occurred during construction, but the net result of channelization and bank stabilization will increase available habitat.

Irretrievable loss of terrestrial biota during construction has been addressed in Section 4.1.1, and in the ASER(2) and ERS(3) . It is assumed that the majority of wildlife and vegetation have been displaced and/or destroyed in the construction area of 1,235 acres (500 ha).

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 4.3-4

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) 5.8 DECOMMISSIONING AND DISMANTLING Consumers Power Company will comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations properly in existence at the tire of deconnissioning the Midland Plant Units 1 and 2. At the time of decommissioning which is not expected to occur prior to 2012, and probably much later, a dismantlement plan will be submitted to the NRC as currently required by 10 CFR 50.82 and Regulatory Guide 1.86 This plan will take advantage of then existing technology and result in a mutually agreeable restoration of the land.

At the present time, for planning purposes, Consumers Power Company endorses 6 l the Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory study which covers the subject of decommissioning alternatives.

Of the major methods of decommissioning outlined-in this study, mothballing and prompt removal / dismantling, Consumers Power Company has chosen to tentatively select prompt removal / dismantling for Midland Units 1 and 2.

6 The methodology of the Battelle study was followed in deriving Table 5.8-1 for the prompt removal / dismantling of the Midland Plant Units 1 and 2. Reduction factors for t'.o-unit-on-a-site deccmmissioning were taken from the Atomic Industrial Forum study.( ) In addition to those costs involved in removal of the power block, associated costs are shown for restoration of the cooling pond area to its approximate condition prior to site preparation and process steam evaporators which are unique to the Midland Plant.

Restoration of the cooling pond is predicated on an existing condition of a local permit that states "If the company abandons the use of the property as approved by this order, then the dike and pond area shall be leveled and left REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 5.8-1

MIDI.Ard 1&2-ER(OLS)

O approved by this order, then the dike and pond area shall be leveled and left with a cover of soil in such a manner as to be harmonious with the then-existent drainage and suitable for uses permitted by the Township Zoning Ordinance for tr.e use district in which the dike and pond area is located (3) ,

9 O

5.8-2

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

TABLE 5.8-1 ESTIMATED DECOMMISSIONING A'iD RESTORATION COSTS (Millions of 1981 Dollars)

Activity Estimate Mobilization, Demobilization and Temporary Facilities S 3.7 Supplies, Power, Contractor Services, Nuclear Insurance 18.1 Equipment 4.1 Staff Labor 25.4 6 Demolition Services 40.2 Disposal (Radioactive Waste) 35.7 Overheads 12.5 Subtotal Decommissioning $139.7 Reboiler, Diesel-Generator, Administration, Service Water and Circulating Vater Structures Demolition 6.4 Site Specific Restoration 34.3 Total Decommissioning, Deraolition and Site Restoration $180.4 (a) PrompgIg$moval/dismantlingbasedonBattellePacificNorthwest Study and Atomic Industrial Forum Study (2)

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) 5.8R REFERENCES

1. Directorate of Regulatory Standards, Termination of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Reactors, Regulatory Guide 1.86 (June 1974), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

la. R I Smith, G J Konzek and W E Kennedy, Jr, Technology, Safety and Costs 6 of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station, NUREG/CR-0130 (June 1978), Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Prepared for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

2. W J Manion and T S LaGuardia, An Engineering Evaluation of Nuclear Power Reactor Decommissioning Alternatives (November 1976), National Environmental Studies Project, Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc.
3. Division of Radiological and Environmental Protection (compiler), Final Environmental Statement Related to the Construction of Midland Plant Units 1 & 2, Consumers Power Company,Section VIII (March 1972), US Atomic Energy Commission.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 5.8R-1

CHAPTER 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page No 6 EFFLUENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS... ..... .... .... .. . . 6.1-1 6.1 APPLICANT'S PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS .. . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. 6.1-1 6.1.1 Surface Waters .. .... ... ... . .... 6.1-1 6.1.1.1 Physical and Chemical Parameters .. ... . 6.1-2 2 6.1.2.2 Biological Parameters. . .. . . .... ..... . . 6.1-3a 6.1.1.2.1 Entrainment Sampling for Fish Eggs and Larvae. . . 6.1-3b 6.1.1.2.2 Impingement Sampling . ...... ... .. . .. . 6.1-4 6.1.1.2.3 Biological Sampling in the Tittabawassee River . 6.1-5 6.1.2 Ground Water .... . . . .. .... . ....... . 6.1-5 6.1.2.1 Preoperational Groundwater Monitoring Program. .. 6.1-6 6.1.2.2 Supplementary Preoperational Groundwater Monitoring Program . . . ... .. .. 6.1-7 6.1.2.2.1 Description. . . . ... . . . ... 6.1-7 6.1.2.2.2 Groundwater Levels .... .. . . .... . .. . ... 6.1-8 6.1.2.2.3 Groundwater Quality. . . ..... ..... .. . 6.1-9 v.1.2.3 Models . .. ... .. ... . . . .. . . . 6.1-9 6.1.3 Air... . . . .. . . .... . ... .. . . 6.1-9 6.1.3.1 Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program . ... 6.1-9 6.1.3.1.1 Meteorological Site Characteristics. . . ..... 6.1-9 6.1.3.1.2 Meteorological Data Aquisition System.. ... . . 6.1-11 6.1.3.1.3 Calibration. ..... .... ...... ... . ... ..... 6.1-14 6.1.3.1.4 Service and Maintenance... ..... .... . .... ... 6.1-16 6.1.3.1.5 Data Reduction Procedures. . . .. . . ... . 6.1-17 6.1.3.1.6 Meteorological Data Recovery . . .. . ... 6.1-18 6.1.3.1.7 Joint Frequency Distributions of Wind Direction and Speed by Atmospheric Stability Class . .. . 6.1-18 6.1.3.1.8 Fog and Ice Monitoring .. ...... .......... .. 6.1-18 2l6.1.3.2 Models ... .. .. .. ... . ..... ... .... .. 6.1-18b 6.1.3.3 Preoperational Noise Survey.. . .... ....... . 6.1-19 6.1.3.3.1 Instrumentation... .... .... .. . ....... 6.1-19 6.1.3.3.2 Calibration... .... . .... . . .. ... . 6.1-21 6.1.3.3.3 Methodology of Data Collection . . ... . . 6.1-21 1l5.1.4 Land ..... .. .. . . . .... . . ........ .. .. 6.1-22 6.1.4. Geology and Soils...... .. .. ....... . . . 6.1-22 6.1.4.1.1 Exploration Programs . . ... . .... ...... . 6.1-23 6.1.4.1.2 Soil and Rock Sampling Methods . . . .... . 6.1-24 6.1.4.1.3 Subsidence Monitaring Program.. ... . ...... 6.1-25 6.1.4.2 Land Use and Demographic Surveys . 6.1-26 6.1.4.3 Ecological Parameters. .......... .. . ... .... 6.1-26 5l 6.1.4.4 Archeclogy ..... .... . ..... . .. .. . .. 6.1-27 6.1.5 Radiological Monitoring.. .. . . . ... .. . 6.1-27a REVISION 5 - JANUARY 1979 6-i

O Section Title Page No 6.1R REFERENCES .. .. . .. . ..... 6.1R-1 6.2 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED OPERATIONAL MONITORING PROGRRIS . .. . . ....... . ..... .. 6.2-1 6.2.1 surface Waters ..... . .. . .............. 6.2-1 6.2.1.1 Physical and Chemical Parameters . .... . .. 6.2-1 6.2.1.2 BiAogical Parameters... ... ...... ...... . .. 6.2-2 6.2.2 Ground Water ... ....... .... . .. ........... 6.2-2 6.2.3 Air. ....... .... ....... .......... . ... ... 6.2-3 6.2.3.1 Meteorology.. ...... ..... .. .. . ..... . ... 6.2-3 6.2.3.1.1 Operational Meteorological Monitoring Program. . 6.2-3 2j6.2.3.1.2 Operational Fog and Ice Monitoring Program 6.2-3a 6.2.3.2 Noise. .. . . . ...... . . . . .... 6.2-4 6.2.4 Land . ... ...... . . .. .. . . . . .. . 6.2-4 6.2.4.1 Geology and Soils. ....... .. ...... . . . 6.2-4 6.2.4.1.1 Exploratory.. ... ..... . .. .... .... .. .. 6.2-4 6.2.4.1.2 Subsidence ... .. ... . ... . ... .. .. . 6.2-5 6.2.4.2 Land Use and Demography.. ...... . . . . . . 6.2-5 6.2.4.3 Ecological Parameters. . . . . .. 6.2-5 6.2.5 Radiological Monitoring. ...... .. ... . .. 6.2-6 6.2R REFERENCES .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . ..... . 6.2R-1 6.2A ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 6.3 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING PRORA'!S ..... . ...... . . .. .. . 6.3-1 6.3.1 Terrestrial Ecological Programs. .. . . .. 6.3-1 6.3.2 Related Aquatic Ecological Programs..... ..... 6.3-1 6.3.2.1 Dow Chemical Company Study (Zillich) ..... 6.3-1 6.3.2.2 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Study.. . ..... . . . .. . ... . .. . ... 6.3-2 6.3.2.3 Dow Chemical Company Study (Batchelder &

Alexander) . .. .. . ......... . . ... . 6.3-2 6.3.2.4 Grea t I.akes Basin Framework Study. . . . . ..... 6.3-3 6.3.2.5 Great Lakes Resource Management Program. .. ... 6.3-3 6.3.3 Meteorological Programs... . ...... . . .. 6.3-4 6.3.4 Hydrological Programs. .. .. . .. .. .. . 6.3-4 6.3.4.1 The Dow Chemical Study ..... .. ... ..... 6.3-4 6.3.4.2 US Geological Survey . . ........ ... . . 6.3-5 6.3.4.3 East Central Michigan Planning and Development Region .. . . . . . .. . . ... 6.3-6 6.3.4.4 STORET Data............... .. .... .. .. .. . 6.3-7 6.3.4.5 Water Quality Management Plan for Lower Lake Huron Basin . . . ... ..... .... ... . 6.3-7 6.3.4.6 Other Programs .... .. ...... ... .. . ... . 6.3-8 6.3.5 Geological Programs. . .. .... .... . . 6.3-8 6.3.6 Archaeological Programs. ... . . . . . 6.3-8 6.3.7 Noise Programs . .. . ....... . ... 6.3-8 6.3.8 Radiological Programs. . . .. . . .. .. . .. 6.3-9 6.3R REFERENCES . ... .. ... . . . .. 6.3R-1 REVISION 5 - JANUARY 1979 6-ii

Section Title Paee No 6.4 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRO.NeiENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING DATA.... . ..... . . ... . . 6.4-1 REVISION 5 - JANUARY 1979 6-iii

O CHAPTER 6 LIST OF TABLES Table Description 6.1-1 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PARAMETERS TO BE MEASURED IN THE TITTABAWASSEE RIVER 6.1.2 PRE 0PERATIONAL BIOLOGICAL SAMPLING IN TIE TITTABAWASSEE RIVER NEAR MIDLANT 6.1-3 SENSORS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND SYSTEM ACCURACY OF INSTRDIENTS USED ON 91.5-METER METEOROLOGICAL TOWER 6.1-4 SENSORS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND SYSTEM ACCURACY OF INSTRUMENTS USED ON EACH 10-METER TOWER STATION 6.1-5 PERCENTAGE OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA RECOVERED FOR THE MIDLAND PLANT 6.1-6 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRN! AS DESCRIBED IN PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS 6.1-7 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -- PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL PHASES 6.1-8 PREOPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENTIRONMENTAL MONITO'.ING PROGRAM SCHEDULE 6.1-9 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS 6.4-1 GROSS BETA ANALYSIS -- SDDIARY OF LABORATORY RESUL"S 6.4-2 TRITIUM ANALYSIS -- SDDIARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS O

REVISION 5 - JANUARY 1979 6-iv

CHAPTER 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Description 6.1-1 BIOLOGICAL & CHEMICAL SAMPLING STATIONS IN TITTABAWASSET, RIVER, MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 6.1-2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS 6.1-3 DESIGN OF GR)UNDWATER MONITORING WELLS 6.1-4 SITE PLAN SHOWING PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS 6.1-5 PIEZ0 METER SECTION P1 6.1-6 PIEZOMETER SECTION P2 6.1-7 PIEZ0 METER INSTALLATIONS 6.1-8 SUBSIDENCE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM -- BENCIDIARK LOCATIONS AND DESIGN 6.1-9 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN 10 MILES REVISION 5 - JANUARY 1979 6-v

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) 8.2 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FACILITY Estimated levelized annual costs of electric energy production frcm the Midland Plant are shown in the ERS(l) ,

8.2.1 Capital Costs of Facility Construction The ERS(2) presents the capital costs of constructing Midland Units 1 and 2.

8.2.2 Capital Costs of Transmission Facilities Construction costs for the associated transmission lines and substation facilities are reported in the ERS(3).

8.2.3 Fuel Ccsts Fuel costs associated with the production of energy at the Midland Plant are discussed in the ERS CO).

8.2.4 Operating and Maintenance Costs The uniform annue. equivalent operating and maintenance costs are given in the ERS (5).

8.2.5 Costs of Decommissioning and Dismantling 3lCostsofdecommissioninganddismantlingthemainpowerstructureare estimated in 1981 dollars to be $146.1 million. Local requirements include removal of the pond and intake structures. The 1981 estimate for removal of 6 the pond and intake structure and relandscaping of the Plant site is $34.3 million.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 8.2-1

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) 9 3 Section 5.8 is a Jiscussion and cost breakdown for decommissioning and dismantling the Midland P1 t.

8.2. Cost of Income and Property Taxes The present worth of income and property tax payments of the Midland Plant is indicated in the ERS( ).

8.2.7 Socioeconomic Costs Additional municipal services would be required to support the Plant operating personnel who live in the area; however, the property taxes incurred by the Midland Plant will more than of' et the increase in service costs.

Public service impacts attributable to immigration due to operation of the Plant are expected to be minimal. For example, the 240 school children would represent approximately 2.5% of the total projected Midland school 1980-81 2 enrollment of 9,679 if all were to be enrolled in Midland schools. Regarding traffic services, the vehicles introduced by Midland Plant staff personnel would represent less than 1% of all registered vehicles in the Midland area.

This figure is based on an average of 1.7 vehicles per staff member (530 vehicles) and the 1976-77 registration of 59,000 vehicles total.

8.2.8 Environmental Costs Only minor environmental costs are associated with the operation of the Midland Plant:

a. Preemptica of 1,235 (500 ha) acres of land from other uses during the life of the Plant; REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 8.2-2

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

b. An increase in local fogging and icing;
c. Entrainment of planktonic organisms (phytoplankton, zooplankton, ichthyoplankton, and invertebrates) from approximately 5% of the river flow during the initial filling of the cooling pond and intermittent makeup pumping;
d. Possible impingement losses of some resident and migrant fish species during internittent makeup pumping;
e. Temperatures elevated above normal river temperature 'luctuations during blowdown.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 8.2-3

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS) r NRC QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES TABLE OF CONTENTS Question ID NRC Request ER Revision Page No Aquatic Ecology 1 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 3-1 4 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 4-1 5 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 5-1 6 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 6-1 7 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 7-1 8 May 22, 1978 2 AFC 8-1 9 May 22, 1978 2 AZC 9-1 10 May 22, 1978 2 AEC 10-1 11 October 11, 1978 3 AEC 11-1 12 October 11, 1978 3 AEC 12-1 13 October 11, 1978 3 AEC 13-1 Archaeology 1 May 22, 1978 2, 3 ARC 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2, 3 ARC 2-1 3 October 11, 1978 3,5,6 ARC 3-1 4 October 11, 1978 3 ARC 4-1 5 October 11, 1978 3 ARC 5-1 6 October 11, 1978 3 ARC 6-1 7 October 11, 1978 3 ARC 7-1 8 October 11, 1978 3 ARC 8-1 9 October 11, 1978 3, 6 ARC 9-1 10 October 11, 1978 3, 6 ARC 19-1 11 October 11, 1978 3, 4 ARC 11-1 Benefit-Cost Analyses and Need for Power la May 22, 1978 2 B-C la-1 lb May 22, 1973 2, 3 B-C lb-1 le May 22, 1978 2, 3 B-C 1c-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2, 3 B-C 3-1 4 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 4-1 5 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 5-1 6 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 6-1 7a May 22, 1978 2 B-C 7a-1 7b May 22, 1978 2 B-C 7b-1 8 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 8-1 9a May 22, 1978 2 B-C 9a-1 9b May . 1978 2 B-C 9b-1 9c May 27, 1978 2 B-C 9c-1 10 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 10-1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 Q&R-i

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Question ID NRC Request ER Revision Page No 10a May 22, 1975 2, 3 B-C 10a-1 11 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 11-1 12 May 22, 1978 2 B-C 12-1 13 May 22, 1978 2, 3 B-C 13-1 14a May 22, 1978 2 B-C 14a-1 14b May 22, 1978 2 B-C 14b-1 15 October 18, 1978 3, 4 B-C 15-1 Endangered Species 1 October 11, 1978 3, 4 END 1-1 2 October 11, 1978 3, 4 END 2-1 3 October 11, 1978 3, 4 END 3-1 4 October 11, 1978 3, 4 END 4-1 5 December 22, 1978 5 END 5-1 6 December 22, 1978 5 END 6-1 Floodplain Management 1 January 31, 1979 6 FPM 1-1 2 January 31, 1979 6 FPM 2-1 3 January 31, 1979 6 FPM 3-1 Heat Dissipation 1 May 22, 1978 2 HDS 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 HDS 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2 HDS 3-1 4 May 22, 1978 2 HDS 4-1 Hydrology, Water Use and Water Quality 1 May 22, 1978 2 HYD 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 HYD 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2 HYD 3-1 4 October 11, 1978 3 HYD 4-1 5 October 11, 1978 3 HYD 5-1 6 October 11, 1978 3 HYD 6-1 7 October 11, 1978 3 HYD 7-1 8 October 11, 1978 3, 4 HYD 8-1 9 October 11, 1978 3, 4, 5 HYD 9-1 10 'ctober 11, 1978 3, 4 HYD 10-1 11 Jctober 11, 1978 3 HYD 11-1 12 October 11, 1978 3 HYD 12-1 13 October 11, 1978 3, 4 HYD 13-1 14 October 11, 1978 3 HYD 14-1 Meteorology 1 May 22, 1978 2 MET 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 MET 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2 MET 3-1 4 May 22, 1978 2, 3 MET 4-1 5 May 22, 1978 2 MET 5-1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 Q&R-ii

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Question ID NRC Request ER Revision __Page No 6b May 22, 1978 2 MET 6b-1 7 May 22, 1978 2 MET 7-1 8 May 22, 1978 2 MET 8-1 9 May 22, 1978 2 MET 9-1 10 May 22, 1978 2 MET 10-1 11 May 22, 1978 2 MET 11-1 12 May 22, 1978 2 MET 12-1 13 October 11, 1978 3 MET 13-1 14 October 11, 1978 3 MET 14-1 15 October 11, 1978 3 MET 15-1 16 October 11, 1978 3 MET 16-1 17 October 11, 1978 3 MET 17-1 Plant Effluent Chemistry 1 May 22, 1978 2 PEC 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2,3,4 PEC 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2 PEC 3-1 4 Ma3 22, 1978 2 PEC 4-1 5 May 22, 1978 2 PEC 5-1 6 May 22, 197" 2 PEC 6-1 7 May 22, 1978 2 PEC 7-1 8 May 22, 1978 2 PEC 8-1 9 May 22, 1978 2 PEC 9-1 Radiological 1 November 16, 1978 4, 5 RAD 1-1 2 November 16, 1978 4 RAD 2-1 3 November 16, 1978 4 RAD 3-1 4 November 16, 1978 4 RAD 4-1 5 November 16, 1978 4 RAD 5-1 6 November 16, 1978 4, 5 RAD 6-1 7 November 16, 1978 4 RAD 7-1 8 November 16, 1978 4 RAD 8-1 Socioeconomics 1 May 22, 1978 2 SOC 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 S0C 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2,3,4 S0C 3-1 4 May 22, 1978 2 SOC 4-1 5 May 22, 1978 2 SOC 5-1 6 May 22, 1978 2, 3 S0C 6-1 7 May 22, 1978 2 SOC 7-1 8 October 11, 1978 3. 4 SOC 8-1 9 October 11, 1978 3 SOC 9-1 10 October 11, 1978 3, 4 SOC 19-1 11 October 11, 1978 3 SOC 11-1 12 October 11, 1978 3, 4 SOC 12-1 3 October 11, 1978 3, 4 SOC 13-1 14 October 11, 1970 3, 4 SOC 14-1 15 October 11, 19'8 3 SOC 15-1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 Q&R-iii

MIDLAND 1&2-ER(OLS)

Question ID NRC Request ER Revision Pace No 16 October 11, 1978 3 SOC 16-1 17 October 11, 1978 3 SOC 17-1 18 October 11, 1978 3 SCC 18-1 Terrestri:1 Ecology 1 May 22, 1978 2 TEC 1-1 2 May 22, 1978 2 TEC 2-1 3 May 22, 1978 2 TEC 3-1 4 October 11, 1978 3, 4 TEC 4-1 5 October 11, 1978 3 TEC 5-1 REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 Q&R-iv

MIDLAND 1&2 - ER(OLS)

ARCHAEOLOGY QUESTION 3 Provide an inventory of all cultural resources remaining on the Midland Plant property including the methods used for site location and evaluation. In addition, provide information on the structure and function of any .ndividual historic and/or arcnaeological sites that have been located.

RESPONSE

3)Asurveytolocateanddescribeculturalresources in the floodplain (between the cooling pond dike and the bank of the Tittabawassee River 1 was initiated in October 1978. Six copies of Commonwealth Associates, Inc, Archeological 5landHistoricalInvestigationsoftheFloodplainArea, Midland Plant Site, Midland, Michigan (January 1979), Consumers Power Company, were provided to 6 the NRC via separate cover on February 8, 1979.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 ARC 3-1

MIDLAND 1&2 - ER(OLS)

ARCilAE0 LOGY QUESTION 9 Please provide the results of the evaluation of the prehistoric cultural materials found on the site in 1971.

RESPONSE

The results of the evaluation of the prehistoric cultural materials found by members of the Michigan Archaeological Society on the Midland Plant site in 6 1971 are contained in the report describing the floodplain archaeological survey. Refer to the respon:e to Archaeology Question 3.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 ARC 9-1

MIDLAND 1&2 - ER(OLS)

ARCHAE 0 LOGY QUESTION 10 Provide an evaluation of other cultural materials known to have been collected from the Midland site including the photographs of collections that are currently available from members of the Saginaw Archaeological Commission and Chippewa Nature Ereserve. Include information on chronology, site function, and cultural affiliation. This evaluation is to be made by a professional archaeologist meeting SOPA (Society of Professional Archaeologists) requirements.

RESPONSE

3l The evaluation of other cultural materials known to have been collected 6lpreviouslyfromtheMidlandPlantsitearedescribedinareportdescribing 3 the floodplain archaeological survey (refer to the response to Archaeology Question 3).

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 ARC 10-1

MIDLAND 1&2 - Eh(OLS)

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT QUESTION 1 Provide verification of compliance with the State of Michigan Water Resources Commission Order and Permit No FP-55, issued on June 25, 1969, regarding construction of structures, in the floodplain of the Tittabawassee River, and mitigating actions, therefore, to compensate for loss of floodplain cross-sectional area due to the construction.

RESPONSE

Response will 'oe provided in March 1979.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 FPM 1-1

MIDLAND 1&2 - ER(OLS)

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT QUESTION 2 Provide verification of compliance with any amendments to the Order and Permit indicated in Question 1, above.

RESPONSE

Response will be provided in March 1979.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 FPM 2-1

MIDLB3 1&2 - ER(OLS)

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT QUESTION 3 Provide a map indicating the floodplain of the Tittabawassee River in the area of the plant both before and after the construction indicated in Questions 1 and 2, above.

RESPONSE

Response vill be provided in Marc!. 1979.

REVISION 6 - FEBRUARY 1979 FPM 3-1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19270F622&oldid=2379792"