ML19269D441
| ML19269D441 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1979 |
| From: | Grier B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Thompson D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269D433 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7906040058 | |
| Download: ML19269D441 (2) | |
Text
'
Jja r% < ~ ;--
89%
[7 4
T * ( )[$
UNITED STATES f
' (' (~ 'f y (M NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
S REGION I
% $ D(f j E
sai Ann avsNut
.y.//f J
g,, s x,~
o,..u......~~ m v.~,.,,o.
April 3, 1979 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Dudley Thompson, Executive Officer for Operations Support, IE FROM:
Boyce H. Grier, Director, Region I
SUBJECT:
PETITION TO REV0KE THE SEABROOK CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A petition to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to revoke the construction permit of Seabrook was sent from Denver, Colorado to the Clamshell Alliance in Portsmouth, New Hampshire on February 15, 1979.
The Clamshell Alliance forwarded the petition to Region I on March 22, 1979.
It was received in Region I March 26, 1979.
The petition bears the names of 25 individuals.
Receipt of this petition in Region I was discussed in preliminary notification PN-NRC:I-37 and in the Daily Report for March 28, 1979.
~
The subject petition is forwarded with this memorandum for appropriate action.
='5-Na h, cyce H. Grier ector
Enclosure:
As stated 2258 167 7 90G 04006I A
.o 0
- hE, THE UNDERSIGNED, PETITION THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY OMISSION TO REVOKE THE LICENSE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 'IEE NUCLFAR P0hl.R PLANT AT SE.E R00K, NEW FJMPSHIRE. hE OPPOSE IT FOR'IEE FOLLOh'ING REASONS :
1.
No safe and responsible method has been developed to store nuclear was te.
The effects of nuclear wastes have been proven hamful to people, causing cancer and genetic damage.
2.
We do not want to be exposed to low-level radiatien emissions, such as has occurred at Vemon, Vement, where a sinilar r.uclear power plant has been built. The cumulative effect of low-level radiation has been proven to cause cancer and genetic damage.
3 The cooling system of the proposed Seabrook plant has not been proven safe for the environment.
waE ADoRESS 2258 168 oATE TM co r t er,w N t.u a, rs 3^.B @ htMa U b '-
%J. tL nh M S~I-x I}\\J:.tI er_ e S// / Wia Fc42/Pd {w t s, i s '
CT< es,.Lbmw n --l,' wr.nn
=^2R Ec: C,i raw L'/
<)w bwaci $4.
L >l.,.. / n f _'5 F. r..r '
t,, t r ' e
(', I -
UObWom Edin G l '1 n '" h
' ba, a -r4 5 d 4 rJ
/4 -
u
'h >w l.. w o( ' rq n b e,s,- H A,r
%- I SriVbs Pc, v-D' n :-
s s
kJ %codLOc I'h./%. U, A. ~
ro m Itphs1. Booldn
('e e.
9BMh P
l 'd b.', 1/ m ' e % 4., % N -r oXW r.+ %.
ic
<e,c w.a
<.,n cJ.stn e. ce, c e.
MCO NC
) h !O MOO
(
y1. C[
' llk i fnwfih!o/.
i M 6. 9) i w ('1
'~ 2.m /-e%'k h w MA /2
'% c.
~-f i a, c -
/ h'- O b : w u IQc,.tc r /
(0 FMC2 _i -
a/ u 2
g n u, n,. p.;
r A,vJ 3.,aa lr H v..
',).,
%,. -w:0 v.:+
pc.-ci
.-p w.,rn %.,OccCc. pcsc (La h \\ 1^ '
> c n D 'in 6 IIG/ Ork Y C, u td et
('<.
N RG J...
72 F-- 2 CL.J/ s.m e I,
--. I ' I J r b./ 4 C-25A,/B v C3co_
'.D.tk.d Tl..$
),,
',Ls ocia b
,13 13,->LL n D L.
-, c
'" J Y b \\./
N /* ) 19',' M (Yg
- e#
N '-
t'/.\\N @/\\f da \\ dVC fM r # L h (~t?
[A
/,
e hn dvi+ M M
/ ** (^
- k. c'f(*T N dr l./
\\
.s M.,r.,3 L%
d..A,L. % Nd
%II.L l' $,
. np i%ri.
icy % \\
r< G
' 2/A Mh l (, g.,
-l
-e J
I e~
's L
f
//
lhDC
$\\
\\ ' Cn A G Dt% (,~ G -
9td b,*
Mc jb b
$W o.,
w --
T L./ /. h N
v m im ao..d v Ad / 0 +w 97n