ML19269B982
| ML19269B982 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1979 |
| From: | Stallings C VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269B977 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7901190178 | |
| Download: ML19269B982 (3) | |
Text
.
Vr.no NIA Ex.zCnIC AND Powna COMPANY R a c raw on n,Va noin A 2026:
Jenuary A, 3 979 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 731/121278 Office of Inspection and Enforcement PO/DLB:sej U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cousaission Docket Nos.
50-338 50-339 Region II 101 Ma etta Street, Suite 3100 License Nos.
NPF-4 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 CPPR-78
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
We have reviewed your letter of December 12, 1978 in reference to the inspection conducted at North Anna Power Station on October 2 - November 3, 1978 and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos.
50-338/78-37 and 50-339/78-32.
Our responses to the specific violations are attached.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the reports. Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company interposes no objection to the inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosure.
Very truly yours, Nb
.)
C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment cc:
Mr. Albert Schwencer f}{
01 FICI,.u. <, u. '
7901190176
RESPONSE TO NON-COMPLIANCE ITEMS REPORTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT NOS.
50-338/78-37 AND NO. 50-339/78-32.
NRC COMMENT 1.
Technical Specification 6.9.1.8.a requires that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained for those procedures in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972.
Sections I.4 and 1.5 of RG 1.33 Appendix A address procedures for draining and refilling and control of maintenance, respectively.
Contrary to the above, procedures for the control of repairs to valve 1-CH-280 conducted on October 24, 1978, were inadequate in that two vent and drain valves were left open when the alternate charging header was refilled, resulting in spillage of several hundred gallons of contaminated water to the auxiliary building, This is en infraction and applies to Unit 1.
RESPONSE
The above infraction is correct as stated.
Specifically, pursuant to section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice" Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted:
1.
Corrective steps taken and results achieved:
An investigation into the actual events which took place was made.
A synopsis of this investigation with a discussion of the errors made was included in the required reading material for the plant operations staf f and discussed with the shif t supervisors.
In addition, a program for including vent and drain valves on the tagging record has been instituted.
2.
Corrective action taken to avoid further non-compliance:
To ensure proper refilling of secured systems and implementing of the tagout systen, the applicable maintenance operating procedures wil'.
be revised.
3.
Date when full compliance will be achieved; Full compliance will be ac'ieved by February 1, 1979 when the above ment ioned procedures are reviseu.
e
NRC COMMENT 2.
Criterion VI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and Section 17.1.4.6 of the Final Safety Analysis Report requires, in part, that measures be established to assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed, approved, and distributed to and used at the location where activities prescribed in those documents are performed.
Contrary to the above, the program as implemented by Project Operating Procedure No. 717 for control of drawings and specifica-tions does not assure that revisions to drawings and specifications used by operating and test personnel are distributed to those personnel.
The instruction document control program does not provide for updating of controlled drawings held by operations or test personnel.
This is an infraction and applies to Unit 2.
RESPONSE
The above infraction is correct as stated.
Specifically, pursuant to section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice" Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted:
1.
Corrective steps taken and results achieved:
A review was made of our document control program and it wes determined the apparatus for getting notification to station records of a change did exist in Project Operating Procedure No. 717. A program was then instituted at the station to insure all changes to Unit #2 drawings as a result of design and field changes by the Architect-Engi-neer were noted on the controlled drawing sets by listing the applicable reference number of the notification documentation.
The location of these controlled sets have been made known to engineering and operations for personnel and any copies of these drawings made by station records use in the field shall have a listing of the current changes noted on the drawing.
2.
Corrective action taken to avoid further non-coupliance:
A station records administrative procedure is being written at this time to formalize the above mentioned program.
3.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
Full compliance will be achieved by February 1,1979 when the above mentioned procedure is approved.
.